Journal of the House of Representatives
of the Second Session of the 110th General Assembly
of the State of South Carolina
being the Regular Session Beginning Tuesday, January 11, 1994

Page Finder Index

| Printed Page 1730, Feb. 10 | Printed Page 1750, Feb. 10 |

Printed Page 1740 . . . . . Thursday, February 10, 1994

MR. KITTRELL - EXAMINATION BY MR. ELLIOTT:
Q. Thank you. Why are you interested in becoming a chief judge of the ALJ division? I believe you've been -- had your position on the Workers' Compensation Commission for a little over three years. You still have three years left in that term. Why do you want to make the change?
A. Well, I have an extensive background in trial experience and different areas of the law. I have a tax degree which I am not utilizing now which I did utilize some in my law practice and this position has just come -- has just become available. It has not been available until this legislation was passed last year, so I think that I do have those abilities in my background, educational experience and work history, to try to take -- to try different kinds of cases and that's my primary purpose at this time what I'd like to do.
Q. What is your commitment to this particular job?
A. Full time.
Q. Well, I mean would you --
A. The job -- the new job or --
Q. -- To finish out your term --
A. The job --
Q. -- or to finish the ALJ?
A. -- the job as a commissioner now.
Q. The Chief Justice position -- Chief Judge position, would you fill out your term -- is your commitment to filling out your term?
A. As a commissioner?
Q. No, sir. As a Chief Judge of the ALJ Division.
A. Yes, I would want to serve the entire five years. Yes.
Q. What aspects of your experience at the Workers' Compensation Commission are going to be valuable to you in this job that you've applied for, the ALJ position, and what ways are they going to be valuable to you?
A. Well, I've been -- many people call us administrative law judges over there, we reply to a commissioner. Technically, we try cases for three out of four weeks each month and we sit as the trier of facts and apply the law to those facts that are presented to us. I think that is a strong credential that I have to present to all of you and also to the Legislature in consideration of my candidacy.

Also the third week -- the fourth week of each month, we sit as an appellate panel and we then review briefs that are filed by attorneys on both sides on cases that have been appealed from a single commissioner. And we sit and we listen to ten minute arguments from each attorney. We then have to make a decision whether there is substantial evidence on the


Printed Page 1741 . . . . . Thursday, February 10, 1994

record to support the decision of a single commissioner or whether it should be reversed, amended, remanded or whatever. I think that offers -- I think that is an additional credential that I have in my background.

Also as one of the seven commissioners, we have the sole responsibility of running a state agency and that's an additional hat I wear over there. We have 80 plus employees over there and are responsible for that budget over there running that agency, so those are what I think I have to offer from that standpoint.

With regard to managerial skills, if I could speak to that, if you would like to hear that further.
Q. Please.
A. When I was in the Navy, the first two years in the Navy, I was a flag lieutenant to an admiral. I was responsible for running the Flag Division which consisted of 125 enlisted men. That was my responsibility for almost a year and a half. I had 12 chiefs and the rest were enlisted men under E-6 and below.

I did that and then my last year in the military, I ran with three other officers an operation in Vietnam, so I think I have a vast experience of running -- of handling different people and it would be from a managerial -- as a manager.
Q. You mentioned your tax degree. What other -- what do you know about the substantive and procedural law, administrative law in other areas other than Workers' Compensation Commission and perhaps tax?
A. My experience in administrative law was probably one or two cases before the ABC Commission, numerous cases in the Social Security arena, several cases before the Residential Homebuilders Commission. I don't have any experience in Environmental law over there, but I would think as any good circuit judge will tell you and I know this is not a Circuit Court, but if we're going to have to hear cases in all areas of law, we're going to have to do the same thing they do.

