Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter

The Senate assembled at 12:00 Noon, the hour to which it stood adjourned, and was called to order by the PRESIDENT Pro Tempore.

A quorum being present, the proceedings were opened with a devotion by the Chaplain as follows:

Beloved, St. Paul was a man with a mission, and it was his attitude that carried him through! Listen to his words (II Cor. 4:18):

"So we do not look at what we can see right now, these troubles all around us, but we look forward..."
Let us pray.

O God of ancient days and our day: we remember the verdicts of history that where there is no vision, the people perish.

We come to You before we negotiate with each other!

Inspire us, O Lord, with zest and zeal for the progressive fashioning of the South Carolina of our dreams.

We know that "Rome was not built in a day," so give us patience. But help us to move forward guided by The Spirit of which Carl Daw wrote some time back:

"Like the murmur of the dove's song,

Like the challenge of her flight,

Like the vigor of the wind's rush,

Like the new flame's eager might!

So, Come Holy Spirit, Come!"
Amen.

At 12:05 P.M., on motion of Senator MARTIN, the Senate receded from business not to exceed five minutes.

At 12:17 P.M., the Senate resumed.

At 12:17 P.M., the PRESIDENT assumed the Chair.

The PRESIDENT called for Petitions, Memorials, Presentments of Grand Juries and such like papers.

The following appointments were transmitted by the Honorable James H. Hodges:

Initial Appointment, South Carolina Board of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, with term to commence March 15, 1999, and to expire March 15, 2003

3rd Congressional District:

Anne P. Elliott, 132 Surrey Circle, Aiken, S.C. 29801 VICE John F. Elliott

Referred to the Committee on Corrections and Penology.

Initial Appointment, South Carolina State Ethics Commission, with term to commence June 30, 2001, and to expire June 30, 2006

At-Large:

Kenneth Charles Krawcheck, Esq., Nine State Street, Charleston, S.C. 29401 VICE Richard Vance Davis

Referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

At 3:00 P.M., Senator LEVENTIS requested a leave of absence from 5:00 - 9:00 P.M.

At 3:00 P.M., Senator LEVENTIS requested a leave of absence for Friday, August 24, 2001, from 6:00 A.M. until Noon.

S. 773 (Word version) -- Senator Leventis: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 7-7-501, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO VOTING PRECINCTS IN SUMTER COUNTY, SO AS TO REDESIGNATE CERTAIN PRECINCTS AND DESIGNATE A MAP NUMBER ON WHICH LINES OF THESE PRECINCTS ARE DELINEATED.

Senator LEVENTIS asked unanimous consent to make a motion to recall the Bill from the Committee on Judiciary.

There was no objection.

The Bill was recalled from the Committee on Judiciary.

Senator LEVENTIS asked unanimous consent to take the Bill up for immediate consideration.

There was no objection.

The Senate proceeded to a consideration of the Bill, the question being the second reading of the Bill.

Senator LEVENTIS proposed the following amendment (PT\1619DW01), which was adopted:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, Section 7-7-501(A) as contained in SECTION 1, page 2, line 42, by striking /Taylors/ and inserting / Taylors /

Amend title to conform.

Senator LEVENTIS explained the amendment.

The amendment was adopted.

There being no further amendments, the Bill was read the second time and ordered placed on the third reading Calendar.

On motion of Senator LEVENTIS, with unanimous consent, S. 773 was ordered to receive a third reading on the next legislative day.

Columbia, S.C., June 28, 2001

Mr. President and Senators:

The House respectfully informs your Honorable Body that it insists upon the amendments proposed by the House to:
H. 3599 (Word version) -- Reps. Rodgers and Gilham: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 50-5-15, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS IN THE SOUTH CAROLINA MARINE RESOURCES ACT OF 2000, SO AS TO FURTHER DEFINE AND PROVIDE FOR BAITING OF "PEELER TRAPS".
asks for a Committee of Conference, and has appointed Reps. Ott, Davenport and Scarborough to the committee on the part of the House.

Very respectfully,
Speaker of the House

Received as information.

Whereupon, Senators RANKIN, RAVENEL and GREGORY were appointed to the Committee of Conference on the part of the Senate and a message was sent to the House accordingly.

H. 3599 (Word version) -- Reps. Rodgers and Gilham: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 50-5-15, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS IN THE SOUTH CAROLINA MARINE RESOURCES ACT OF 2000, SO AS TO FURTHER DEFINE AND PROVIDE FOR BAITING OF "PEELER TRAPS".

On motion of Senator RANKIN, with unanimous consent, the Report of the Committee of Conference was taken up for immediate consideration.

Senator RANKIN spoke on the report.

On motion of Senator RANKIN, the Report of the Committee of Conference to H. 3599 was adopted as follows:

The COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE, to whom was referred:

H. 3599 (Word version) -- Reps. Rodgers and Gilham: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 50-5-15, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS IN THE SOUTH CAROLINA MARINE RESOURCES ACT OF 2000, SO AS TO FURTHER DEFINE AND PROVIDE FOR BAITING OF "PEELER TRAPS".

Beg leave to report that they have duly and carefully considered the same and recommend:

That the same do pass with the following amendments:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by striking all after the enacting words and inserting:

/SECTION   1.   Section 50-5-15(37) of the 1976 Code, as added by Act 245 of 2000, is amended to read:

"(37)   'Peeler trap' means a trap constructed of one inch or smaller hexagonal wire which is:

(a)   unbaited; or

(b)   baited with only one live male crabs. crab and may have one single piece of fish having no dimension greater than three inches."

SECTION   2.   Section 50-5-1705(D) of the 1976 Code, as added by Act 245 of 2000, is amended to read:

"(D)   It is unlawful for a person to take or have in possession more than five two red drum in any one day."

SECTION   3.   Section 50-5-1710(3) of the 1976 Code, as added by Act 245 of 2000, is amended to read:

"(3)   red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) (channel bass or spottail bass) of less than fourteen fifteen inches in total length, or more than twenty-seven twenty-four inches in total length; or"

SECTION   4.   This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor. /

Amend title to read.

/ TO AMEND SECTION 50-5-15, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS IN THE SOUTH CAROLINA MARINE RESOURCES ACT OF 2000, SO AS TO FURTHER DEFINE AND PROVIDE FOR BAITING OF "PEELER TRAPS"; TO AMEND SECTION 50-5-1705, RELATING TO RED DRUM CATCH LIMITS, SO AS TO CHANGE THE RED DRUM CATCH LIMIT FROM FIVE TO TWO RED DRUM PER DAY; AND TO AMEND SECTION 50-5-1710, RELATING TO RED DRUM SIZE LIMITS, SO AS TO CHANGE THE RED DRUM SIZE LIMITS FROM NOT LESS THAN FOURTEEN INCHES OR MORE THAN TWENTY-SEVEN INCHES TO NOT LESS THAN FIFTEEN INCHES OR MORE THAN TWENTY-FOUR INCHES. /

/s/Sen. Chauncey K. Gregory       /s/Rep. Guy Ralph Davenport
/s/Arthur Ravenel, Jr.            /s/Rep. Harry Legare Ott
/s/Sen. Luke A. Rankin, Sr.              /s/Rep. Wallace Berry Scarborough

The following were introduced:

S. 780 (Word version) -- Senator Peeler: A SENATE RESOLUTION TO EXPRESS THE PROFOUND SORROW OF THE MEMBERS OF THE SOUTH

The Senate Resolution was adopted.

S. 781 (Word version) -- Senator Jackson: A SENATE RESOLUTION TO CONGRATULATE MRS. ERNESTINE JORDAN STEWART, A NATIVE OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, NOW RESIDING IN COLUMBIA, ON THE OCCASION OF HER ONE HUNDREDTH BIRTHDAY ON AUGUST 27, 2001.
l:\s-res\dj\002stew.mrh.doc

The Senate Resolution was adopted.

S. 782 (Word version) -- Senator Fair: A BILL TO AMEND SECTIONS 11-27-30, 11-27-40, AND 11-27-50, ALL AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE EFFECT OF ARTICLE X OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA CONSTITUTION ON BONDS OF THE STATE, POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS OF THE STATE, AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS, RESPECTIVELY, SO AS TO DEEM A COMPLETE OR PARTIAL SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO, OR OTHER TRANSFEREE OF, OR OTHER ASSOCIATE OF THE STATE, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, OR A SCHOOL DISTRICT TO BE THE STATE, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, OR SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR BONDING PURPOSES WHEN THE SUCCESSOR, TRANSFEREE, OR ASSOCIATE UNDERTAKES ALL OR A PORTION OF THE OPERATION OR ASSUMES ALL OR A PORTION OF A DUTY OF THE STATE, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, OR SCHOOL DISTRICT.
l:\council\bills\dka\4569mm01.doc

Read the first time and referred to the Committee on Finance.

S. 783 (Word version) -- Senators Grooms, Matthews and Pinckney: A BILL TO AUTHORIZE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE COLLETON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT TO SET BY MAJORITY VOTE A SALARY THAT EACH MEMBER OF THE BOARD SHALL RECEIVE FOR ATTENDING MEETINGS OF THE BOARD, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE MANNER IN WHICH THESE AMOUNTS SHALL BE PAID AND FOR LIMITATIONS THEREON.
l:\council\bills\skb\18665som01.doc

Read the first time and ordered placed on the Local and Uncontested Calendar.

On motion of Senator GROOMS, with unanimous consent, S.783 was ordered to receive a second and third reading on the next two consecutive legislative days.

H. 4315 (Word version) -- Reps. Law, Merrill, Hinson, Dantzler and Gourdine: A BILL TO AMEND ACT 518 OF 1982, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO MEMBERSHIP OF THE BERKELEY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, SO AS TO PROVIDE FOR THE ELECTION OF AN AT-LARGE MEMBER IN NONPARTISAN ELECTIONS BEGINNING WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION IN 2002 AND EVERY FOUR YEARS THEREAFTER AND TO FURTHER PROVIDE THAT THE AT-LARGE MEMBER SHALL SERVE AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD.

Read the first time and referred to the Berkley County Legislative Delegation.

S. 777 (Word version) -- Senators Wilson, Courson, Bauer, Ryberg, Setzler, Alexander, Anderson, Branton, Drummond, Elliott, Fair, Ford, Giese, Glover, Gregory, Grooms, Hawkins, Hayes, Holland, Hutto, Jackson, Land, Leatherman, Leventis, Martin, Matthews, McConnell, McGill, Mescher, Moore, O'Dell, Patterson, Peeler, Pinckney, Rankin, Ravenel, Reese, Richardson, Ritchie, Saleeby, Short, J. Verne Smith, Thomas, Verdin and Waldrep: A SENATE RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE COMMISSIONING OF A PORTRAIT TO BE PLACED IN THE SENATE CHAMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE FLOYD D. SPENCE, LONGTIME AND BELOVED CONGRESSMAN FROM THE SECOND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.

The Senate proceeded to a consideration of the Senate Resolution, the question being the adoption of the Resolution.

The "ayes" and "nays" were demanded and taken, resulting as follows:

Alexander                 Anderson                  Bauer   

Branton                   Courson                   Drummond
Elliott                   Fair                      Ford
Giese                     Glover                    Gregory
Grooms                    Hawkins                   Hayes
Holland                   Hutto                     Jackson
Land                      Leatherman                Leventis
Martin                    Matthews                  McConnell
McGill                    Mescher                   Moore
O'Dell                    Patterson                 Peeler
Pinckney                  Rankin                    Ravenel
Reese                     Richardson                Ritchie
Ryberg                    Saleeby                   Setzler
Short                     Smith, J. Verne           Thomas
Verdin                    Waldrep                   Wilson

The Senate Resolution was adopted.

H. 3003 (Word version) -- Reps. Wilkins, W.D. Smith, J. Brown, Harrison, Harrell, Cato, Townsend, Sharpe, Wilder, Altman, Walker, Simrill, Campsen, J. Young, Sandifer, A. Young, Stille, Clyburn and Cotty: A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 2-1-35 SO AS TO ESTABLISH THE ELECTION DISTRICTS FROM WHICH MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ARE ELECTED COMMENCING WITH THE 2002 GENERAL ELECTION, TO DESIGNATE THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS THE SUBMITTING AUTHORITY TO MAKE THE REQUIRED SUBMISSION OF THE HOUSE REAPPORTIONMENT PLAN CONTAINED IN THIS ACT TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE UNDER THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT, AND TO REPEAL SECTION 2-1-25,

The Senate proceeded to a consideration of the Bill, the question being the third reading of the Bill.

Senator McCONNELL spoke on the Bill.

I would ask unanimous consent to have this Memorandum distributed to the members. It deals with the availability of maps for amendments under consideration and how to access them on your computer.

Next, ladies and gentlemen of the Senate, I want to give you a brief update today on the progress of redistricting in the Senate.

We are about to begin an important debate about a process that has its roots, of course, in our Constitution. We all are present in this Chamber today as a result of election decisions made by citizens back in our home districts. We are now charged with making important decisions about the boundaries of the districts that will elect future members of this body and the U. S. Congress and, of course, the House of Representatives across the way.

This is a difficult process that is demanding on a personal, as well as a political, level. However, we must not be distracted from the task before us. I am appealing to the Senate to have the will to come together as a body and to adopt districts that will provide fair representation to our voters in the coming decade.

As you know, I have attempted to reach out to every Senator in this Chamber by working to help create redistricting plans that focused on constitutional principles and traditional redistricting guidelines instead of partisan interests.

We have followed fair and lawful criteria in creating the voting districts that our citizens will use to elect candidates to Congress and the Senate. I am satisfied that the Judiciary Committee and the redistricting subcommittee have considered and adopted guidelines that bring honor to this process and to the Senate.

I want to report to the Senate about the work and efforts that have taken place over the past six months that bring us to this special session this morning.

The redistricting subcommittee worked hard to create an open process that would encourage citizen involvement and input, and we were successful.

Before deciding on the criteria for its redistricting efforts, the subcommittee traveled around the State to listen and focus on matters of interest to our citizens. The subcommittee held six public hearings in different parts of the State and gathered extensive citizen input before deciding on the criteria that would guide us through this process.

Before the first map was drawn, the subcommittee learned about communities of interest and other issues of concern to our citizens. We examined the new census data and the statutory and other requirements that apply to the creation of voting districts. We invited and received valuable public input and submissions to help guide us before I allowed the staff to attempt to draw the first district. And, I think that's an important thing that needs to be noted. We didn't even cut on the computers. And, I think that is a very important step in this process.

Our staff solicited comments and information from each Senator regarding the proposed districts and received responses from almost every member of the body. I want to thank the members of the subcommittee and the members of this body for their hard work in gathering this information and, in particular, to our staff. This staff has worked hours, countless hours, to make this reapportionment happen, to get your amendments, to verify them -- and, I'm going to tell you, they have proved that that is just the finest staff that you could have for a Judiciary Committee and it's one that we really, regardless of how you might feel about the plan or whatever -- I don't think you could ask for people that are willing to give more than this staff has been willing to give.

