Journal of the House of Representatives
of the Second Session of the 111th General Assembly
of the State of South Carolina
being the Regular Session Beginning Tuesday, January 9, 1996

Page Finder Index

| Printed Page 150, Jan. 11 | Printed Page 172, Jan. 11 |

Printed Page 160 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

RECORD FOR VOTING

The lock on my voting console was broken. Had I been able to vote, I would have voted no.

Rep. THEODORE A. BROWN

The question then recurred to the motion to adjourn debate until Wednesday, January 24, which was agreed to.


Printed Page 161 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

S. 870--DEBATE ADJOURNED

The following Concurrent Resolution was taken up.

S. 870 -- Senators Leventis and Land: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION TO REQUEST THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO DESIGNATE AND NAME A PORTION OF STATE HIGHWAY 76/378 IN SUMTER COUNTY AS THE R. J. CHIC MATHIS HIGHWAY.

Rep. TOWNSEND moved to adjourn debate upon the Concurrent Resolution until Thursday, January 18, which was adopted.

MOTION PERIOD

The motion period was dispensed with on motion of Rep. TRIPP.

H. 3628--DEBATE ADJOURNED

Rep. D. SMITH moved to adjourn debate upon the following Joint Resolution until Wednesday, January 24, which was adopted.

H. 3628 -- Reps. Thomas, Moody-Lawrence, Cobb-Hunter, Richardson, T. Brown, Knotts, Keegan, Wright, J. Harris, Gamble, J. Young, P. Harris, Baxley, Townsend, Dantzler, Witherspoon, Stille, Law, Scott, Riser and Cotty: A JOINT RESOLUTION TO CREATE A STUDY COMMITTEE TO EXAMINE STATE LAW RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION, POSSESSION, AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC LIQUORS IN MINIBOTTLES AND TO EXAMINE AMENDMENTS TO STATE LAW PERTAINING TO ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR BY THE DRINK.

H. 3203--POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTIONS

AMENDED AND ORDERED TO THIRD READING

The following Bill was taken up.

H. 3203 -- Rep. Stuart: A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 59-19-45 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT ANY PERSON ELECTED TO A SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OR APPOINTED OR ELECTED TO A COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION AFTER JULY 1, 1995, WHO PREVIOUSLY HAS NOT SERVED IN SUCH OFFICE, SHALL SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE AN ORIENTATION PROGRAM WITHIN ONE YEAR OF TAKING OFFICE, TO PROVIDE EXCEPTIONS, AND TO PROVIDE THAT THE STATE


Printed Page 162 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SHALL REIMBURSE LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS OF EDUCATION FOR THE COST OF THESE ORIENTATIONS UP TO A MAXIMUM AMOUNT PER YEAR.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. ROBINSON raised the Point of Order that Rep. Fair's objection on the bill was out of order as he was no longer a member of the House.

The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order and ordered the objection removed from the bill.

Reps. STUART and KNOTTS objected to the Bill.

Rep. SIMRILL moved to recommit the Bill to the Committee on Education and Public Works.

Rep. KELLEY moved to table the motion to recommit.

Rep. SIMRILL demanded the yeas and nays, which were not ordered.

The motion to recommit was tabled, by a division vote of 39 to 14.

The House Education and Public Works Committee proposed the following Amendment No. 1 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\BR1\18233AC.95), which was adopted.

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by deleting Section 59-19-45(A) and inserting:

/(A) Within one year of taking office, all persons elected or appointed as members of a school district board of trustees after July 1, 1995, shall successfully complete an orientation in the powers, duties, and responsibilities of a board member including, but not limited to, topics on policy development, personnel, superintendent and board relations, instructional programs, district finance, school law, ethics, and community relations./

Amend further by deleting Section 59-19-45(E) and inserting:

/(E) The State Department of Education shall reimburse a school district or county board of education conducting an orientation for a new board member as required by this section at the rate of eighty dollars per member, provided that the total reimbursements by the department in any one fiscal year must not exceed ten thousand dollars. If the total projected cost of these reimbursements for any year as determined by the department exceeds ten thousand dollars, the eighty dollar reimbursement per new member must be reduced proportionately. If funds are not available for these reimbursements, the board member orientation is not required but may be conducted at the option of a school district or county board of


Printed Page 163 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

education. The State Board of Education shall establish guidelines and procedures for these reimbursements./

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Rep. JASKWHICH explained the amendment.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. MEACHAM raised the Point of Order that since former Rep. Fair's objection had been removed from the bill, then the bill should be on the uncontested calendar.