We're going to have to sit and listen to the facts, research the law and maybe have briefs submitted to us with regard to the respective positions and then evaluate that and learn as we go along just as all judges do. I don't have expertise in every area of the law, though. I will admit that.
Q. Do you practice law now?
A. No. As a Commissioner, it's a full time job.
Q. Full time, Worker's Compensation Commission. What do you think your first day will look like come March 1st? What will you be doing that first day, that first week?
A. Well, there is not a place for us to meet from what I understand, so I would imagine the first day would be a matter of meetings, meeting with


Printed Page 1742 . . . . . Thursday, February 10, 1994

people with different agencies, larger agencies perhaps for such as DHEC, Labor, Tax -- Department of Tax and Revenue, talking with all these people and trying to get some ideas as to what the case load is going to be and try to assimilate -- trying to work with the three judges, trying to work with the staffs over here to put together this legislation and also even before that, talking with these people and trying to get this thing up and running.

It's going to take a lot of work and it's not something -- I don't think that the three Administrative Law judges are going to be able to do it by themselves. I think there is still going to have to be some input and some work with the Legislature itself.

There is going to have to be some additional funding to set up some of the positions that are going to be required to have this court run in an efficient manner.
Q. Well, in that area have you given any thought to what the budget would be --
A. No, sir.
Q. -- when you take the office -- all right.
A. I know that there is going to have -- unless we hire court reporters, we're going to have -- from court reporting agencies or companies around town, we're going to have to hire some court reporters and we know they're 24 to $30,000 a year salaries to start off with there, so we're looking at -- you know, we're probably looking at three of those to start off with.

I think there's a Clerk of Court that's mandated by the legislation. I'm not sure how quick that's going to be, you know, something that -- someone can come on board. It'd have to be evaluated carefully.
Q. How would you get a grasp on what you needed to start as far as a budget? We're going -- when you take office as a chief judge of the ALJ Division, the budget process is well underway for 94-95, something needs to be done fairly quickly.
A. I would hope to be able to meet with Court Administration and get some guidelines, some help and assistance from them and also of people on the staff of the Supreme Court and also the Court of Appeals and also talk with administrative courts in other states that have those.
Q. As the chief judge, what steps would you take to make sure the case load is moving?
A. Hopefully, the Clerk of Court will do that, but until that's set up, that's just an evaluation that one's going to have to do on a weekly basis, see what the volume of the cases are, see what the status of them are.


Printed Page 1743 . . . . . Thursday, February 10, 1994

I would think that you can't move one case ahead of another case. You know, I think you're going to have to still try your cases based upon the dates in which they were filed, you know, with the court.
Q. All right. As Workers' Compensation Commissioner, you function in a quasi-judicial capacity?
A. Correct.
Q. Is there any kind of code of conduct that you adhere to in that capacity?
A. Well, we are subject to the State Ethics Commission and, of course, they have advisory opinions from time to time over there that we were made -- that we're acquainted with by our executive director, but I think the Canons of Ethics applicable to members of the judiciary should be applicable to us also even though we're not a part of the judiciary branch, I think we think we should still abide by those Canons.
Q. I understand that you're now engaged and have been dating Ms. Kathryn Williams?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. Congratulations and best wishes to you. What do you do about her cases when they come before you at the Workers' Compensation Commission?
A. Ms. Will--- I have been recused with regard to any of her cases for in excess of two years now. Whenever my relationship with her developed to the extent that it was different from any other attorney who appeared before me, I made that known to Walter Hundley, chairman of our commission, all of my fellow commissioners, to the members of the Workers' Compensation Bar and to the industry and all the staff at the Commission.

That's been -- and I have -- even when I was hearing her cases, the most I heard was two or three cases and several appeals, but I have distanced myself completely from her and her practice for over two years.
Q. I see. Are there ever any other discussions about her even -- no matter how --
A. No.
Q. -- innocuous with the other commissioners?
A. No, sir.
Q. On your statement of economic interest, you report a very minuscule interest in the Robert Mills' building, which is -- I believe is leased by the Budget and Control Board and there is a sublease to DHEC as --
A. That is formerly -- and Bob Mays, Robert Foster, Bill Booth and several other people here in Columbia have a law office up on Devine Street. Gene Griffith and I originally practiced law with them from '79


Printed Page 1744 . . . . . Thursday, February 10, 1994

through the end of the '89, I believe, and Bob Mays would put together partnership deals and from time to time would ask Gene if I -- Gene if he wanted a small piece of it.