After conducting this thorough preparation, the subcommittee solicited and considered a number of actual redistricting plans proposed by the staff, public, the political caucuses, and various advocacy groups. Ultimately, the subcommittee decided on a sound plan which adheres to traditional redistricting criteria and complies with both the requirements of the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act.

I believe that the plan adopted yesterday, or I should say last week, by the Judiciary Committee demonstrates that members' concerns were taken into account in the drafting process wherever possible. However, as each of you know, it is impossible to draft any plan that can fully satisfy each and every Senator.

And candidly, there has been too much partisan rancor in this already difficult process. I have heard far too much talk of threats and efforts

So, let us proceed thoughtfully and carefully over the next few days, or the next few hours or whatever -- I don't want to encourage anybody to be long-winded -- observing the courtesy that keeps this body together. We need to talk. We need to debate, but we don't need to yell at one another or get personal. I hope we can disagree but still work together as members of this body. I know that different people will want to get different comments into the record apart from the prepared comments except to tell you, ladies and gentlemen of the Senate, that the most disappointing part of this for me has been -- and I say this to both Republicans and Democrats -- that I instructed this staff to go out and develop the criteria. Early on, I made it clear to them I did not want a maximization plan for the Republicans -- that, instead, we would run it on the basis of traditional criteria. And, I'm not going to call anybody's name except to say I know that politics now has gotten in the way.

This plan, the staff recommendation -- and I'm referring back to that plan before any Judiciary Committee/subcommittee actions -- with the exception and, I understand the Senator from Greenville's frustrations, but, I can't cure something that you can't cure.

But, for most of the others in here, Republican and Democrat, you ought to be supporting the staff recommendation plan. There might be some small adjustments that are needed. But, beyond that, congressional and on Senate, it was a fair plan. It was an objective plan. It kept politics as much as possible out of the picture. It didn't do violence to traditional districts and, the most disappointing part, is that hands from both parties have gotten into the mixture. We've got an executive branch that wants into the legislative bowl of soup on this and we should have been able to go forward and handle our plan.

I want to make it clear on the record we did not take our criteria and apply it to the House plan. We have not weighed in on the House of Representatives redistricting so our criteria have not been applied to

The Senator from Kershaw, if he were here, has been in as difficult of a situation as I've been in with trying to move this thing through. And, I've had to table amendments on both sides and then, I hear on one hand, "I'm soft on the Democrats" and then I hear if I do another way, "I'm being too pro-Republican" or whatever. The staff tried to come up with a plan. It should easily have 37-40 votes in the Senate -- easily, in my opinion. Everybody's entitled to his own opinion and that's my disappointment at this particular hour. We will continue to do the best that we can do and to look at it.

I'm going to close by simply saying that I will be looking at your amendments. Several years ago the Senator from Aiken -- and some others of you -- and I were on the same team on that reapportionment, and we accepted an amendment, as my memory recalls last time, from one Senator trying to help him out. Of course, we got grilled in depositions and then on the floor of the Senate, I mean on the floor of the Federal Court, over why the amendment was adopted and whatever.

So, it's not any dislike of you, your amendment, your region or whatever, but, as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, I'm going to try to look objectively on the front end at the question of whether the amendment violates the criteria and, if it does, I'm going to fight you on the amendment -- because once we depart the criteria, we've departed. And, then, somebody else is going to be up. One of my good friends in here, I hear, has got a congressional plan. He and I are going to have to get into it over that plan. The plan doesn't fit the criteria and I'm going to fight the adoption of it. But, I just want to tell you, that's the tactic I'm going to take and weigh in on the criteria. I know there's some criticism on some districts. There are some problems I can't fix. If you start splitting VTD's, where do you stop splitting VTD's in the State?

The population variance -- we kept it where the courts indicate we need to be. I had one Senator tell me, "You can fix it. Just go up and increase your variance." Read the roadmap as to where we've been before. And, there's just no need to go back and repeat that mistake and, I guess, to say that experience ought to be our teacher and we're just going to do the best we can do with it today. But, it's no personal situation and, to the Senator from Greenville, I will reiterate -- if I

Anyway, with that, Mr. PRESIDENT, to tell you all where we are, we adopted the Judiciary Committee Report as the working model -- that does not prejudice you on your amendments. We made that clear in the last motion.

I will have an amendment up later. It is a technical amendment. The House, in our trying to be good neighbors to the folks across the Hall, we found some errors, some scriveners' errors, and we were going to correct them along the way. But, it seems that they got nervous and think there's some trap or something in there, so the amendment I've got will simply undo the corrections that we did to some House language that we just caught the scriveners' errors and let them handle that. That will be my last effort to try to fix things or improve things across the Hall. And, I do have an amendment up to undo that. And, I hope that will satisfy them.

Senator, did you have a question?

I'm sorry. I just wanted to mention that thing about the scriveners' error because when I get up here on that amendment I am undoing what I think is their mistake, but they paddle their boat.

Sen. SETZLER: Senator from Charleston, I wonder if you would   yield, retaining the floor, for the purpose of a unanimous consent that

your prepared remarks be duplicated and a copy provided to every

member of the Senate? I so move.
PRESIDENT:       Without objection.
Sen. SETZLER:     Senator from Charleston, I have a second question.   Are your remarks being recorded in the Journal and are the remarks   of today being recorded in the Journal? If they are not, I ask   unanimous consent that the remarks of all members of the Senate   today, and the debate, be recorded in the Journal verbatim.
Sen. McCONNELL: I am informed that all remarks today are being   recorded, not necessarily in the Journal, because it would be   voluminous. But, all remarks for the purposes of the record are   being recorded.

So, with that, Mr. PRESIDENT, those are my opening remarks. If you have no questions, I guess what we'll do is proceed to take up the amendments and to see where we go.

On motion of Senator SETZLER, with unanimous consent, Senator McCONNELL's remarks were ordered printed in the Journal.

Senator O'DELL proposed the following Amendment No. 1 (JUD3003.010), which was adopted (#1):

Amend the Bill, as and if amended, beginning on page 194, line 1, through page 195, line 20, in SECTION 5 by striking District 4 and inserting therein:

/ DISTRICT 4

Area   Population
Abbeville County
VTD 1   957
VTD 2   1,292
VTD 3   1,891
VTD 4   870
VTD 5   2,490

Anderson County
VTD 10   822
VTD 11   3,382
VTD 12   2,814
VTD 13   1,461
VTD 18   346
VTD 19   5,091
VTD 20   3,095
VTD 26   2,133
VTD 27   909
VTD 4   2,741
VTD 44   1,206
VTD 45   1,449
VTD 46   1,467
VTD 47   2,013
VTD 48   1,605
VTD 50   1,637
VTD 51   3,580
VTD 52   2,365
VTD 53   6,325

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,595

PERCENT VARIATION   0.432 /

Amend the Bill further, as and if amended, on page 204, lines 1-26, in SECTION 5 by striking District 10 and inserting therein:

/DISTRICT 10

Area   Population
Abbeville County
VTD 10   2,904

Greenwood County   66,271

Laurens County
VTD 20   717
VTD 21   876
VTD 29   2,065
VTD 30   2,379
VTD 32   2,539
VTD 35   1,068

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,543

PERCENT VARIATION   0.373 /.

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Senator O'DELL explained the amendment.

Senator McCONNELL spoke on the amendment.

Senator WALDREP argued contra to the adoption of the amendment.

Senator McCONNELL moved that the amendment be adopted.

Amendment No. 1 was adopted.

Senator RICHARDSON proposed the following Amendment No. 2 (JUD3003.005), which was tabled:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, beginning on page 269, line 4, through page 292, line 29, in SECTION 8 by striking Districts 1 through 6 and inserting therein:

Area   Population
Beaufort County
VTD 10   3,274
VTD 11   682
VTD 12   1,918
VTD 13   2,500
VTD 14   328
VTD 15   2,129
VTD 16   2,232
VTD 17   1,789
VTD 18   2,264
VTD 19   1,284
VTD 20   842
VTD 21   499
VTD 22   2,623
VTD 23   454
VTD 24   1,218
VTD 25   836
VTD 26   1,905
VTD 27   2,929
VTD 28   2,163
VTD 29   908
VTD 30   1,860
VTD 31   1,443
VTD 32   2,243
VTD 33   1,270
VTD 34   337
VTD 35   796
VTD 36   2,483
VTD 37   1,079
VTD 38   1,641
VTD 39   4,841
VTD 40   2,283
VTD 41   35
VTD 42   975
VTD 43   415
VTD 44   1,845
VTD 45   719
VTD 46   1,655

Berkeley County
VTD 10   1,983
VTD 11   3,148
VTD 12   1,159
VTD 13   777

Colleton County
VTD 30   1,382

Dorchester County
VTD 18   2,206
VTD 21   4,566
VTD 22   4,541
VTD 23   3,143
VTD 24   4,025
VTD 25   1,812
VTD 26   2,621
VTD 27   1,904
VTD 28   2,773
VTD 29   2,843
VTD 30   3,603
VTD 31   1,834
VTD 32   1,447
VTD 33   2,325
VTD 35   2,000
VTD 36   1,960
VTD 37   3,099
VTD 39   4,306
VTD 40   4,637
VTD 44   117
VTD 45   6,333
VTD 46   5,426
VTD 47   3,878
VTD 48   2,448
VTD 49   4,933

Georgetown County   55,797

DISTRICT TOTAL   668,669

PERCENT VARIATION   0.000

Area   Population
Aiken County
VTD 10   1,242
VTD 11   1,672
VTD 12   1,264
VTD 15   839
VTD 16   432
VTD 17   535
VTD 18   1,024
VTD 28   2,185
VTD 29   1,553
VTD 42   2,582
VTD 43   1,106
VTD 64   3,846
VTD 65   1,909
VTD 69   4,006
VTD 70   2,250
VTD 74   7
VTD 75   0
VTD 9
Tract 0217.00
Blocks: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2035, 2036, 2037, 2038, 2039, 2040, 2041, 2042, 2043, 2044, 2045, 2046, 2047, 2048, 2049, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059, 2060, 2061, 2062, 2063, 2064, 2065, 2066, 2092, 2093, 2094, 2095, 2096, 2097, 2098, 2099, 2105, 2111, 2982, 2983, 2998, 2999   502

Barnwell County   23,478

Calhoun County
VTD 1   1,395
VTD 10   558
VTD 11   2,108

Fairfield County   23,454

Kershaw County   52,647

Lexington County   216,014

Newberry County   36,108

Orangeburg County
VTD 13   1,233
VTD 14   2,227
VTD 15   1,668
VTD 22   1,008
VTD 23   5,063
VTD 33   1,986
VTD 34   1,838
VTD 35   1,967
VTD 36   1,885
VTD 37   3,785
VTD 41   1,031
VTD 42   939

Richland County
VTD 1   3,978
VTD 10   9,169
VTD 101   1,834
VTD 102   1,997
VTD 103   1,959
VTD 104   2,710
VTD 107   2,962
VTD 108   2,598
VTD 109   1,959
VTD 11   3,433
VTD 110
Tract 0116.03
Blocks: 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018,

Sumter County
VTD 1   1,968
VTD 10   1,404
VTD 11   1,605
VTD 16
Tract 0006.00
Blocks: 2046, 2048, 2051, 2052, 2053, 2054, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2059, 2060   28
VTD 17   2,775
VTD 18   2,657
VTD 19   1,973
VTD 23   1,576

DISTRICT TOTAL   668,668

PERCENT VARIATION   0.000

DISTRICT 3

Area   Population
Abbeville County   26,167

Aiken County
VTD 1   1,781
VTD 13   1,418
VTD 14   1,303
VTD 19   2,451
VTD 2   1,191

Anderson County   165,740

Edgefield County   24,595

Greenwood County   66,271

Laurens County
VTD 10   3,403
VTD 11   1,605
VTD 12   2,787
VTD 13   3,065
VTD 14   530
VTD 15   1,982
VTD 16   2,021
VTD 17   1,271
VTD 18   2,270
VTD 19   2,933
VTD 2
Tract 9801.00
Blocks: 1051, 1053, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1068, 1069, 1070, 1071, 1072, 1073, 1074, 1075, 1995, 4043, 4044, 4999   510

McCormick County   9,958

Oconee County   66,215

Pickens County   110,757

Saluda County   19,181

DISTRICT TOTAL   668,669

PERCENT VARIATION   0.000

DISTRICT 4

Area   Population
Greenville County   379,616

Laurens County
VTD 1   3,544
VTD 2
Tract 9801.00
Blocks: 1000, 1001, 1004, 1005, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1034, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043, 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1052, 1057, 1058, 1059, 1060, 1061, 1062, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066, 1067, 1076, 1077, 1996   1,836

Spartanburg County   253,791

Union County   29,881

DISTRICT TOTAL   668,668

PERCENT VARIATION   0.000

DISTRICT 5

Area   Population
Cherokee County   52,537

Chester County   34,068

Chesterfield County   42,768

Darlington County
VTD 1   1,955
VTD 12   1,204
VTD 2   1,537
VTD 3   1,990
VTD 34   1,374

Dillon County   30,722

Florence County   125,761

Lancaster County   61,351

Lee County
VTD 5   209

Marlboro County   28,818

York County   164,614

DISTRICT TOTAL   668,670

PERCENT VARIATION   0.000

DISTRICT 6

Area   Population
Allendale County   11,211

Bamberg County   16,658

Beaufort County
VTD 1   296
VTD 2   746
VTD 3   959
VTD 4   511
VTD 5   1,139
VTD 6   465

Berkeley County
VTD 1   3,534
VTD 2   1,082
VTD 3   1,829
VTD 5
Tract 0202.00
Blocks: 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043, 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1051, 1053, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058, 1059, 1060, 1061, 1062, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066, 1067, 1068, 1069, 1070, 1071, 1072, 1073, 1074, 1075, 1076, 1077, 1078, 1079, 1083, 1090, 1091, 1095, 1096, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026,

Calhoun County
VTD 2   1,060
VTD 4   299
VTD 7   356
VTD 8   1,551
VTD 9   425

Charleston County
VTD 113   934
VTD 114   2,688
VTD 115   1,405
VTD 116   553
VTD 117   748
VTD 118   2,154
VTD 119   3,791
VTD 120   3,818
VTD 121   355
VTD 122   2,548
VTD 123   470
VTD 124   1,781
VTD 125   1,420
VTD 126   822
VTD 127   2,169

Clarendon County   32,502

Colleton County
VTD 1   211
VTD 10   776
VTD 11   1,047
VTD 12   228
VTD 13   507
VTD 14   792
VTD 15   738
VTD 16   520
VTD 17   4,616
VTD 18   4,207
VTD 19   960
VTD 2   761
VTD 20   1,282
VTD 22   939
VTD 23   3,305
VTD 24   2,315
VTD 25   1,687
VTD 26   3,474
VTD 27   970
VTD 28   1,084
VTD 29   1,379
VTD 3   579
VTD 4   1,339
VTD 5   954
VTD 6   327
VTD 7   411
VTD 8   578
VTD 9   896

Darlington County
VTD 10   2,596
VTD 11   3,486
VTD 13   1,026
VTD 14   1,165
VTD 15   1,468
VTD 16   1,502

