South Carolina General Assembly
114th Session, 2001-2002
Journal of the House of Representatives


Printed Page 4114 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Thursday, May 30, 2002
(Statewide Session)

Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter

The House assembled at 10:00 a.m.
Deliberations were opened with prayer by Rev. W. Osborne Herlong, Jr. as follows:

Loving God, You have created the world as a garden and placed us in it to tend and to care for it. Awaken in us the responsibility given as caretakers of Your creation that all may benefit. Help us to be good stewards of our abundant resources. Let Your blessing rest upon the seedtime and harvest, the commerce and industry, the leisure and rest, the arts and culture of our people. Give us the wisdom of the Psalmist who exalted the Lord when he said "I will lift up my eyes to the hills- from where will my help come? My help comes from the Lord, Who made heaven and earth." (Psalm 121:1-2) Amen.

Pursuant to Rule 6.3, the House of Representatives was led in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America by the SPEAKER.

After corrections to the Journal of the proceedings of yesterday, the SPEAKER ordered it confirmed.

MOTION ADOPTED

Rep. WEBB moved that when the House adjourns, it adjourn in memory of John B. Thomas of Clemson, which was agreed to.

SILENT PRAYER

The House stood in silent prayer for Tucker Belangia who was killed in an automobile accident.


Printed Page 4115 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

R. 373, H. 4878--ORDERED PRINTED IN THE JOURNAL

The SPEAKER ordered the following veto printed in the Journal:

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

May 29, 2002
The Honorable David H. Wilkins
Speaker
South Carolina House of Representatives
State House
Columbia, South Carolina 29201

Dear Mr. Speaker and Members of the House:

I am returning H.4878, R.373, the FY 2002-03 General Appropriations Act, with my vetoes.
I commend the members of the General Assembly for completing the budget ahead of schedule this year. I hope that this precedent will establish a trend so that future sessions of the General Assembly can be shortened.
I also appreciate the efforts by members to deal with a difficult budget situation. I am, however, disappointed that this budget retreats from progress made in education.
Further, I am disappointed the legislature imposed smaller cuts on itself than on other state agencies. This action is difficult to justify to other state agencies and employees, so I am vetoing these provisions.
My vetoes are as follows:
Veto #1. General & Temporary, page 430, Section 72.91, "Joint Committee on Medicaid."
While I welcome legislative interest in, and input on, the Medicaid program, the committee's scope of authority over the administration of the program intrudes into the executive domain. Additionally, this proviso could potentially violate federal law and regulations if administrative authority over the program is delegated. The information sought by the legislature is available in its regular base budget review process, and I will continue to direct the Department of Health and Human Services to work with the General Assembly. For these reasons, I am vetoing this section.
Veto #2. General & Temporary, page 435, Section 72.98, Item "There is established the Joint Committee on Medicaid composed of


Printed Page 4116 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

six members, three appointed by the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee from the membership of the Senate and three appointed by the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee from the membership of the House. The committee must: 1) make a detailed and careful study of the State Medicaid Plan, the federal laws pertaining to the program, and all other laws of the State which have a bearing upon the Medicaid program; 2) compare the State Medicaid Program with the Medicaid program structures of other states; 3) recommend changes in the Medicaid program structure regarding eligibility, type, scope and duration of services, together with predicted General Fund revenue, to the end that the State Medicaid Plan will be more stable and affordable for the taxpayers of the State; 4) provide for the revision of state laws and the State Medicaid Plan so as to develop a more easily understood, financially manageable and stable system; and 5) make recommendations for amendments to the State Medicaid Plan. The committee may: 1) hold public hearings; 2) receive testimony of any employees of the State or any other witnesses who may assist the committee in its duties; and 3) call for assistance in the performance of its duties from any employees or agencies of the State or any of its political subdivisions. The committee may adopt by majority vote rules not inconsistent with this chapter that it considers proper with respect to matters relating to the discharge of its duties under this proviso. Professional and clerical services for the committee must be made available from the staffs of the General Assembly, the Budget and Control Board, the Department of Health and Human Services, and other state agencies and institutions. Expenses of the study committee may be paid from appropriated funds of the House of Representatives upon approval of the Speaker of the House and from appropriated funds of the Senate upon approval of the President Pro Tempore of the Senate. The committee must make reports and recommendations to the General Assembly and the Governor by the beginning of the 2003 Legislative Session. The Office of Research and Statistics shall assist the committee in conducting analysis of the costs and benefits of the Medicaid Program and opportunities for cost containment. The Department of Health and Human Services must provide to the committee all financial and statistical data, excluding any confidential identifying information, regarding the Medicaid Program."
This item is another attempt to delegate administrative authority of the Medicaid Program and for the same reason noted in Veto #1, I am vetoing this item.


Printed Page 4117 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Veto #3. House of Representatives, page 228, Section 54B, Item "Other Operating Expenses General Funds $2,556,675."
Since I have vetoed the study committee, the additional funding for this item is not needed. However, this appropriation was added to existing lines to make an item veto of this increase difficult. Since I object to the $150,000 increase and not to the entire appropriation, I would recommend Budget and Control Board approval to allow the House to spend the balance of $2,406,675 and will call a special meeting of the Budget and Control Board to address this issue. For these reasons, I am vetoing this item.
Veto #4. The Senate, page 227, Section 54A, Item "Other Operating Expenses General Funds $1,920,848."
For the same reasons provided in Veto #3, I am vetoing this item in the Senate's budget. Similarly, I would recommend that the Budget and Control Board approve the Senate's use of the remaining $1,770,848.
Veto #5. General & Temporary, page 434, Section 72.98, Item "Due to unanticipated costs associated with the legal defense of reapportionment legislation and other civil litigation and the resulting impact on the budgets of the House and the Senate, the Budget and Control Board is directed to transfer the amount of $1.3 million from board reserve accounts to A01 Senate reserve account and the amount of $1.3 million from board reserve accounts to A05 House revenue reserve account. The Comptroller General shall establish expenditure authorization for the amount transferred."
I am vetoing this item because it provides additional funding for items that have already been addressed. Last year, the House and Senate included recurring increases in their base budget for nonrecurring expenses associated with redistricting. Had the General Assembly adopted appropriate redistricting plans in the first place, the litigation that resulted in court-drawn plans would not have been necessary. Furthermore, practically all litigation costs for redistricting were paid by insurance and other sources and did not require general fund expenditures.
Veto #6. Legislative Department, page 379, Section 54.23, "Legislative Carry Forward."
This section gives the General Assembly more authority to retain unspent funds than it allows for most agencies. By removing this proviso, the General Assembly could retain up to ten percent of unspent appropriations. I am vetoing this section because the General Assembly should abide by the same rules it imposes upon other agencies.

Printed Page 4118 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Veto #7. Legislative Department, page 380, Section 54.41, "General Assembly Exemption."
This section exempts the General Assembly from reporting requirements to the Budget and Control Board that other agencies have to follow. I am vetoing this section because the General Assembly should abide by the same rules as it imposes upon other agencies.
Veto #8. Health and Human Services, page 328, Section 8.38, "Silver Card Plus Program."
The waiver request to expand the Silvercard program was submitted to federal officials in January, and we are waiting for their approval. In April, we were notified that our waiver application is consistent with federal initiatives and is similar to the Illinois waiver, which has been approved. Federal officials have assured us that they are working with us to reach the goal of approving our waiver request. Consequently, I am vetoing this section because it would require an unnecessary duplication of effort.
Veto #9. Department of Education, page 303, Section 1.76, "EAA Funding."
This proviso limits the flexibility to use unspent funds in one EAA program for another EAA program. While the intention to protect EAA funds is good, other education programs could benefit from unspent funds. For example, last year, unspent funds for teacher specialists were used to fund homework centers, remedial resources, and retraining grants to below-average schools. Without this flexibility, these EAA programs would not have been funded. I am vetoing this section for these reasons but would welcome a proviso that clearly protects education funding and provides flexibility under reasonable circumstances.
Veto #10. Commission on Higher Education, page 319, Section 5A.28, "Election Day Closings."
This proviso removes the requirement that institutions of higher education close on election day. I am vetoing this section so higher education facilities will remain closed on election day.
Veto #11. General & Temporary, page 432, Section 72.97, Item "Adjutant General's Office: $771,748 must be transferred to the General Fund from Subfund 4418 National Guard Pensions."
This item transfers National Guard pension funds to the State's general fund. I am vetoing this proviso because these funds should remain in the pension system.
Veto #12. General & Temporary, page 432, Section 72.97, Item "Adjutant General's Office: $1,779 must be transferred to the General

Printed Page 4119 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Fund from Subfund 4332 Ng Pension Operating Expenses."
This item transfers National Guard pension funds to the State's general fund. I am vetoing this proviso because these funds should remain in the pension system.
Veto #13. General & Temporary, page 432, Section 72.97, Item "Budget and Control Board: $225,583 must be transferred to the General Fund from Subfund 4261 Retirement System-Admin."
This item transfers pension funds from the South Carolina State Retirement Systems to the State's general fund. I am vetoing this item because these pension funds should remain in the retirement system, and the transfer to the General Fund is unnecessary with the vetoes of the additional $150,000 provided to each of the House and the Senate as outlined in Vetoes #3 and #4.
Veto #14. Department of Corrections, page 367, Section 37.27, "Release of Inmates."
This proviso directs the Department of Corrections to release inmates on the first day of the month in which their sentences expire or the last day of the prior month if the first day falls on a holiday or weekend. While the intent of this proviso is to provide some financial relief to the agency, I do not believe it is in the best interest of our citizens. Consequently, I am vetoing this section.
Veto #15. Department of Health and Human Services, page 78, Section 8, Item "Executive Director General Funds $116,199."
I am vetoing this item merely to balance the budget. Under the flexibility provisos in this act, the agency may identify available funds elsewhere in the budget so this particular item can be paid.
Veto #16. Department of Social Services, page 107, Section 13, Item "Commissioner/s General Funds $129,484."
I am vetoing this item merely to balance the budget. Under the flexibility provisos in this act, the agency may identify available funds elsewhere in the budget so this particular item can be paid.
Veto #17. Department of Commerce, page 157, Section 27, Item "Other Operating Expenses General Funds $129,685."
I am vetoing this item merely to balance the budget. Under the flexibility provisos in this act, the agency may identify available funds elsewhere in the budget so this particular item can be paid.
Veto #18. Department of Revenue, page 281, Section 64, Item "Other Operating Expenses General Funds $182,500."
I am vetoing this item merely to balance the budget. Under the flexibility provisos in this act, the agency may identify available funds elsewhere in the budget so this particular item can be paid.

Printed Page 4120 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Veto #19. Department of Corrections, page 179, Section 37, Item "Other Operating Expenses General Funds $152,032."
I am vetoing this item merely to balance the budget. Under the flexibility provisos in this act, the agency may identify available funds elsewhere in the budget so this particular item can be paid.

Sincerely,
Jim Hodges
Governor

MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

The following was received:

Columbia, S.C., May 29, 2002
Mr. Speaker and Members of the House:
The Senate respectfully informs your Honorable Body that the Report of the Committee of Conference on the following Bill, having been adopted by both Houses, it was ordered that the title be changed to that of an Act and the Act enrolled for ratification:

(R409) H. 3515 (Word version) -- Reps. Sandifer, Robinson, Allison, Altman, Askins, Barfield, Barrett, Bingham, Carnell, Cato, Chellis, Cobb-Hunter, Cooper, Dantzler, Harrell, Huggins, Keegan, Kelley, Kirsh, Klauber, Law, Leach, Martin, Meacham-Richardson, J. M. Neal, Phillips, Rice, Riser, Simrill, D. C. Smith, W. D. Smith, Snow, Talley, Taylor, Thompson, Trotter, Walker, Whipper, Wilder, A. Young, McLeod, Davenport, Emory, Sinclair and Knotts: AN ACT TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 40-19-235 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A NONRESIDENT EMBALMER OR FUNERAL DIRECTOR MAY BE LICENSED IN THIS STATE IF THE LICENSURE REQUIREMENTS OF HIS STATE ARE SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO REQUIREMENTS OF THIS STATE AND TO REQUIRE FIVE YEARS OF PRACTICE AND PASSAGE OF AN EXAMINATION FOR LICENSURE WHEN THE LICENSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ANOTHER STATE ARE NOT SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO REQUIREMENTS IN THIS STATE; TO ADD SECTION 40-19-265 SO AS TO ESTABLISH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FUNERAL HOMES, BRANCH FUNERAL HOMES, RETAIL SALES OUTLETS, AND CREMATORIES; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-10, AS AMENDED,


Printed Page 4121 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

RELATING TO THE SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF FUNERAL SERVICE, SO AS TO REQUIRE ALL FUNERAL DIRECTORS AND EMBALMERS SERVING ON THE BOARD TO BE FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES OF A FUNERAL ESTABLISHMENT; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-20, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS CONCERNING EMBALMERS AND FUNERAL DIRECTORS, SO AS TO REVISE, AMONG OTHER DEFINITIONS, "BRANCH FUNERAL HOME", "DISPOSITION", AND "MANAGER" AND TO DEFINE ADDITIONAL TERMS; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-110, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO GROUNDS FOR MISCONDUCT, SO AS TO PROHIBIT SOLICITING THE SALE OF FUNERAL MERCHANDISE AND TO CLARIFY OTHER GROUNDS; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-230, RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS FOR LICENSURE, SO AS TO CHANGE THE ACCREDITING BODY FOR EMBALMING COLLEGES AND TO CONFORM PROVISIONS TO THE REVISED LICENSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR OUT-OF-STATE EMBALMERS AND FUNERAL DIRECTORS; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-270, RELATING TO PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS OF FUNERAL ESTABLISHMENTS AND CREMATORIES, SO AS TO APPLY CERTAIN OF THESE PROVISIONS TO RETAIL SALES OUTLETS; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-280, RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT A PERSON BE LICENSED TO HOLD HIMSELF OUT AS PRACTICING FUNERAL SERVICE OR OPERATING A FUNERAL ESTABLISHMENT, SO AS TO APPLY THIS LICENSURE REQUIREMENT TO A PERSON OPERATING A CREMATORY OR A RETAIL SALES OUTLET; AND TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-290, RELATING TO DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION AND EXPENSES TO CLIENTS BY FUNERAL ESTABLISHMENTS, SO AS TO ALSO REQUIRE CREMATORIES TO DISCLOSE SUCH INFORMATION AND EXPENSES TO ITS CLIENTS.
The Senate has ordered the Bill Enrolled for Ratification.

Very respectfully,
President
Received as information.


Printed Page 4122 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

INTRODUCTION OF BILLS

The following Bill and Joint Resolution were introduced, read the first time, and referred to appropriate committees:

S. 742 (Word version) -- Senator J. V. Smith: A BILL TO AMEND TITLE 48, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION BY ADDING CHAPTER 56, SO AS TO AUTHORIZE THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL TO ADMINISTER A PILOT PROGRAM WITH UP TO TEN PARTICIPANTS FOR UP TO FIVE YEARS, WITH A POSSIBLE FIVE-YEAR RENEWAL, FOR THE PURPOSE OF TESTING AND EVALUATING INNOVATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL APPROACHES TO ACHIEVE SUPERIOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE NOT OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED UNDER EXISTING LAW, TO REQUIRE PARTICIPANTS TO BE MEMBERS OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE PROGRAM, TO ESTABLISH PILOT PROGRAM PROCEDURES AND BASIC TERMS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT AND PARTICIPANTS, TO REQUIRE PUBLIC NOTICE OF AGREEMENTS BEING CONSIDERED FOR APPROVAL OR REVOCATION, TO AUTHORIZE VARIANCES FROM EXISTING LAW, AND TO REQUIRE PARTICIPANTS TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN REPORTING AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES.
Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs

S. 1306 (Word version) -- Judiciary Committee: A JOINT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, RELATING TO ARTICLE 9, IN-CAR CAMERA VIDEOTAPING EQUIPMENT, DESIGNATED AS REGULATION DOCUMENT NUMBER 2610, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 1, CHAPTER 23, TITLE 1 OF THE 1976 CODE.
Referred to Committee on Education and Public Works

ROLL CALL

The roll call of the House of Representatives was taken resulting as follows:

Allison                Altman                 Bales
Barfield               Barrett                Battle

Printed Page 4123 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Bingham                Bowers                 Breeland
Brown, G.              Brown, J.              Brown, R.
Campsen                Carnell                Cato
Chellis                Clyburn                Coates
Cobb-Hunter            Cooper                 Dantzler
Davenport              Delleney               Easterday
Edge                   Emory                  Fleming
Freeman                Frye                   Gourdine
Hamilton               Harrell                Harrison
Haskins                Hayes                  Hines, J.
Hines, M.              Hinson                 Howard
Huggins                Jennings               Keegan
Kelley                 Kennedy                Kirsh
Koon                   Law                    Leach
Littlejohn             Lloyd                  Loftis
Lourie                 Lucas                  Mack
Martin                 McCraw                 McGee
Meacham-Richardson     Merrill                Miller
Moody-Lawrence         Neal, J.H.             Neal, J.M.
Ott                    Parks                  Perry
Phillips               Rhoad                  Riser
Rivers                 Sandifer               Scarborough
Scott                  Sharpe                 Sheheen
Simrill                Sinclair               Smith, D.C.
Smith, F.N.            Smith, J.R.            Smith, W.D.
Snow                   Stille                 Stuart
Talley                 Taylor                 Thompson
Townsend               Trotter                Vaughn
Walker                 Webb                   Weeks
Whatley                Whipper                White
Wilder                 Wilkins                Witherspoon
Young, A.