I think my interest is less than one tenth of one percent. I really don't know very much about it, but in that I -- you know, it's something insignificant and minute interest. I felt I needed to put it down.
Q. Would it have any impact on you in hearing cases from the Department of Health and Environmental Control?
A. I can't see how it would have any impact at all.
Q. Do you feel you would need to recuse yourself from those cases?
A. No, sir.
Q. All right.
A. I don't think I receive any income from it. I'm -- hopefully, some day I may receive some interest, but maybe not. Maybe partnership -- these days.
Q. On your Personal Data Questionnaire, you reported that you had been a codefendant in your status as a guardian ad litem, an escrow agent and trustee. If you would, briefly explain those actions, the allegations -- if there are any allegations against you for fraud, deceit or violation of your fiduciary duty?
A. No. No. It would have been -- it would be when I would be appointed guardian ad litem maybe in a Family Court action to represent some minor child or trustee in a court and probate court or something like that. These are just normal fiduciary positions that attorneys take in their law practice at the request of some fellow attorney. As a commissioner, I named lawyers as guardian ad litem to represent minor children all the time. That's what they involve.
Q. All right, sir. But what would be the nature of the allegations against you? I mean, you might be named as a guardian --
A. There wasn't any -- well, I think there may have been a foreclosure action or there may have been some -- I really don't know the particulars of those cases. I went back and looked at them, but because they were all situations where there was never any action brought against me in a personal -- you know, in a personal nature, and I read all those actions.

I went to Newberry and looked at all those court documents and pulled all the files themselves, but there was never anything to impute my character or had anything to do with credibility whatsoever. I'm not -- I can't recall the nature of those cases, but --
Q. Are any violation of your fiduciary duty or --
A. No, sir. No violation of any duty I had.


Printed Page 1745 . . . . . Thursday, February 10, 1994

Q. You reported that you serve as an informal hearing officer on about 30 to 70 cases a month, negotiating settlement between injured workers and insurance carriers. Tell me a little bit about that. I mean is there a potential for conflict there for your position as a Workers' Compensation Commissioner?
A. No. That's the initial stage where we try to get both sides together and see if we can help them negotiate out a settlement.
Q. Is that --
A. And then if they can't, then we schedule it for a hearing before --
Q. That is part of your employment --
A. Yes.
Q. -- as a Workers' Compensation Commissioner?
A. That's part of my duty as a commissioner.
Q. As a Workers' Compensation Commissioner, legislators appear before you from time to time, have you continued to hear their cases while you're seeking the position of ALJ?
A. I'm not sure I've heard any. I don't think I've heard any. I don't think I've heard any.
Q. Well, after your --
A. That I recall.
Q. Well, after this screening and you're determined to be either qualified or unqualified, what will be your practice? How will you handle the situation when a legislator comes before you?
A. Well, I would think that I would have to let him try the case unless -- because that's the normal practice now, they practice now in Court of Common Pleas and they practice before State agencies now. And until that practice changed, I would think that they would have to be given that right to come try the case.
Q. How do you avoid any appearance of pressure on the legislator or any appearance of impropriety by you hearing a case of someone that you may be soliciting or seeking their vote?
A. Oh, you're talking about this process now or if I were elected judge and then subsequently --
Q. I'm sorry. As a Workers' Compensation Commissioner in the interim between the screening and the time of the election.
A. Well, I haven't heard any. I think if someone were to come before me, then I think I might give some consideration to that. Maybe have it scheduled before another commissioner.
Q. On your Personal Data Questionnaire -- excuse me, your statement --