Dorchester County
VTD 1   611
VTD 10   447
VTD 11   1,052
VTD 12   888
VTD 13   505
VTD 14   456
VTD 15   616
VTD 16   544
VTD 17   1,458
VTD 19   1,168
VTD 2   824
VTD 20   966
VTD 3   879
VTD 34   239
VTD 4   891

Hampton County   21,386

Jasper County   20,678

Lee County
VTD 1   106
VTD 10   702
VTD 11   522
VTD 12   7
VTD 13   2,475
VTD 14   854
VTD 15   423
VTD 16   320
VTD 17   1,115
VTD 18   335
VTD 19   532
VTD 2   663
VTD 20   552
VTD 21   514
VTD 22   828
VTD 23   425
VTD 24   901
VTD 25   1,143
VTD 26   145
VTD 27   273
VTD 28   781
VTD 29   1,360
VTD 3   299
VTD 30   712
VTD 31   356
VTD 4   266
VTD 6   630
VTD 7   778

Marion County   35,466

Orangeburg County
VTD 1   1,143
VTD 10   1,291
VTD 11   1,252
VTD 12   2,187
VTD 16   2,081
VTD 17   1,003
VTD 18   2,359
VTD 19   1,181
VTD 2   1,098
VTD 20   1,417
VTD 21   758
VTD 24   1,667
VTD 25   2,409
VTD 26   1,878
VTD 27   2,653
VTD 28   844
VTD 29   2,832
VTD 3   1,662
VTD 30   2,881
VTD 31   2,766
VTD 32   4,534
VTD 38   1,744
VTD 39   1,084
VTD 4   3,109
VTD 40   3,224
VTD 43   2,218
VTD 45   1,156
VTD 46   974
VTD 47   2,464
VTD 48   1,645
VTD 49   2,458
VTD 5   923
VTD 50   2,263
VTD 6   1,355
VTD 7   850

Richland County
VTD 100   2,306
VTD 105   2,590
VTD 106   2,219
VTD 110
Tract 0116.03
Blocks: 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1050, 1051, 1053, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1059, 1060, 1061   1,834
VTD 113   4,028
VTD 114   4,026
VTD 115   4,120
VTD 116   2,033
VTD 117   3,296
VTD 118   2,145
VTD 119   3,994
VTD 120   1,678
VTD 121   744
VTD 122   3,582
VTD 123   1,285
VTD 124   1,470
VTD 125   3,984
VTD 126   2,720
VTD 32   3,401
VTD 33   3,512
VTD 34   1,263
VTD 35   4,616
VTD 36   5,718
VTD 58   3,727
VTD 64   2,860
VTD 65   1,312
VTD 66   2,443
VTD 67   2,872
VTD 68   2,764
VTD 69   1,128

Sumter County
VTD 12   1,136
VTD 13   135
VTD 14   826
VTD 15   1,843
VTD 16
Tract 0006.00
Blocks: 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2028, 2032, 2033, 2034, 2035, 2036, 2037, 2038, 2039, 2040, 2041, 2042, 2043, 2044, 2045, 2047, 2049, 2050, 2058, 2061, 2062, 3011, 3012, 3019, 3020, 3021, 3022   1,222
VTD 2   817
VTD 20   351
VTD 21   678
VTD 22   236
VTD 36   2,544
VTD 37   1,702
VTD 38   2,297
VTD 39   2,430

Williamsburg County   37,217

DISTRICT TOTAL   668,668

PERCENT VARIATION   0.000 /

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Senator RICHARDSON explained the amendment.

Senators McCONNELL and LEVENTIS argued contra to the adoption of the amendment.

Senator LEVENTIS moved to lay the amendment on the table.

Amendment No. 2 was laid on the table.

Senator ANDERSON proposed the following Amendment No. 3 (JUD3003.002), which was tabled:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, beginning on page 197, line 1, through page 203, line 7, in SECTION 5 by striking Districts 6-9 and inserting therein:

/ DISTRICT 06

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 100
Tract 0016.00
Blocks: 1000, 1001, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017   2,212
Tract 0027.01
Blocks: 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014   516
VTD 101
Tract 0016.00
Blocks: 3000, 3003, 3004, 3013   11
Tract 0017.00
Blocks: 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 2003, 2004   992
Tract 0027.02
Blocks: 3023, 3024   0
VTD 102   2,312
VTD 103   1,843
VTD 104   1,569
VTD 105   3,063
VTD 106
Tract 0023.01
Blocks: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029   912
Tract 0023.02

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,375

PERCENT VARIATION   0.180

DISTRICT 07

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 100
Tract 0016.00
Blocks: 1002, 1003, 1004, 1017, 1018, 1019, 2016, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023   249
Tract 0023.04
Blocks: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2019, 2021, 2022, 2023   760
VTD 101
Tract 0016.00
Blocks: 3012   0
Tract 0017.00
Blocks: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013   807
VTD 106
Tract 0023.02
Blocks: 1000, 1001, 1032, 1033, 1034, 1036,

DISTRICT TOTAL   85,948

DISTRICT 08

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 116   1,708
VTD 125
Tract 0018.02
Blocks: 3016, 3017, 3034, 3035, 3036, 3037, 3038, 3039, 3040, 3041, 3042, 3043, 3044, 3045, 3046, 3047, 3048, 3049, 3050, 3051, 3052, 3053, 3073   1,443
Tract 0018.06
Blocks: 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1052, 1999, 3000, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020   1,821
VTD 135   2,364
VTD 138
Tract 0021.03
Blocks: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2024, 2027, 2028   3
Tract 0021.07
Blocks: 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029   1,269
VTD 139
Tract 0021.03
Blocks: 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2012, 2013, 2017, 2018, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2025, 2026, 3010, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017   1,234
Tract 0021.07
Blocks: 1005, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029,

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,490

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.835

DISTRICT 09

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 33
Tract 0033.01
Blocks: 1017, 1018, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 3008, 3009, 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019, 3020, 3021, 3022, 3023, 3024, 3025, 3026, 3027, 3030, 3031, 3032, 3033, 3034, 3039, 3040, 3999, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4023, 4024, 4025, 4026, 4027, 4028, 4029, 4030, 4031, 4032, 4033, 4034, 4035, 4036, 4037, 4038, 4039   2,791
Tract 0035.00
Blocks: 1035, 1036, 1038   8
VTD 36
Tract 0029.01
Blocks: 1041, 1042, 1998, 2000, 2001, 2002,

Laurens County
VTD 1   3,544
VTD 10   3,403
VTD 11   1,605
VTD 12   2,787
VTD 13   3,065
VTD 14   530
VTD 15   1,982
VTD 16   2,021
VTD 17   1,271
VTD 18   2,270
VTD 19   2,933
VTD 2   2,346
VTD 22   1,886
VTD 23   2,006
VTD 24   1,350
VTD 25   969
VTD 26   2,163
VTD 27   1,793
VTD 28   2,247
VTD 3   2,251
VTD 31   994

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,055

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.187 /

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Senator ANDERSON explained the amendment.

Senator ANDERSON moved that the amendment be adopted.

Senator MARTIN argued contra to the adoption of the amendment.

Senator McCONNELL argued contra to the adoption of the amendment.

Senator FORD argued in favor of the adoption of the amendment.

Senator PATTERSON spoke on the amendment.

Senator ANDERSON asked unanimous consent to make a motion to amend Amendment No. 3 by removing from the amendment the two incumbent Senators within the district competing against each other and by raising the variance to 3%.

Senators MARTIN and LEATHERMAN objected.

Senator McCONNELL moved to lay the amendment on the table.

Amendment No. 3 was laid on the table.

Senator FORD desired to be recorded as voting against the motion to table Amendment No. 3.

Senators LAND, MOORE and HUTTO proposed the following Amendment No. 4 (JUD3003.014), which was tabled:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, beginning on page 188, line 35, through page 268, line 26, in SECTION 5 by striking Districts 1-46 and inserting therein:

/ DISTRICT 01

Area   Population
Oconee County   66,215

Pickens County
VTD 17   3,498
VTD 25   835
VTD 36   976
VTD 45   8,888
VTD 46   3,012
VTD 48   2,486
VTD 49   1,638

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,548

PERCENT VARIATION   0.378

DISTRICT 02

Area   Population
Pickens County
VTD 1   155
VTD 10   1,458
VTD 11   657
VTD 12   2,730
VTD 13   3,084
VTD 14   1,037
VTD 15   1,574
VTD 16   3,308
VTD 18   1,349
VTD 19   2,425
VTD 2   2,264
VTD 20   2,022
VTD 21   896
VTD 22   2,906
VTD 23   2,484

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,472

PERCENT VARIATION   0.291

DISTRICT 03

Area   Population
Anderson County
VTD 1   5,265
VTD 10   822
VTD 11   3,382
VTD 14   3,858
VTD 15   458
VTD 16   1,102

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,325

PERCENT VARIATION   0.123

DISTRICT 04

Area   Population
Abbeville County   26,167

Anderson County
VTD 25   870
VTD 26   2,133
VTD 27   909
VTD 34   2,508
VTD 39   1,698
VTD 40   2,892
VTD 42   4,441
VTD 43   1,582
VTD 44   1,206
VTD 45   1,449
VTD 46   1,467
VTD 47   2,013
VTD 48   1,605
VTD 49   1,804
VTD 50   1,637
VTD 51   3,580
VTD 52   2,365
VTD 53   6,325
VTD 58   4,815
VTD 59   879
VTD 60   2,785
VTD 61   1,095
VTD 62   751
VTD 67   654
VTD 71   1,184
VTD 72   1,117
VTD 73   1,449
VTD 74   785
VTD 75   683
VTD 78   527
VTD 79   602
VTD 80   505
VTD 81   1,118
VTD 83   2,308

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,908

PERCENT VARIATION   0.791

DISTRICT 05

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 1   192
VTD 10   2,563
VTD 105   3,063
VTD 11   2,932
VTD 112   1,613
VTD 113   3,508
VTD 114   5,198
VTD 12   3,593
VTD 121   1,828
VTD 122   2,405
VTD 13   3,891
VTD 14   3,370
VTD 15   6,796
VTD 16   3,773
VTD 17   7,973
VTD 2   1,144
VTD 3   3,037
VTD 4   669
VTD 5   2,327
VTD 6   2,551
VTD 7   1,624
VTD 8   3,066
VTD 87   2,879
VTD 88   1,784
VTD 89   1,674
VTD 9   3,223
VTD 90   4,492
VTD 96   1,894
VTD 97   2,560

Pickens County
VTD 9   1,952

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,574

PERCENT VARIATION   0.408

DISTRICT 06

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 100   3,737
VTD 101   1,810
VTD 102   2,312
VTD 103   1,843
VTD 104   1,569
VTD 108   2,412
VTD 110   2,428
VTD 111   856
VTD 119   2,826
VTD 120   3,648
VTD 128   2,666
VTD 129   2,344
VTD 130   1,433
VTD 136   4,052
VTD 18   4,108
VTD 19   4,125
VTD 20   2,974
VTD 21   4,498
VTD 22   2,826
VTD 23   3,464
VTD 42   11,216
VTD 91   3,483
VTD 92   1,962
VTD 93   3,503
VTD 94   3,174
VTD 95   2,524
VTD 98   2,674
VTD 99   2,976

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,443

PERCENT VARIATION   0.258

DISTRICT 07

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 106   3,655
VTD 115   2,140
VTD 123   1,295
VTD 124   801
VTD 131   4,040
VTD 132   4,788
VTD 133   2,163
VTD 134   821
VTD 137   2,623
VTD 138   1,853
VTD 139   2,540
VTD 140   1,770
VTD 141   2,347
VTD 142   1,105
VTD 144   1,191
VTD 27   1,016
VTD 28   1,513
VTD 29   1,685
VTD 30   2,164
VTD 31   2,985
VTD 32   5,122
VTD 34   2,747
VTD 35   1,760
VTD 37   1,753
VTD 38   3,005
VTD 48   1,705
VTD 49   4,682
VTD 59   1,102
VTD 61   2,099
VTD 63   1,137
VTD 64   1,831
VTD 65   2,754
VTD 69   2,195
VTD 70   4,384
VTD 71   718
VTD 72   2,960

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,871

PERCENT VARIATION   0.749

DISTRICT 08

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 107   1,188
VTD 109   1,541
VTD 116   1,708
VTD 117   2,227
VTD 118   1,193
VTD 125   3,268
VTD 126   3,283
VTD 127   1,305
VTD 135   2,364
VTD 143   1,635
VTD 145   2,116
VTD 146   1,377
VTD 24   3,390
VTD 25   2,411
VTD 26   2,469
VTD 39   4,018
VTD 40   2,383
VTD 41   9,278
VTD 43   2,314
VTD 44   3,335
VTD 45   11,734
VTD 57   4,641
VTD 60   1,638
VTD 62   1,562
VTD 67   4,204
VTD 68   1,550
VTD 73   2,217
VTD 74   1,658
VTD 76   1,847

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,640

PERCENT VARIATION   0.484

DISTRICT 09

Area   Population
Anderson County
VTD 12   2,814
VTD 13   1,461
VTD 19   5,091
VTD 20   3,095
VTD 4   2,741
VTD 7   1,472

Greenville County
VTD 33   3,469
VTD 36   1,823
VTD 46   3,339
VTD 47   2,206
VTD 50   1,941
VTD 51   1,221
VTD 52   2,345
VTD 53   1,273
VTD 54   3,485
VTD 55   2,939
VTD 56   4,592
VTD 58   2,407

Laurens County
VTD 10   3,403
VTD 11   1,605
VTD 12   2,787
VTD 13   3,065
VTD 14   530
VTD 15   1,982
VTD 16   2,021
VTD 17   1,271

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,486

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.839

DISTRICT 10

Area   Population
Greenwood County   66,271

Laurens County
VTD 19   2,933
VTD 25   969
VTD 26   2,163
VTD 27   1,793
VTD 28   2,247
VTD 30   2,379
VTD 31   994
VTD 32   2,539
VTD 33   1,669
VTD 36   3,669

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,626

PERCENT VARIATION   0.468

Area   Population
Spartanburg County
VTD 10   3,720
VTD 11   11,984
VTD 16   11,128
VTD 2   3,913
VTD 21   2,985
VTD 3   4,268
VTD 30   1,410
VTD 31   1,507
VTD 32   1,551
VTD 36   448
VTD 37   2,857
VTD 38   1,620
VTD 39   3,645
VTD 4   777
VTD 40   2,027
VTD 43   3,204
VTD 44   1,291
VTD 45   1,936
VTD 47   2,872
VTD 48   985
VTD 49   2,611
VTD 50   1,110
VTD 51   880
VTD 54   2,377
VTD 55   2,593
VTD 56   1,656
VTD 57   1,449
VTD 58   1,085
VTD 6   3,774
VTD 9   6,127