STATEMENT OF ATTENDANCE

I came in after the roll call and was present for the Session on Thursday, May 30.

Lonnie Hosey                      Rex Rice
Denny Neilson                     Walton McLeod
JoAnne Gilham                     James E. Smith
Karl Allen                        Jeff Young
Brenda Lee                        Todd Rutherford

Printed Page 4124 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

H.B. "Chip" Limehouse             Bill Cotty
G. Murrell Smith                  Daniel Tripp
Richard Quinn                     Jerry Govan
David Owens

Total Present--117

STATEMENT OF ATTENDANCE

Rep. RUTHERFORD signed a statement with the Clerk that he came in after the roll call of the House and was present for the Session on Wednesday, February 13.

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

The SPEAKER granted Rep. F. N. SMITH a leave of absence for the remainder of the day.

DOCTOR OF THE DAY

Announcement was made that Dr. Brian Huff of Columbia is the Doctor of the Day for the General Assembly.

SPECIAL PRESENTATION

Rep. BINGHAM presented to the House the Brookland-Cayce High School Varsity Softball Team, the 2002 Class AAA State Champions, their coaches and other school officials.

SPECIAL PRESENTATION

Rep. FREEMAN and the Chesterfield Delegation presented to the House the Cheraw High School Boys Golf Team, the 2002 Class AA State Champions, their coach and other school officials.

SPECIAL PRESENTATION

Rep. OTT presented to the House Rhett Taber, Jr. of the Buoy Creek Water Skiers, First Class Nation Division Champion of the International Amateur Ski Tournament.

STATEMENT BY REP. LIMEHOUSE
AND THE CHARLESTON DELEGATION

Rep. LIMEHOUSE and the Charleston Delegation made a statement relative to Rep. Whatley's service in the House.


Printed Page 4125 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

CO-SPONSOR ADDED

In accordance with House Rule 5.2 below:
"5.2   Every bill before presentation shall have its title endorsed; every report, its title at length; every petition, memorial, or other paper, its prayer or substance; and, in every instance, the name of the member presenting any paper shall be endorsed and the papers shall be presented by the member to the Speaker at the desk. After a bill or resolution has been presented and given first reading, no further names of co-sponsors may be added. A member may add his name to a bill or resolution or a co-sponsor of a bill or resolution may remove his name at any time prior to the bill or resolution receiving passage on second reading. The member or co-sponsor shall notify the Clerk of the House in writing of his desire to have his name added or removed from the bill or resolution. The Clerk of the House shall print the member's or co-sponsor's written notification in the House Journal. The removal or addition of a name does not apply to a bill or resolution sponsored by a committee."

CO-SPONSOR ADDED

Bill Number:   H. 4863 (Word version)
Date:   ADD:
05/30/02   BARFIELD

RETURNED TO THE SENATE WITH AMENDMENTS

The following Bills were taken up, read the third time, and ordered returned to the Senate with amendments:

S. 1288 (Word version) -- Senators Setzler, Knotts and Bauer: A BILL TO DIRECT THE LEXINGTON COUNTY OFFICIAL CHARGED WITH THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COLLECTING DELINQUENT TAXES, IN CONNECTION WITH THE REQUIREMENT FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES ON A WATERCRAFT AND OUTBOARD MOTOR, BE CURRENT BEFORE THE TITLE TO THESE ITEMS MAY BE TRANSFERRED, THAT THIS PROHIBITION ON THE TRANSFER OF TITLE APPLIES ONLY FOR PROPERTY TAXES DUE FOR PROPERTY TAX YEARS BEGINNING AFTER 1999, THAT USED WATERCRAFT AND USED OUTBOARD MOTORS OBTAINED FROM A LICENSED DEALER ON OR AFTER OCTOBER 3, 2000, ARE FREE OF THE LIEN FOR THE PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES FOR PROPERTY TAX YEARS BEFORE 2000, AND THAT NO REFUNDS OF PROPERTY TAXES


Printed Page 4126 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

ON WATERCRAFT AND OUTBOARD MOTORS ARE PAYABLE FOR PROPERTY TAX YEARS BEFORE.

S. 252 (Word version) -- Senators Hayes, Branton, Alexander, Ravenel, Leatherman, Grooms, J. V. Smith, Peeler, Giese, Wilson, Gregory, Hawkins, Ritchie and Fair: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 61-4-100, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO CRIMINAL CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST SELLERS AND BUYERS FOR THE UNLAWFUL PURCHASE OF BEER OR WINE BY A MINOR, SO AS TO PROHIBIT A MINOR FROM BEING CHARGED WITH UNLAWFULLY PURCHASING BEER OR WINE IF THE MINOR MADE THE PURCHASE AS PART OF AN INVESTIGATION BEING CONDUCTED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT.

S. 1096 (Word version) -- Senator Moore: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 50-11-140, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO IT BEING UNLAWFUL TO CARRY WEAPONS WHILE HUNTING RACCOONS, OPOSSUMS, OR FOX DURING THE PERIOD IT IS LAWFUL TO HUNT THEM WITHOUT WEAPONS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT IT IS LAWFUL TO RUN RACCOONS WITH DOGS AT ANY TIME DURING THE YEAR.

S. 1275--DEBATE ADJOURNED

Rep. CATO moved to adjourn debate upon the following Bill, which was adopted:

S. 1275 (Word version) -- Senator Moore: A BILL TO AMEND ACT 595 OF 1992, RELATING TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EDGEFIELD COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, SO AS TO REVISE THE SINGLE-MEMBER DISTRICTS FROM WHICH TRUSTEES ARE ELECTED.

ORDERED TO THIRD READING

The following Bill was taken up, read the second time, and ordered to a third reading:

S. 1252 (Word version) -- Senators Grooms, Matthews and Pinckney: A BILL TO REPEAL ACT 917 OF 1964 RELATING TO THE AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF COLLETON COUNTY TO SELL SURPLUS SCHOOL PROPERTY.


Printed Page 4127 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

S. 1252--ORDERED TO BE READ THIRD TIME TOMORROW

On motion of Rep. LLOYD, with unanimous consent, it was ordered that S. 1252 (Word version) be read the third time tomorrow.

S. 1208--RECONSIDERED

The motion of Rep. COOPER to reconsider the vote whereby the following Bill was given a second reading was taken up and agreed to:

S. 1208 (Word version) -- Judiciary Committee: A BILL TO ENACT "STEPHANIE'S LAW"; TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-510, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO PERSONS REQUIRED OR PERMITTED TO REPORT CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT, SO AS TO REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES TO DETERMINE WHETHER PREVIOUS REPORTS HAVE BEEN MADE REGARDING A CHILD OR SUBJECT OF A REPORT AND TO REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT TO MAINTAIN A RECORD OF INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT IS NOT INVESTIGATED; TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-650, RELATING TO DUTIES OF LOCAL CHILD PROTECTIVE AGENCIES, SO AS TO RE-CATEGORIZE UNFOUNDED REPORTS; TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-655, RELATING TO THE CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES APPEALS PROCESS, SO AS TO DELETE THE REQUIREMENT THAT CERTAIN RECORDS BE PURGED; AND TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-680, RELATING TO THE CENTRAL REGISTRY OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE CENTRAL REGISTRY OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT MUST NOT CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM REPORTS CLASSIFIED AS UNFOUNDED.

S. 830--AMENDED AND ORDERED TO THIRD READING

The following Bill was taken up:

S. 830 (Word version) -- Senators Giese, Hayes, Courson and Reese: A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 8-11-65 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT STATE AND LOCAL OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES ARE ENTITLED TO CERTAIN PAID LEAVES OF ABSENCE IN ORDER TO BE AN ORGAN DONOR.


Printed Page 4128 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Rep. DAVENPORT proposed the following Amendment No. 1 (Doc Name COUNCIL\NBD\AMEND\11813AC02), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:
/SECTION   __.   The 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 8-11-780.   Notwithstanding the provisions of this article or any other provision of law, an employee may request voluntarily, in writing, to transfer a specified amount of the employee's accrued annual or sick leave to a specified employee of the same agency to be utilized by the specified employee for absences that have or will occur due to extenuating circumstances which must be approved by the director of the agency on a case-by-case basis."/
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and title to conform.

Rep. DAVENPORT explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.

The Bill, as amended, was read the second time and ordered to third reading.

S. 830--ORDERED TO BE READ THIRD TIME TOMORROW

On motion of Rep. DAVENPORT, with unanimous consent, it was ordered that S. 830 (Word version) be read the third time tomorrow.

S. 721--DEBATE ADJOURNED

The following Bill was taken up:

S. 721 (Word version) -- Senator McConnell: A BILL TO AMEND CHAPTER 6, TITLE 61, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL ACT, SO AS TO ADD SECTION 61-6-710, ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL FOOD MANUFACTURER'S LICENSE TO BE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE FOR A PERSON WHO MANUFACTURES FOOD ITEMS SUCH AS SAUCES AND MARINADES IN WHICH THERE IS AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE INGREDIENT AND WHO DOES SO UNDER AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE MANUFACTURER, AND TO ALLOW THE PURCHASE OF THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE IN CONTAINERS HOLDING QUANTITIES GREATER THAN THE QUANTITIES SOLD TO


Printed Page 4129 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

THE CONSUMER, AND TO PROVIDE THAT THE DEPARTMENT MUST ESTABLISH THE FORM OF APPLICATION AND CONDITIONS FOR ISSUANCE OF THE LICENSE; TO AMEND SECTION 12-33-210, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE TAXES ON LICENSES ISSUED UNDER TITLE 61, SO AS TO INCLUDE A TAX FOR THE SPECIAL FOOD MANUFACTURER'S LICENSE; TO AMEND SECTION 61-2-175, RELATING TO SHIPPING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES INTO THE STATE, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES MAY BE SHIPPED DIRECTLY TO A RESIDENT WHO HOLDS A SPECIAL FOOD MANUFACTURER'S LICENSE; TO AMEND SECTION 61-6-2900, RELATING TO THE SHIPMENT OR TRANSFER OF IMPORTED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, SO AS TO PROVIDE THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES MAY BE SHIPPED TO A PERSON HOLDING A SPECIAL FOOD MANUFACTURER'S LICENSE; AND TO AMEND SECTION 61-6-4050, RELATING TO THE PURCHASE OF ALCOHOLIC LIQUORS FROM LICENSED RETAIL DEALERS SO AS TO ADD ALCOHOLIC LIQUORS PURCHASED PURSUANT TO A SPECIAL FOOD MANUFACTURER'S LICENSE.

Rep. HARRISON explained the Bill.

Rep. HARRISON moved to adjourn debate on the Bill until Tuesday, June 4, which was agreed to.

S. 1208--DEBATE ADJOURNED

Rep. HARRISON moved to adjourn debate upon the following Bill, which was adopted:

S. 1208 (Word version) -- Judiciary Committee: A BILL TO ENACT "STEPHANIE'S LAW"; TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-510, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO PERSONS REQUIRED OR PERMITTED TO REPORT CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT, SO AS TO REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES TO DETERMINE WHETHER PREVIOUS REPORTS HAVE BEEN MADE REGARDING A CHILD OR SUBJECT OF A REPORT AND TO REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT TO MAINTAIN A RECORD OF INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT IS NOT INVESTIGATED; TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-650, RELATING TO DUTIES OF LOCAL CHILD PROTECTIVE AGENCIES, SO AS TO


Printed Page 4130 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

RE-CATEGORIZE UNFOUNDED REPORTS; TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-655, RELATING TO THE CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES APPEALS PROCESS, SO AS TO DELETE THE REQUIREMENT THAT CERTAIN RECORDS BE PURGED; AND TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-680, RELATING TO THE CENTRAL REGISTRY OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE CENTRAL REGISTRY OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT MUST NOT CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM REPORTS CLASSIFIED AS UNFOUNDED.

S. 1303--POINT OF ORDER

The following Joint Resolution was taken up:

S. 1303 (Word version) -- Education Committee: A JOINT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE REGULATIONS OF THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, RELATING TO REQUIREMENTS FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL CERTIFICATION, DESIGNATED AS REGULATION DOCUMENT NUMBER 2683, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 1, CHAPTER 23, TITLE 1 OF THE 1976 CODE.

Rep. WALKER explained the Joint Resolution.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. LOFTIS made the Point of Order that the Joint Resolution was improperly before the House for consideration since its number and title have not been printed in the House Calendar at least one statewide legislative day prior to second reading.
The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order.

S. 410--POINT OF ORDER

The following Bill was taken up:

S. 410 (Word version) -- Senators Grooms, Bauer, Mescher, Holland, Ryberg, Ford, Wilson, Leatherman, J. V. Smith, Verdin, Hutto, Reese, Passailaigue, Leventis, Alexander, Gregory, McConnell, Waldrep, Giese, Martin, Drummond, Moore, Anderson, Land, McGill, Ritchie, Elliott, Glover, Pinckney, Hawkins, Branton and Fair: A BILL TO AMEND CHAPTER 1, TITLE 8, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO PUBLIC OFFICERS, BY ADDING SECTION 8-1-135 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A LAW ENFORCEMENT


Printed Page 4131 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

OFFICER OF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION IS NOT CONSIDERED A DUAL OFFICEHOLDER FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTION 3, ARTICLE VI OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, IF HE HOLDS AN OFFICE IN ANOTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. CAMPSEN made the Point of Order that the Bill was improperly before the House for consideration since its number and title have not been printed in the House Calendar at least one statewide legislative day prior to second reading.
The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order.

H. 3756--DEBATE ADJOURNED

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration:

H. 3756 (Word version) -- Reps. Wilkins and Harrison: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-420, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO FAMILY COURT JURISDICTION, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT FAMILY COURT HAS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION TO HEAR AND DETERMINE MATTERS RELATING TO THE VALIDITY OF PREMARITAL AGREEMENTS AND THE EFFECT OF THESE AGREEMENTS ON ISSUES OTHERWISE WITHIN FAMILY COURT JURISDICTION.

Rep. HARRISON moved to adjourn debate on the Senate Amendments, which was agreed to.

H. 4337--SENATE AMENDMENTS AMENDED AND RETURNED TO THE SENATE

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration:

H. 4337 (Word version) -- Reps. Campsen, Chellis, Barfield, Harrell and Easterday: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 12-6-3910, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE DUE DATES FOR QUARTERLY PAYMENTS OF ESTIMATED STATE INCOME TAX BY ENACTING THE "SOUTH CAROLINA ESTIMATED INCOME TAX PAYMENT REFORM ACT", SO AS TO CHANGE


Printed Page 4132 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

THE DUE DATE FOR THE FIRST CORPORATE INCOME TAX ESTIMATED PAYMENT FROM MARCH 15 TO APRIL 15.

Rep. PERRY proposed the following Amendment No. 2A (Doc Name COUNCIL\NBD\AMEND\11836AC02), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:
/SECTION   __.   A.   Section 12-6-1140(10) of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"(10)   three hundred dollars for taxable year 1999 and three thousand dollars for taxable year 2000 for a volunteer firefighter, or rescue squad member, or volunteer member of a Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) Response Team not otherwise eligible for this exemption. For taxable years after 2000, the Board of Economic Advisors annually shall estimate a maximum deduction that may be permitted under this section for a taxable year based on an individual income tax revenue loss of three million one hundred thousand dollars attributable to this deduction and shall certify that maximum deduction to the Department of Revenue and for the applicable taxable year, the maximum deduction amount must not exceed the lesser of the certified estimate or three thousand dollars. Only a volunteer earning a minimum number of points pursuant to Section 23-9-190 is eligible for this deduction."
B.   Section 23-9-190 of the 1976 Code, as added by Act 100 of 1999, is amended to read:

"Section 23-9-190.   (A)   The State Fire Marshal shall establish a performance-based point system for volunteer firefighters, and volunteer rescue squad members, and volunteer members of a Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) Response Team. Members receiving annually a minimum number of points set by the Fire Marshal are eligible for the deduction allowed pursuant to Section 12-6-1140. Points must be awarded for a year as follows:

(1)   Participation in approved training, including:

(a)   Certified interior firefighter;

(b)   Emergency vehicle driver training;

(c)   Pump operations;

(d)   Incident command systems;

(e)   Rural water supply;

(f)   Automobile extrication;

(g)   Certified instructor training;

(h)   Certified inspector training;

( i)   Certified public fire education training;


Printed Page 4133 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

( j)   Officer training.;

(k)   HAZMAT operations;

( l)   HAZMAT technician;

(m)   HAZMAT specialist.