Printed Page 1746 . . . . . Thursday, February 10, 1994

A. I don't know but of several who really do very much workers' compensation practice, but I've been primarily in the Upstate over the last year.
Q. On your Statement of Economic Interest, you mentioned a golfing round at Kiawah Island.
A. Yes.
Q. That was apparently provided to you by the Turner, Padget, Graham and Laney law firm who apparently appeared before the Workers' Compensation Commission on occasions?
A. Yes.
Q. And you did report that you paid them back for that trip. Is it reported in that sense that they -- because of their relationship being that they appear before the Workers' Compensation Commission?
A. We were down at a medical seminar in Charleston. At the time, Workers' Compensation Medical Seminar. Bill Clyburn and I went out to play with lawyers from that firm and numerous other firms. Just a lot of people went out to play at Kiawah and I thought I had -- sometimes it's difficult when you're playing with lawyers to fight them over who is going to pay for the bill and what happened was they just wrote a check for the whole thing and I thought I had reimbursed them and then when I filled out my Ethics thing out the following year, I recognized I hadn't so -- and Bill Clyburn, my fellow commissioner hadn't either. We both reimbursed the firm at that time. It was oversight on my part.
Q. Well, one thing I would mention, a lot of people would take issue with you whether lawyers would fight to pick up the tab or not, but nevertheless --
A. Well, I amend that part.
Q. Have there been other golfing rounds similar to this one that you've reported in your Statement of Economic Interest?
A. No, there haven't been any others. I play with my son who is eight years of age. We play at Furman about every weekend when we can, but that's the extent of my golfing right now.
Q. But as a --
SENATOR MOORE: Does he lobby you, too?
A. Let me tell you, he is quite a little golfer. He really is.
Q. As an Administrative Law judge, what would be your practice in this situation when you have some attorneys who are going to be appearing before you this week, next week or sometime soon and they offer to take you out for a round of golf?
A. I'm not going to let them do it.

Printed Page 1747 . . . . . Thursday, February 10, 1994

Q. Have you ever been held in contempt or sanctioned by a court for any reason?
A. No, sir.
Q. Have you directly -- sought directly or indirectly the pledge of a legislator for your --
A. No, sir.
Q. Are you aware of any solicitation on your behalf --
A. No, sir.
Q. -- by others? Okay. And our records show that you've filed your expenditure report with the Committee, but not with the Senate and House Ethics Committees, so you might want to look into that because the law does require that.
A. With the Senate Ethics Committee --
Q. The Senate and House Ethics Committee.
A. Thank you very much for telling me that.
Q. That's all the questions I have.
THE CHAIRMAN: Questions from the Members? Senator McConnell.
EXAMINATION BY SENATOR MCCONNELL:
Q. Have you sought the endorsement of any group of members or caucus of the General Assembly?
A. I don't know any group of members or any caucus, Senator, so I have not done so, no, sir.
Q. Have you participated in a formalized interview process other than the Bar Screening Committee or this committee?
A. No, sir.
Q. Have you directly or indirectly had any meeting or conversations pertaining to your candidacy with members of the Bar Screening Committee, Bar employees or lobbyists representing the Bar either before you were screened or after you were screened, but prior to the Bar's screening report being made public?
A. No, sir.
Q. Thank you.
THE CHAIRMAN: Senator Moore.
EXAMINATION BY SENATOR MOORE:
Q. Commissioner, do you recall the date you were first contacted by the representative of the Bar?
A. I well do.
Q. Okay.
A. I was sitting in Moncks Corner and my office -- I had just finished trying my last case and I called my office to check and see if I had any cases that settled for Wednesday morning in Moncks Corner. He said,
Printed Page 1748 . . . . . Thursday, February 10, 1994