The SPEAKER stated that other objections had been placed on the bill so it would remain on the contested calendar and he overruled the Point of Order.

Rep. JASKWHICH continued speaking.

Rep. SIMRILL spoke against the amendment and moved to table the amendment.

Rep. TOWNSEND demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 39; Nays 63

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Allison              Baxley               Cato
Dantzler             Delleney             Easterday
Elliott              Fleming              Hallman
Haskins              Herdklotz            Huff
Kirsh                Koon                 Lanford
Law                  Limbaugh             Marchbanks
Martin               Mason                McAbee
McCraw               McKay                Meacham
Quinn                Robinson             Sandifer
Sharpe               Simrill              Smith, R.
Spearman             Thomas               Tripp
Vaughn               Wilkes               Witherspoon
Wofford              Young                Young-Brickell

Total--39
Printed Page 164 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson             Askins               Bailey
Boan                 Breeland             Brown, J.
Byrd                 Cain                 Cave
Chamblee             Clyburn              Cooper
Cotty                Cromer               Davenport
Gamble               Govan                Harrell
Harris, J.           Harrison             Harvin
Hines, J.            Hines, M.            Howard
Hutson               Inabinett            Jaskwhich
Jennings             Keegan               Kelley
Kennedy              Keyserling           Knotts
Lee                  Limehouse            Littlejohn
Lloyd                McMahand             McTeer
Moody-Lawrence       Neal                 Phillips
Rhoad                Rice                 Richardson
Riser                Rogers               Scott
Seithel              Shissias             Smith, D.
Stille               Stoddard             Stuart
Townsend             Trotter              Walker
Whatley              Whipper, L.          Whipper, S.
Wilder               Wilkins              Worley

Total--63

So, the House refused to table the amendment.

RECORD FOR VOTING

The lock on my voting console was broken. Had I been able to vote, I would have voted no.

Rep. THEODORE A. BROWN

The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment, which was agreed to.

Rep. SIMRILL moved to table the Bill and demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 36; Nays 67
Printed Page 165 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Baxley              Brown, H.           Cato
Cooper              Dantzler            Delleney
Easterday           Elliott             Fleming
Haskins             Herdklotz           Kirsh
Klauber             Law                 Limbaugh
Marchbanks          McAbee              Meacham
Moody-Lawrence      Neal                Quinn
Robinson            Rogers              Sandifer
Sharpe              Simrill             Smith, R.
Spearman            Thomas              Tripp
Vaughn              Wells               Witherspoon
Wofford             Young               Young-Brickell

Total--36

Those who voted in the negative are:

Allison              Anderson             Bailey
Boan                 Breeland             Brown, J.
Byrd                 Cain                 Canty
Cave                 Chamblee             Clyburn
Cotty                Cromer               Davenport
Fulmer               Gamble               Govan
Hallman              Harrell              Harris, J.
Harrison             Harvin               Hines, J.
Hines, M.            Hodges               Howard
Hutson               Inabinett            Jaskwhich
Jennings             Keegan               Kelley
Kennedy              Keyserling           Knotts
Koon                 Lee                  Limehouse
Littlejohn           Lloyd                Martin
Mason                McMahand             McTeer
Rhoad                Rice                 Richardson
Riser                Scott                Seithel
Shissias             Smith, D.            Stille
Stuart               Townsend             Trotter
Walker               Whatley              Whipper, L.
Whipper, S.          White                Wilder

Printed Page 166 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

Wilkes               Wilkins              Worley
Wright               

Total--67

So, the House refused to table the Bill.

RECORD FOR VOTING

The lock on my voting console was broken. Had I been able to vote, I would have voted no.

Rep. THEODORE A. BROWN

The question then recurred to the passage of the Bill, as amended, on second reading.