(2)   Possessing a commercial or Class E drivers license;

(3)   Participation in first aid/medical training such as:

(a)   First responder;

(b)   EMT--basic;

(c)   EMT--intermediate;

(d)   Paramedic.

(4)   Participation in public fire education programs;

(5)   Attendance at meetings;

(6)   Station staffing; and

(7)   Volunteer response.

(B)   The Fire Marshal shall, in consultation with the South Carolina State Firemen's Association and in the case of volunteer HAZMAT Teams, county emergency services directors:

(1)   Develop a standardized form and recordkeeping system and provide a master copy of all information and forms to each fire department, and rescue squad, and HAZMAT Response Team in the State;

(2)   Provide training to the various fire chiefs or rescue squad leaders and county emergency services directors on the use of the forms and the outline of the program;

(3)   Advertise the availability of the program.

(C)   The local fire chief/rescue squad leader and county emergency services director shall:

(1)   Provide written records to each member by January 31 of the year following the applicable tax year that shows the points obtained by each member for the previous tax year;

(2)   Maintain a copy of records for each member for at least seven years;

(3)   Certify the report for each member;

(4)   Provide to the Department of Revenue by January 31 of the year following the applicable tax year copies of the records forwarded to members pursuant to item (1) of this subsection. Each member's social security number must be included in the copies forwarded to the department."
C.   Section 12-6-1140(9) of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"(9)   DELETED three thousand dollars for a person serving as a reserve police officer. For purposes of this item, a reserve police


Printed Page 4134 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

officer is a person eligible to perform police functions under the provisions of Chapter 28 of Title 23 who, during the applicable taxable year, actually performed police functions. The department may require the taxpayer to provide the documentation necessary to determine eligibility for this deduction."
D.   Notwithstanding the general effective date of this act, this section takes effect upon approval by the Governor and applies for taxable years beginning after 2001./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and title to conform.

Rep. PERRY explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.

Rep. VAUGHN proposed the following Amendment No. 3A (Doc Name COUNCIL\GJK\AMEND\21431SD02), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, by adding a new SECTION appropriately numbered to read:
/ SECTION   ___.   (A) Section 12-36-2120(28)(a) of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 399 of 2000, is further amended to read:

"(a)   medicine and prosthetic devices sold by prescription, prescription medicines used in the treatment of renal disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and Crohn's disease, prescription medicines and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals used in the treatment of cancer, lymphoma, leukemia, or related diseases, including prescription medicines used to relieve the effects of any such treatment, and free samples of prescription medicine distributed by its manufacturer and any use of these free samples."
(B)   This act takes effect January 1, 2004. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and title to conform.

Rep. VAUGHN explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.

Rep. J. R. Smith proposed the following Amendment No. 4A (Doc Name COUNCIL\BBM\AMEND\9224HTC02), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, by adding an appropriately numbered SECTION to read:
/ SECTION   __.   A.   Section 12-36-2610 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:


Printed Page 4135 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

"Section 12-36-2610.   When a sales or use tax return required by Section 12-36-2570 and Chapter 10 of Title 4 is filed and the taxes due on it are paid in full on or before the final due date, including any date to which the time for making the return and paying the tax has been extended pursuant to the provisions of Section 12-54-70, the taxpayer is allowed a discount as follows:

(1)   on taxes shown to be due by the return of less than one hundred dollars, three percent;

(2)   on taxes shown to be due by the return of one hundred dollars or more, two percent.

In no case is a discount allowed if the return, or the tax on it is received after the due date, pursuant to Section 12-36-2570, or after the expiration of any extension granted by the department. The discount permitted a taxpayer under this section may not exceed three thousand dollars during any one state fiscal year. However, for taxpayers filing electronically, the discount may not exceed three thousand one hundred dollars. However, a A person making sales into this State who cannot be required to register for sales and use tax under applicable law but who nevertheless voluntarily registers to collect and remit use tax on items of tangible personal property sold to customers in this State is entitled to a discount on returns filed as otherwise provided in this section not to exceed ten thousand dollars during any one state fiscal year."
B.   Section 12-54-250(A) of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"(A)   The South Carolina Department of Revenue may require, consistent with the cash management policies of the State Treasurer, that any person owing twenty fifteen thousand dollars or more in connection with any return, report, or other document to be filed with the department shall pay the tax liability to the State no later than the date the payment is required by law to be made in funds which are available immediately to the State on the date of payment. Payment in immediately available funds may be made by any means established by the department, with the approval of the State Treasurer, which insures ensures the availability of those funds to the State on the date of payment. Evidence of the payment must be furnished to the department on or before the due date of the tax as provided by law. Failure to make timely payment in immediately available funds or failure to provide evidence of payment in a timely manner subjects the taxpayer to penalties and interest as provided by law for delinquent or deficient tax payments."


Printed Page 4136 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

C.   Section 12-4-580(D)(1) of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 89 of 2001, is further amended to read:

"(1)   'Governmental entity' means the State and any state agency, board, committee, department, private or public institution of higher learning; all political subdivisions of the State; and all federal agencies, boards, and departments. 'Political subdivision' includes the Municipal Association of South Carolina and the South Carolina Association of Counties when these organizations submit claims on behalf of their members."
D.   Notwithstanding any other effective date in this act, this section takes effect July 1, 2002. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend title to conform.

Rep. J. R. SMITH explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.

The Senate amendments, as amended, were then agreed to and the Bill was ordered returned to the Senate.

S. 887--NONCONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration:

S. 887 (Word version) -- Senators Hayes, Ryberg, Gregory, Hutto, Matthews, Short and Moore: A BILL TO AMEND SECTIONS 4-10-320, 4-10-330, AND 4-10-340, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE COMMISSION CREATED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF A COUNTY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CAPITAL PROJECTS SALES TAX ACT, THE REFERENDUM REQUIRED BEFORE THE TAX MAY BE IMPOSED, AND THE DATE THE TAX IS IMPOSED AND TERMINATES, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE COMMISSION SHALL RECOMMEND THE WORDING OF THE REFERENDUM QUESTION TO THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE COUNTY WHICH MAY ALTER THIS RECOMMENDED WORDING ONLY BY A TWO-THIRDS VOTE AND PROVIDE WHAT CONSTITUTES A TWO-THIRDS VOTE, TO PROVIDE FOR A REVISED DATE FOR THE REFERENDUM IN CASES OF A SUBSEQUENT IMPOSITION OF THE TAX AND DELETE OBSOLETE LANGUAGE, TO PROVIDE FOR THE


Printed Page 4137 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

CONTINUATION OF THE TAX WITHOUT INTERRUPTION IN A SUBSEQUENT IMPOSITION, AND TO REVISE THE FACTORS FOR DETERMINING THE TERMINATION OF THE TAX.

Rep. J. R. SMITH explained the Senate Amendments.

The House refused to agree to the Senate amendments and a message was ordered sent accordingly.

H. 3906--SENATE AMENDMENTS CONCURRED IN AND BILL ENROLLED

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration:

H. 3906 (Word version) -- Rep. Wilkins: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 15-49-20, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN GRANTING A NAME CHANGE, SO AS TO REQUIRE A PERSON SEEKING A NAME CHANGE TO BE FINGERPRINTED AND TO PROVIDE THE RESULTS OF A SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION CRIMINAL RECORD CHECK, A SCREENING STATEMENT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES THAT THE PERSON IS NOT ON THE DEPARTMENT'S REGISTRY OF PERPETRATORS OF CHILD ABUSE OR NEGLECT, AND A CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT PRINTOUT; TO EXEMPT FROM THESE REQUIREMENTS PARENTS SEEKING A NAME CHANGE FOR THEIR MINOR CHILD AND PERSONS SEEKING TO RETURN TO THEIR MAIDEN NAME OR A FORMER MARRIED NAME IN A DIVORCE ACTION; AND TO REQUIRE THE COURT TO CONDUCT A HEARING ON THE PETITION.

Rep. EASTERDAY explained the Senate Amendments.

The Senate amendments were agreed to, and the Bill having received three readings in both Houses, it was ordered that the title be changed to that of an Act, and that it be enrolled for ratification.


Printed Page 4138 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

H. 3485--DEBATE ADJOURNED

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration:

H. 3485 (Word version) -- Reps. Phillips, Littlejohn, McCraw and Whipper: A BILL TO AMEND ARTICLE 22, CHAPTER 3, TITLE 56, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE PLATES TO MEMBERS OF MUNICIPAL COUNCILS, COUNTY COUNCILS, AND COUNTY CORONERS BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FOR PRIVATE PASSENGER MOTOR VEHICLES OWNED BY THEM, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE DEPARTMENT MAY ISSUE SPECIAL LICENSE PLATES TO MAYORS.

Rep. RICE moved to adjourn debate on the Senate Amendments, which was agreed to.

H. 3978--POINT OF ORDER

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration:

H. 3978 (Word version) -- Rep. Merrill: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 44-93-100, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO EXEMPTIONS FROM REGULATION FOR GENERATORS OF LESS THAN FIFTY POUNDS OF INFECTIOUS WASTE, SO AS TO REQUIRE SHARPS TO BE MANAGED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 93 AND REGULATIONS PROMULGATED UNDER THAT CHAPTER.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. WITHERSPOON made the Point of Order that the Senate Amendments were improperly before the House for consideration since its number and title have not been printed in the House Calendar at least one statewide legislative day prior to second reading.
The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order.


Printed Page 4139 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

H. 5291--POINT OF ORDER

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration:

H. 5291 (Word version) -- Reps. Bingham, Huggins and Riser: A BILL TO DIRECT THE LEXINGTON COUNTY OFFICIAL CHARGED WITH THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COLLECTING DELINQUENT TAXES, IN CONNECTION WITH THE REQUIREMENT FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES ON A WATERCRAFT AND OUTBOARD MOTOR BE CURRENT BEFORE THE TITLE TO THESE ITEMS MAY BE TRANSFERRED, THAT THIS PROHIBITION ON THE TRANSFER OF TITLE APPLIES ONLY FOR PROPERTY TAXES DUE FOR PROPERTY TAX YEARS BEGINNING AFTER 1999, THAT USED WATERCRAFT AND USED OUTBOARD MOTORS OBTAINED FROM A LICENSED DEALER ON OR AFTER OCTOBER 3, 2000, ARE FREE OF THE LIEN FOR THE PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES FOR PROPERTY TAX YEARS BEFORE 2000, AND THAT NO REFUNDS OF PROPERTY TAXES ON WATERCRAFT AND OUTBOARD MOTORS ARE PAYABLE FOR PROPERTY TAX YEARS BEFORE.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. STUART made the Point of Order that the Senate Amendments were improperly before the House for consideration since its number and title have not been printed in the House Calendar at least one statewide legislative day prior to second reading.
The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order.

H. 4835--POINT OF ORDER

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration:

H. 4835 (Word version) -- Reps. Carnell, Keegan, Harrell, A. Young and Quinn: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 2-47-55, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE ANNUAL PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE JOINT BOND REVIEW COMMITTEE AND THE BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD, SO AS TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THE SUBMISSION TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHICH WOULD SERVE AS AN OUTLINE FOR AN AGENCY'S PERMANENT


Printed Page 4140 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES FOR THE NEXT FIVE-YEAR PERIOD; AND TO AMEND ACT 1377 OF 1968, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF STATE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SO AS TO DELETE SECTION 5 WHICH REQUIRES STATE AGENCIES AND INSTITUTIONS TO SUBMIT AN OVERALL PLAN SEEKING APPROVAL OF REQUESTS FOR FUNDING OF PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS OR OF THE ESTABLISHMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECTS PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED UNDER ACT 1377 OF 1968 (STATE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT).

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. J. R. SMITH made the Point of Order that the Senate Amendments were improperly before the House for consideration since its number and title have not been printed in the House Calendar at least one statewide legislative day prior to second reading.
The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order.

S. 1007--POINT OF ORDER

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration:

S. 1007 (Word version) -- Senators Bauer, Gregory, Ravenel, Ritchie, Branton, Hawkins, Fair, Hayes and Kuhn: A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 23-1-240 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT MONIES FOR THE PREMIUMS FOR TORT LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR STATE CONSTABLES OBTAINED THROUGH THE OFFICE OF INSURANCE SERVICES OF THE BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD AND FOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE MUST BE PROVIDED BY APPROPRIATIONS TO THE STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION; AND SECTION 42-1-135 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE TERM "EMPLOYEE" FOR PURPOSES OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW INCLUDES ALL SOUTH CAROLINA STATE CONSTABLES WHILE PERFORMING DUTIES IN CONNECTION WITH THEIR APPOINTMENT; AND TO AMEND SECTION 42-7-65, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE DESIGNATION OF "AVERAGE WEEKLY WAGE" FOR CERTAIN CATEGORIES OF PERSONS FOR PURPOSES OF THE SOUTH


Printed Page 4141 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

CAROLINA WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE AVERAGE WEEKLY WAGE FOR ALL VOLUNTEER STATE CONSTABLES SERVING WITHOUT COMPENSATION IS THIRTY-SEVEN AND ONE-HALF PERCENT OF THE AVERAGE WEEKLY WAGE IN THE STATE FOR THE PRECEDING FISCAL YEAR.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. COBB-HUNTER made the Point of Order that the Senate Amendments were improperly before the House for consideration since its number and title have not been printed in the House Calendar at least one statewide legislative day prior to second reading.
The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order.

S. 820--NONCONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration:

S. 820 (Word version) -- Senators Reese, Elliott and Richardson: A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 16-17-745 SO AS TO MAKE IT UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON THROUGH "CLONING" TO GROW OR CREATE A HUMAN BEING, OR ANY HUMAN PART, OR TO CONSPIRE TO DO SO, TO DEFINE CLONING FOR THIS PURPOSE, AND TO PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS.

POINT OF ORDER

Rep. WEEKS made the Point of Order that the Senate Amendments were improperly before the House for consideration since its number and title have not been printed in the House Calendar at least one statewide legislative day prior to second reading.
The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order.

RULE 5.15 WAIVED

Rep. CAMPSEN moved to waive Rule 5.15, which was agreed to by a division vote of 43 to 12.

Rep. CAMPSEN explained the Senate Amendments.

The House refused to agree to the Senate amendments and a message was ordered sent accordingly.


Printed Page 4142 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

ORDERED ENROLLED FOR RATIFICATION

The following Bill was read the third time, passed and, having received three readings in both Houses, it was ordered that the title be changed to that of an Act, and that it be enrolled for ratification:

S. 1249 (Word version) -- Senators Short and Fair: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-1570, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO COUNSEL FOR A GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT COUNSEL MUST BE APPOINTED FOR A GUARDIAN AD LITEM WHO IS NOT AN ATTORNEY IN ANY CASE THAT IS CONTESTED; TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-1690, RELATING TO THE REIMBURSEMENT FOR FEES AND COSTS FOR THE CONSENT OR RELINQUISHMENT OF A CHILD FOR ADOPTION, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE COURT MAY APPROVE AN ADOPTION WHILE NOT APPROVING UNREASONABLE FEES AND COSTS; TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-1700, RELATING TO FUTURE CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS AFTER THE CONSENT OR RELINQUISHMENT HAS BEEN GIVEN FOR AN ADOPTION, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE GIVING OF CONSENT OR RELINQUISHMENT FOR AN ADOPTION RELIEVES A PERSON OF ALL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS, INCLUDING FUTURE CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS; TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-1770, RELATING TO OPEN AND COOPERATIVE ADOPTIONS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A FINAL ADOPTION DECREE IS NOT AFFECTED BY AN AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BEFORE THE ADOPTION BETWEEN A CHILD'S ADOPTIVE AND BIOLOGICAL PARENTS CONCERNING VISITATION, EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION, OR OTHER INTERACTION BETWEEN THE CHILD AND ANY OTHER PERSON.

