Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format
Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter
S. 1343
STATUS INFORMATION
Concurrent Resolution
Sponsors: Senators Malloy, Knotts, Campsen and McConnell
Document Path: l:\s-jud\bills\malloy\jud0053.jjg.docx
Introduced in the Senate on April 13, 2010
Introduced in the House on April 15, 2010
Adopted by the General Assembly on May 12, 2010
Summary: Federal mandate
HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
Date Body Action Description with journal page number
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/13/2010 Senate Introduced, placed on calendar without reference SJ-8
4/14/2010 Scrivener's error corrected
4/14/2010 Senate Adopted, sent to House SJ-75
4/15/2010 House Introduced HJ-26
4/15/2010 House Referred to Committee on Judiciary HJ-26
5/6/2010 House Committee report: Favorable Judiciary HJ-8
5/12/2010 House Adopted, returned to Senate with concurrence HJ-36
View the latest legislative information at the LPITS web site
VERSIONS OF THIS BILL
4/13/2010
4/13/2010-A
4/14/2010
5/6/2010
COMMITTEE REPORT
May 6, 2010
S. 1343
S. Printed 5/6/10--H.
Read the first time April 15, 2010.
To whom was referred a Concurrent Resolution (S. 1343) to provide that the State of South Carolina opposes the federal mandate that a state enact a law to require the revocation, suspension, issuance, or reinstatement delay for all persons, etc., respectfully
That they have duly and carefully considered the same and recommend that the same do pass:
JAMES H. HARRISON for Committee.
TO PROVIDE THAT THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA OPPOSES THE FEDERAL MANDATE THAT A STATE ENACT A LAW TO REQUIRE THE REVOCATION, SUSPENSION, ISSUANCE, OR REINSTATEMENT DELAY FOR ALL PERSONS WHO ARE CONVICTED OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENSES; AND TO PROVIDE THAT THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA SHALL OPT OUT OF THE FEDERAL MANDATE WITHOUT THE LOSS OF FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS.
Whereas, pursuant to 23 U.S.C Section 159, the federal government mandates that a state, as a prerequisite to receiving certain federal transportation funds, enact a law to require the revocation, suspension, issuance, or reinstatement delay of a driver's license for all persons who are convicted of controlled substance offenses regardless of whether the offenses are traffic related; and
Whereas, pursuant to 23 U.S.C. Section 159, the federal government allows a state to opt out of the mandate and receive the federal transportation funds, if the state submits a written certification to the Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation stating that the Governor is opposed to the mandate, and that the state's legislature has adopted a resolution expressing its opposition to the mandate; and
Whereas, South Carolina enacted Section 56-1-745 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, in compliance with 23 U.S.C. Section 159; and
Whereas, the General Assembly of South Carolina now desires to amend or repeal Section 56-1-745 and opt out of the federal mandate without the loss of federal transportation funds; and
Whereas, at least thirty-two other states have adopted similar resolutions in opposition to the federal mandate. Now, therefore,
Be it resolved by the Senate, the House of Representatives concurring:
That the State of South Carolina opposes the federal mandate, as provided in 23 U.S.C. Section 159, that a state enact a law to require the revocation, suspension, issuance, or reinstatement delay, of a driver's license for all persons who are convicted of controlled substance offenses; and
Be it further resolved that the State of South Carolina desires to opt out of the federal mandate, as provided in 23 U.S.C. Section 159, without the loss of federal transportation funds; and
Be it further resolved that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Governor, the Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation, and to each member of the South Carolina Congressional Delegation.
This web page was last updated on Monday, October 10, 2011 at 12:18 P.M.