Journal of the House of Representatives
of the First Session of the 111th General Assembly
of the State of South Carolina
being the Regular Session Beginning Tuesday, January 10, 1995

Page Finder Index

| Printed Page 1950, Mar. 22 | Printed Page 1970, Mar. 22 |

Printed Page 1960 . . . . . Wednesday, March 22, 1995

Rep. McTEER proposed the following Amendment No. 43 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\JIC\5689HTC.95), which was tabled.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, Section 12-37-251(F), as contained in SECTION 2, Page 3651-3, by adding beginning on line 9 /Beginning


Printed Page 1961 . . . . . Wednesday, March 22, 1995

with appropriations for fiscal year 1996-97 and continuing through appropriations for fiscal year 2005-06, the base student cost must be increased cumulatively by at least two hundred dollars each fiscal year. Each year this requirement is met, the EFA is deemed to be fully funded. No portion of EIA funds may be counted toward base student cost beyond that amount included in the general appropriations act for fiscal year 1995-96. A local school district is not subject to the maintenance of effort requirements for that portion of the three hundred dollar increase that exceeds the EFA inflation factor./

Amend title to conform.

Rep. McTEER explained the amendment.

Rep. H. BROWN moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.

Reps. SANDIFER and CAIN proposed the following Amendment No. 5 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\GJK\21585SD.95), which was adopted.

Amend the Report of the Committee on Ways and Means, as and if amended, in Section 4-9-142 of the 1976 Code as contained in SECTION 4 and in Section 5-21-70 as contained in SECTION 5 immediately after /Constitution/ on the last line of item (2) of subsection (A) in each section by inserting

/, or to offset a deficit in providing a service or function which is funded through the imposition of fees by increasing such fees in an amount necessary to cover that deficit/

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend totals and title to conform.

Rep. SANDIFER explained the amendment.

The amendment was then adopted.

Rep. KOON proposed the following Amendment No. 7 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\GJK\21579SD.95), which was tabled.

Amend the Report of the Ways and Means Committee, as and if amended, by adding a new SECTION appropriately numbered to read:

/SECTION . (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no county, municipality, school district, special purpose district, or other political subdivision of this State with limited or unlimited fiscal autonomy may levy ad valorem tax millage in any year which exceeds the ad valorem tax millage it levied for the previous year as adjusted by the annual rate of inflation in the previous year as reflected in the increase in


Printed Page 1962 . . . . . Wednesday, March 22, 1995

the consumer price index for the southeast published by the United States Department of Labor unless the millage increase is first approved by a majority of the qualified electors of the county, municipality, school district, special purpose district, or other political subdivision in a referendum held on the question of increasing such millage. The political subdivision shall call the referendum, set its date, frame the question for the ballot, and bear its cost. The county election commission shall conduct the referendum in accordance with the election laws of this State, mutatis mutandis, and declare the results.

(B) The provisions of this section are cumulative to any other limitations on ad valorem tax millage increases provided by law or the Constitution of this State, except that where another provision of law also requires a referendum to increase ad valorem tax millage of a particular entity above a certain amount, only one referendum shall be required.

(C) Where more than one referendum in a county is required in any year due to multiple political subdivisions proposing increases in ad valorem tax millages, the referendums to the extent possible must be held at the same time by the county election commission./

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend totals and title to conform.

Rep. KOON explained the amendment.

Rep. H. BROWN moved to table the amendment.

Rep. KOON demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 82; Nays 27

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Allison          Anderson         Askins
Bailey           Baxley           Beatty
Boan             Breeland         Brown, G.
Brown, H.        Brown, T.        Cain
Canty            Cave             Chamblee
Clyburn          Cobb-Hunter      Cromer
Dantzler         Delleney         Felder
Fulmer           Govan            Hallman
Harrell          Harris, J.       Harris, P.
Harrison         Herdklotz        Hodges
Howard           Hutson           Inabinett
Jennings         Keegan           Kelley


Printed Page 1963 . . . . . Wednesday, March 22, 1995

Kennedy          Keyserling       Kinon
Kirsh            Klauber          Lanford
Law              Limbaugh         Littlejohn
Lloyd            Marchbanks       Martin
Mason            McAbee           McCraw
McTeer           Meacham          Moody-Lawrence
Neal             Phillips         Rhoad
Richardson       Robinson         Sandifer
Scott            Seithel          Sheheen
Simrill          Smith, D.        Stille
Thomas           Townsend         Tucker
Walker           Wells            Whatley
Whipper, L.      Whipper, S.      White
Wilder           Wilkes           Wilkins
Witherspoon      Wofford          Young, A.
Young, J.