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,790

PERCENT VARIATION   0.656

Area   Population
Spartanburg County
VTD 1   4,298
VTD 14   3,481
VTD 15   3,520
VTD 19   3,737
VTD 20   2,360
VTD 26   3,921
VTD 27   3,769
VTD 28   853
VTD 29   4,388
VTD 5   3,417
VTD 62   3,807
VTD 63   1,401
VTD 64   5,444
VTD 65   1,033
VTD 66   3,699
VTD 67   8,284
VTD 68   1,395
VTD 69   5,665
VTD 7   1,248
VTD 70   4,221
VTD 71   5,823
VTD 72   1,882
VTD 73   3,115
VTD 77   1,283
VTD 78   1,498
VTD 8   1,944
VTD 80   1,914

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,400

PERCENT VARIATION   0.209

DISTRICT 13

Area   Population
Laurens County
VTD 1   3,544

Spartanburg County
VTD 12   4,722
VTD 13   3,480
VTD 17   4,300
VTD 18   5,106
VTD 22   1,811
VTD 23   1,897
VTD 24   3,567
VTD 25   1,444
VTD 33   2,368
VTD 35   1,370
VTD 41   1,285
VTD 42   5,634
VTD 46   2,630
VTD 52   1,870
VTD 53   4,295
VTD 59   1,234
VTD 60   2,072
VTD 61   1,609
VTD 74   2,169
VTD 75   1,329
VTD 76   2,865
VTD 79   3,203
VTD 81   1,929
VTD 82   1,732
VTD 83   1,232
VTD 84   1,144
VTD 85   2,189
VTD 86   1,301
VTD 87   2,875
VTD 88   3,638
VTD 89   2,301

DISTRICT TOTAL   88,041

PERCENT VARIATION   0.944

Area   Population
Cherokee County   52,537

Union County
VTD 1   492
VTD 10   502
VTD 11   592
VTD 12   507
VTD 13   1,000
VTD 14   753
VTD 15   336
VTD 16   1,555
VTD 17   1,431
VTD 18   762
VTD 2   693
VTD 23   1,056
VTD 24   957
VTD 25   425
VTD 26   623
VTD 27   844
VTD 3   779
VTD 37   1,254
VTD 4   742
VTD 5   420
VTD 6   860
VTD 7   677
VTD 8   634
VTD 9   281

York County
VTD 1   471
VTD 10   722
VTD 11   597
VTD 12   295
VTD 13   479
VTD 2   2,337
VTD 29   852
VTD 3   2,421
VTD 30   806

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,337

PERCENT VARIATION   0.136

DISTRICT 15

Area   Population
York County
VTD 14   1,978
VTD 15   2,359
VTD 17   3,741
VTD 18   2,512
VTD 19   1,858
VTD 20   1,983
VTD 21   2,439
VTD 22   1,666
VTD 25   3,405
VTD 26   1,152
VTD 33   2,947
VTD 34   1,321
VTD 35   2,570
VTD 36   4,316
VTD 37   4,522
VTD 38   990
VTD 39   3,180
VTD 4   3,396
VTD 40   2,448
VTD 41   3,973
VTD 42   3,988
VTD 43   1,165
VTD 49   1,502
VTD 51   1,597
VTD 52   3,012
VTD 53   2,812
VTD 55   1,598
VTD 56   3,984

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,633

PERCENT VARIATION   0.476

DISTRICT 16

Area   Population
Lancaster County
VTD 1   3,836
VTD 10   1,863
VTD 11   3,074
VTD 12   1,116
VTD 13   1,973
VTD 15   4,838
VTD 16   2,206
VTD 17   2,697
VTD 18   1,202
VTD 19   386
VTD 2   1,983
VTD 21   2,768
VTD 22   2,932
VTD 23   2,217
VTD 24   1,470
VTD 25   1,681
VTD 26   327
VTD 27   441
VTD 28   815
VTD 29   1,095
VTD 3   1,235
VTD 30   2,773
VTD 32   2,019
VTD 4   2,158
VTD 5   2,044

York County
VTD 23   708
VTD 24   2,351
VTD 27   4,139
VTD 28   2,620
VTD 44   4,895
VTD 66   2,673
VTD 68   2,084
VTD 69   2,268
VTD 70   2,430
VTD 71   4,016
VTD 72   1,246
VTD 73   1,941

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,306

PERCENT VARIATION   0.101

DISTRICT 17

Area   Population
Chester County   34,068

Fairfield County   23,454

York County
VTD 16   2,223
VTD 31   1,070
VTD 32   1,785
VTD 47   1,123
VTD 48   1,046
VTD 50   754
VTD 54   6,769
VTD 59   3,174
VTD 60   2,734
VTD 61   3,043
VTD 62   2,333

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,507

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.815

DISTRICT 18

Area   Population
Lexington County
VTD 1   2,665
VTD 2   3,368
VTD 22   804
VTD 23   2,042
VTD 27   3,199
VTD 28   3,385
VTD 29   1,623
VTD 42   1,531
VTD 7   1,456

Newberry County   36,108

Saluda County   19,181

Union County
VTD 19   686
VTD 20   245
VTD 21   173
VTD 22   956
VTD 28   647
VTD 29   149
VTD 30   394
VTD 31   248
VTD 32   479
VTD 33   850
VTD 34   864
VTD 35   1,206
VTD 36   815
VTD 38   217
VTD 39   1,101

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,068

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.172

DISTRICT 19

Area   Population
Richland County
VTD 18   3,487
VTD 19   2,447
VTD 20   2,735
VTD 21   2,952
VTD 22   1,419
VTD 23   4,342
VTD 24   6,046
VTD 29   4,287
VTD 31   4,784
VTD 32   3,401
VTD 33   3,512
VTD 34   1,263
VTD 35   4,616
VTD 36   5,718
VTD 37   3,085
VTD 58   3,727
VTD 63   1,348
VTD 64   2,860
VTD 65   1,312
VTD 66   2,443
VTD 67   2,872
VTD 68   2,764
VTD 69   1,128
VTD 70   2,594
VTD 71   715
VTD 72   2,545
VTD 74   2,191
VTD 75   2,307

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,484

PERCENT VARIATION   0.305

DISTRICT 20

Area   Population
Lexington County
VTD 14   2,440
VTD 15   2,653
VTD 6   2,843

Richland County
VTD 1   3,978
VTD 10   9,169
VTD 100   2,306
VTD 101   1,834
VTD 102   1,997
VTD 104   2,710
VTD 11   3,433
VTD 12   3,099
VTD 13   2,050
VTD 14   3,310
VTD 15   3,122
VTD 16   2,022
VTD 17   1,776
VTD 2   3,927
VTD 3   1,985
VTD 4   2,038
VTD 5   2,904
VTD 6   1,845
VTD 7   5,374
VTD 8   5,090
VTD 9   4,210
VTD 94   888
VTD 96   3,303
VTD 97   7,265

PERCENT VARIATION   0.405

DISTRICT 21

Area   Population
Calhoun County
VTD 1   1,395
VTD 10   558
VTD 11   2,108
VTD 3   1,653
VTD 6   710

Richland County
VTD 103   1,959
VTD 105   2,590
VTD 106   2,219
VTD 107   2,962
VTD 108   2,598
VTD 111   2,656
VTD 112   2,016
VTD 113   4,028
VTD 114   4,026
VTD 115   4,120
VTD 116   2,033
VTD 117   3,296
VTD 118   2,145
VTD 119   3,994
VTD 120   1,678
VTD 121   744
VTD 122   3,582
VTD 123   1,285
VTD 124   1,470
VTD 125   3,984
VTD 126   2,720
VTD 45   797
VTD 73   2,579
VTD 76   3,956
VTD 77   2,164
VTD 78   2,531

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,940

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.319

DISTRICT 22

Area   Population
Kershaw County
VTD 16   3,756
VTD 21   3,532
VTD 30   1,634
VTD 31   5,279

Richland County
VTD 109   1,959
VTD 110   2,107
VTD 25   4,909
VTD 26   2,155
VTD 27   3,959
VTD 28   3,333
VTD 30   2,957
VTD 38   5,029
VTD 39   2,547
VTD 40   7
VTD 41   0
VTD 42   0
VTD 43   0
VTD 44   0
VTD 46   4,205
VTD 47   9
VTD 48   1,423
VTD 49   476
VTD 50   9

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,243

PERCENT VARIATION   0.029

DISTRICT 23

Area   Population
Lexington County
VTD 10   2,692
VTD 11   2,494
VTD 12   2,833
VTD 13   2,893
VTD 16   3,046
VTD 17   4,129
VTD 18   1,405
VTD 19   947
VTD 20   4,825
VTD 21   2,451
VTD 24   4,804
VTD 3   3,296

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,985

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.267

DISTRICT 24

Area   Population
Aiken County
VTD 1   1,781
VTD 14   1,303
VTD 24   2,177
VTD 27   2,019
VTD 3   902
VTD 35   1,569
VTD 36   2,783
VTD 39   1,810
VTD 4   533
VTD 40   2,095
VTD 41   3,561
VTD 44   2,215
VTD 45   1,281
VTD 46   1,834
VTD 47   1,364
VTD 48   3,333
VTD 5   880
VTD 50   2,121
VTD 51   1,883

Lexington County
VTD 30   2,622
VTD 31   2,245
VTD 32   2,366
VTD 43   2,271
VTD 44   3,976
VTD 45   3,985
VTD 57   4,886
VTD 62   1,977
VTD 74   1,901

DISTRICT TOTAL   88,008

PERCENT VARIATION   0.906

DISTRICT 25

Area   Population
Aiken County
VTD 13   1,418
VTD 19   2,451
VTD 2   1,191
VTD 20   1,047
VTD 21   2,773
VTD 22   2,112
VTD 23   2,749
VTD 25   2,286
VTD 26   2,930
VTD 30   3,476
VTD 31   1,927
VTD 32   2,500

Edgefield County   24,595

McCormick County   9,958

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,052

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.190

DISTRICT 26

Area   Population
Aiken County
VTD 10   1,242
VTD 11   1,672
VTD 12   1,264
VTD 16   432
VTD 17   535
VTD 18   1,024
VTD 29   1,553
VTD 43   1,106
VTD 65   1,909
VTD 8   469
VTD 9   733

Lexington County
VTD 25   2,620
VTD 26   1,985

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,730

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.560

DISTRICT 27

Area   Population
Chesterfield County   42,768

Kershaw County
VTD 1   1,826
VTD 12   2,224
VTD 13   2,566

Lancaster County
VTD 14   1,012
VTD 20   580
VTD 31   2,119
VTD 7   1,705

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,630

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.674

DISTRICT 28

Area   Population
Dillon County
VTD 11   329
VTD 12   1,507
VTD 20   732

Horry County
VTD 1   944
VTD 100   1,963
VTD 101   1,341
VTD 102   756
VTD 103   529
VTD 104   1,164
VTD 105   259
VTD 106   520
VTD 107   680
VTD 108   2,032
VTD 12   730
VTD 13   2,001
VTD 14   1,713
VTD 15   288
VTD 18   1,656
VTD 19   1,149
VTD 2   1,015
VTD 21   1,965
VTD 22   530
VTD 23   362
VTD 25   276
VTD 29   873
VTD 3   351
VTD 30   346
VTD 31   2,397
VTD 32   228
VTD 34   749
VTD 35   436
VTD 37   997
VTD 39   798
VTD 4   1,964
VTD 40   532
VTD 41   2,419
VTD 42   1,340
VTD 43   5,485
VTD 44   471

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,703

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.590

DISTRICT 29

Area   Population
Darlington County   67,394

Lee County   20,119

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,513

PERCENT VARIATION   0.338

DISTRICT 30

Area   Population
Dillon County
VTD 19   838
VTD 4   3,821

Florence County
VTD 10   1,815
VTD 12   1,578
VTD 13   2,241
VTD 14   2,778
VTD 15   2,400
VTD 17   1,724
VTD 22   845
VTD 24   3,065
VTD 29   572
VTD 35   3,855
VTD 39   1,435
VTD 4   2,355
VTD 40   648
VTD 44   900
VTD 47   1,237
VTD 49   1,051
VTD 5   3,240
VTD 54   1,401
VTD 55   3,720
VTD 56   1,052
VTD 58   890
VTD 66   3,835
VTD 68   1,274
VTD 69   2,644

Marion County   35,466

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,680

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.617

DISTRICT 31

Area   Population
Dillon County
VTD 1   2,686
VTD 10   594
VTD 13   1,611
VTD 14   634
VTD 15   1,103
VTD 16   340
VTD 17   1,364
VTD 18   473
VTD 2   3,806
VTD 3   3,342
VTD 5   707
VTD 9   3,457

Florence County
VTD 1   1,217
VTD 16   1,137
VTD 18   1,054
VTD 19   2,663
VTD 2   1,115
VTD 20   2,325
VTD 50   1,452
VTD 51   2,704
VTD 52   2,393
VTD 53   3,034
VTD 57   2,517
VTD 60   3,003
VTD 61   1,973
VTD 62   2,092
VTD 63   1,168
VTD 64   2,162
VTD 65   2,397
VTD 9   3,939

Marlboro County   28,818

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,280

PERCENT VARIATION   0.071

DISTRICT 32

Area   Population
Florence County
VTD 25   1,020
VTD 26   786
VTD 28   3,532
VTD 34   584
VTD 43   1,630
VTD 6   1,118
VTD 7   1,391
VTD 8   1,310

Georgetown County
VTD 1   1,295
VTD 18   1,975
VTD 19   1,800
VTD 2   794
VTD 20   2,456
VTD 21   877
VTD 22   1,659
VTD 23   3,037
VTD 24   1,735
VTD 25   3,172
VTD 26   2,431
VTD 27   640
VTD 28   1,831
VTD 29   1,205
VTD 3   1,647
VTD 30   2,843
VTD 32   1,427
VTD 33   829
VTD 34   1,626
VTD 36   911

Williamsburg County   37,217

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,468

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.860

DISTRICT 33

Area   Population
Horry County
VTD 10   1,533
VTD 11   5,043
VTD 17   3,487
VTD 20   1,947
VTD 24   2,288
VTD 33   1,390
VTD 36   3,287
VTD 38   2,629
VTD 45   1,827
VTD 46   3,258
VTD 51   2,233
VTD 52   2,335
VTD 55   1,328
VTD 56   1,597
VTD 60   1,578
VTD 62   2,061
VTD 66   1,164
VTD 67   1,397
VTD 68   2,303
VTD 70   5,894
VTD 71   5,547
VTD 73   4,955
VTD 74   2,389
VTD 76   11,885
VTD 77   3,713

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,570

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.743

DISTRICT 34

Area   Population
Charleston County
VTD 1   2,273
VTD 10   1,915
VTD 11   543
VTD 12   2,675
VTD 13   4,402
VTD 14   2,245
VTD 15   1,362
VTD 186   438
VTD 19   1,131
VTD 20   1,809
VTD 21   1,162
VTD 22   940
VTD 23   1,430
VTD 24   1,603
VTD 25   1,815
VTD 26   1,749
VTD 27   897
VTD 28   1,080
VTD 29   1,649
VTD 3   1,664
VTD 31   1,909
VTD 5   2,878
VTD 7   2,536