RETURNED TO THE SENATE WITH AMENDMENTS

The following Bills were taken up, read the third time, and ordered returned to the Senate with amendments:

S. 977 (Word version) -- Senators Giese, J. V. Smith, Land, Short, Drummond, Fair, Mescher, Leatherman, Verdin, Ritchie and Branton: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 40-33-10, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS USED IN THE LICENSURE AND REGULATION OF NURSES, SO AS TO DEFINE "ATTENDANT CARE SERVICES" AND "INDIVIDUAL


Printed Page 4143 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

IN NEED OF IN-HOME CARE"; AND TO AMEND SECTION 40-33-50, RELATING TO CIRCUMSTANCES TO WHICH THE CHAPTER DOES NOT APPLY, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE CHAPTER MAY NOT BE CONSTRUED TO PROHIBIT A PERSON NOT LICENSED UNDER THIS CHAPTER FROM PROVIDING ATTENDANT CARE SERVICES WHICH ENABLE A PERSON TO REMAIN AT HOME RATHER THAN IN AN INSTITUTION AND WHICH INCLUDES HOMEMAKER AND COMPANION SERVICES AND CERTAIN HEALTH MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES.

S. 290 (Word version) -- Senator Bauer: A BILL TO AMEND ACT 789 OF 1952, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE CLINTON-NEWBERRY NATURAL GAS AUTHORITY, SO AS TO ALLOW THE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO FIRM GAS SALES, MAKE CONSISTENT CHANGES IN PROVISIONS TO ALLOW FIRM GAS SALES, AND CHANGE THE MANNER OF THE DISPOSITION OF NET REVENUES, SO THAT THEY ARE DIVIDED EQUALLY BETWEEN THE CITIES OF CLINTON AND NEWBERRY.

H. 5345--ADOPTED AND SENT TO SENATE

The following Concurrent Resolution was taken up:

H. 5345 (Word version) -- Reps. Edge, Witherspoon, Barfield, Keegan and Kelley: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION TO REQUEST THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO NAME THE BRIDGE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF SC-22 AND US-701 NORTH AS THE "LIEUTENANT RANDY G. GERALD MEMORIAL BRIDGE" IN HONOR OF THIS OUTSTANDING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHO LOST HIS LIFE IN THE LINE OF DUTY.

Whereas, roads and bridges throughout the County of Horry and the State of South Carolina have been named in honor of distinguished citizens who have given of both their time and efforts to improve the State of South Carolina; and

Whereas, Lieutenant Randy Gerald, an outstanding deputy of the Horry County Sheriff's Department, having served Horry County for thirteen years and eleven months, was murdered while trying to aid and


Printed Page 4144 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

assist a citizen of the county on December 29, 2001, along Highway 701 North; and

Whereas, during Lieutenant Randy G. Gerald's thirteen years of service, he demonstrated tremendous love and care for his fellow workers, friends, and citizens of Horry County; and

Whereas, Lieutenant Gerald also showed extraordinary professionalism and dedication to his job and the protection of the citizens of Horry County; and

Whereas, at the time of his untimely death, he was demonstrating all these valuable qualities; and

Whereas, the members of the General Assembly, by this resolution, would like to honor the memory of this wonderful and brave man in an appropriate and fitting way. Now, therefore,

Be it resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:

That the members of the General Assembly request the Department of Transportation to name the bridge located at the intersection of SC-22 and US-701 North as the "Lieutenant Randy G. Gerald Memorial Bridge" in honor of this outstanding law enforcement officer who lost his life in the line of duty, and the department is further requested to install appropriate markers or signs at this bridge as the department considers appropriate.

Be it further resolved that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Department of Transportation.

The Concurrent Resolution was adopted and sent to the Senate.

RECURRENCE TO THE MORNING HOUR

Rep. EASTERDAY moved that the House recur to the Morning Hour, which was agreed to.


Printed Page 4145 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

The following was received:

Columbia, S.C., May 30, 2002
Mr. Speaker and Members of the House:

The Senate respectfully invites your Honorable Body to attend in the Senate Chamber at 12:30 p.m. today for the purpose of Ratifying Acts.

Very respectfully,
President

On motion of Rep. W. D. SMITH the invitation was accepted.

S. 1275--DEBATE ADJOURNED

Rep. CLYBURN moved to adjourn debate upon the following Bill until Tuesday, June 4, which was adopted:

S. 1275 (Word version) -- Senator Moore: A BILL TO AMEND ACT 595 OF 1992, RELATING TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EDGEFIELD COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, SO AS TO REVISE THE SINGLE-MEMBER DISTRICTS FROM WHICH TRUSTEES ARE ELECTED.

S. 1208--AMENDED AND ORDERED TO THIRD READING

The following Bill was taken up:

S. 1208 (Word version) -- Judiciary Committee: A BILL TO ENACT "STEPHANIE'S LAW"; TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-510, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO PERSONS REQUIRED OR PERMITTED TO REPORT CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT, SO AS TO REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES TO DETERMINE WHETHER PREVIOUS REPORTS HAVE BEEN MADE REGARDING A CHILD OR SUBJECT OF A REPORT AND TO REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT TO MAINTAIN A RECORD OF INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT IS NOT INVESTIGATED; TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-650, RELATING TO DUTIES OF LOCAL CHILD PROTECTIVE AGENCIES, SO AS TO RE-CATEGORIZE UNFOUNDED REPORTS; TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-655, RELATING TO THE CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES APPEALS PROCESS, SO AS TO DELETE THE REQUIREMENT THAT CERTAIN RECORDS BE PURGED; AND


Printed Page 4146 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-680, RELATING TO THE CENTRAL REGISTRY OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE CENTRAL REGISTRY OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT MUST NOT CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM REPORTS CLASSIFIED AS UNFOUNDED.

Reps. HARRISON, COOPER and WHITE proposed the following Amendment No. 3 (Doc Name COUNCIL\NBD\AMEND\ 11844AC02), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, by striking all after the enacting words and inserting:
/SECTION   1.   This act may be cited as "Stephanie's Law".
SECTION   2.   Section 20-7-510 of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 81 of 2001, is further amended by adding appropriately numbered new subsections to read:

"( )   When a report is referred to the department for an investigation or other response, the department must determine whether previous reports have been made regarding the same child or the same subject of the report. In determining whether previous reports have been made, the department must determine whether there are any suspected, indicated, or unfounded reports maintained pursuant to Section 20-7-650 regarding the same child or the same subject of the report.

( )   If the department does not conduct an investigation as a result of information received pursuant to this section, the department must make a record of the information and must classify the record as a Category IV unfounded report in accordance with Section 20-7-650. The department and law enforcement are authorized to use information recorded pursuant to this subsection for purposes of assessing risk and safety if additional contacts are made concerning the child, the family, or the subject of the report."
SECTION   3.   Section 20-7-650 of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 104 of 1999, is further amended to read:

"Section 20-7-650.   (A)   It is the purpose of this section to encourage the voluntary acceptance of any service offered by the department in connection with child abuse and neglect or another problem of a nature affecting the stability of family life.

(B)   The department must be staffed adequately with persons trained in the investigation of suspected child abuse and neglect and in the provision of services to abused and neglected children and their families.


Printed Page 4147 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

(C)   Within twenty-four hours of the receipt of a report of suspected child abuse or neglect or within twenty-four hours after the department has assumed legal custody of a child pursuant to Section 20-7-610(F) or (G) or within twenty-four hours after being notified that a child has been taken into emergency protective custody, the department must begin an appropriate and thorough investigation to determine whether a report of suspected child abuse or neglect is 'indicated' or 'unfounded'. The finding must be made no later than forty-five days from the receipt of the report. A single extension of no more than fifteen days may be granted by the director of the department, or the director's designee, for good cause shown, pursuant to guidelines adopted by the department. If the investigation cannot be completed because the department is unable to locate the child or family or for other compelling reason, the report may be classified as unfounded Category III and the investigation may be reopened at a later date if the child or family is located or the compelling reason for failure to complete the investigation is removed. The department shall must make a finding within forty-five days after the investigation is reopened.

This section does not require the department to investigate reports of child abuse or neglect which resulted in the death of the child unless there are other children residing in the home, or a resident of the home is pregnant, or the subject of the report is the parent, guardian, or person responsible for the welfare of another child regardless of whether that child resides in the home.

(D)   The department may file with the family court an affidavit and a petition to support issuance of a warrant at any time after receipt of a report. The family court shall must issue the warrant if the affidavit and petition establish probable cause to believe the child is an abused or neglected child and that the investigation cannot be completed without issuance of the warrant. The warrant may authorize the department to interview the child, to inspect the condition of the child, to inspect the premises where the child may be located or may reside, and to obtain copies of medical, school, or other records concerning the child.

(E)   The department or law enforcement, or both, may interview the child alleged to have been abused or neglected and any other child in the household during the investigation. The interviews may be conducted on school premises, at day-care facilities, at the child's home, or at other suitable locations, and in the discretion of the department or law enforcement, or both, may be conducted outside the


Printed Page 4148 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

presence of the parents. To the extent reasonably possible, the needs and interests of the child must be accommodated in making arrangements for interviews, including time, place, method of obtaining the child's presence, and conduct of the interview. The department or law enforcement, or both, shall must provide notification of the interview to the parents as soon as reasonably possible during the investigation if notice will not jeopardize the safety of the child or the course of the investigation. All state, law enforcement, and community agencies providing child welfare intervention into in a child's life should coordinate their services to minimize the number of interviews of the child to reduce potential emotional trauma to the child.

(F)   Reports of child abuse and neglect must be classified in the department's data system and records in one of three categories: Suspected, Unfounded, or Indicated. If the report is categorized as unfounded, the entry must further state the classification of unfounded reports as set forth in subsection (H). All initial reports must be considered suspected. Reports must be maintained in the category of suspected for no more than sixty days after the report was received by the department. By the end of the sixty-day time period, suspected reports must be classified as either unfounded or indicated pursuant to the agency's investigation.

(G)(1)   Indicated findings must be based upon a finding of the facts available to the department that abuse or neglect is supported by there is a preponderance of evidence that the child is an abused or neglected child. Indicated findings must include a description of the services being provided the child and those responsible for the child's welfare, and all relevant dispositional information.

(2)   If the family court makes a determination or the process described in Section 20-7-655 results in a determination that the indicated finding is not supported by a preponderance of evidence that there was any act of child abuse or neglect, the case classification must be converted to 'unfounded' and subsection (J) applies.

(3)   If the family court makes a specific determination, or the process described in Section 20-7-655 results in a determination that there is not a preponderance of evidence that the person who was the subject of the report committed an act of child abuse or neglect, but that the child was abused or neglected by an unknown person, the department must maintain the case as an indicated case and access to records of the case may be granted as provided in Section 20-7-690. The department shall not delete from its data system or records information indicating that the person was the subject of the report.


Printed Page 4149 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

The department's data system and records must clearly record the results of the court or administrative proceeding. If the case record and data system included a designation with the name of the subject of the report indicating that the person committed the abuse or neglect, that designation must be removed following the determination that there is not a preponderance of evidence that the subject of the report committed an act of child abuse or neglect.

(G)(H)     All reports that are not indicated at the conclusion of the investigation and all records of information for which an investigation was not conducted pursuant to Section 20-7-510 must be classified as 'unfounded'. Unfounded reports must be further classified as either Category I, Category II, or Category III, or Category IV.

(1)   Category I unfounded reports are those in which abuse and neglect were ruled out following the investigation. A report falls in this category if evidence of abuse or neglect as defined in this article was not found regardless of whether the family had other problems or was in need of services.

(2)   Category II unfounded reports are those in which the evidence produced by the investigation was inconclusive as to whether abuse or neglect occurred. A report falls in this category if there is evidence of abuse or neglect as defined in this article but not enough evidence to constitute a preponderance of evidence. This category does not include cases in which the family had other problems that are not within the definition of abuse and neglect in Section 20-7-490 investigation did not produce a preponderance of the evidence that the child is an abused or neglected child.

(3)   Category III unfounded reports are those in which an investigation could not be completed because the department was unable to locate the child or family or for some other compelling reason.

(4)   Category IV unfounded reports are records of information received pursuant to Section 20-7-510, but which were not investigated by the department.

(H)   Reports of child abuse and neglect must be entered immediately into the department's centralized data system in one of four categories: Suspected, Unfounded, Indicated, or Affirmative Determination. If the report is categorized as unfounded, the entry must further state the classification of unfounded report as set forth in subsection (G). All initial reports must be considered suspected. Reports of suspected child abuse and neglect must be maintained for no more than sixty days after the report was received by the department.


Printed Page 4150 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

On or before the expiration of that time, reports must be converted into either unfounded or indicated reports pursuant to the agency's investigation. Upon an affirmative determination, indicated reports must be converted to the category of "affirmative determination".

(1) Indicated reports must be accompanied by a description of services being provided as required under subsection (F).

(2) Affirmative determinations must be accompanied by a description of services being provided the child and those responsible for his welfare and relevant dispositional information.

(I) The names, addresses, and all other identifying characteristics of persons named in all unfounded reports in Category I maintained in department files may be used only for auditing and statistical purposes. All identifying information contained in unfounded reports in Category I must be destroyed immediately after use of the information for auditing and statistical purposes, and in no case later than one year from the date that the last report has been determined to be unfounded; however, all information in the report which is unnecessary for auditing and statistical purposes must be destroyed immediately upon a determination that the report is unfounded, and the remaining information must be kept strictly confidential except for auditing and statistical purposes. If an unfounded report is in Category II or Category III, the report and related information may be retained by the department in its records for one year for use by department staff or law enforcement agencies in relation to child abuse and neglect investigations or proceedings involving the subject of the report or the same child. The department may not use the information in records or entries of Category II or III unfounded reports for any purpose other than child abuse and neglect proceedings involving the same subject or the same child and auditing and statistical purposes. Notwithstanding Section 20-7-690 or any other provision of law, no information contained in unfounded reports may be disclosed under any circumstances, except that:

(1) the confidentiality and disclosure provisions of this subsection do not apply to information requested by the Department of Child Fatalities pursuant to Section 20-7-5930; and the information pertaining to an unfounded case must be released to the Department of Child Fatalities when the request is made pursuant to Section 20-7-5930;

(2) information in records concerning Category II or III unfounded reports may be disclosed to a law enforcement agency


Printed Page 4151 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

investigating a child abuse or neglect case involving the subject of the report or the same child.

If an unfounded report is in Category I, only information necessary for auditing and statistical purposes may be retained in department records or in the database. As soon as the record has been used for auditing or statistical purposes, it must be destroyed. All identifying information must be deleted from the database immediately upon use of the entry for auditing or statistical purposes. In no case may the record or entry be kept for more than one year from the date that the report was determined to be unfounded. The department may not use the information contained in records or entries of Category I unfounded cases for any purpose other than auditing or statistical purposes. No information contained in the record or the database concerning a Category I unfounded case may be disclosed to any person or entity other than the Department of Child Fatalities pursuant to Section 20-7-5930.

(I)   The Central Registry of Child Abuse and Neglect must not contain information from reports classified as unfounded.

(J)   Upon an affirmative determination, the names, addresses, birth dates, identifying characteristics, and other information of persons named in indicated reports maintained in agency files must be converted immediately to the category of "affirmative determination". The names, addresses, birth dates, identifying characteristics, and other information unnecessary for auditing and statistical purposes or persons named in affirmative determinations of child abuse or neglect maintained in agency files must be destroyed seven years from the date services are terminated. Information concerning reports classified as unfounded contained in the statewide data system and records must be maintained for not less than five years after the finding. Information contained in unfounded cases is not subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act as provided for in Chapter 4, Title 30. Access to and use of information contained in unfounded cases must be strictly limited to the following purposes and entities:

(1)   a prosecutor or law enforcement officer or agency, for purposes of investigation of a suspected false report pursuant to Section 20-7-567;

(2)   the department or a law enforcement officer or agency, for the purpose investigating allegations of abuse or neglect;

(3)   the department or a law enforcement officer or agency, when information is received that allows the reopening of a Category III unfounded report pursuant to subsection (C);


Printed Page 4152 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

(4)   as evidence in a court proceeding, if admissible under the rules of evidence as determined by a judge of competent jurisdiction;

(5)   a person who is the subject of a report in an action brought by a prosecutor or by the department, if otherwise subject to discovery under the applicable rules of procedure;

(6)   the department, for program improvement, auditing, and statistical purposes;

(7)   as authorized in Section 20-7-695; and

(8)   the Department of Child Fatalities pursuant to Section 20-7-5930.

(K)   Except as authorized in this section, no person may disseminate or permit dissemination of information maintained pursuant to subsection (J). A person who disseminates or permits dissemination in violation of this subsection is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than one thousand five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. A person aggrieved by an unlawful dissemination in violation of this subsection may bring a civil action to recover damages incurred as a result of the unlawful act and to enjoin its dissemination or use.