Total--82

Those who voted in the negative are:

Cato             Cooper           Cotty
Davenport        Easterday        Fair
Fleming          Gamble           Haskins
Huff             Knotts           Koon
Limehouse        Quinn            Rice
Riser            Rogers           Sharpe
Shissias         Smith, R.        Spearman
Stuart           Tripp            Trotter
Vaughn           Waldrop          Wright

Total--27

So, the amendment was tabled.

Rep. KOON proposed the following Amendment No. 9 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\GJK\21581SD.95), which was tabled.

Amend the Report of the Ways and Means Committee, as and if amended, by striking SECTIONS 1 and 2 and inserting:

/SECTION 1. Chapter 36, Title 12 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Article 11


Printed Page 1964 . . . . . Wednesday, March 22, 1995

Section 12-36-1110. An additional sales, use, and casual excise tax equal to two percent of gross proceeds of sales or sales price is imposed pursuant to this chapter. Of the total revenue of the tax imposed by this article, an amount equal to 24.6 percent must be credited to the general fund of the State and 6.1 percent must be credited to the Education Improvement Act. The remaining revenues must be credited to the State Property Tax Relief Fund in the State Treasury, a fund separate and distinct from the general fund of the State, and the revenue in this fund must be used to reimburse property taxing governmental entities for the revenues not collected as a result of the homestead exemption for school taxes allowed pursuant to Section 12-37-251. Reimbursements must be made from the fund in the manner that reimbursements are made pursuant to Section 12-37-270, mutatis mutandis. If insufficient revenues are available in the fund to provide the full reimbursement, the difference must be made up from the general fund of the State and the general fund must be reimbursed from revenues accruing in the State Property Tax Relief Fund. If excess revenues are available in the fund after full reimbursement, the excess must be distributed to the several counties of this State on a per capita basis and used by the counties only to reduce ad valorem taxes for county operating purposes."

SECTION 2. Section 12-36-940 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"Section 12-36-940. Every retailer may add to the sales price:

(1) no amount on sales of ten cents or less;

(2) one cent on sales of eleven cents and over, but not in excess of twenty cents;

(3) two cents on sales of twenty-one cents and over, but not in excess of forty cents;

(4) three cents on sales of forty-one cents and over, but not in excess of sixty cents;

(5) four cents on sales of sixty-one cents and over, but not in excess of eighty cents;

(6) five cents on sales of eighty-one cents and over, but not in excess of one dollar;

(7) one cent additional for each twenty cents or major fraction thereon in excess of one dollar.

The inability, impracticability, refusal, or failure to add these amounts to the sales price and collect from the purchaser does not relieve the taxpayer from the tax levied by this article.


Printed Page 1965 . . . . . Wednesday, March 22, 1995

A retailer may add the amount of the tax to the sales price and the department shall prescribe tables providing the amount to be added to the sales price consistent with the total rate of the tax."

SECTION 3. Section 12-36-2120 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding an appropriately numbered item at the end to read:

"( ) food items eligible for purchase with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons, not including restaurant meals."

SECTION 4. Chapter 10, Title 4 of the 1976 Code is repealed.

SECTION 5. Article 3, Chapter 37, Title 12 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 12-37-251. There is a homestead exemption from ad valorem school operating and debt service taxes equal to one hundred percent of the fair market value of property assessed for ad valorem taxes pursuant to Section 12-43-220(c)."

SECTION 6. The 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 12-37-252. Revenue gained by the State of South Carolina each fiscal year as determined by the Comptroller General because of lower reimbursements to counties and municipalities for revenue lost as a result of the existing homestead exemption provided by law not contained in Section 12-37- 251 must be deposited in the State Property Tax Relief Fund."