Pursuant to Rule 7.7 the yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:

Yeas 64; Nays 34

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Anderson             Bailey               Boan
Breeland             Brown, J.            Byrd
Cain                 Canty                Cave
Chamblee             Cotty                Fulmer
Gamble               Govan                Hallman
Harrell              Harris, J.           Harrison
Harvin               Hines, J.            Hines, M.
Hodges               Howard               Hutson
Jaskwhich            Keegan               Kelley
Kennedy              Keyserling           Knotts
Koon                 Lanford              Lee
Limehouse            Littlejohn           Lloyd
Martin               Mason                McMahand
McTeer               Neal                 Rhoad
Rice                 Richardson           Riser
Scott                Seithel              Shissias
Smith, D.            Stille               Stoddard
Stuart               Townsend             Trotter
Walker               Whatley              Whipper, L.
Whipper, S.          White                Wilder

Printed Page 167 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

Wilkes               Wilkins              Worley
Wright

Total--64

Those who voted in the negative are:

Allison              Cato                 Dantzler
Davenport            Easterday            Fleming
Haskins              Herdklotz            Kirsh
Klauber              Law                  Limbaugh
Marchbanks           McAbee               McCraw
McKay                Meacham              Moody-Lawrence
Neilson              Phillips             Quinn
Robinson             Sandifer             Simrill
Smith, R.            Spearman             Thomas
Tripp                Vaughn               Wells
Witherspoon          Wofford              Young
Young-Brickell                            

Total--34

So, the Bill, as amended, was read the second time and ordered to third reading.

RECORD FOR VOTING

The lock on my voting console was broken. Had I been able to vote, I would have voted yes.

Rep. THEODORE A. BROWN

H. 3931--RECOMMITTED

The following Bill was taken up.

H. 3931 -- Labor, Commerce and Industry Committee: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 42-9-30, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE AMOUNT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND PERIOD OF DISABILITY FOR CERTAIN INJURIES, SO AS TO PROVIDE FOR A PRESUMPTION OF TOTAL AND PERMANENT DISABILITY IN CASES WHERE THERE IS A FIFTY PERCENT OR MORE LOSS OF USE OF THE BACK, AND PROVIDE THAT THIS PRESUMPTION MAY BE REBUTTED BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE; TO


Printed Page 168 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

AMEND THE 1976 CODE BY ADDING SECTION 42-9-45 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT MENTAL ILLNESS RESULTING FROM WORK-RELATED STRESS IS NOT AN ACCIDENTAL INJURY ARISING OUT OF AND IN THE COURSE OF EMPLOYMENT EXCEPT UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, AND PROVIDE FOR RELATED MATTERS; TO AMEND SECTION 42-9-260, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO NOTICE TO THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WHEN PAYMENTS OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION HAVE BEGUN AND SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF PAYMENTS, SO AS TO DELETE CERTAIN LANGUAGE AND PROVISIONS, PROVIDE THAT WHEN AN EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN OUT OF WORK DUE TO A REPORTED WORK-RELATED INJURY OR OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE FOR EIGHT DAYS, AN EMPLOYER MAY START TEMPORARY TOTAL DISABILITY PAYMENTS IMMEDIATELY AND MAY CONTINUE SUCH PAYMENTS FOR UP TO ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DAYS WITHOUT WAIVER OF ANY GROUNDS FOR DENIAL OF A CLAIM AS MAY APPEAR FOLLOWING A GOOD FAITH INVESTIGATION, PROVIDE FOR THE TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF TEMPORARY DISABILITY COMPENSATION, AND PROVIDE FOR RELATED MATTERS; TO AMEND SECTION 42-1-40, RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF "AVERAGE WEEKLY WAGES" UNDER THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW, SO AS TO DELETE CERTAIN LANGUAGE AND PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDE THAT "AVERAGE WEEKLY WAGE" MUST BE CALCULATED BY TAKING THE TOTAL WAGES PAID FOR THE LAST FOUR QUARTERS IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE QUARTER IN WHICH THE INJURY OCCURRED AS REPORTED ON THE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION'S EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION REPORTS DIVIDED BY FIFTY-TWO OR BY THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF WEEKS FOR WHICH WAGES WERE PAID, WHICHEVER IS LESS; TO AMEND SECTION 42-9-360, RELATING TO ASSIGNMENTS OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EXEMPTIONS FROM THE CLAIMS OF CREDITORS AND TAXES, SO AS TO ADD PROVISIONS TO THE SECTION INCLUDING, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE PROVISION THAT IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR AN AUTHORIZED HEALTH CARE PROVIDER TO ACTIVELY PURSUE COLLECTION PROCEDURES AGAINST A WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMANT BEFORE THE FINAL ADJUDICATION OF THE CLAIMANT'S CLAIM; AND TO AMEND SECTION 42-19-10, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE WORKERS'
Printed Page 169 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