Upon a determination that more likely than not, a person who is the subject of a report as defined in Section 20-7-490 did not commit child abuse or neglect, the name, address, birth date, and other identifying characteristics of that person must be purged immediately from the department's files. This provision does not prohibit the department from maintaining an "indicated report" which contains identifying information on the child who is the subject of the indicated report and those responsible for his welfare without identifying a subject of the report or providing child protective services to the child who is the subject of the indicated report and those responsible for the child's welfare.

(K)(L)   At a hearing pursuant to Section 20-7-736 or 20-7-738, at which the court orders that a child be taken or retained in custody or finds that the child was abused or neglected, the court:

(1)   must order that a person be entered in the Central Registry of Child Abuse and Neglect if it the court finds that there is a preponderance of evidence that the person physically or sexually abused or wilfully or recklessly neglected the child. However, if the only form of physical abuse that is indicated is excessive corporal punishment, the court only may order that the person be entered in the Central Registry if item (2) applies;


Printed Page 4153 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

(2)   may order that the person be entered in the Central Registry if it the court finds that there is a preponderance of evidence that the person abused or neglected the child in any manner other than provided for in item (1) and that the nature and circumstances of the abuse indicate that the person would present a significant risk of committing physical or sexual abuse or wilful or reckless neglect if the person were in a position or setting outside of the person's home that involves care of or substantial contact with children.

(L)(M)     The At the probable cause hearing, the court may order at the probable cause hearing that the person be entered in the Central Registry if there is sufficient evidence to support the findings required by subsection (K).

(M)(N)   At any time following receipt of a report, the department may petition the family court for an order directing that the person named as perpetrator be entered in the Central Registry of Child Abuse and Neglect. The petition must have attached a written case summary stating facts sufficient to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the person named as perpetrator abused or neglected the child and that the nature and circumstances of the abuse indicate that the person named as perpetrator would present a significant risk of committing physical or sexual abuse or wilful or reckless neglect if placed in a position or setting outside of the person's home that involves care of or substantial contact with children. The department shall must serve a copy of the petition and summary on the person named as perpetrator. The petition shall must include a statement that the judge shall must rule based on the facts stated in the petition unless the clerk of court or the clerk's designee receives a written request for a hearing from the person named as perpetrator within five days after service of the petition. The name, address, and telephone number of the clerk of court or the clerk's designee must be stated in the petition. If the person named as perpetrator requests a hearing, the court shall must schedule a hearing on the merits of the allegations in the petition and summary to be held no later than five working days following the request.

(N)(O)   The department must seek an order placing a person in the Central Registry pursuant to subsection (K), (L), or (M) in all cases in which the department concludes that there is a preponderance of evidence that the person committed sexual abuse.

(O)(P)   The department is charged with providing, directing, or coordinating the appropriate and timely delivery of services to children found to be abused or neglected and those responsible for their welfare


Printed Page 4154 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

or others exercising temporary or permanent control over these children. Services must not be construed to include emergency protective custody provided for in Section 20-7-736.

(P)(Q)   In cases where a person has been placed in the Central Registry of Child Abuse and Neglect, the outcome of any further proceedings must be entered immediately by the department into the Central Registry of Child Abuse and Neglect. If it is determined that a report is unfounded, the department must immediately purge information identifying that person as a perpetrator from the registry and from department records as provided in Section 20-7-680(D) and (E).

(Q)(R)     The department must furnish to parents or guardians on a standardized form the following information as soon as reasonably possible after commencing the investigation:

(1)   the names of the investigators;

(2)   the allegations being investigated;

(3)   whether the person's name has been recorded by the department as a suspected perpetrator of abuse or neglect;

(4)   the right to inspect department records concerning the investigation;

(5)   statutory and family court remedies available to complete the investigation and to protect the child if the parent or guardian or subject of the report indicates a refusal to cooperate;

(6)   how information provided by the parent or guardian may be used;

(7)   the possible outcomes of the investigation; and

(8)   the telephone number and name of a department employee available to answer questions.

(R)(S)   The department must cooperate with law enforcement agencies within the area it serves and establish procedures necessary to facilitate the referral of child protection cases to the department. Where the facts indicating abuse or neglect also appear to indicate a violation of criminal law, the department must notify the appropriate law enforcement agency of those facts within twenty-four hours of the department's finding for the purposes of police investigation. The law enforcement agency must file a formal incident report at the time it is notified by the department of the finding. When the intake report is of alleged sexual abuse, the department must notify the appropriate law enforcement agency within twenty-four hours of receipt of the report to determine if a joint investigation is necessary. The law enforcement agency must file a formal incident report at the time it is notified of the


Printed Page 4155 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

alleged sexual abuse. The law enforcement agency must provide to the department copies of incident reports generated in any case reported to law enforcement by the department and in any case in which the officer responsible for the case knows the department is involved with the family or the child. The law enforcement officer must make reasonable efforts to advise the department of significant developments in the case, such as disposition in summary court, referral of a juvenile to the Department of Juvenile Justice, arrest or detention, trial date, and disposition of charges. The department must include in its records copies of incident reports provided under this section and must record the disposition of charges.

(S)(T)   The department actively must seek the cooperation and involvement of local public and private institutions, groups, and programs concerned with matters of child protection and welfare within the area it serves.

(T)(U)     The local office of the department responsible for the county of the mother's legal residence must provide, direct, or coordinate the appropriate and timely delivery of services to children born of incarcerated mothers where no provision has been made for placement of the child outside the prison setting. Referral of these cases to the appropriate local office is the responsibility of the agency or institution having custody of the mother.

(U)(V)     In all instances, the agency in all instances must act in accordance with the policies, procedures, and regulations promulgated and distributed by the State Department of Social Services pursuant to this chapter."
SECTION   4.   Section 20-7-655 of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 450 of 1996, is further amended to read:

"Section 20-7-655.   (A)   The Department of Social Services shall purpose of this section is to provide a child protective services appeals process for review of indicated reports that have been indicated pursuant to Section 20-7-650 and are not otherwise being brought before the family court for disposition and for reports indicated and entered in the Central Registry pursuant to Section 20-7-670 and not being brought before the family court for disposition. The appeals hearing must be scheduled and conducted in accordance with the department's fair hearing regulations except as to the date for a final decision. This process is available only to the person determined to have abused or neglected the child.

(B)   The state director shall appoint a child protective services appeals committee hearing officer to conduct a contested case hearing


Printed Page 4156 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

for each case decision which is appealed. The committee must be comprised of three officials or employees of the Department of Social Services, none of whom may be a resident of or employed by the department in the county where the case originates or a member of the investigative unit which investigated the case if the case decision being appealed involves institutional abuse The hearing officer shall prepare recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law for review by the state director or the state director's designee who shall render the final decision. The designee under this subsection must not be a person who was involved in making the original case decision or who conducted the interim review of the original case decision. The purpose of the hearing is to determine whether there is a preponderance of evidence that the appellant was responsible for abuse or neglect of the child.

(C)   When the department determines that an appeal hearing is needed pursuant to Section 20-7-690(J), it shall provide notice of the availability of the hearing to the potential appellant by certified mail. The notice must inform the person of the right to appeal the case determination and the date and time of the appeal hearing. The notice must also advise the appellant of his rights as provided in the department's fair hearing regulations. If a person requests an appeal under this section and the family court has determined that the person is responsible for abuse or neglect of the child, an appeal pursuant to this section is not available. If the family court reaches such a determination after the initiation of the appeal provided for in this section, the department shall terminate the appeal upon receipt of an order that disposes of the issue. If a proceeding is pending in the family court that may result in a finding that will dispose of an appeal under this section, the department shall stay the appeal pending the court's decision.

(D)   If the department determines that a report of suspected child abuse or neglect is indicated and the case will not be brought before department is not taking the case to the family court for disposition, or if the case was entered in the Central Registry pursuant to Section 20-7-670 and the department is not taking the case to family court for disposition, the department must shall provide notice of the case decision by certified mail to the subject of the report by certified mail person determined to have abused or neglected the child. The notice must inform the subject of the report person of the right to appeal the case decision and that, if he intends to appeal the decision, he must notify the local child protection agency department of his intent in writing within thirty days of receipt of the notice. The notice also must


Printed Page 4157 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

advise the person that the appeal process is for the purpose of determining whether a preponderance of evidence supports the case decision that the person abused or neglected the child. If the subject of the report person does not notify the department of his intent to appeal in writing within thirty days of receipt of the notice, the right to appeal is waived by the subject person and the case decision becomes the affirmative determination final.

(E)   Within fourteen days after receipt of a notice of intent to appeal, an appropriate official of the department designated by the director must conduct an interim review of case documentation and the case determination must be conducted by an appropriate official of the department designated by the director. The interim review may not delay the scheduling of the appeals contested case hearing. If the official conducting the interim review decides that the determination against the appellant is not supported by a preponderance of evidence, this decision must be reflected in the department's case record and database as provided in Section 20-7-650(G)(2) or (3). If the person's name was in the Central Registry as a result of a determination pursuant to Section 20-7-670 and the interim review results in a reversal of the decision that supports that entry, the person's name must be removed from the Central Registry.

(F)   The child protective services appeals committee shall determine whether or not the case determination is supported by a preponderance of evidence that the subject of the report abused or neglected the child. If the appeals committee affirms the case determination, the subject has the right to judicial review in the family court of the jurisdiction in which the case originated. After a contested case hearing, if the state director or the director's designee decides that the determination against the appellant is not supported by a preponderance of evidence, this decision must be reflected in the department's case record and database as provided in Section 20-7-650(G)(2) or (3). If the person's name was in the Central Registry as a result of a determination pursuant to Section 20-7-670 and the state director or the director's designee reverses the decision that supports that entry, the person's name must be removed from the Central Registry. If the state director or the director's designee affirms the determination against the appellant, the appellant has the right to seek judicial review in the family court of the jurisdiction in which the case originated.

(G)   Proceedings for judicial review may be instituted by filing An appellant seeking judicial review shall file a petition in the family court


Printed Page 4158 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

within thirty days after the final decision of the department. Copies The appellant shall serve a copy of the petition must be served upon the department and all parties of record. Judicial review must be conducted by. The family court shall conduct a judicial review in accordance with the standards of review provided for in Section 1-23-380. The court may enter judgment upon the pleadings and a certified transcript of the record which must include the evidence upon which the findings and decisions appealed are based. The judgment must include a determination of whether by the decision of the department that a preponderance of evidence shows that the subject of the report appellant abused or neglected the child should be affirmed or reversed. The appellant is not entitled to a trial de novo in the family court.

(H)   Upon a determination by the interim review, the appeals committee or the court that there is not a preponderance of evidence that the subject of the report abused or neglected a child as defined in Section 20-7-490, the name, address, birth date, and other identifying characteristics of that person must be purged immediately from the department's files and from the Central Registry of Child Abuse and Neglect. This subsection does not prohibit the department or the registry from maintaining an 'indicated report' which contains identifying information on the child who is the subject of the indicated report and those responsible for the child's welfare without identifying a subject of the report, and it does not prohibit the department from providing child protective services to the child who is the subject of an indicated report and those responsible for the child's welfare.

(I)   When the appeals procedure is used for institutional abuse cases investigated by the Department of Social Services, the investigative unit of the Department of Social Services must receive all notices and the case documentation review."
SECTION   5.   Section 20-7-680 of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 132 of 1997, is further amended to read:

"Section 20-7-680.   (A)   The purpose of this section is to establish a system for the identification of abused and neglected children and those who are responsible for their welfare, to provide a system for the coordination of reports concerning abused and neglected children, and to provide data for determining the incidence and prevalence of child abuse and neglect in this State. To further these purposes, the department must maintain one or more statewide data systems concerning cases reported to it pursuant to this article.


Printed Page 4159 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

(B)   The Department of Social Services must maintain a Central Registry of Child Abuse and Neglect within the department's child protective services unit in accordance with Sections 20-7-650, 20-7-670, and 17-25-135. Perpetrators of child abuse and neglect must be entered in the registry only by order of a court as provided for in Sections 20-7-650 and 17-25-135, or as provided for in Section 20-7-670. Each entry in the registry must be accompanied by information further identifying the person, including, but not limited to, the person's date of birth, address, and any other identifying characteristics, and describing the abuse or neglect committed by the person.

(C)   The Department of Social Services shall must furnish annually to the Governor and the General Assembly a report on the incidence and prevalence of child abuse and neglect in South Carolina, the effectiveness of services provided throughout the State to protect children from this harm, and any other data considered instructive.

(D)   The name, address, birth date, identifying characteristics, and other information of a person named in a report must be removed from department records and the central registry immediately upon a determination by the department or the court that the report is unfounded, except as provided in Section 20-7-650(I). The Central Registry of Child Abuse and Neglect must not contain information from reports classified as unfounded. Other department records and databases must treat unfounded cases as provided for in Section 20-7-650.

(E)   The names, addresses, birth dates, identifying characteristics, and other information unnecessary for auditing and statistical purposes of persons named in the registry or department records of indicated cases other than the Central Registry of Child Abuse and Neglect must be destroyed seven years from the date services are terminated. This section does not prohibit the department from maintaining an 'indicated report case' which contains identifying information on the child who is the subject of the indicated report and those responsible for the child's welfare without identifying a person as perpetrator, and it does not prohibit the department from providing child protective services to the child who is the subject of an indicated report and those responsible for the child's welfare.

(F)   Information in the central registry and other department records may be released only as authorized in Section 20-7-690 or as otherwise specifically authorized by statute. Information in records of the department other than the Central Registry of Child Abuse and


Printed Page 4160 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Neglect must not be used for screening potential employees or volunteers of any public or private entity, except as specifically provided by Section 20-7-690 or as otherwise provided by statute. However, nothing in this section prevents the department from using other information in its records when making decisions associated with administration or delivery of the department's programs and services."
SECTION   6.   This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and title to conform.

Rep. HARRISON explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.

The Bill, as amended, was read the second time and ordered to third reading.

S. 1208--ORDERED TO BE READ THIRD TIME TOMORROW

On motion of Rep. COOPER, with unanimous consent, it was ordered that S. 1208 (Word version) be read the third time tomorrow.

H. 3756--DEBATE ADJOURNED

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration:

H. 3756 (Word version) -- Reps. Wilkins and Harrison: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-420, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO FAMILY COURT JURISDICTION, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT FAMILY COURT HAS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION TO HEAR AND DETERMINE MATTERS RELATING TO THE VALIDITY OF PREMARITAL AGREEMENTS AND THE EFFECT OF THESE AGREEMENTS ON ISSUES OTHERWISE WITHIN FAMILY COURT JURISDICTION.

Rep. HARRISON moved to adjourn debate on the Senate Amendments, which was agreed to.

MOTION PERIOD

The motion period was dispensed with on motion of Rep. HARRISON.


Printed Page 4161 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

S. 12--AMENDED AND INTERRUPTED DEBATE

The Senate amendments to the following Bill were taken up for consideration:

S. 12 (Word version) -- Senators Richardson, Mescher, Grooms, McConnell and Branton: A BILL TO AMEND CHAPTER 40, TITLE 59, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO CHARTER SCHOOLS, SO AS TO FURTHER PROVIDE FOR THE ORGANIZATION, OPERATION, AND GOVERNANCE OF CHARTER SCHOOLS.

Rep. McGEE proposed the following Amendment No. 4 (Doc Name COUNCIL\PT\AMEND\1045DW02), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 12-4, by striking lines 17 through 25 and inserting:
/ However, under no circumstances may a charter school enrollment differ from the racial composition of the school district by more than ten percent. If the number of applications exceeds the capacity of /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend title to conform.

Rep. MCGEE explained the amendment.

Rep. MCGEE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.

Rep. McGEE proposed the following Amendment No. 5 (Doc Name COUNCIL\PT\AMEND\1046DW02), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 12-4, Section 59-40-50(B)(7) as contained in SECTION 1, by striking lines 14 through 27 and inserting:
/     (6)(7)   admit all children eligible to attend public school in a school district who are eligible to apply for admission to a charter school operating in that school district, subject to space limitations. However, under no circumstances may a charter school enrollment differ from the racial composition of the school district by more than ten percent. If the number of applications exceeds the capacity of a program, class, grade level, or building, students shall must be accepted by lot, and there is no appeal to the sponsor; /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend title to conform.


Printed Page 4162 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Rep. MCGEE explained the amendment.

Rep. SCOTT moved to table the amendment.