"Yes, all of your cases are settled and marked off. You're to be here at 10:00 o'clock in the morning," so that's when I got in my car.
Q. So what date was that, do you remember?
A. That would have been last Tuesday afternoon about 4:00 o'clock.
Q. What day is that?
MS. SATTERWHITE: January 4th.
Q. January 4th. And what date did the interview take place?
A. It was last Wednesday morning at 10:00 o'clock at the Bar office here in Columbia. The three attorneys were Colden Battey of Beaufort, Rock Wise of Greenwood and a lady from Orangeburg, I think her name was Gwendolyn Fuller.
Q. Where does she reside, do you know?
A. Sir?
Q. What part of the state does she reside?
A. I think she's from Orangeburg.
Q. Orangeburg. I see.
A. I did know Colden Battey from -- he appeared before me on one occasion some two years ago in Beaufort in one workers' comp. case. I had never met the other two before.
Q. Did you furnish a list of references?
A. I furnished five names, yes, sir.
Q. Do you know if any of them were contacted?
A. I think three or four were, yes, sir.
Q. And when and how were you notified of the results?
A. The letter was mailed to my apartment here in Columbia. I live -- well, I imagine it's Cayce. I live on the river down -- I live in an apartment complex and I live right across the river in Cayce.

It was delivered Monday afternoon around 3:00 or 4:00 o'clock and that's when I found out, sir.
Q. Do you recall what date -- what the date of the letter was?
A. I think I have it over here in the --
Q. Would you look?
A. Would you like me to look?
Q. I would.
A. I think I have it over here. I don't know why I brought it, but I did. I'm sorry. I didn't bring it with me.
Q. I have no more questions, Mr. Chairman.
THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Senator. Any other questions? Commissioner, let me ask you about if someone who was acting in a judicial -- quasi-judicial capacity right now, what safeguards have you taken to ensure that -- I'm sure that many of the comp. lawyers that


Printed Page 1749 . . . . . Thursday, February 10, 1994

appear in front of you are aware of your candidacy. What safeguards have you taken to ensure that they don't actively evolve too early in efforts to try to solicit support for your election?
A. What efforts have I taken what now?
THE CHAIRMAN: Well, probably a better way to ask it is this, have you talked to any comp. lawyers -- any workers' comp. lawyers who appear in front of you about helping you at some point time to be elected to this position?
A. I've apprised many of them now I'm running and a lot of the reason is because we have to get orders prepared and get things, you know, taken care of.

I would imagine in idle conversation, I have mentioned it to many of them I'm running because a lot of them are old friends of mine on both sides of the bar. I haven't utilized that relationship in any way nor asked them to help or assist me in my -- you know, in my candidacy, though.
THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you.
A. If I could ask for one other thing with regard to the way I do my orders that might be of interest to you, there was an Attorney General opinion written by Cam Lewis of some four or five years ago. He's an old friend of mine and when I first went on the Commission, Cam and I were talking about ex parte and so forth in regard to orders and I've made it a practice to send a letter if I ask an attorney to draw up a proposed order for me.

I outline in the letter or in an attachment the facts as I see them in the case, the -- my rulings and my order, all of that, and any law, either case law or otherwise that I want to incorporate in the order. I send a copy of that letter to opposing counsel and I ask the lawyer if he has any problems with drawing the order, please let me know.

You know, I don't require anyone to draw an order for me. Because of case load, we don't have time to draw all of our orders over there and then when it comes in, a copy is furnished to opposing counsel and he has a minimum of ten days to get in a written objection to me. And, of course, under our -- we have Court of Appeals cases in the state which allows any judge or commissioner to change their mind on any order anyhow until they affix their signature to it, so I still reserve that right.

You know, I scratch through a good bit of the orders and change them around a good bit, but that's my practice in the way that the orders are prepared.
THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Commissioner. Any further questions? Thank you very much.
A. Thank you all very much.


| Printed Page 1730, Feb. 10 | Printed Page 1750, Feb. 10 |

Page Finder Index