COMPENSATION LAW AND EMPLOYERS' RECORDS AND REPORTS OF INJURIES, SO AS TO DELETE THE CURRENT PROVISIONS OF THE SECTION, AND PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THAT EVERY EMPLOYER SHALL KEEP A RECORD OF ALL INJURIES RECEIVED BY HIS EMPLOYEES IN THE COURSE OF THEIR EMPLOYMENT ON FORMS APPROVED BY THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION AND THAT CERTAIN INJURIES MUST BE REPORTED IN WRITING TO THE COMMISSION ACCORDING TO CERTAIN GUIDELINES.

Rep. YOUNG-BRICKELL moved to recommit the Bill to the Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry, retaining its place on the Calendar, which was agreed to.

H. 3827--RECOMMITTED

The following Bill was taken up.

H. 3827 -- Rep. Cato: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 38-73-1425, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE FINAL RATE OR PREMIUM CHARGE FOR PRIVATE PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE RISK CEDED TO THE SOUTH CAROLINA REINSURANCE FACILITY, SO AS TO DELETE CERTAIN PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THAT BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 1996, AND ANNUALLY THEREAFTER, THE FINAL RATE OR PREMIUM CHARGE FOR A PRIVATE PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE RISK CEDED TO THE FACILITY MUST BE CALCULATED SO THAT THE PROJECTED COMBINED RATIO FOR RISKS SUBJECT TO THE FINAL RATE OR PREMIUM CHARGES IS NO MORE THAN ONE HUNDRED PERCENT; TO PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 38-73-1425 AS AMENDED BY THIS ACT, ARE EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 1, 1996; TO AMEND SECTION 38-73-1420, RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF REINSURANCE FACILITY FILE AN EXPENSE COMPONENT, SO AS TO DELETE CERTAIN LANGUAGE, AND PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THAT THE COST REDUCTIONS REALIZED IN OPERATING RESULTS OF THE REINSURANCE FACILITY MUST BE APPLIED EXCLUSIVELY TO REDUCE THE RECOUPMENT CHARGES ON ALL POLICIES OF PRIVATE PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE WRITTEN IN SOUTH CAROLINA; TO AMEND SECTION 38-73-455, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE RATES, SO


Printed Page 170 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

AS TO PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THAT MEMBER COMPANIES OF AN AFFILIATED GROUP OF AUTOMOBILE INSURERS MAY UTILIZE DIFFERENT FILED RATES FOR AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COVERAGES WHICH THEY ARE MANDATED BY LAW TO WRITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RATING PLANS FILED WITH AND APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE; TO AMEND SECTION 38-77-280, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE AND COLLISION AND COMPREHENSIVE COVERAGES, SO AS TO DELETE CERTAIN LANGUAGE AND PROVISIONS, AND PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THAT THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE SHALL COMPILE A COMPARATIVE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLAINTS RECEIVED BY, OR FILED WITH, THE DEPARTMENT FROM PERSONS ALLEGING DISCRIMINATION WHEN THE PERSON IS DENIED PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGES BY AN INSURER; TO AMEND THE 1976 CODE BY ADDING SECTION 38-77-596 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT, NOTWITHSTANDING SECTION 38-77-590, UPON NOTIFICATION TO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE REINSURANCE FACILITY, DESIGNATED PRODUCERS MAY CONTRACT WITH A VOLUNTARY MARKET OUTLET FOR ANY TYPE OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CEDEABLE TO THE FACILITY; TO AMEND SECTION 38-77-950, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO UNREASONABLE OR EXCESSIVE USE OF THE REINSURANCE FACILITY BY AN INSURER, SO AS TO DELETE CERTAIN PROVISIONS, PROVIDE THAT AN AUTOMOBILE INSURER OR A GROUP OF INSURERS UNDER THE SAME MANAGEMENT MAY CEDE UP TO, AND INCLUDING, ONE HUNDRED PERCENT OF TOTAL DIRECT CEDEABLE WRITTEN PREMIUMS ON SOUTH CAROLINA AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE AS REPORTED IN THE MOST RECENTLY FILED ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE INSURER OR GROUP, PROVIDE THAT A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF EXCESSIVE OR UNREASONABLE UTILIZATION IS ESTABLISHED UPON A SHOWING THAT AN AUTOMOBILE INSURER OR A GROUP OF INSURERS UNDER THE SAME MANAGEMENT HAS CEDED OR IS ABOUT TO CEDE MORE THAN FIFTY PERCENT, RATHER THAN THIRTY-FIVE PERCENT, OF TOTAL DIRECT CEDEABLE WRITTEN PREMIUMS ON SOUTH CAROLINA AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE AS REPORTED IN THE MOST RECENTLY FILED ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE INSURER OR GROUP, PROVIDE THAT A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF
Printed Page 171 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