Georgetown County
VTD 10   1,504
VTD 11   2,214
VTD 12   967

Horry County
VTD 26   2,946
VTD 27   1,450
VTD 28   6,294
VTD 80   2,490
VTD 81   1,637
VTD 82   2,354
VTD 83   5,818
VTD 99   6,313

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,324

PERCENT VARIATION   0.122

DISTRICT 35

Area   Population
Sumter County
VTD 1   1,968
VTD 10   1,404
VTD 11   1,605
VTD 12   1,136
VTD 17   2,775
VTD 18   2,657
VTD 19   1,973
VTD 2   817
VTD 20   351
VTD 21   678
VTD 22   236
VTD 23   1,576
VTD 24   1,443
VTD 25   2,188

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,562

PERCENT VARIATION   0.394

Area   Population
Calhoun County
VTD 12   2,118
VTD 2   1,060
VTD 4   299
VTD 5   2,952
VTD 7   356
VTD 8   1,551
VTD 9   425

Clarendon County   32,502

Florence County
VTD 11   2,431
VTD 27   1,045
VTD 3   1,392
VTD 30   2,336
VTD 31   1,724
VTD 32   2,306
VTD 33   3,624
VTD 36   1,375
VTD 38   2,232
VTD 42   1,049
VTD 46   2,833
VTD 59   5,143
VTD 67   1,584
VTD 70   416

Sumter County
VTD 13   135
VTD 14   826
VTD 15   1,843
VTD 16   1,250
VTD 40   2,002
VTD 45   1,192
VTD 47   1,469
VTD 48   1,006
VTD 49   3,050
VTD 50   687

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,837

PERCENT VARIATION   0.710

DISTRICT 37

Area   Population
Berkeley County
VTD 1   3,534
VTD 10   1,983
VTD 12   1,159
VTD 13   777
VTD 14   3,218
VTD 16   2,543
VTD 17   3,040
VTD 2   1,082
VTD 3   1,829
VTD 4   3,404
VTD 5   4,914
VTD 6   1,301
VTD 9   3,182

Colleton County
VTD 1   211
VTD 10   776
VTD 11   1,047
VTD 12   228
VTD 13   507
VTD 14   792
VTD 15   738
VTD 16   520
VTD 17   4,616
VTD 18   4,207
VTD 19   960
VTD 2   761

Dorchester County
VTD 1   611
VTD 10   447
VTD 11   1,052
VTD 12   888
VTD 13   505
VTD 14   456
VTD 15   616
VTD 16   544
VTD 17   1,458
VTD 18   2,206
VTD 19   1,168
VTD 2   824
VTD 20   966
VTD 23   3,143
VTD 3   879
VTD 34   239
VTD 4   891
VTD 42   383
VTD 43   323
VTD 5   1,126
VTD 6   1,056
VTD 7   586
VTD 8   1,881
VTD 9   734

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,710

DISTRICT 38

Area   Population
Berkeley County
VTD 25   3,411
VTD 26   3,678
VTD 27   1,679
VTD 30   3,803
VTD 31   5,071
VTD 39   981

Dorchester County
VTD 21   4,566
VTD 22   4,541
VTD 24   4,025
VTD 25   1,812
VTD 26   2,621
VTD 27   1,904
VTD 28   2,773
VTD 29   2,843
VTD 30   3,603
VTD 31   1,834
VTD 32   1,447
VTD 33   2,325
VTD 35   2,000
VTD 36   1,960
VTD 37   3,099
VTD 39   4,306
VTD 40   4,637
VTD 44   117
VTD 45   6,333
VTD 47   3,878
VTD 48   2,448
VTD 49   4,933

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,628

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.676

Area   Population
Allendale County   11,211

Bamberg County   16,658

Hampton County
VTD 1   111
VTD 10   748
VTD 11   649
VTD 12   483
VTD 15   391
VTD 16   919
VTD 17   145
VTD 2   1,085
VTD 20   532
VTD 21   680
VTD 22   1,384
VTD 3   346
VTD 4   442
VTD 5   503
VTD 6   362
VTD 7   1,929
VTD 8   1,929
VTD 9   2,260

Orangeburg County
VTD 12   2,187
VTD 13   1,233
VTD 17   1,003
VTD 18   2,359
VTD 19   1,181
VTD 20   1,417
VTD 21   758
VTD 22   1,008
VTD 23   5,063
VTD 24   1,667
VTD 25   2,409
VTD 26   1,878
VTD 27   2,653

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,181

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.042

DISTRICT 40

Area   Population
Aiken County
VTD 15   839
VTD 28   2,185
VTD 42   2,582
VTD 68   1,953
VTD 69   4,006
VTD 70   2,250
VTD 71   8
VTD 72   167
VTD 73   2,338
VTD 74   7
VTD 75   0

Barnwell County   23,478

Orangeburg County
VTD 1   1,143
VTD 10   1,291
VTD 11   1,252
VTD 14   2,227
VTD 15   1,668
VTD 16   2,081
VTD 2   1,098
VTD 31   2,766

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,981

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.272

DISTRICT 41

Area   Population
Charleston County
VTD 110   3,137
VTD 111   803
VTD 112   1,535
VTD 113   934
VTD 114   2,688
VTD 115   1,405
VTD 116   553
VTD 117   748
VTD 119   3,791
VTD 122   2,548
VTD 123   470
VTD 124   1,781
VTD 125   1,420

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,796

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.484

DISTRICT 42

Area   Population
Charleston County
VTD 100   802
VTD 101   161
VTD 102   596
VTD 103   2,008
VTD 104   1,422
VTD 105   2,736
VTD 106   1,519
VTD 107   1,138
VTD 108   4,455
VTD 109   2,879
VTD 118   2,154
VTD 120   3,818
VTD 121   355
VTD 127   2,169
VTD 128   851
VTD 129   2,394
VTD 130   1,764
VTD 131   1,502
VTD 132   926
VTD 133   1,429
VTD 134   1,927
VTD 135   974
VTD 141   967
VTD 184   1,841
VTD 48   3,675
VTD 49   1,452
VTD 51   1,173
VTD 53   1,878
VTD 54   1,330
VTD 55   1,775
VTD 56   1,057
VTD 57   1,735

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,143

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.086

DISTRICT 43

Area   Population
Berkeley County
VTD 18   1,599
VTD 19   313
VTD 20   511
VTD 24   1,535
VTD 29   3,410
VTD 7   2,661
VTD 8   878

Charleston County
VTD 2   1,261

Dorchester County
VTD 46   5,426

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,590

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.720

DISTRICT 44

Area   Population
Berkeley County
VTD 11   3,148
VTD 15   2,678
VTD 21   6,144
VTD 22   3,253
VTD 23   1,480
VTD 28   6,333
VTD 32   2,923
VTD 33   3,911
VTD 34   1,240
VTD 35   4,329
VTD 36   2,434
VTD 37   5,021
VTD 38   5,220
VTD 40   3,083
VTD 41   2,130
VTD 42   8,253
VTD 43   8,882
VTD 44   2,877
VTD 45   3,025
VTD 46   4,791

Charleston County
VTD 84   4,237
VTD 88   1,581

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,973

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.281

Area   Population
Beaufort County
VTD 1   296
VTD 10   3,274
VTD 14   328
VTD 16   2,232
VTD 17   1,789
VTD 2   746
VTD 23   454
VTD 25   836
VTD 3   959
VTD 34   337
VTD 35   796
VTD 36   2,483
VTD 39   4,841
VTD 4   511
VTD 40   2,283
VTD 5   1,139
VTD 6   465
VTD 7   1,410
VTD 8   7,167
VTD 9   1,740

Charleston County
VTD 170   935
VTD 171   2,328
VTD 172   2,038
VTD 173   1,215
VTD 174   1,396
VTD 176   1,559
VTD 177   2,120
VTD 178   1,505
VTD 179   2,655
VTD 180   1,673
VTD 181   1,681
VTD 182   745

Colleton County
VTD 25   1,687

Hampton County
VTD 13   1,495
VTD 14   4,153
VTD 18   580
VTD 19   260

Jasper County   20,678

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,604

PERCENT VARIATION   0.443

DISTRICT 46

Area   Population
Beaufort County
VTD 11   682
VTD 12   1,918
VTD 13   2,500
VTD 15   2,129
VTD 18   2,264
VTD 19   1,284
VTD 20   842
VTD 21   499
VTD 22   2,623
VTD 24   1,218
VTD 26   1,905
VTD 27   2,929
VTD 28   2,163
VTD 29   908
VTD 30   1,860
VTD 31   1,443
VTD 32   2,243
VTD 33   1,270
VTD 37   1,079
VTD 38   1,641

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.421" /

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Senator LEVENTIS explained the amendment.

I wanted to give the Judiciary Committee the benefit of knowing more about the process the Democratic Caucus used to develop the plan it proffered so that the committee would have the benefit of information different than and in addition to the comments made by its staff. The staff was allowed to describe what they perceived to be weaknesses in the plan, although they admitted to being unable to study the plan in detail. At the time the plan was offered to the committee, Senator C. BRADLEY HUTTO requested that I be allowed to speak to its attributes. I am not sure why members of the Senate were denied the chance to make comments; the committee apparently had all the information it wanted to consider.

I want to highlight the traditional districting principles we prioritized in developing this plan. I will also discuss how we addressed the pertinent Voting Rights Act issues and the constitutional considerations, like one-person one-vote and remediation of the racial gerrymandering that remained in the plan, even after the 1997 plan was put into place.

As you know, I worked for the John McCain Presidential Campaign. I have prided myself in trying to act in a bipartisan manner on issues that should transcend partisan politics. Reapportionment is an issue the General Assembly should resolve every ten years. Yet, the South Carolina General Assembly has been unable to get through reapportionment without court intervention in 30 years.

The plan passed by the Judiciary subcommittee will not pass muster either in a court of law or the court of public opinion.   Our plan offers some middle ground that will allow for some bipartisan cooperation and collaboration. Why is this plan a better plan?

1.   The three-judge court in Smith v. Beasley held that South Carolina's single most important traditional districting principle was to respect political subdivisions, specifically counties and cities. They are our most recognizable communities of interest, as evidenced by the fact

Our plan keeps more cities and counties whole. Clearly, this plan is superior in that regard. Of course, some counties and cities must be split because their population exceeds the ideal district size. Still minimizing the number or splits is also an important districting principle. Again, our plan is clearly superior in this regard. The Democratic Caucus Plan has 21 whole counties or 40% more than the 15 whole counties in the Judiciary Plan. I realize your analysis is based on "county splits" but I prefer to count this vital statistic the way the average citizen does, not how the "professionals" count.

2.   The population of each district should be as equal as possible given other important considerations. Our plan's deviation is far below the plus/minus 5% standard approved by the Supreme Court for state legislative districts.

3.   There is no question that the existing plan retained much of the unconstitutional racial gerrymandering the Republican Party insisted on in 1993. The Smith v. Beasley litigation remedied only one unconstitutional majority minority district. The staff plan perpetuates much of that racial gerrymandering under the pretext of minimizing change from the present plan to a new plan which leaves the plan vulnerable to litigation. These race-based districts are often oddly shaped and were already found to be the product of racial gerrymandering used by the Republican Party during the 1993 Session on reapportionment to maximize the number of African-American voters in majority minority districts in order to limit the number of African-American voters in the other districts.

Our plan has been careful not to retrogress under Section V. We believe our plan is far superior on that important issue. We have endeavored to maintain and/or establish districts that provide an equal opportunity for minorities to elect the candidate of their choice. Section V of the Voting Rights Act does not establish a finite number of districts which must be created. Our plan contains 9 majority districts versus the 10 districts in the current (1997) plan and the Judiciary Committee Plan. If the unconstitutional districts in the 1997 plan (unchallenged for lack of a plaintiff) which survive in the

We have not had a written report produced, but indications from our equal opportunity analysis from our expert proves that our plan creates equal opportunity for minorities to be elected in these districts. South Carolina can be proud of the fact that its recent election history demonstrates a real and progressive reduction in the incidence of racially polarized voting. This is an important fact in that it undergirds the fact that the minority population in a majority minority district can, depending on the local voting history, be substantially less than the old norm of 65%. Look at District 7 in the 2000 elections. An African-American Senator won an election against a white incumbent county office holder by a 63% margin in a district which was barely 50% minority population and a minority voting age population of less than 50%.

No plan is perfect but the plan advanced by the Democratic Caucus is a meaningful and substantive place to start. The Democratic Caucus Plan: maintains a population deviation which falls within the constitutional/judicial standard; corrects the constitutional violations in those districts not fixed under Smith v. Beasley; adheres to the traditional districting principles which the court enunciated three years ago; and does so while meeting the standards of the Voting Rights Act.

On motion of Senator LEVENTIS, with unanimous consent, Senator LEVENTIS' remarks were ordered printed in the Journal.

Senator LEVENTIS moved that the amendment be adopted.

Senator McCONNELL argued contra to the adoption of the amendment.

Senator RICHARDSON spoke on the amendment.

Senator MATTHEWS argued in favor of the adoption of the amendment.

Senator McCONNELL moved to lay the amendment on the table.

The "ayes" and "nays" were demanded and taken, resulting as follows:

Alexander                 Bauer                     Branton
Courson                   Elliott                   Fair
Giese                     Gregory                   Grooms
Hawkins                   Hayes                     Leatherman
Martin                    McConnell                 Mescher
Peeler                    Ravenel                   Richardson
Ritchie                   Ryberg                    Smith, J. Verne
Thomas                    Verdin                    Waldrep
Wilson

Anderson                  Drummond                  Ford
Glover                    Holland                   Hutto
Jackson                   Land *                    Leventis
Matthews                  McGill                    Moore
O'Dell                    Patterson                 Pinckney *
Rankin                    Reese                     Saleeby
Setzler                   Short

*These Senators were not present in the Chamber at the time the vote was taken and the votes were recorded by leave of the Senate, with unanimous consent.

The amendment was laid on the table.

I voted to table the Democratic Caucus amendment just presented. It was an attempt to decimate the representation of District 24. The cigar-styled district cuts through neighborhoods and is completely counter to maintaining a compact district with a commonality of interest. The Democratic plan for District 24 is an attempt to lessen the wonderful people of Aiken County's representation in the South Carolina Senate.

Since the last reapportionment battle, we have campaigned through many election cycles. We have come to the realization and statistics have proven that positive changes have finally created a society where it is no longer necessary to have a district with 60-65% minority representation in order for an African-American to be elected. As a matter of fact, having districts with a minority population of 60-65% dilutes the possibility of a Black influence that is representative of the Black population of this State.

It is the position of the Black Caucus that more districts need Black influence rather than a majority population. As a matter of fact, any district with a Black voting age population (BVAP) greater than 30% is one where African-American voters have enough influence to substantially affect the choice of a Senator. A district with a BVAP of only 20-30% creates a situation where Blacks have an impact. Because of this it is important for more districts to have Black influence and impact. Districts with a Black population of 60-65% do not accomplish this. It is only with more districts having Black influence and impact that Blacks will have appropriate representation that is sensitive to their issues of concern.