SECTION 7. The 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 12-36-1115. Revenue gained by the State of South Carolina each fiscal year as determined by the Comptroller General as a result of taxpayers deducting lower property tax expenses on their state income tax returns because of the provisions of Section 12-37-251 must be deposited in the State Property Tax Relief Fund."/

Amend the Report further, as and if amended by striking SECTION 11 and inserting:

/SECTION 11. This act takes effect July 1, 1995, except that Section 5 of this act is effective for property tax years beginning after 1994./

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend totals and title to conform.

Rep. KOON explained the amendment.

Rep. H. BROWN moved to table the amendment.


Printed Page 1966 . . . . . Wednesday, March 22, 1995

Rep. KOON demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:
Yeas 82; Nays 26

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Allison          Anderson         Bailey
Baxley           Beatty           Boan
Brown, G.        Brown, H.        Brown, T.
Byrd             Cain             Carnell
Cato             Cave             Chamblee
Clyburn          Cooper           Cotty
Cromer           Dantzler         Delleney
Easterday        Fair             Felder
Gamble           Hallman          Harrell
Harris, J.       Harris, P.       Harrison
Haskins          Herdklotz        Hodges
Huff             Inabinett        Jennings
Keegan           Kelley           Kinon
Kirsh            Klauber          Limbaugh
Lloyd            Marchbanks       Martin
Mason            McAbee           McCraw
McTeer           Meacham          Moody-Lawrence
Neilson          Phillips         Quinn
Rhoad            Rice             Richardson
Robinson         Rogers           Sandifer
Seithel          Sheheen          Simrill
Smith, D.        Smith, R.        Spearman
Thomas           Tripp            Trotter
Tucker           Vaughn           Waldrop
Wells            Whatley          Whipper, L.
White            Wilkes           Wilkins
Witherspoon      Wofford          Young, A.
Young, J.

Total--82

Those who voted in the negative are:

Askins           Breeland         Canty
Cobb-Hunter      Davenport        Fleming
Govan            Howard           Kennedy
Keyserling       Knotts           Koon


Printed Page 1967 . . . . . Wednesday, March 22, 1995

Lanford          Limehouse        Littlejohn
Neal             Riser            Scott
Sharpe           Shissias         Stille
Stuart           Townsend         Walker
Wilder           Wright

Total--26

So, the amendment was tabled.

Reps. WRIGHT, KNOTTS, VAUGHN, QUINN and LANFORD proposed the following Amendment No. 10 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\JIC\5664HTC.95), which was tabled.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by striking all after the enacting words and inserting:

/SECTION 1. A. Section 12-37-220(B) of the 1976 Code is amended by adding an appropriately numbered item at the end to read:

"( ) an amount of the fair market value of real property, not including agricultural real property, equal to increases in such value resulting from countywide reassessment programs occurring after the current owner acquired the property. This exemption does not extend to increases in fair market value attributable to permanent improvements, unless such improvements merely restore the status quo ante of a structure damaged or destroyed by mishap or natural disaster. When ownership of real property benefiting from this exemption changes, the fair market value of the property escalates to its then current fair market value. For purposes of this exemption, the acquisition of residential property assessed pursuant to Section 12-43-220(c) by interspousal gift or by a surviving spouse by devise or operation of law is not considered a change of ownership."

B. This section is effective for increases in fair market value occurring as a result of reassessment programs occurring after 1994.

SECTION 2. A. Article 1, Title 6 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 6-1-60. The governing body of a county, municipality, special purpose or public service district, and the governing body authorized by law to levy school taxes may not increase the millage rate it imposes for a tax year over the millage rate it imposed for the prior tax year by more than the percentage increase in the consumer price index in the most recently completed calendar year. An additional increase, not to exceed the increase allowed to reflect the consumer price index, may be imposed


Printed Page 1968 . . . . . Wednesday, March 22, 1995

by a three-fifth's vote of the governing body. Any further increase may be imposed only if the increase is approved by a majority of the qualified electors of the political subdivision voting in a referendum called for this purpose."