EXCESSIVE OR UNREASONABLE UTILIZATION OF THE FACILITY IS ESTABLISHED UPON A SHOWING THAT AN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE INSURER OR A GROUP OF INSURERS UNDER THE SAME MANAGEMENT HAS CEDED OR IS ABOUT TO CEDE MORE THAN SIXTY-FIVE PERCENT, RATHER THAN THIRTY-FIVE PERCENT, OF TOTAL DIRECT CEDEABLE WRITTEN PREMIUMS ON SOUTH CAROLINA AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE AS REPORTED IN THE MOST RECENTLY FILED ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE INSURER OR GROUP, PROVIDE THAT A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF EXCESSIVE OR UNREASONABLE UTILIZATION IS ESTABLISHED UPON A SHOWING THAT AN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE INSURER OR A GROUP OF INSURERS UNDER THE SAME MANAGEMENT HAS CEDED OR IS ABOUT TO CEDE MORE THAN EIGHTY PERCENT, RATHER THAN THIRTY-FIVE PERCENT, OF TOTAL DIRECT CEDEABLE WRITTEN PREMIUMS ON SOUTH CAROLINA AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE AS REPORTED IN THE MOST RECENTLY FILED ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE INSURER OR GROUP, AND PROVIDE FOR VARYING EFFECTIVE DATES FOR THE ABOVE CHANGES TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 38-77-950; TO AMEND THE 1976 CODE BY ADDING SECTION 38-73-458 SO AS TO PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS THAT INSURERS OF PRIVATE PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE AND INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF RATING ORGANIZATIONS MAY ELECT TO FILE PRIVATE PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE RATES OR PREMIUM CHARGES UNDER THE "INDEX FILE AND USE" RATING METHODOLOGY; TO REQUIRE ALL INSURERS SUBJECT TO SECTION 38-77-280 TO SUBMIT RATE FILINGS TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS FOLLOWING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ACT, AND PROVIDE THAT THESE FILINGS MUST REFLECT THE RATE DECREASES, IF ANY, ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE PASSAGE OF THIS ACT; AND TO PROVIDE THAT IF ANY PROVISION OF THIS ACT OR THE APPLICATION THEREOF TO ANY PERSON OR CIRCUMSTANCE IS HELD TO BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR OTHERWISE INVALID, THE REMAINDER OF THIS ACT AND THE APPLICATION OF SUCH PROVISION TO OTHER PERSONS OR CIRCUMSTANCES ARE NOT AFFECTED, AND THAT IT IS TO BE CONCLUSIVELY PRESUMED THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Printed Page 172 . . . . . Thursday, January 11, 1996

WOULD HAVE ENACTED THE REMAINDER OF THIS ACT WITHOUT THE INVALID OR UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION.

Rep. CATO moved to recommit the Bill to the Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry, retaining its place on the Calendar, which was agreed to.


| Printed Page 150, Jan. 11 | Printed Page 172, Jan. 11 |

Page Finder Index