We cannot support any plan that packs African-Americans in super majority districts. Black districts marginalize the political strength of the Blacks of this State. Through experience we have learned that maximization equals marginalization.

Senator McCONNELL proposed the following Amendment No. 5 (JUD3003.015), which was adopted (#2):

Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, line 27, by inserting / AND THE PRIMARIES THEREFOR / after /ELECTION/ .

Amend the bill further, as and if amended, page 1, beginning on line 33, by striking /TO REPEAL SECTION 2-1-65, RELATING TO ELECTION DISTRICTS FROM WHICH MEMBERS OF THE SENATE WERE FORMERLY ELECTED;/

Amend the bill further, as and if amended, page 1, beginning on line 35, by striking /AMEND SECTION 7-19-40, AS AMENDED,/ and inserting / ADD SECTION 7-19-45, /

Amend the bill further, as and if amended, page 2, line 6, by striking /2002/ and inserting therein / 2000 / .

Amend the bill further, as and if amended, page 188, beginning on line 18, by striking SECTIONS 3 and 4 and inserting therein the following:

/ SECTION 3.   Section 2-1-25 of the 1976 Code is repealed, provided that until the members of the House elected in the 2002 general election from the districts enumerated in Section 2-1-35 of the 1976 Code qualify and take office, the districts now provided by law continue to apply for purposes of vacancies in office for members of the House of Representatives.

SECTION   4.   Upon approval of this act by the Governor and pursuant to 28 CFR Section 51.23, the House of Representatives is designated the submitting authority to make the required submission to the United States Department of Justice under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1973a, of the House of Representatives' reapportionment plan set forth in this act. /

Amend the bill further, as and if amended, page 188, line 31, in Section 2-1-75, as contained in SECTION 5, by inserting / and the primaries therefore / after /election/ .

Amend the bill further, as and if amended, page 293, line 11, in SECTION 11, by striking /declares/ and inserting therein / declaring /.

Amend the bill further, as and if amended, page 293, line 25, in SECTION 12, by striking /provided, that/ and inserting therein / however, /

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Senator McCONNELL explained the amendment.

Senator McCONNELL moved that the amendment be adopted.

Amendment No. 5 was adopted.

Senator SETZLER proposed the following Amendment No. 6 (JUD3003.007), which was tabled:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 224, beginning on line 1, as contained in SECTION 5, by striking line 1 through line 8 on page 225 and inserting therein the following:

Area   Population
Lexington County
VTD 10   2,692
VTD 14   2,440
VTD 17   4,129
VTD 18   1,405
VTD 24   4,804
VTD 30   2,622
VTD 31   2,245
VTD 32   2,366
VTD 33   3,539
VTD 34   6,804
VTD 35   3,960
VTD 44   3,976
VTD 45   3,985
VTD 46   4,709
VTD 47   3,954
VTD 48   4,193
VTD 49   3,947
VTD 57   4,886
VTD 58   2,958
VTD 59   4,541
VTD 62   1,977
VTD 63   2,000
VTD 64   2,922
VTD 69   2,796
VTD 9   2,680

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,530

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.789 /.

Amend the bill further, as and if amended, page 229, beginning on line 1, as contained in SECTION 5, by striking lines 1 through line 39 and inserting therein the following:

Area                                         Population
Aiken County
VTD 1   1,781
VTD 10   1,242
VTD 11   1,672
VTD 12   1,264
VTD 17   535
VTD 18   1,024
VTD 4   533
VTD 43   1,106

Lexington County
VTD 19   947
VTD 25   2,620
VTD 26   1,985
VTD 27   3,199
VTD 36   2,538
VTD 37   3,357
VTD 38   3,917
VTD 39   3,590
VTD 40   1,809
VTD 41   1,935
VTD 42   1,531
VTD 43   2,271
VTD 50   2,362
VTD 51   655
VTD 52   1,188
VTD 53   2,480
VTD 54   2,268
VTD 55   3,313
VTD 56   3,154
VTD 60   4,856
VTD 61   4,281
VTD 65   5,609
VTD 66   2,898
VTD 67   1,223
VTD 68   1,410
VTD 70   3,265
VTD 71   1,746

Saluda County
VTD 28   331
VTD 29   1,047
VTD 30   424

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,881

PERCENT VARIATION   0.760 /.

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Senator SETZLER explained the amendment.

Senator RICHARDSON argued contra to the adoption of the amendment.

Senator MOORE spoke on the amendment.

Senator McCONNELL spoke on the amendment.

Senator MARTIN moved to lay the amendment on the table.

The "ayes" and "nays" were demanded and taken, resulting as follows:

Alexander                 Branton                   Courson
Fair                      Giese                     Gregory
Grooms                    Hawkins                   Hayes
Leatherman                Martin                    McConnell
Mescher                   Peeler                    Ravenel
Richardson                Ritchie                   Ryberg
Smith, J. Verne           Thomas                    Verdin
Wilson

Anderson                  Drummond                  Elliott
Ford                      Glover                    Holland
Hutto                     Jackson                   Leventis
Matthews                  McGill                    Moore
O'Dell                    Patterson                 Pinckney
Rankin                    Reese                     Saleeby
Setzler                   Short                     Waldrep

Amendment No. 6 was laid on the table.

On motion of Senator HUTTO, with unanimous consent, the following statement by Senator LAND was ordered printed in the Journal.

Had I been present, I would have voted "no" on the motion to table the amendment. By previous unanimous consent motion, a "no" vote could have been cast for me if such vote would not have changed the outcome. However, my vote on this motion would have changed the outcome; therefore, it was not recorded.

Senators FORD, MATTHEWS and HUTTO proposed the following Amendment No. 7 (JUD3003.004), which was withdrawn and subsequently resubmitted and tabled:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, beginning on page 269, line 4, through page 292, line 29, in SECTION 8 by striking Districts 1 through 6 and inserting therein:

/ DISTRICT 1

Area   Population
Berkeley County
VTD 10   1,983
VTD 11   3,148
VTD 12   1,159
VTD 13   777
VTD 14   3,218

Dorchester County
VTD 18   2,206
VTD 21   4,566
VTD 22   4,541
VTD 23   3,143
VTD 24   4,025
VTD 25   1,812
VTD 26   2,621
VTD 27   1,904
VTD 28   2,773
VTD 29   2,843
VTD 30   3,603
VTD 31   1,834
VTD 32   1,447
VTD 33   2,325
VTD 35   2,000
VTD 36   1,960
VTD 37   3,099
VTD 39   4,306
VTD 40   4,637
VTD 44   117
VTD 45   6,333
VTD 46   5,426
VTD 47   3,878
VTD 48   2,448
VTD 49   4,933

Georgetown County   55,797

Horry County   196,629

DISTRICT TOTAL   668,669

DISTRICT 2

Area   Population
Aiken County
VTD 10   1,242
VTD 11   1,672
VTD 12   1,264
VTD 15   839
VTD 16   432
VTD 17   535
VTD 18   1,024
VTD 28   2,185
VTD 29   1,553
VTD 42   2,582
VTD 43   1,106
VTD 64   3,846
VTD 65   1,909
VTD 69   4,006
VTD 70   2,250
VTD 74   7
VTD 75   0
VTD 9
Tract 0217.00
Blocks: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2035, 2036, 2037, 2038, 2039, 2040, 2041, 2042, 2043, 2044, 2045, 2046, 2047, 2048, 2049, 2055, 2056, 2057, 2058, 2059, 2060, 2061, 2062, 2063, 2064, 2065, 2066, 2092, 2093, 2094, 2095, 2096, 2097, 2098, 2099, 2105, 2111, 2982, 2983, 2998, 2999   502

Allendale County   11,211

Barnwell County   23,478

Colleton County   38,264

Hampton County   21,386

Jasper County   20,678

Lexington County   216,014

Richland County
VTD 1   3,978
VTD 10   9,169
VTD 101   1,834
VTD 102   1,997
VTD 103   1,959
VTD 104   2,710
VTD 107   2,962
VTD 108   2,598
VTD 109   1,959
VTD 11   3,433
VTD 110
Tract 0116.03
Blocks: 1016, 1020, 1021   16
VTD 111   2,656
VTD 112   2,016
VTD 12   3,099
VTD 13   2,050
VTD 14   3,310
VTD 15   3,122
VTD 16   2,022
VTD 17   1,776
VTD 18   3,487
VTD 19   2,447
VTD 2   3,927
VTD 20   2,735
VTD 21   2,952
VTD 22   1,419
VTD 23   4,342
VTD 24   6,046
VTD 25   4,909

DISTRICT TOTAL   668,669

PERCENT VARIATION   0.000

DISTRICT 3

Area   Population
Abbeville County   26,167

Aiken County
VTD 1   1,781
VTD 13   1,418
VTD 14   1,303
VTD 19   2,451
VTD 2   1,191
VTD 20   1,047
VTD 21   2,773
VTD 22   2,112
VTD 23   2,749
VTD 24   2,177
VTD 25   2,286
VTD 26   2,930
VTD 27   2,019
VTD 3   902
VTD 30   3,476
VTD 31   1,927
VTD 32   2,500
VTD 33   2,684
VTD 34   2,423
VTD 35   1,569
VTD 36   2,783

Anderson County   165,740

Edgefield County   24,595

Greenwood County   66,271

Laurens County
VTD 10   3,403
VTD 11   1,605
VTD 12   2,787
VTD 13   3,065
VTD 14   530
VTD 15   1,982
VTD 16   2,021
VTD 17   1,271
VTD 18   2,270
VTD 19   2,933
VTD 2
Tract 9801.00
Blocks: 1051, 1053, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1068, 1069, 1070, 1071, 1072, 1073, 1074, 1075, 1995, 4043, 4044, 4999   510
VTD 20   717
VTD 21   876
VTD 22   1,886
VTD 23   2,006
VTD 24   1,350
VTD 25   969
VTD 26   2,163
VTD 27   1,793
VTD 28   2,247
VTD 29   2,065
VTD 3   2,251
VTD 30   2,379
VTD 31   994
VTD 32   2,539
VTD 33   1,669
VTD 34   1,481

McCormick County   9,958

Oconee County   66,215

Pickens County   110,757

Saluda County   19,181

DISTRICT TOTAL   668,669

PERCENT VARIATION   0.000

DISTRICT 4

Area   Population
Greenville County   379,616

Laurens County
VTD 1   3,544
VTD 2
Tract 9801.00
Blocks: 1000, 1001, 1004, 1005, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1034, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, 1043, 1044, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1052, 1057, 1058, 1059, 1060, 1061, 1062, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066, 1067, 1076, 1077, 1996   1,836

Spartanburg County   253,791

Union County   29,881

DISTRICT TOTAL   668,668

PERCENT VARIATION   0.000

DISTRICT 5

Area   Population
Cherokee County   52,537

Chester County   34,068

Chesterfield County   42,768

Darlington County   67,394

Dillon County   30,722

Fairfield County   23,454

Kershaw County   52,647

Lancaster County   61,351

Lee County   20,119

Marlboro County   28,818

Newberry County   36,108

Sumter County
VTD 1   1,968
VTD 10
Tract 0004.00
Blocks: 4003, 4004, 4005, 4006, 4007, 4008, 4009, 4010, 4011, 4012, 4013, 4014, 4015, 4016, 4017, 4018, 4019, 4020, 4021, 4022, 4023, 4024, 4029, 4030, 4031, 4032, 4033, 4034, 4035, 4036, 4037, 4038, 4039, 4040   459
VTD 18   2,657
VTD 23   1,576

York County   164,614

DISTRICT TOTAL   668,669

PERCENT VARIATION   0.000

DISTRICT 6

Area   Population
Bamberg County   16,658

Berkeley County
VTD 1   3,534
VTD 2   1,082
VTD 3   1,829
VTD 5
Tract 0202.00

Calhoun County   15,185

Charleston County
VTD 113   934
VTD 114   2,688
VTD 115   1,405
VTD 116   553
VTD 117   748

Clarendon County   32,502

Dorchester County
VTD 1   611
VTD 10   447
VTD 11   1,052
VTD 12   888
VTD 13   505
VTD 14   456
VTD 15   616
VTD 16   544
VTD 17   1,458
VTD 19   1,168
VTD 2   824
VTD 20   966
VTD 3   879
VTD 34   239
VTD 4   891
VTD 42   383
VTD 43   323
VTD 5   1,126
VTD 6   1,056
VTD 7   586
VTD 8   1,881
VTD 9   734

Florence County   125,761

Orangeburg County   91,582

Richland County
VTD 100   2,306
VTD 105   2,590
VTD 106   2,219
VTD 110
Tract 0116.03
Blocks: 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1015, 1017, 1018, 1019, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1050, 1051, 1053, 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058, 1059, 1060, 1061   2,091
VTD 113   4,028
VTD 114   4,026
VTD 115   4,120
VTD 116   2,033
VTD 117   3,296
VTD 118   2,145
VTD 119   3,994
VTD 120   1,678
VTD 121   744
VTD 122   3,582
VTD 123   1,285
VTD 124   1,470
VTD 125   3,984
VTD 126   2,720
VTD 32   3,401
VTD 33   3,512
VTD 34   1,263
VTD 35   4,616
VTD 36   5,718
VTD 58   3,727
VTD 64   2,860
VTD 65   1,312
VTD 66   2,443
VTD 67   2,872

Sumter County
VTD 10
Tract 0004.00
Blocks: 4000, 4001, 4002, 4025, 4026, 4027, 4028, 4041, 4042, 4048, 4049, 5005, 5006, 5007, 5008, 5009, 5010, 5011, 5012, 5013, 5014, 5015, 5016, 5017, 5018, 5024, 5025, 5028, 5029, 5030, 5031, 5032, 5033, 5034, 5035, 5040, 5999   945
VTD 11   1,605
VTD 12   1,136
VTD 13   135
VTD 14   826
VTD 15   1,843
VTD 16   1,250
VTD 17   2,775
VTD 19   1,973
VTD 2   817
VTD 20   351

Williamsburg County   37,217

DISTRICT TOTAL   668,668

PERCENT VARIATION   0.000 /

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Senator FORD explained the amendment.

Senator FORD asked unanimous consent to make a motion to amend Amendment No. 7 by moving in the amendment Ft. Jackson and

Senator McCONNELL objected.

On motion of Senator FORD, with unanimous consent, Amendment No. 7 was withdrawn.

Senator McGILL proposed the following Amendment No. 8 (JUD3003.018), which was tabled:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, beginning on page 240, line 1, through page 241, line 5, in SECTION 5 by striking District 32 and inserting therein:

/ DISTRICT 32

Area   Population
Berkeley County
VTD 1   3,534
VTD 2   1,082
VTD 20   511
VTD 3   1,829
VTD 5   4,914
VTD 6   1,301
VTD 8   878

Florence County
VTD 30   2,336
VTD 32   2,306
VTD 33   3,624

Georgetown County
VTD 1   1,295
VTD 2   794
VTD 20   2,456
VTD 21   877
VTD 22   1,659
VTD 23   3,037
VTD 24   1,735
VTD 25   3,172
VTD 3   1,647

Horry County
VTD 35   436
VTD 46   3,258
VTD 63   945
VTD 66   1,164

Williamsburg County   37,217

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,034

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.211/.