Rep. ALTMAN demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:

Yeas 35; Nays 66

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Brown, G.              Brown, J.              Brown, R.
Clyburn                Cobb-Hunter            Emory
Gilham                 Gourdine               Govan
Hines, J.              Hines, M.              Hosey
Jennings               Kennedy                Lee
Lloyd                  Lourie                 Mack
Martin                 McLeod                 Miller
Moody-Lawrence         Neal, J.H.             Neal, J.M.
Parks                  Rutherford             Scott
Sheheen                Smith, J.E.            Snow
Stille                 Townsend               Walker
Weeks                  Whipper

Total--35

Those who voted in the negative are:

Allison                Altman                 Barfield
Barrett                Bingham                Bowers
Campsen                Cato                   Chellis
Cotty                  Dantzler               Davenport
Delleney               Easterday              Edge
Fleming                Frye                   Hamilton
Harrison               Haskins                Hinson
Huggins                Keegan                 Kelley
Kirsh                  Koon                   Leach
Limehouse              Littlejohn             Loftis
Lucas                  McCraw                 McGee
Meacham-Richardson     Merrill                Neilson
Owens                  Perry                  Phillips
Quinn                  Rhoad                  Rice
Riser                  Sandifer               Scarborough
Sharpe                 Simrill                Sinclair

Printed Page 4163 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Smith, D.C.            Smith, G.M.            Smith, J.R.
Smith, W.D.            Stuart                 Talley
Taylor                 Thompson               Tripp
Trotter                Vaughn                 Webb
Whatley                White                  Wilkins
Witherspoon            Young, A.              Young, J.

Total--66

So, the House refused to table the amendment.

SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE IN CHAIR

Rep. TOWNSEND spoke against the amendment.
Rep. MCGEE spoke in favor of the amendment.

SPEAKER IN CHAIR

LEAVE OF ABSENCE

The SPEAKER granted Rep. W. D. SMITH a leave of absence for the remainder of the day.

Rep. MCGEE continued speaking.

Rep. SCOTT moved to adjourn debate on the amendment.

Rep. ALTMAN moved to table the motion, which was agreed to.

Rep. SCOTT moved to adjourn debate on the Bill until Tuesday, June 4.

Rep. TOWNSEND moved to table the motion.

Rep. MOODY-LAWRENCE demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:

Yeas 67; Nays 31

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Allison                Altman                 Barrett
Bingham                Bowers                 Campsen
Cato                   Chellis                Cooper

Printed Page 4164 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Cotty                  Dantzler               Davenport
Delleney               Easterday              Edge
Fleming                Frye                   Gilham
Hamilton               Harrell                Harrison
Hinson                 Huggins                Keegan
Kelley                 Kirsh                  Koon
Law                    Leach                  Limehouse
Littlejohn             Loftis                 Lourie
Lucas                  Martin                 McCraw
McGee                  Meacham-Richardson     Merrill
Owens                  Perry                  Phillips
Quinn                  Rice                   Riser
Sandifer               Scarborough            Simrill
Sinclair               Smith, D.C.            Smith, G.M.
Stuart                 Talley                 Taylor
Thompson               Townsend               Tripp
Vaughn                 Walker                 Webb
Whatley                White                  Wilder
Wilkins                Witherspoon            Young, A.
Young, J.

Total--67

Those who voted in the negative are:

Breeland               Brown, G.              Brown, J.
Brown, R.              Clyburn                Cobb-Hunter
Emory                  Gourdine               Govan
Hines, J.              Hines, M.              Hosey
Howard                 Lee                    Lloyd
Mack                   McLeod                 Miller
Moody-Lawrence         Neal, J.H.             Neal, J.M.
Neilson                Parks                  Rhoad
Rivers                 Rutherford             Scott
Smith, J.E.            Snow                   Weeks
Whipper

Total--31

So, the motion to adjourn debate was tabled.

The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.


Printed Page 4165 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Rep. SCOTT demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:

Yeas 56; Nays 50

Those who voted in the affirmative are:

Allison                Altman                 Barfield
Barrett                Bingham                Campsen
Cato                   Chellis                Cooper
Dantzler               Davenport              Delleney
Easterday              Edge                   Fleming
Frye                   Hamilton               Harrell
Harrison               Haskins                Hinson
Keegan                 Kelley                 Kirsh
Koon                   Law                    Leach
Limehouse              Loftis                 Lucas
McCraw                 McGee                  Meacham-Richardson
Merrill                Owens                  Perry
Phillips               Quinn                  Rice
Riser                  Sandifer               Scarborough
Simrill                Sinclair               Smith, G.M.
Talley                 Taylor                 Thompson
Tripp                  Vaughn                 Webb
White                  Wilkins                Witherspoon
Young, A.              Young, J.

Total--56

Those who voted in the negative are:

Bowers                 Breeland               Brown, G.
Brown, J.              Brown, R.              Carnell
Clyburn                Cobb-Hunter            Cotty
Emory                  Freeman                Gilham
Gourdine               Govan                  Hines, J.
Hines, M.              Hosey                  Howard
Huggins                Jennings               Kennedy
Lee                    Littlejohn             Lloyd
Lourie                 Mack                   Martin
McLeod                 Miller                 Moody-Lawrence
Neal, J.H.             Neal, J.M.             Neilson
Parks                  Rhoad                  Rivers
Rutherford             Scott                  Sharpe

Printed Page 4166 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

Sheheen                Smith, D.C.            Smith, J.E.
Smith, J.R.            Snow                   Stuart
Townsend               Walker                 Weeks
Whipper                Wilder

Total--50

So, the amendment was adopted.

RECURRENCE TO THE MORNING HOUR

Rep. TOWNSEND moved that the House recur to the Morning Hour, which was agreed to.

Further proceedings were interrupted by the House recurring to the Morning Hour, the pending question being consideration of amendments.

MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

The following was received:

Columbia, S.C., May 30, 2002
Mr. Speaker and Members of the House:
The Senate respectfully informs your Honorable Body that it concurs in the amendments proposed by the House to S. 1288:

S. 1288 (Word version) -- Senators Setzler, Knotts and Bauer: A BILL TO DIRECT THE LEXINGTON COUNTY OFFICIAL CHARGED WITH THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COLLECTING DELINQUENT TAXES, IN CONNECTION WITH THE REQUIREMENT FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES ON A WATERCRAFT AND OUTBOARD MOTOR, BE CURRENT BEFORE THE TITLE TO THESE ITEMS MAY BE TRANSFERRED, THAT THIS PROHIBITION ON THE TRANSFER OF TITLE APPLIES ONLY FOR PROPERTY TAXES DUE FOR PROPERTY TAX YEARS BEGINNING AFTER 1999, THAT USED WATERCRAFT AND USED OUTBOARD MOTORS OBTAINED FROM A LICENSED DEALER ON OR AFTER OCTOBER 3, 2000, ARE FREE OF THE LIEN FOR THE PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES FOR PROPERTY TAX YEARS BEFORE 2000, AND THAT NO REFUNDS OF PROPERTY TAXES


Printed Page 4167 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

ON WATERCRAFT AND OUTBOARD MOTORS ARE PAYABLE FOR PROPERTY TAX YEARS BEFORE.
and has ordered the Bill Enrolled for Ratification.

Very respectfully,
President
Received as information.

MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE

The following was received:

Columbia, S.C., May 30, 2002
Mr. Speaker and Members of the House:

The Senate respectfully informs your Honorable Body that it has confirmed the Governor's appointment of:

Berkeley County Master-in-Equity
Term Commencing: November 7, 2002
Term Expiring: November 7, 2008
Seat: Master-in-Equity

Reappointment
Mr. Robert E. Watson
Post Office Box 118
Moncks Corner, South Carolina 29461
843-761-4888

Very respectfully,
President of the Senate
Received as information.

REPORT OF STANDING COMMITTEE

Rep. FLEMING, from the Committee on Invitations and Memorial Resolutions, submitted a favorable report on:

S. 1308 (Word version) -- Senator Peeler: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION TO REQUEST THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO NAME INTERSTATE 85 IN CHEROKEE COUNTY AS THE "VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY" IN HONOR AND MEMORY OF THE VETERANS OF CHEROKEE COUNTY FOR


Printed Page 4168 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

THEIR FAITHFUL SERVICE TO THIS STATE AND OUR NATION AND REQUEST THAT THE DEPARTMENT ERECT APPROPRIATE SIGNS AND MARKERS REFLECTING THIS DESIGNATION.
Ordered for consideration tomorrow.

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

The following was introduced:

H. 5379 (Word version) -- Rep. Webb: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION TO COMMEND KHALIL GREENE OF THE CLEMSON UNIVERSITY BASEBALL TEAM FOR HIS OUTSTANDING ACCOMPLISHMENTS ON THE DIAMOND AND TO CONGRATULATE HIM ON BEING NAMED THE 2002 ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE BASEBALL PLAYER OF THE YEAR.

The Concurrent Resolution was agreed to and ordered sent to the Senate.

HOUSE RESOLUTION

The following was introduced:

H. 5380 (Word version) -- Rep. Huggins: A HOUSE RESOLUTION TO CONGRATULATE THE DUTCH FORK HIGH SCHOOL SILVER FOXES ON WINNING THE CLASS AAAA STATE GOLF CHAMPIONSHIP.

The Resolution was adopted.

INTRODUCTION OF BILL

The following Joint Resolution was introduced, read the first time, and referred to appropriate committee:

S. 1313 (Word version) -- Senators Hayes, Gregory and Short: A JOINT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF YORK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 4 (FORT MILL) TO IMPOSE


Printed Page 4169 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

AN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TAX NOT TO EXCEED FOUR MILLS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 ONLY.
On motion of Rep. MEACHAM-RICHARDSON, with unanimous consent, the Joint Resolution was ordered placed on the Calendar without reference.

H. 3601--RECALLED FROM SENATE

On motion of Rep. CATO, with unanimous consent, the following Bill was ordered recalled from the Senate:

H. 3601 (Word version) -- Reps. Huggins and Barfield: A BILL TO AMEND TITLE 27, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO PROPERTY AND CONVEYANCES, BY ADDING CHAPTER 50 SO AS TO REQUIRE A WRITTEN PROPERTY CONDITION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT UPON THE SALE OF CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, TO PROVIDE EXEMPTIONS FROM THIS REQUIREMENT, TO IMPOSE DUTIES ON OWNERS AND REAL ESTATE LICENSEES IN REGARD TO THESE REQUIREMENTS, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE REAL ESTATE COMMISSION TO PERFORM SPECIFIC DUTIES AND FUNCTIONS IN REGARD TO THESE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS.

H. 4337--RECALLED FROM SENATE

On motion of Rep. PERRY, with unanimous consent, the following Bill was ordered recalled from the Senate:

H. 4337 (Word version) -- Reps. Campsen, Chellis, Barfield, Harrell and Easterday: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 12-6-3910, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE DUE DATES FOR QUARTERLY PAYMENTS OF ESTIMATED STATE INCOME TAX BY ENACTING THE "SOUTH CAROLINA ESTIMATED INCOME TAX PAYMENT REFORM ACT", SO AS TO CHANGE THE DUE DATE FOR THE FIRST CORPORATE INCOME TAX ESTIMATED PAYMENT FROM MARCH 15 TO APRIL 15.

S. 419--REQUEST FOR DEBATE WITHDRAWN

Rep. J. E. SMITH, with unanimous consent, withdrew his request for debate on S. 419 (Word version); however, other requests for debate remained on the Bill.


Printed Page 4170 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

S. 1259--RECALLED FROM COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

On motion of Rep. LEACH, with unanimous consent, the following Joint Resolution was ordered recalled from the Committee on Judiciary:

S. 1259 (Word version) -- Senator Fair: A JOINT RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH THE SOUTH CAROLINA COVENANT MARRIAGE STUDY COMMITTEE, TO PROVIDE FOR ITS MEMBERSHIP, SCOPE OF STUDY, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, AND TO ABOLISH THE STUDY COMMITTEE UPON SUBMISSION OF ITS REPORT.

MOTION ADOPTED

Rep. SCOTT moved that upon the completion of the Ratification of Acts, the House stand adjourned, which was agreed to.

RATIFICATION OF ACTS

At 1:00 p.m. the House attended in the Senate Chamber, where the following Acts and Joint Resolutions were duly ratified:

(R396, S. 131 (Word version)) -- Senators Leatherman and Drummond: A JOINT RESOLUTION PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 16, ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, RELATING TO BENEFITS AND FUNDING OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PENSION PLANS IN THIS STATE AND INVESTMENTS ALLOWED FOR FUNDS OF THE VARIOUS STATE-OPERATED RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, SO AS TO DELETE THE RESTRICTIONS LIMITING SUCH INVESTMENTS TO AMERICAN-BASED CORPORATIONS REGISTERED ON AN AMERICAN NATIONAL EXCHANGE AS PROVIDED IN THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR QUOTED THROUGH THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS AUTOMATIC QUOTATION SYSTEM; AND PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 11, ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, RELATING TO RESTRICTIONS ON THE PLEDGING OF THE CREDIT OF THE STATE AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS OF THE STATE, SO AS TO PROVIDE FOR INVESTMENT OF FUNDS IN A SEPARATE PENSION PLAN FOR FIREFIGHTERS OFFERED BY A MUNICIPALITY, COUNTY, SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICT, OR PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT.


Printed Page 4171 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

(R397, S. 320 (Word version)) -- Senators Gregory, Peeler and Drummond: AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 50-11-2300, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO FUNDING OF THE OPERATION GAME THIEF PROGRAM, SO AS TO PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING FROM THE SALE OF OPERATION GAME THIEF PARAPHERNALIA AND TO AMEND SECTION 50-11-2310, RELATING TO PURPOSES FOR WHICH PROGRAM FUNDS MAY BE EXPENDED, SO AS TO PROVIDE FOR REWARD PAYMENTS FOR INFORMATION LEADING TO THE ARREST OF PERSONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF NATURAL RESOURCE LAWS, AND TO PROVIDE THAT PROGRAM FUNDS MAY BE EXPENDED FOR OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE "PROPERTY WATCH PROGRAM", THE "COASTAL WATCH PROGRAM", AND OTHER PROGRAMS WITHIN THE OPERATION GAME THIEF PROGRAM AND TO ENHANCE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN THE PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES.

(R398, S. 634 (Word version)) -- Senators Wilson and Ford: AN ACT TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 23-6-305 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT UPON RECEIVING PROPER AUTHORITY FROM THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, THE MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SHALL PROVIDE SELECTIVE SERVICE REGISTRATION FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS AT THE TIME IT ISSUES, RENEWS, OR PROVIDES A DUPLICATE COPY OF A DRIVER'S LICENSE OR IDENTIFICATION CARD, AND TO PROVIDE THAT THE MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION MUST INCLUDE CERTAIN INFORMATION IN AN APPLICATION FOR A DRIVER'S LICENSE OR IDENTIFICATION CARD THAT INFORMS THE APPLICANT THAT SUBMISSION OF THE APPLICATION SERVES AS CONSENT TO BE REGISTERED WITH THE SELECTIVE SERVICE UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.

(R399, S. 668 (Word version)) -- Senator J. V. Smith: AN ACT TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 41-27-235 SO AS TO ALLOW NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES THE OPTION OF ELECTION AS A REIMBURSABLE EMPLOYER FOR PURPOSES OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY LAW; TO AMEND SECTION


Printed Page 4172 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

41-27-210, RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF "EMPLOYER", SO AS TO EXTEND THE DEFINITION TO ANY NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBE AND ANY EMPLOYING UNIT REQUIRED TO PAY THE FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT TAX; TO AMEND SECTION 41-27-260, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF "EMPLOYMENT", SO AS TO EXTEND THE DEFINITION TO AN APPOINTED SUCCESSOR TO AN ELECTED OFFICIAL AND ADD AN EXEMPTION DEFINITION PERTAINING TO NATIVE AMERICANS; TO AMEND SECTION 41-31-40, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO AN EMPLOYER'S BASE RATE COMPUTATION PERIOD, SO AS TO EXPERIENCE RATE NEW EMPLOYERS AFTER TWELVE MONTHS AT THE NEXT ANNUAL RATING FOLLOWING THE YEAR IN WHICH THEY REACH THEIR TWELVE-MONTH EXPERIENCE STATUS; TO AMEND SECTION 41-31-60, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE EMPLOYER DELINQUENT REPORT PENALTY, SO AS TO REDUCE THIS PENALTY; TO AMEND SECTION 41-31-110, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE SUCCESSOR RATING PERIOD, SO AS TO REDUCE THE RATING PERIOD TO ONCE A YEAR; TO AMEND SECTION 41-31-160, RELATING TO CONTRIBUTION REPORTS, SO AS TO REQUIRE ELECTRONIC CONTRIBUTION AND WAGE REPORTS FOR EMPLOYERS REPORTING TWO HUNDRED FIFTY OR MORE EMPLOYEES IN 2003 AND EMPLOYERS REPORTING ONE HUNDRED OR MORE EMPLOYEES IN 2005; AND TO AMEND SECTION 41-33-80, RELATING TO THE UNEMPLOYMENT TRUST FUND, SO AS TO CORRECT A REFERENCE.

