View Amendment Current Amendment: 3 to Bill 3999 Rep. HENDERSON proposes the following Amendment No. 3 to H. 3999 (COUNCIL\BH\3999C003.BH.VR16):

Reference is to Printer's Date 3/9/16-H.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by striking Section 44-66-30(A), as contained in SECTION 1, in its entirety and inserting:

/      (A)      Where a patient is unable to consent, decisions concerning his health care may be made by the following persons in the following order of priority:
           (1)      a guardian appointed by the court pursuant to Article 5, Part 3 of the South Carolina Probate Code, if the decision is within the scope of the guardianship;
           (2)      an attorney-in-fact appointed by the patient in a durable power of attorney executed pursuant to Section 62-5-501, if the decision is within the scope of his authority;
           (3)      a person given priority to make health care decisions for the patient by another statutory provision;
           (4)      a spouse of the patient unless the spouse and the patient are separated pursuant to one of the following:
           (a)      entry of a pendente lite order in a divorce or separate maintenance action;
           (b)      formal signing of a written property or marital settlement agreement; or
           (c)      entry of a permanent order of separate maintenance and support or of a permanent order approving a property or marital settlement agreement between the parties;
           (5)      a parent or an adult child of the patient, or if the patient has more than one adult child, a majority of the adult children who are reasonably available for consultation;
           (6)      a parent of the patient;
           (6)(7)      an adult sibling, grandparent, or adult grandchild of the patient, or if the patient has more than one adult sibling, a majority of the adult siblings who are reasonably available for consultation;
           (8)      a grandparent of the patient, or if the patient has more than one grandparent, a majority of the grandparents who are reasonably available for consultation;
           (7)(9)      any other adult relative by blood or marriage who reasonably is believed by the health care professional to have a close personal relationship with the patient, or if the patient has more than one other adult relative, a majority of those other adult relatives who are reasonably available for consultation;
           (8)      a person given authority to make health care decisions for the patient by another statutory provision.
           (10)       a close friend of the patient who is an adult and reasonably is believed by the health care professional to have a close personal relationship with the patient.      /

Amend the bill, further, as and if amended by striking Section 44-66-30(B) in its entirety and inserting:

     
/      (B)      Documentation of efforts to locate a decision maker who is a person identified in subsections (A) must be recorded in the patient's medical record.      /

Amend the bill further, as and if amended, by striking Section 44-66-30(E) in its entirety and inserting:

/      (D)(E)      An attending physician or other health care professional responsible for the care of a patient who is unable to consent may not give priority or authority under pursuant to subsections (A)(5) through (8) (A)(10) to a person if the attending physician or health care professional has actual knowledge that, before becoming unable to consent, the patient did not want that person involved in decisions concerning his care.            /

Renumber sections to conform.
Amend title to conform.