B. This section applies for property tax years beginning after 1995.

SECTION 3. A. Article 3, Chapter 11, Title 11 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 11-11-330. Funds credited to the State Property Tax Relief Fund must be distributed to counties in the proportion that the total appraised value of taxable property in the county bears to the total of such appraised value statewide. The distribution to a county from this fund must be used to provide a property tax credit against the property tax liability of all taxable property in the county calculated by multiplying the county's distribution by a fraction in which the numerator is the appraised value of the particular property and the denominator is the total of appraised value in the county."

B. This section applies for property tax years beginning after 1994 and motor vehicle property tax years beginning after 1995.

SECTION 4. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor./

Amend title to conform.

Rep. WRIGHT moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.

AMENDMENT NO. 18--TABLED

Debate was resumed on Amendment No. 18, by Rep. KIRSH.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by adding a new SECTION, appropriately numbered, to read:

/SECTION ___. Article 1, Chapter 7, Title 2 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 2-7-130. A bill or joint resolution raising an existing state tax or imposing a new state tax must receive a majority vote of at least two-thirds of the membership of each house."/

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Rep. KIRSH moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.

AMENDMENT NO. 22--TABLED

Debate was resumed on Amendment No. 22 by Rep. LANFORD, et al.

Rep. LANFORD moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.


Printed Page 1969 . . . . . Wednesday, March 22, 1995

Reps. LANFORD, G. BROWN, ELLIOTT, FELDER and STUART proposed the following Amendment No. 23, which was adopted.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by adding the following items to be appropriately numbered to Section 4-9-142(A) as follows:

"( ) To raise the revenue necessary to comply with unfunded mandates, as defined by Section 4-9-55, from the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the state and federal governments.

( ) To raise the amount of revenue necessary to replace any property tax revenue not collected by reason of the exemption provided in Section 12-37-251 which is not reimbursed by the State of South Carolina; and

( ) To raise the amount of revenue necessary to replace property tax revenue not collected by reason of a reduction in the property tax base; provided that, to the extent a millage rate is increased to offset a reduction in the tax base pursuant to this item, the adjustment to the millage rate may only be that increment necessary to raise the same amount of revenue as was raised in the previous year. The millage rate, as adjusted pursuant to this section, may also be changed in accordance with the other provisions of this section."

Renumber sections/items and title to conform.

Rep. LANFORD explained the amendment.

Rep. H. BROWN spoke against the amendment.

Rep. LANFORD spoke in favor of the amendment.

Rep. H. BROWN moved to table the amendment.

Rep. FELDER demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 34; Nays 77

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Allison          Brown, H.        Cato
Chamblee         Dantzler         Easterday
Fair             Fulmer           Hallman
Harrell          Harris, P.       Harrison
Haskins          Huff             Keegan
Kelley           Kirsh            Klauber
Law              Littlejohn       Marchbanks
Meacham          Robinson         Seithel
Smith, R.        Tripp            Vaughn
Waldrop          Wells            Whatley


Printed Page 1970 . . . . . Wednesday, March 22, 1995

Wilkins          Wofford          Worley
Young, A.

Total--34

Those who voted in the negative are:

Anderson         Askins           Bailey
Baxley           Beatty           Boan
Breeland         Brown, G.        Brown, J.
Brown, T.        Byrd             Cain
Canty            Carnell          Cave
Clyburn          Cobb-Hunter      Cotty
Cromer           Davenport        Delleney
Felder           Fleming          Gamble
Govan            Harris, J.       Herdklotz
Hodges           Howard           Hutson
Inabinett        Jennings         Kennedy
Keyserling       Kinon            Knotts
Koon             Lanford          Limbaugh
Limehouse        Lloyd            Martin
Mason            McAbee           McCraw
McTeer           Moody-Lawrence   Neal
Neilson          Phillips         Quinn
Rhoad            Rice             Richardson
Riser            Rogers           Sandifer
Scott            Sharpe           Sheheen
Shissias         Simrill          Spearman
Stille           Stuart           Thomas
Trotter          Tucker           Walker
Whipper, L.      Whipper, S.      White
Wilder           Wilkes           Witherspoon
Wright           Young, J.

Total--77

So, the House refused to table the amendment.


| Printed Page 1950, Mar. 22 | Printed Page 1970, Mar. 22 |

Page Finder Index