(R400, S. 966 (Word version)) -- Senator Leatherman: AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 59-133-30, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY, SO AS TO DELETE THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD MAY NOT EXCEED FIVE MEMBERS; AND TO AMEND SECTION 59-133-40, RELATING TO MEETINGS OF THE BOARD, SO AS TO DELETE THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE BOARD MAY ONLY MEET IN FLORENCE.

(R401, S. 1085 (Word version)) -- Senator McConnell: AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 40-5-210, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA,


Printed Page 4173 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

1976, RELATING TO THE STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, SO AS TO REVISE CERTAIN QUALIFICATIONS OF MEMBERS OF THE BOARD AND PROVIDE THAT THE MEMBERSHIP, TERMS, AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD SHALL BE AS SET BY THE SUPREME COURT EXCEPT THAT AT LEAST ONE MEMBER OF THE BOARD FROM EACH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT MUST BE APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT; AND TO AMEND SECTION 40-5-80, RELATING TO CITIZENS NOT PREVENTED FROM PROSECUTING OR DEFENDING THEIR OWN CAUSE OR THE CAUSE OF ANOTHER, SO AS TO DELETE THE AUTHORITY OF A CITIZEN TO DEFEND THE CAUSE OF ANOTHER UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS.

(R402, S. 1087 (Word version)) -- Senator Branton: AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 30-15-60, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO OBTAINING A CERTIFIED COPY OF A VETERAN'S REGISTERED DISCHARGE, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A DD 214 OR OTHER DISCHARGE RECORD FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT IS NOT A PUBLIC RECORD AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO INSPECTION OR DISCLOSURE; TO MAKE IT UNLAWFUL TO DISCLOSE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE RECORD; TO ENUMERATE WHO MAY EXAMINE OR OBTAIN A COPY OF SUCH RECORD; TO PROHIBIT THESE RECORDS FROM BEING USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES; AND TO PROHIBIT A PERSON WHO IS AUTHORIZED TO OBTAIN THIS INFORMATION FROM DISSEMINATING OR DISCLOSING SUCH INFORMATION.

(R403, S. 1133 (Word version)) -- Senator Moore: A JOINT RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A COMMITTEE TO STUDY CERTAIN ISSUES AFFECTING VETERANS AND PROVIDE FOR RELATED MATTERS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AND DUTIES, THE FILLING OF VACANCIES, AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS AND STAFFING.

(R404, S. 1157 (Word version)) -- Senator Alexander: AN ACT TO PROVIDE THAT STUDENTS WHO RESIDE IN AND ATTEND A PUBLIC SCHOOL IN OCONEE COUNTY AND WHO PARTICIPATE IN INTERSCHOLASTIC SOCCER OR AS A MEMBER OF A SCHOOL


Printed Page 4174 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

SOCCER SQUAD MAY PARTICIPATE IN ORGANIZED SOCCER THAT IS INDEPENDENT OF THE CONTROL OF THE SCHOOL UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS; AND TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 59-63-70 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT DURING THE SEASON FOR ANY HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE SPORT EXCEPT FOR FOOTBALL, A STUDENT WHILE A MEMBER OF A SCHOOL TEAM MAY PARTICIPATE ON A TEAM THAT IS INDEPENDENT OF THE SCHOOL'S CONTROL UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS.

(R405, S. 1195 (Word version)) -- Senator Martin: AN ACT TO ENACT THE "SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PICKENS COUNTY SCHOOL BOND PROPERTY TAX RELIEF ACT" WHICH AUTHORIZES THE IMPOSITION OF THE ONE PERCENT SALES AND USE TAX WITHIN PICKENS COUNTY UPON APPROVAL IN A REFERENDUM TO BE USED FOR SPECIFIED SCHOOL PURPOSES.

(R406, S. 1226 (Word version)) -- Senator Land: AN ACT TO REPEAL SECTION 50-11-1280, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO RESTRICTIONS ON SHOOTING PRESERVES IN GAME ZONES 7 AND 9.

(R407, H. 3309 (Word version)) -- Reps. Cobb-Hunter and McLeod: AN ACT TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING CHAPTER 105 TO TITLE 59 SO AS TO ENACT THE "SOUTH CAROLINA CAMPUS SEXUAL ASSAULT INFORMATION ACT" WHICH REQUIRES INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING TO DEVELOP, PUBLISH, AND IMPLEMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES TO PROMOTE PREVENTION, AWARENESS, AND REMEDIES FOR CAMPUS SEXUAL ASSAULT; TO AMEND TITLE 59, BY ADDING CHAPTER 106 SO AS TO ENACT THE "SOUTH CAROLINA CAMPUS SEX CRIMES PREVENTION ACT" WHICH PROVIDES THAT EACH INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION MUST INCLUDE A STATEMENT IN THEIR ANNUAL SECURITY REPORT WHICH ADVISES WHERE LAW ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED CONCERNING REGISTERED SEX OFFENDERS; TO AMEND SECTION 23-3-460, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO REGISTRATION OF SEX OFFENDERS, SO AS TO REQUIRE OFFENDERS WHO ARE


Printed Page 4175 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

ENROLLED AT, EMPLOYED BY, OR CARRYING ON A VOCATION AT AN INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION TO PROVIDE CERTAIN WRITTEN NOTICE OF A CHANGE IN STATUS; TO AMEND SECTION 16-3-510, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO UNLAWFUL HAZING WHILE INITIATING OR ADMITTING PERSONS INTO CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS AND ENTITIES, SO AS TO REVISE THE ORGANIZATIONS AND ENTITIES TO WHICH THE SECTION APPLIES; AND TO ADD SECTION 59-63-275 SO AS TO PROHIBIT HAZING AT ALL PUBLIC EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND TO DEFINE HAZING FOR THIS PURPOSE.

(R408, H. 3324 (Word version)) -- Rep. Perry: AN ACT TO REPEAL CHAPTER 27, TITLE 1, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE SOUTH CAROLINA ADVISORY COMMISSION ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS; TO AMEND SECTION 1-11-250, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS IN REGARD TO THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANAGEMENT, SO AS TO DELETE THE DEFINITION OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE MANAGEMENT COUNCIL; TO AMEND SECTION 1-11-260, RELATING TO POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANAGEMENT, SO AS TO DELETE REFERENCES TO THE MOTOR VEHICLE MANAGEMENT COUNCIL, AND TO REPEAL SECTIONS 1-11-230 AND 1-11-240 RELATING TO THE MOTOR VEHICLE MANAGEMENT COUNCIL.

(R409, H. 3515 (Word version)) -- Reps. Sandifer, Robinson, Allison, Altman, Askins, Barfield, Barrett, Bingham, Carnell, Cato, Chellis, Cobb-Hunter, Cooper, Dantzler, Harrell, Huggins, Keegan, Kelley, Kirsh, Klauber, Law, Leach, Martin, Meacham-Richardson, J.M. Neal, Phillips, Rice, Riser, Simrill, D.C. Smith, W.D. Smith, Snow, Talley, Taylor, Thompson, Trotter, Walker, Whipper, Wilder, A. Young, McLeod, Davenport, Emory, Sinclair and Knotts: AN ACT TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 40-19-235 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A NONRESIDENT EMBALMER OR FUNERAL DIRECTOR MAY BE LICENSED IN THIS STATE IF THE LICENSURE REQUIREMENTS OF HIS STATE ARE SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO REQUIREMENTS OF THIS STATE AND TO REQUIRE FIVE YEARS OF PRACTICE AND PASSAGE OF AN


Printed Page 4176 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

EXAMINATION FOR LICENSURE WHEN THE LICENSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ANOTHER STATE ARE NOT SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO REQUIREMENTS IN THIS STATE; TO ADD SECTION 40-19-265 SO AS TO ESTABLISH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FUNERAL HOMES, BRANCH FUNERAL HOMES, RETAIL SALES OUTLETS, AND CREMATORIES; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-10, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF FUNERAL SERVICE, SO AS TO REQUIRE ALL FUNERAL DIRECTORS AND EMBALMERS SERVING ON THE BOARD TO BE ACTIVELY EMPLOYED OR ENGAGED IN THE FUNERAL SERVICE PROFESSION; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-20, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS CONCERNING EMBALMERS AND FUNERAL DIRECTORS, SO AS TO REVISE THE DEFINITIONS OF "BRANCH FUNERAL HOME", "CHAPEL", "DISPOSITION", "FUNERAL MERCHANDISE", AND "MANAGER" AND TO DEFINE "RETAIL SALES OUTLET" AND "OWNER"; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-110, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO GROUNDS FOR MISCONDUCT, SO AS TO PROHIBIT SOLICITING THE SALE OF FUNERAL MERCHANDISE AND TO CLARIFY OTHER GROUNDS; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-230, RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS FOR LICENSURE, SO AS TO CHANGE THE ACCREDITING BODY FOR EMBALMING COLLEGES AND TO CONFORM PROVISIONS TO THE REVISED LICENSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR OUT-OF-STATE EMBALMERS AND FUNERAL DIRECTORS; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-270, RELATING TO PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS OF FUNERAL ESTABLISHMENTS AND CREMATORIES, SO AS TO APPLY CERTAIN OF THESE PROVISIONS TO RETAIL SALES OUTLETS, TO PROVIDE THAT ALL PERMITS ARE VALID FOR TWO YEARS, AND TO PROVIDE WHEN A MANAGER MUST BE EMPLOYED BY A FUNERAL ESTABLISHMENT; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-280, RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT A PERSON BE LICENSED TO HOLD HIMSELF OUT AS PRACTICING FUNERAL SERVICE OR OPERATING A FUNERAL ESTABLISHMENT, SO AS TO ALSO APPLY THIS LICENSURE REQUIREMENT TO A PERSON OPERATING A CREMATORY OR A RETAIL SALES OUTLET; TO AMEND SECTION 40-19-290, RELATING TO DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION AND EXPENSES TO CLIENTS BY FUNERAL ESTABLISHMENTS, SO

Printed Page 4177 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

AS TO ALSO REQUIRE CREMATORIES AND RETAIL SALES OUTLETS TO DISCLOSE SUCH INFORMATION AND EXPENSES TO ITS CLIENTS AND TO REQUIRE PAYMENTS RECEIVED BY THESE ESTABLISHMENTS FOR FUNERAL MERCHANDISE TO BE PLACED IN A TRUST ACCOUNT UNTIL DELIVERY; AND BY AMENDING TITLE 40 RELATING TO OCCUPATIONS AND PROFESSIONS BY ADDING CHAPTER 8 SO AS TO ENACT THE "SOUTH CAROLINA PERPETUAL CARE CEMETERY ACT", TO ESTABLISH THE SOUTH CAROLINA PERPETUAL CARE CEMETERY BOARD, TO PROVIDE FOR ITS MEMBERS, POWERS, AND DUTIES AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATION OF CEMETERIES, BURIAL GROUNDS, AND CONTRACTS OR AGREEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE FINAL DISPOSITION OF A DEAD HUMAN BODY, TO REQUIRE LICENSURE OF AN ENTITY OPERATING A PERPETUAL CARE CEMETERY COMPANY, TO ESTABLISH LICENSURE PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THESE ENTITIES, AND TO FURTHER PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATION OF THESE ENTITIES; AND TO REPEAL CHAPTER 55, TITLE 39 RELATING TO CEMETERIES AND THE "SOUTH CAROLINA CEMETERY ACT OF 1984".

(R410, H. 3851 (Word version)) -- Reps. J.E. Smith and Rodgers: AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 6-1-530, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO REVENUE GENERATED BY THE LOCAL ACCOMMODATIONS TAX, SO AS TO ALSO REQUIRE THEIR USE FOR OTHER TOURISM-RELATED LANDS AND WATER ACCESS; TO AMEND SECTION 6-4-5, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS FOR PURPOSES OF ALLOCATION OF THE LOCAL ACCOMMODATIONS TAX, SO AS TO DELETE A REFERENCE TO THE STATE TAX OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE AND TO DELETE THE DEFINITION FOR "TOURIST"; AND TO AMEND SECTION 6-4-25, RELATING TO ADVISORY COMMITTEES TO RECOMMEND EXPENDITURE OF ACCOMMODATIONS TAX REVENUE, SO AS TO REQUIRE APPOINTMENT OF THE COMMITTEE BY A MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY RECEIVING MORE THAN FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS, INSTEAD OF TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS.


Printed Page 4178 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

(R411, H. 4096 (Word version)) -- Rep. Cato: AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 38-1-20, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS USED IN TITLE 38 PERTAINING TO INSURANCE, SO AS TO ADD AND REDEFINE CERTAIN DEFINITIONS TO COMPLY, CONFORM, AND BE CONSISTENT WITH THE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 43 OF TITLE 38 IN THIS ACT; TO AMEND CHAPTER 43, TITLE 38, RELATING TO INSURANCE AGENTS AND AGENCIES, SO AS TO, AMONG OTHER THINGS, ESTABLISH A UNIFORM STANDARD FOR PERFORMING THE DUTIES OF A PRODUCER, PROVIDE UNIFORM EXCEPTIONS TO LICENSURE AMONG STATES FOR INDIVIDUALS NOT LICENSED AS INSURANCE PRODUCERS, CLARIFY THE REQUIREMENT FOR AGENCY LICENSURE, REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT THAT AN INSURER LICENSE AN AGENT AND INSTEAD REQUIRE AN INSURER APPOINT A LICENSED AGENT, ESTABLISH STANDARD NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR INSURERS AND PRODUCERS WHEN A PRODUCER'S CONTRACT IS CANCELED, PROVIDE IMMUNITY AND CONFIDENTIALITY FOR THESE NOTIFICATIONS, ESTABLISH NONRESIDENT LICENSING STANDARDS FOR PRODUCERS AMONG STATES, ESTABLISH INSURANCE LINES OF AUTHORITY A PRODUCER MAY BE LICENSED FOR IN THE STATE, ESTABLISH FEE STANDARDS FOR LICENSURE AND APPOINTMENT OF AN INSURANCE PRODUCER, ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLICATION FOR A PRODUCER LICENSE, ESTABLISH A UNIFORM STANDARD FOR NONRESIDENT PRODUCER'S EXEMPTION FROM PRE-LICENSING EDUCATION AND EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDE UNIFORM STANDARDS FOR ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY PRODUCER LICENSE, REQUIRE PRODUCER PRE-LICENSING EDUCATION COURSES TO BE REVIEWED BY THE CONTINUING EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE, ESTABLISH AN ADDITIONAL EXEMPTION FROM PRODUCER CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, ADD A REINSTATEMENT PROVISION FOR A PRODUCER'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LICENSING REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDE ADDITIONAL OFFENSES FOR WHICH DISCIPLINARY ACTION MAY BE WARRANTED, AND ESTABLISH REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCERS AGAINST WHOM ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION HAS BEEN TAKEN.


Printed Page 4179 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

(R412, H. 4180 (Word version)) -- Reps. Sandifer and Cato: AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 38-55-330, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO FUNERAL DIRECTORS ACTING AS AGENTS FOR LIFE INSURERS FOR FUNDING PRENEED FUNERAL CONTRACTS, SO AS TO DELETE THE PROVISION REQUIRING THE SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF FUNERAL SERVICE TO VERIFY THAT SUCH AN INSURANCE POLICY IS CONSISTENT WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR PRENEED FUNERAL CONTRACTS; AND TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY PROVISIONS RELATING TO MINIMUM VALUES OF ANY PAID UP ANNUITY, CASH SURRENDER, OR DEATH BENEFITS AVAILABLE UNDER CERTAIN ANNUITIES.