Amend the bill further, as and if amended, beginning on page 261, line 1, through page 262, line 3, in SECTION 5 by striking District 43 and inserting therein:

/ DISTRICT 43

Area   Population
Charleston County
VTD 1   2,273
VTD 2   1,261
VTD 3   1,664
VTD 4   3,486

Georgetown County
VTD 10   1,504
VTD 11   2,214
VTD 12   967
VTD 13   1,935
VTD 14   2,380
VTD 15   2,886
VTD 16   2,028
VTD 17   1,554

Horry County
VTD 26   2,946
VTD 27   1,450
VTD 28   6,294
VTD 38   2,629
VTD 76   11,885
VTD 80   2,490
VTD 81   1,637
VTD 82   2,354
VTD 83   5,818
VTD 99   6,313

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,598

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.711 /.

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Senator McGILL explained the amendment.

Senator McCONNELL argued contra to the adoption of the amendment.

Senator McCONNELL moved to lay the amendment on the table.

The "ayes" and "nays" were demanded and taken, resulting as follows:

Alexander                 Bauer                     Branton
Courson                   Elliott                   Fair
Giese                     Gregory                   Grooms
Hawkins                   Hayes                     Leatherman
Martin                    McConnell                 Mescher
O'Dell                    Peeler                    Richardson
Ritchie                   Ryberg                    Smith, J. Verne
Thomas                    Verdin                    Waldrep
Wilson

Anderson                  Drummond                  Ford
Glover                    Holland                   Hutto
Jackson                   Leventis                  Matthews
McGill                    Moore                     Patterson
Rankin                    Ravenel                   Reese
Saleeby                   Setzler                   Short

Amendment No. 8 was laid on the table.

On motion of Senator FORD, with unanimous consent, Amendment No. 7 (JUD3003.004), which was previously withdrawn, was taken up for immediate consideration.

Senator FORD moved that the amendment be adopted.

Senator COURSON spoke on the amendment.

Senator COURSON moved to lay the amendment on the table.

The "ayes" and "nays" were demanded and taken, resulting as follows:

Alexander                 Bauer                     Branton
Courson                   Fair                      Giese
Gregory                   Grooms                    Hawkins
Hayes                     Leatherman                Martin
McConnell                 Mescher                   Peeler
Ravenel                   Richardson                Ritchie
Ryberg                    Smith, J. Verne           Thomas
Verdin                    Waldrep                   Wilson

Anderson                  Drummond                  Elliott
Ford                      Glover                    Holland
Hutto                     Jackson                   Land *
Leventis                  Matthews                  McGill
Moore                     O'Dell                    Patterson
Pinckney                  Rankin                    Reese
Saleeby                   Setzler                   Short

*This Senator was not present in the Chamber at the time the vote was taken and the vote was recorded by leave of the Senate, with unanimous consent.

Amendment No. 7 was laid on the table.

Senator WILSON proposed the following Amendment No. 9 (JUD3003.008), which was tabled:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, beginning on page 188, line 35, through page 268, line 26, in SECTION 5 by striking Districts 1-46 and inserting therein:

Area   Population
Oconee County   66,215

Pickens County
VTD 25   835
VTD 36   976
VTD 45   8,888
VTD 46   3,012
VTD 47   2,664
VTD 48   2,486
VTD 49   1,638

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,714

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.578

DISTRICT 02

Area   Population
Pickens County
VTD 1   155
VTD 10   1,458
VTD 11   657
VTD 12   2,730
VTD 13   3,084
VTD 14   1,037
VTD 15   1,574
VTD 16   3,308
VTD 17   3,498
VTD 18   1,349
VTD 19   2,425
VTD 2   2,264
VTD 20   2,022
VTD 21   896
VTD 22   2,906
VTD 23   2,484
VTD 24   3,966
VTD 26   2,490
VTD 27   3,707

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,878

PERCENT VARIATION   0.757

DISTRICT 03

Area   Population
Anderson County
VTD 1   5,265
VTD 14   3,858
VTD 15   458
VTD 16   1,102
VTD 2   3,561
VTD 21   2,427
VTD 22   1,210
VTD 23   1,572
VTD 28   901
VTD 29   1,112

Pickens County
VTD 44   2,380

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,207

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.013

DISTRICT 04

Area   Population
Abbeville County
VTD 1   957

Anderson County
VTD 10   822
VTD 11   3,382
VTD 12   2,814
VTD 13   1,461
VTD 17   4,016
VTD 18   346
VTD 19   5,091
VTD 20   3,095
VTD 24   4,752
VTD 25   870
VTD 26   2,133
VTD 27   909
VTD 49   1,804
VTD 51   3,580
VTD 52   2,365
VTD 53   6,325
VTD 54   509
VTD 55   2,457
VTD 56   2,591
VTD 57   479
VTD 58   4,815
VTD 59   879
VTD 60   2,785
VTD 61   1,095
VTD 62   751
VTD 63   546
VTD 64   415
VTD 65   762
VTD 66   2,423
VTD 67   654
VTD 68   304
VTD 69   1,193
VTD 70   1,368
VTD 71   1,184
VTD 72   1,117
VTD 73   1,449

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,547

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.769

DISTRICT 05

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 1   192
VTD 10   2,563
VTD 11   2,932
VTD 12   3,593
VTD 129   2,344
VTD 13   3,891
VTD 130   1,433
VTD 136   4,052
VTD 14   3,370
VTD 15   6,796
VTD 16   3,773
VTD 17   7,973
VTD 18   4,108
VTD 19   4,125
VTD 2   1,144
VTD 20   2,974
VTD 21   4,498
VTD 22   2,826
VTD 23   3,464
VTD 3   3,037
VTD 4   669
VTD 5   2,327
VTD 6   2,551

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,211

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.008

DISTRICT 06

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 100   3,737
VTD 101   1,810
VTD 102   2,312
VTD 103   1,843
VTD 104   1,569
VTD 105   3,063
VTD 107   1,188
VTD 108   2,412
VTD 109   1,541
VTD 110   2,428
VTD 111   856
VTD 112   1,613
VTD 113   3,508
VTD 114   5,198
VTD 119   2,826
VTD 120   3,648
VTD 121   1,828
VTD 122   2,405
VTD 126   3,283
VTD 127   1,305
VTD 128   2,666
VTD 60   1,638
VTD 62   1,562
VTD 68   1,550
VTD 89   1,674
VTD 90   4,492
VTD 91   3,483

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,705

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.588

DISTRICT 07

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 106   3,655
VTD 115   2,140
VTD 123   1,295
VTD 124   801
VTD 131   4,040
VTD 132   4,788
VTD 133   2,163
VTD 134   821
VTD 137   2,623
VTD 138   1,853
VTD 139   2,540
VTD 140   1,770
VTD 141   2,347
VTD 144   1,191
VTD 27   1,016
VTD 28   1,513
VTD 29   1,685
VTD 30   2,164
VTD 31   2,985
VTD 32   5,122
VTD 34   2,747
VTD 35   1,760
VTD 37   1,753
VTD 38   3,005

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,766

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.518

DISTRICT 08

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 116   1,708
VTD 117   2,227
VTD 118   1,193
VTD 125   3,268
VTD 135   2,364
VTD 142   1,105
VTD 143   1,635
VTD 145   2,116
VTD 146   1,377
VTD 24   3,390
VTD 25   2,411
VTD 26   2,469
VTD 39   4,018
VTD 40   2,383
VTD 41   9,278
VTD 42   11,216
VTD 43   2,314
VTD 44   3,335
VTD 45   11,734

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,894

PERCENT VARIATION   0.775

DISTRICT 09

Area   Population
Greenville County
VTD 33   3,469
VTD 36   1,823
VTD 46   3,339
VTD 47   2,206
VTD 50   1,941
VTD 51   1,221
VTD 52   2,345
VTD 53   1,273
VTD 54   3,485
VTD 55   2,939
VTD 56   4,592
VTD 58   2,407

Laurens County
VTD 1   3,544
VTD 10   3,403
VTD 11   1,605
VTD 12   2,787
VTD 13   3,065
VTD 14   530
VTD 15   1,982
VTD 16   2,021
VTD 17   1,271
VTD 18   2,270
VTD 19   2,933

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,536

PERCENT VARIATION   0.365

DISTRICT 10

Area   Population
Abbeville County
VTD 10   2,904
VTD 12   660
VTD 2   1,292
VTD 4   870
VTD 5   2,490
VTD 7   1,381
VTD 9   1,422

Greenwood County
VTD 1   393
VTD 10   2,290
VTD 11   1,455
VTD 12   2,454
VTD 13   2,149
VTD 14   2,827

Laurens County
VTD 21   876
VTD 29   2,065
VTD 30   2,379
VTD 31   994
VTD 32   2,539
VTD 33   1,669
VTD 34   1,481
VTD 35   1,068

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.892

DISTRICT 11

Area   Population
Spartanburg County
VTD 10   3,720
VTD 11   11,984
VTD 12   4,722
VTD 13   3,480
VTD 16   11,128
VTD 2   3,913
VTD 21   2,985
VTD 3   4,268
VTD 30   1,410
VTD 31   1,507
VTD 32   1,551
VTD 33   2,368
VTD 36   448
VTD 37   2,857
VTD 38   1,620
VTD 39   3,645
VTD 4   777
VTD 40   2,027
VTD 41   1,285
VTD 43   3,204
VTD 44   1,291
VTD 45   1,936
VTD 48   985
VTD 49   2,611
VTD 50   1,110
VTD 51   880
VTD 6   3,774
VTD 9   6,127

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,613

PERCENT VARIATION   0.453

Area   Population
Spartanburg County
VTD 1   4,298
VTD 14   3,481
VTD 15   3,520
VTD 19   3,737
VTD 20   2,360
VTD 26   3,921
VTD 27   3,769
VTD 28   853
VTD 29   4,388
VTD 47   2,872
VTD 5   3,417
VTD 54   2,377
VTD 55   2,593
VTD 56   1,656
VTD 57   1,449
VTD 58   1,085
VTD 62   3,807
VTD 63   1,401
VTD 64   5,444
VTD 65   1,033
VTD 66   3,699
VTD 67   8,284
VTD 68   1,395
VTD 7   1,248
VTD 71   5,823
VTD 72   1,882
VTD 73   3,115
VTD 77   1,283
VTD 78   1,498
VTD 8   1,944

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,632

PERCENT VARIATION   0.475

Area   Population
Spartanburg County
VTD 17   4,300
VTD 18   5,106
VTD 22   1,811
VTD 23   1,897
VTD 24   3,567
VTD 25   1,444
VTD 35   1,370
VTD 42   5,634
VTD 46   2,630
VTD 52   1,870
VTD 53   4,295
VTD 59   1,234
VTD 60   2,072
VTD 61   1,609
VTD 69   5,665
VTD 70   4,221
VTD 74   2,169
VTD 75   1,329
VTD 76   2,865
VTD 79   3,203
VTD 80   1,914
VTD 81   1,929
VTD 82   1,732
VTD 83   1,232
VTD 84   1,144
VTD 85   2,189
VTD 86   1,301
VTD 87   2,875
VTD 88   3,638
VTD 89   2,301

Union County
VTD 13   1,000
VTD 14   753
VTD 15   336
VTD 18   762
VTD 19   686

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,750

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.537

DISTRICT 14

Area   Population
Cherokee County   52,537

Union County
VTD 1   492
VTD 10   502
VTD 11   592
VTD 12   507
VTD 16   1,555
VTD 17   1,431
VTD 2   693
VTD 22   956
VTD 24   957
VTD 25   425
VTD 26   623
VTD 3   779
VTD 31   248
VTD 4   742
VTD 7   677
VTD 8   634
VTD 9   281

York County
VTD 1   471
VTD 10   722
VTD 2   2,337
VTD 3   2,421
VTD 4   3,396

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,434

PERCENT VARIATION   0.248

DISTRICT 15

Area   Population
York County
VTD 15   2,359
VTD 17   3,741
VTD 18   2,512
VTD 19   1,858
VTD 32   1,785
VTD 33   2,947
VTD 34   1,321
VTD 35   2,570
VTD 36   4,316
VTD 37   4,522
VTD 38   990
VTD 39   3,180
VTD 40   2,448
VTD 41   3,973
VTD 42   3,988
VTD 43   1,165
VTD 47   1,123
VTD 48   1,046
VTD 49   1,502
VTD 51   1,597
VTD 52   3,012
VTD 53   2,812
VTD 54   6,769
VTD 55   1,598
VTD 56   3,984
VTD 57   1,898
VTD 58   2,521

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,867

PERCENT VARIATION   0.744

DISTRICT 16

Area   Population
Lancaster County
VTD 1   3,836
VTD 10   1,863
VTD 11   3,074
VTD 12   1,116
VTD 13   1,973
VTD 15   4,838
VTD 16   2,206
VTD 17   2,697
VTD 18   1,202
VTD 19   386
VTD 2   1,983
VTD 21   2,768
VTD 22   2,932
VTD 23   2,217
VTD 24   1,470
VTD 25   1,681
VTD 28   815
VTD 29   1,095
VTD 3   1,235
VTD 30   2,773
VTD 32   2,019
VTD 4   2,158
VTD 5   2,044
VTD 6   1,680

York County
VTD 20   1,983
VTD 21   2,439
VTD 22   1,666
VTD 23   708
VTD 24   2,351
VTD 25   3,405
VTD 26   1,152
VTD 27   4,139
VTD 28   2,620
VTD 44   4,895
VTD 71   4,016
VTD 72   1,246
VTD 73   1,941

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,728

PERCENT VARIATION   0.585

DISTRICT 17

Area   Population
Chester County
VTD 1   657
VTD 10   2,576
VTD 11   2,744
VTD 14   167
VTD 15   1,859
VTD 16   4,019
VTD 19   164
VTD 2   488
VTD 20   437
VTD 21   515
VTD 29   1,734
VTD 3   1,352
VTD 4   761
VTD 7   210

Fairfield County
VTD 1   584
VTD 10   993
VTD 16   706
VTD 17   604
VTD 18   1,419
VTD 2   94
VTD 22   2,534
VTD 3   117
VTD 4   187
VTD 7   536
VTD 8   398
VTD 9   834

Richland County
VTD 10   9,169
VTD 11   3,433
VTD 12   3,099
VTD 14   3,310
VTD 18   3,487
VTD 33   3,512
VTD 34   1,263

Union County
VTD 20   245
VTD 21   173
VTD 23   1,056
VTD 27   844
VTD 28   647
VTD 29   149
VTD 30   394
VTD 32   479
VTD 33   850
VTD 34   864
VTD 35   1,206
VTD 40   1,109
VTD 41   635
VTD 42   932

York County
VTD 11   597
VTD 12   295
VTD 13   479
VTD 14   1,978
VTD 16   2,223
VTD 29   852
VTD 30   806
VTD 31   1,070
VTD 45   161
VTD 46   286
VTD 50   754
VTD 59   3,174
VTD 60   2,734
VTD 61   3,043
VTD 65   1,170
VTD 67   1,761