(R413, H. 4909 (Word version)) -- Rep. Bingham: AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 39-24-40, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUG PRESCRIPTIONS AUTHORIZING SUBSTITUTION OF A GENERIC DRUG, SO AS TO AUTHORIZE A PHARMACIST TO MAINTAIN GENERIC SUBSTITUTION RECORDS ELECTRONICALLY AND TO CONFORM THESE PROVISIONS TO OTHER GENERIC SUBSTITUTION PROVISIONS; TO AMEND SECTION 40-43-30, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED IN THE PHARMACY PRACTICE ACT, SO AS TO DEFINE "CERTIFIED PHARMACY TECHNICIAN"; TO AMEND SECTION 40-43-60, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO, AMONG OTHER THINGS, AUTHORIZATION OF A HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER DISPENSING DRUGS THAT THE PRACTITIONER OWNS, SO AS TO ALSO AUTHORIZE A PRACTITIONER TO DISPENSE A COMPLIMENTARY TRIAL SUPPLY OF DRUGS OWNED BY THE PRACTITIONER OR AN INSTITUTION AUTHORIZED TO POSSESS MEDICATIONS; TO AMEND SECTION 40-43-82, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO REGISTRATION QUALIFICATIONS FOR PHARMACY TECHNICIANS, SO AS TO REVISE THESE QUALIFICATIONS AND TO FURTHER SPECIFY APPLICATION AND RENEWAL PROCEDURES; TO AMEND SECTION 40-43-86, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO VARIOUS PHARMACY FACILITY AND PRACTICE REQUIREMENTS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT IN PROVIDING ADEQUATE STAFFING, A PHARMACIST-IN-CHARGE IS NOT REQUIRED TO EMPLOY CERTIFIED PHARMACY TECHNICIANS, TO PROVIDE THAT


Printed Page 4180 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AND DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT FACILITIES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE A CONSULTANT PHARMACIST AND TO AUTHORIZE OTHER HEALTH PROFESSIONALS WITH THESE SERVICES OR FACILITIES TO PERFORM THE DUTIES THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT PHARMACIST, AND TO AUTHORIZE A PHARMACIST TO MAINTAIN GENERIC SUBSTITUTION RECORDS ELECTRONICALLY AND TO CONFORM THOSE PROVISIONS TO OTHER GENERIC SUBSTITUTION PROVISIONS; TO AMEND SECTION 40-43-89, RELATING TO VARIOUS REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO WHOLESALE PHARMACY DISTRIBUTORS, SO AS TO CLARIFY PROVISIONS AND TO DELETE DUPLICATE STATUTORY PROVISIONS RELATING TO PERMIT APPLICATION PROCEDURES; TO AMEND SECTION 40-43-90, RELATING TO PERMIT APPLICATION PROCEDURES, SO AS TO FURTHER PROVIDE FOR PERMIT RENEWAL PROCEDURES AND FOR CHANGE OF NAME OR OWNER CIRCUMSTANCE WHICH REQUIRE A NEW PERMIT TO BE OBTAINED; TO AMEND SECTION 40-43-91, RELATING TO INFORMATION THAT MUST BE REPORTED TO THE BOARD OF PHARMACY ON DRUG THEFT AND EMPLOYEE DRUG CONVICTIONS, SO AS TO INCREASE THE TIME FOR REPORTING THESE EVENTS FROM THREE TO THIRTY DAYS; TO AMEND SECTION 40-43-110, RELATING TO PHARMACY PERMIT AND LICENSE APPLICATION AND RENEWAL PROCEDURES, SO AS TO FURTHER SPECIFY AND CLARIFY THESE PROCEDURES; AND TO AMEND SECTION 40-43-130, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PHARMACISTS, SO AS TO ALSO PROVIDE CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTERED PHARMACY TECHNICIANS.

(R414, H. 4968 (Word version)) -- Rep. Sharpe: AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 47-9-300, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE EXPIRATION AND RENEWAL OF LIVESTOCK BRANDS, SO AS TO DELETE THE PROVISION THAT PROVIDES FOR THE EXPIRATION AND RENEWAL OF THE REGISTRATION, CERTIFICATION, AND RECORDING OF CERTAIN LIVESTOCK BRANDS, AND TO PROVIDE THAT A REGISTERED BRAND FOR LIVESTOCK IS THE PROPERTY OF


Printed Page 4181 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

THE PERSON ADOPTING AND REGISTERING THE BRAND, HIS HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, UNTIL AND UNLESS THE BRAND IS CANCELLED OR REVOKED; TO AMEND SECTION 47-9-340, RELATING TO CANCELLATION OF THE REGISTRATION OF A LIVESTOCK BRAND, SO AS TO DELETE THE PROVISION THAT REQUIRES THE SECRETARY OF STATE TO CANCEL THE REGISTRATION OF A LIVESTOCK BRAND UPON THE FAILURE OF A PERSON TO RENEW THE REGISTRATION UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES; AND TO REPEAL SECTIONS 47-9-310 AND 47-9-320, RELATING TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S DUTY TO NOTIFY A LIVESTOCK BRAND REGISTRANT OF THE NECESSITY TO RENEW THE REGISTRATION OF HIS BRAND UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, AND RELATING TO THE ABANDONMENT OF A LIVESTOCK BRAND.

(R415, H. 5105 (Word version)) -- Reps. Cato and A. Young: AN ACT TO AMEND CHAPTER 10, TITLE 56, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL SECURITY BY ADDING ARTICLE 7 SO AS TO ENACT THE "MOTORIST INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION DATABASE PROGRAM ACT", TO PROVIDE DEFINITIONS FOR CERTAIN TERMS, TO PROVIDE THAT THE INTENT OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO HELP REDUCE THE UNINSURED MOTORIST POPULATION IN THE STATE AND TO MEASURE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE MOTORIST INSURANCE DATABASE ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE, AND TO ESTABLISH A DATABASE TO BE USED WHEN VERIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE'S MOTOR VEHICLE FINANCIAL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS, TO PROVIDE THAT THE MOTORIST INSURANCE DATABASE PROGRAM SHALL BE ADMINISTERED BY THE MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, TO PROVIDE THAT THE MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION SHALL DISCLOSE AN INDIVIDUAL'S REPORTED DATABASE INFORMATION UPON REQUEST BY CERTAIN PERSONS AND AGENCIES FOR A FEE THAT MUST BE USED TO DEFRAY THE DIVISION'S EXPENSES, TO PROVIDE THAT THE STATE AND INSURERS ARE NOT LIABLE FOR PERFORMING THEIR LEGAL DUTIES PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE; TO AMEND SECTION 56-10-553, AS AMENDED,


Printed Page 4182 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

RELATING TO THE COLLECTION OF CERTAIN DATA BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY THROUGH THE USE OF RANDOM SAMPLING, SO AS TO ELIMINATE THE RANDOM SAMPLING PROCEDURE; TO AMEND SECTION 56-10-225, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO PROOF OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY BY A PERSON WHO HAS A MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTERED IN HIS NAME, SO AS TO MAKE TECHNICAL CHANGES, TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE UPON WHICH A PERSON WHO IS CHARGED WITH FAILING TO MAINTAIN PROOF OF INSURANCE IN HIS MOTOR VEHICLE MAY HAVE THE CHARGE DISMISSED UPON SHOWING THE COURT THAT THE MOTOR VEHICLE WAS INSURED AT THE TIME HE WAS CHARGED, AND TO REVISE THE PENALTY FOR THIS OFFENSE; TO AMEND SECTION 56-10-520, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT A PERSON WHO SEEKS TO REGISTER A MOTOR VEHICLE MUST DECLARE THAT THE VEHICLE TO BE REGISTERED IS INSURED, SO AS TO REVISE THE PENALTIES FOR A PERSON WHO OPERATES AN UNINSURED MOTOR VEHICLE, AND A PERSON WHO PRESENTS A FALSE CERTIFICATE THAT A MOTOR VEHICLE IS AN INSURED MOTOR VEHICLE OR FALSE EVIDENCE THAT A MOTOR VEHICLE SOUGHT TO BE REGISTERED IS AN INSURED MOTOR VEHICLE, TO DELETE THE PROVISION THAT MAKES CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THIS SECTION INAPPLICABLE IF THE MOTOR VEHICLE OWNER HAD GOOD CAUSE TO BELIEVE AND BELIEVED THAT THE MOTOR VEHICLE WAS INSURED, TO MAKE TECHNICAL CHANGES, TO SUBSTITUTE THE TERM "NOTICE OF VIOLATION" FOR THE TERM "RECORD OF HIS CONVICTION OF VIOLATION", TO PROVIDE THAT THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MAY RELIEVE A PERSON OF THE REQUIREMENT OF FURNISHING PROOF OF FUTURE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY WHEN THREE YEARS HAVE ELAPSED FROM THE DATE PROOF WAS REQUIRED INSTEAD OF FROM THE DATE OF SUSPENSION; TO AMEND SECTION 56-10-40, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT PROVIDERS OF LIABILITY INSURANCE AND PROVIDERS OF SECURITY IN LIEU OF LIABILITY INSURANCE MUST NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OF THE LAPSE OR TERMINATION OF AN INSURANCE POLICY OR SECURITY IT HAS ISSUED, AND

Printed Page 4183 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

THAT PROVIDES THAT THE DEPARTMENT MUST NOTIFY THE PERSON WHOSE INSURANCE POLICY OR SECURITY HAS LAPSED OR HAS BEEN TERMINATED, SO AS TO REVISE THE PROCEDURE IN WHICH AN INSURANCE PROVIDER MUST NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT WHEN AN INSURANCE POLICY OR SECURITY HAS LAPSED OR HAS BEEN TERMINATED; TO AMEND SECTION 56-10-240, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT AN UNINSURED MOTOR VEHICLE MUST BE INSURED WITHIN A SPECIFIC PERIOD OF TIME OR THE OWNER MUST SURRENDER ITS REGISTRATION AND LICENSE PLATE, SO AS TO DELETE THE PROVISION THAT PROVIDES THE PROCEDURE AN INSURER MUST INFORM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY WHEN A MOTOR VEHICLE BECOMES UNINSURED, TO PROVIDE THAT THE DEPARTMENT MAY AUTHORIZE INSURERS TO UTILIZE ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF PROVIDING NOTICE OF NEW POLICIES WRITTEN AND RENEWALS TO THE DEPARTMENT, TO DELETE THE PROVISION THAT REQUIRES LICENSE PLATES SURRENDERED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION BE FORWARDED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, AND TO ELIMINATE THE REINSTATEMENT FEE CHARGED TO A PERSON WHO VOLUNTARILY SURRENDERS HIS LICENSE PLATES AND REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE BEFORE THEIR SUSPENSION; BY ADDING SECTION 56-10-46 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A PERSON WHO RESPONDS TO THE NOTICE CONTAINED IN SECTION 56-10-40 WHO PURCHASED INSURANCE AFTER RECEIVING THE NOTICE SHALL HAVE HIS MOTOR VEHICLE RECORD NOTED TO INDICATE THAT HE WILL BE SUBJECT TO REGULAR REQUESTS FOR PROOF OF INSURANCE FROM THE MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION; BY ADDING SECTION 56-10-615 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION SHALL OBTAIN INFORMATION FROM INSURERS REGARDING CANCELLATIONS OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE POLICIES, TO PROVIDE THAT THE DIVISION SHALL REQUEST PROOF OF INSURANCE FROM PERSONS IDENTIFIED BY THE MOTORIST INSURANCE DATABASE, AND TO PROVIDE A PENALTY FOR A PERSON WHO FAILS TO RESPOND TO THE DIVISION; TO AMEND SECTION 38-73-470, RELATING TO THE DISPOSITION OF THE UNINSURED MOTORIST PREMIUM, SO AS TO INCREASE THE FEE AND REVISE THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FEE; TO

Printed Page 4184 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

REPEAL SECTION 56-10-270, RELATING TO THE OPERATION OF AN UNINSURED MOTOR VEHICLE; AND TO REPEAL SECTION 56-3-220, RELATING TO DEALER SOLD CARDS.

(R416, H. 5106 (Word version)) -- Reps. Parks, Breeland, Whipper, Clyburn, Moody-Lawrence, Harrison, Lloyd, J. Hines, Weeks, Allen, Allison, Bales, Barrett, Battle, Bingham, Bowers, G. Brown, J. Brown, R. Brown, Carnell, Cato, Cobb-Hunter, Coleman, Freeman, Frye, Gilham, Gourdine, Govan, Harrell, Haskins, Hayes, M. Hines, Hosey, Howard, Huggins, Keegan, Kelley, Kennedy, Kirsh, Koon, Leach, Lee, Lourie, Lucas, Mack, Martin, McGee, McLeod, Meacham-Richardson, Miller, J.H. Neal, Neilson, Ott, Perry, Quinn, Rhoad, Rodgers, Rutherford, Scott, Sheheen, Simrill, F.N. Smith, J.E. Smith, W.D. Smith, Stille, Stuart, Talley, Taylor, Thompson, Townsend, Walker, Wilder and A. Young: AN ACT TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 40-47-97 SO AS TO EXEMPT A TEAM PHYSICIAN LICENSED IN ANOTHER STATE FROM LICENSURE IN THIS STATE IF THE PHYSICIAN IS EMPLOYED OR DESIGNATED AS THE TEAM PHYSICIAN FOR A TEAM VISITING THIS STATE AND THE PHYSICIAN ONLY TREATS THE TEAM MEMBERS, COACHES, AND STAFF.

(R417, H. 5133 (Word version)) -- Rep. Townsend: AN ACT TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 59-101-290 SO AS TO REQUIRE PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING TO NOTIFY INCOMING STUDENTS OR THEIR PARENTS OF THE RISK OF CONTRACTING MENINGOCOCCAL DISEASE AND HEPATITIS B IF LIVING IN ON-CAMPUS STUDENT HOUSING AND TO REQUIRE THESE INSTITUTIONS TO RECOMMEND VACCINATION AGAINST THESE DISEASES IN THE INSTITUTION'S HEALTH AND MEDICAL INFORMATION PROVIDED TO STUDENTS AND PARENTS; AND TO PROVIDE THAT PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING MAY ELECT TO BE GOVERNED BY THIS ACT AND MAY REMOVE ITSELF FROM SUCH GOVERNANCE AT ANY TIME.

(R418, H. 5196 (Word version)) -- Reps. Klauber, Carnell and Parks: AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE GOVERNING BODY OF GREENWOOD COUNTY TO CONVERT A SUBDISTRICT CREATED UNDER


Printed Page 4185 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

THE PROVISIONS OF ACT 441 OF 1959, WHICH CREATED THE GREENWOOD METROPOLITAN DISTRICT, TO A SPECIAL TAX DISTRICT, TRANSFER ALL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF A SUBDISTRICT TO THE SPECIAL TAX DISTRICT, DISSOLVE THE TAX DISTRICT AT THE REQUEST OF ITS COMMISSIONERS, AND REFUND CERTAIN EXCESS AMOUNTS OF MONIES TO THE TAXPAYERS WHO OWN PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT.

(R419, H. 5215 (Word version)) -- Reps. Taylor and Wilder: AN ACT TO AMEND ACT 779 OF 1988, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO LAURENS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS 55 AND 56, SO AS TO REVISE AND REDEFINE THE SINGLE-MEMBER DISTRICTS FROM WHICH TRUSTEES ARE ELECTED; DESIGNATE MAP NUMBERS ON WHICH THESE DISTRICTS ARE DELINEATED; TO MAKE TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS; AND TO DELETE ARCHAIC PROVISIONS.

(R420, H. 5289 (Word version)) -- Reps. Jennings and Freeman: AN ACT TO AMEND ACT 256 OF 1981, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF MARLBORO COUNTY, SO AS TO REDESIGNATE THE EIGHT ELECTION DISTRICTS FROM WHICH MEMBERS OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT ARE ELECTED, DESIGNATE A MAP NUMBER ON WHICH THE ELECTION DISTRICTS ARE DELINEATED, AND DELETE PROVISIONS WHICH PROVIDED THAT THE MEMBERS ARE ELECTED FROM ELECTION DISTRICTS WHICH CORRESPOND TO THE EIGHT SINGLE-MEMBER ELECTION DISTRICTS FROM WHICH MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF MARLBORO COUNTY ARE ELECTED.

RETURNED WITH CONCURRENCE

The Senate returned to the House with concurrence the following:

H. 4327 (Word version) -- Reps. Kennedy, Snow and Harvin: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION TO REQUEST THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO NAME THAT PORTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA HIGHWAY 41 BYPASS, WHICH CREATES PART OF THE BOUNDARY OF WILLIAMSBURG AND GEORGETOWN COUNTIES, BETWEEN SOUTH CAROLINA HIGHWAY 41 AND HORSEPEN CREEK, "SIMPSON PRICE ROAD" AND TO PLACE


Printed Page 4186 . . . . . Thursday, May 30, 2002

APPROPRIATE MARKERS OR SIGNS ON THE HIGHWAY REFLECTING THIS DESIGNATION.

H. 5297 (Word version) -- Reps. Meacham-Richardson, Kirsh, Simrill, Moody-Lawrence, McCraw, Delleney and Emory: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING PARAMOUNT'S CAROWINDS THEME PARK FOR ITS NUMEROUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE STATE BY DECLARING MAY 29, 2002, "PARAMOUNT'S CAROWINDS DAY".

ADJOURNMENT

At 1:20 p.m. the House, in accordance with the motion of Rep. WEBB, adjourned in memory of John B. Thomas of Clemson, to meet at 10:00 a.m. tomorrow.

***

This web page was last updated on Thursday, June 25, 2009 at 1:04 P.M.