DISTRICT TOTAL   88,026

PERCENT VARIATION   0.926

DISTRICT 18

Area   Population
Lexington County
VTD 1   2,665
VTD 2   3,368
VTD 22   804
VTD 23   2,042
VTD 27   3,199
VTD 28   3,385
VTD 29   1,623
VTD 3   3,296
VTD 30   2,622
VTD 31   2,245
VTD 42   1,531
VTD 43   2,271
VTD 44   3,976
VTD 62   1,977

Newberry County   36,108

Saluda County
VTD 1   318
VTD 12   345
VTD 13   723
VTD 14   1,120
VTD 15   304
VTD 16   470
VTD 17   584
VTD 2   418
VTD 21   498
VTD 22   488
VTD 23   337
VTD 25   380
VTD 26   1,039
VTD 3   132
VTD 4   1,010
VTD 5   1,174
VTD 6   709

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,418

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.917

DISTRICT 19

Area   Population
Richland County
VTD 22   1,419
VTD 23   4,342
VTD 31   4,784
VTD 32   3,401
VTD 35   4,616
VTD 36   5,718
VTD 37   3,085
VTD 57   4,840

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,981

PERCENT VARIATION   0.875

DISTRICT 20

Area   Population
Lexington County
VTD 15   2,653
VTD 16   3,046
VTD 19   947
VTD 20   4,825
VTD 21   2,451
VTD 6   2,843

Richland County
VTD 1   3,978
VTD 100   2,306
VTD 101   1,834
VTD 102   1,997
VTD 103   1,959
VTD 104   2,710
VTD 109   1,959
VTD 110   2,107
VTD 111   2,656
VTD 112   2,016
VTD 13   2,050
VTD 15   3,122
VTD 16   2,022
VTD 17   1,776
VTD 2   3,927
VTD 3   1,985
VTD 4   2,038
VTD 5   2,904
VTD 6   1,845
VTD 7   5,374
VTD 8   5,090
VTD 86   1,662
VTD 9   4,210
VTD 94   888
VTD 97   7,265

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,445

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.886

DISTRICT 21

Area   Population
Clarendon County
VTD 11   471
VTD 12   1,625
VTD 14   1,394
VTD 15   2,451
VTD 16   1,526

Lee County
VTD 22   828
VTD 23   425

Richland County
VTD 113   4,028
VTD 114   4,026
VTD 115   4,120
VTD 116   2,033
VTD 117   3,296
VTD 118   2,145
VTD 119   3,994
VTD 120   1,678
VTD 121   744
VTD 122   3,582
VTD 123   1,285
VTD 124   1,470
VTD 125   3,984
VTD 126   2,720
VTD 45   797
VTD 46   4,205
VTD 47   9
VTD 48   1,423
VTD 49   476
VTD 50   9
VTD 51   62
VTD 52   1,067
VTD 53   1,976
VTD 54   0
VTD 55   1,269

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,536

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.782

DISTRICT 22

Area   Population
Kershaw County
VTD 16   3,756
VTD 20   1,658
VTD 21   3,532
VTD 30   1,634
VTD 31   5,279

Richland County
VTD 19   2,447
VTD 20   2,735
VTD 21   2,952
VTD 24   6,046
VTD 25   4,909
VTD 26   2,155
VTD 27   3,959
VTD 28   3,333
VTD 29   4,287
VTD 30   2,957

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,532

PERCENT VARIATION   0.360

DISTRICT 23

Area   Population
Lexington County
VTD 10   2,692
VTD 11   2,494
VTD 12   2,833
VTD 13   2,893
VTD 14   2,440
VTD 17   4,129
VTD 18   1,405
VTD 24   4,804
VTD 25   2,620
VTD 32   2,366
VTD 33   3,539

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,435

PERCENT VARIATION   0.249

DISTRICT 24

Area   Population
Aiken County
VTD 1   1,781
VTD 10   1,242
VTD 11   1,672
VTD 13   1,418
VTD 14   1,303
VTD 19   2,451
VTD 2   1,191
VTD 20   1,047
VTD 23   2,749
VTD 24   2,177
VTD 3   902
VTD 34   2,423
VTD 35   1,569
VTD 36   2,783
VTD 39   1,810
VTD 4   533
VTD 41   3,561
VTD 42   2,582

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,935

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.324

DISTRICT 25

Area   Population
Abbeville County
VTD 11   402
VTD 13   2,454
VTD 14   2,758
VTD 15   1,256
VTD 16   393

Aiken County
VTD 22   2,112
VTD 30   3,476
VTD 31   1,927
VTD 32   2,500
VTD 33   2,684
VTD 49   3,087
VTD 53   2,162
VTD 54   2,445
VTD 55   1,477
VTD 56   1,698
VTD 57   1,574
VTD 58   2,894
VTD 59   1,520

Edgefield County   24,595

Greenwood County
VTD 28   1,818
VTD 33   106
VTD 34   330
VTD 39   299
VTD 41   873
VTD 42   495

McCormick County   9,958

Saluda County
VTD 10   1,444
VTD 11   1,938
VTD 18   575
VTD 19   578
VTD 20   755
VTD 24   427
VTD 27   413
VTD 28   331
VTD 29   1,047
VTD 30   424

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,676

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.621

DISTRICT 26

Area   Population
Calhoun County
VTD 11   2,108

Lexington County
VTD 26   1,985
VTD 37   3,357
VTD 40   1,809
VTD 41   1,935
VTD 50   2,362
VTD 51   655
VTD 52   1,188
VTD 53   2,480
VTD 54   2,268
VTD 55   3,313
VTD 56   3,154
VTD 57   4,886
VTD 59   4,541
VTD 60   4,856
VTD 61   4,281
VTD 63   2,000
VTD 64   2,922
VTD 65   5,609
VTD 66   2,898
VTD 67   1,223
VTD 68   1,410
VTD 69   2,796
VTD 70   3,265
VTD 71   1,746
VTD 72   1,362

Richland County
VTD 105   2,590
VTD 106   2,219
VTD 107   2,962
VTD 108   2,598
VTD 96   3,303

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,333

PERCENT VARIATION   0.132

DISTRICT 27

Area   Population
Chester County
VTD 12   875
VTD 13   508
VTD 17   1,598
VTD 18   2,402
VTD 22   873
VTD 23   160
VTD 24   660
VTD 25   1,612
VTD 26   1,015
VTD 27   1,000
VTD 5   1,458
VTD 6   1,126

Chesterfield County
VTD 1   458
VTD 13   238
VTD 14   887
VTD 16   2,519
VTD 17   670
VTD 18   981
VTD 19   320
VTD 2   290
VTD 21   6,029

Darlington County
VTD 1   1,955
VTD 10   2,596
VTD 11   3,486
VTD 12   1,204
VTD 2   1,537
VTD 3   1,990
VTD 32   2,899
VTD 4   3,422
VTD 5   2,663
VTD 6   1,172
VTD 7   1,036
VTD 8   1,543
VTD 9   1,613

Fairfield County
VTD 11   1,725
VTD 12   772
VTD 13   986
VTD 14   2,307
VTD 15   319
VTD 19   2,700
VTD 20   1,581
VTD 21   1,302
VTD 23   1,132
VTD 5   117
VTD 6   1,507

Kershaw County
VTD 17   496
VTD 19   571
VTD 28   851

Lancaster County
VTD 14   1,012
VTD 20   580
VTD 26   327
VTD 27   441
VTD 31   2,119
VTD 7   1,705

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,575

PERCENT VARIATION   0.409

DISTRICT 28

Area   Population
Chesterfield County
VTD 10   5,797
VTD 11   1,519
VTD 12   1,433
VTD 15   1,887
VTD 20   799
VTD 22   1,172
VTD 23   620
VTD 25   820
VTD 26   282
VTD 27   422
VTD 28   331
VTD 33   1,562
VTD 4   2,418
VTD 5   1,490
VTD 6   533
VTD 9   2,073

Dillon County
VTD 1   2,686
VTD 10   594

Horry County
VTD 101   1,341
VTD 102   756
VTD 103   529
VTD 104   1,164
VTD 105   259
VTD 106   520
VTD 107   680
VTD 12   730
VTD 14   1,713
VTD 15   288
VTD 2   1,015
VTD 21   1,965
VTD 23   362
VTD 25   276
VTD 29   873
VTD 30   346
VTD 32   228
VTD 34   749
VTD 37   997
VTD 39   798
VTD 4   1,964
VTD 40   532
VTD 44   471
VTD 47   625

Marlboro County
VTD 1   955
VTD 12   269
VTD 13   2,268
VTD 2   1,129
VTD 26   1,533
VTD 28   1,558
VTD 29   330
VTD 3   1,077
VTD 30   382
VTD 32   1,173
VTD 4   931
VTD 5   744

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,235

PERCENT VARIATION   0.019

DISTRICT 29

Area   Population
Allendale County   11,211

Bamberg County   16,658

Barnwell County
VTD 10   1,590
VTD 5   1,941
VTD 6   1,167
VTD 7   785

Colleton County
VTD 1   211
VTD 10   776
VTD 11   1,047
VTD 12   228
VTD 15   738
VTD 16   520
VTD 2   761
VTD 3   579
VTD 4   1,339
VTD 5   954
VTD 6   327
VTD 7   411
VTD 8   578

Dorchester County
VTD 1   611
VTD 10   447
VTD 11   1,052
VTD 12   888
VTD 13   505
VTD 14   456
VTD 15   616
VTD 16   544
VTD 17   1,458
VTD 18   2,206
VTD 2   824
VTD 3   879
VTD 4   891
VTD 5   1,126
VTD 6   1,056
VTD 7   586
VTD 8   1,881
VTD 9   734

Hampton County
VTD 1   111
VTD 10   748
VTD 11   649
VTD 12   483

Orangeburg County
VTD 13   1,233
VTD 14   2,227
VTD 20   1,417
VTD 21   758
VTD 23   5,063
VTD 24   1,667
VTD 39   1,084

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,928

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.333

DISTRICT 30

Area   Population
Darlington County
VTD 28   3,060
VTD 29   2,132
VTD 30   1,526
VTD 33   767
VTD 34   1,374
VTD 35   466

Dillon County
VTD 17   1,364

Florence County
VTD 13   2,241
VTD 14   2,778
VTD 15   2,400
VTD 2   1,115
VTD 49   1,051
VTD 54   1,401
VTD 55   3,720
VTD 56   1,052
VTD 68   1,274
VTD 69   2,644

Marion County   35,466

Marlboro County
VTD 10   638
VTD 14   784
VTD 15   805
VTD 16   1,038
VTD 17   1,382
VTD 18   1,270
VTD 19   499
VTD 20   2,023
VTD 21   1,547
VTD 22   1,170
VTD 23   821
VTD 24   669
VTD 25   338
VTD 27   358
VTD 31   538
VTD 6   2,005
VTD 7   195
VTD 8   84
VTD 9   305

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,828

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.447

DISTRICT 31

Area   Population
Florence County
VTD 1   1,217
VTD 10   1,815
VTD 11   2,431
VTD 12   1,578
VTD 16   1,137
VTD 17   1,724
VTD 18   1,054
VTD 19   2,663
VTD 20   2,325
VTD 22   845
VTD 24   3,065
VTD 25   1,020
VTD 26   786
VTD 27   1,045
VTD 28   3,532
VTD 29   572
VTD 34   584
VTD 35   3,855
VTD 36   1,375
VTD 39   1,435
VTD 4   2,355
VTD 40   648
VTD 42   1,049
VTD 43   1,630
VTD 44   900
VTD 47   1,237
VTD 5   3,240
VTD 50   1,452
VTD 51   2,704
VTD 52   2,393
VTD 53   3,034
VTD 57   2,517
VTD 58   890
VTD 59   5,143
VTD 6   1,118
VTD 60   3,003

DISTRICT TOTAL   88,054

PERCENT VARIATION   0.959

DISTRICT 32

Area   Population
Berkeley County
VTD 20   511
VTD 24   1,535
VTD 8   878

Florence County
VTD 30   2,336
VTD 31   1,724
VTD 32   2,306
VTD 33   3,624

Georgetown County
VTD 1   1,295
VTD 2   794
VTD 20   2,456
VTD 21   877
VTD 22   1,659
VTD 23   3,037
VTD 24   1,735
VTD 25   3,172
VTD 26   2,431
VTD 27   640
VTD 28   1,831

Horry County
VTD 35   436
VTD 36   3,287
VTD 66   1,164
VTD 67   1,397
VTD 68   2,303
VTD 87   1,135

Williamsburg County
VTD 1   848
VTD 10   151
VTD 11   926
VTD 12   601
VTD 13   4,389
VTD 14   1,509
VTD 15   6,208
VTD 16   2,181
VTD 17   1,062
VTD 19   886
VTD 2   391
VTD 20   560
VTD 21   810
VTD 22   1,074
VTD 23   415
VTD 24   1,350
VTD 25   896
VTD 26   819
VTD 27   573
VTD 28   839
VTD 29   510

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,642

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.660

DISTRICT 33

Area   Population
Horry County
VTD 1   944
VTD 10   1,533
VTD 100   1,963
VTD 108   2,032
VTD 13   2,001
VTD 17   3,487
VTD 18   1,656
VTD 19   1,149
VTD 20   1,947
VTD 22   530
VTD 24   2,288
VTD 3   351
VTD 31   2,397
VTD 33   1,390
VTD 41   2,419
VTD 42   1,340
VTD 43   5,485
VTD 45   1,827
VTD 50   806
VTD 51   2,233
VTD 52   2,335
VTD 53   670
VTD 54   3,344

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,560

PERCENT VARIATION   0.392

DISTRICT 34

Area   Population
Charleston County
VTD 1   2,273
VTD 13   4,402
VTD 14   2,245
VTD 15   1,362
VTD 151   1,298
VTD 152   1,628
VTD 153   759

Georgetown County
VTD 17   1,554
VTD 18   1,975
VTD 19   1,800
VTD 29   1,205
VTD 30   2,843
VTD 31   1,098
VTD 35   173

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,739

PERCENT VARIATION   0.597

DISTRICT 35

Area   Population
Kershaw County
VTD 1   1,826
VTD 12   2,224
VTD 13   2,566
VTD 14   2,072
VTD 15   921
VTD 2   1,145
VTD 22   2,059
VTD 23   2,287
VTD 24   1,660
VTD 25   1,689
VTD 26   994
VTD 27   1,767
VTD 29   2,170
VTD 5   1,017
VTD 6   837
VTD 7   790
VTD 8   2,006
VTD 9   1,828

Lee County
VTD 1   106

Sumter County
VTD 10   1,404
VTD 11   1,605
VTD 17   2,775
VTD 18   2,657
VTD 19   1,973
VTD 25   2,188
VTD 26   2,083
VTD 27   2,612
VTD 28   3,153
VTD 29   3,039
VTD 30   1,613
VTD 32   1,336
VTD 33   2,004
VTD 34   990
VTD 35   2,733
VTD 4   3,524
VTD 41   1,198
VTD 42   1,627
VTD 5   3,007
VTD 57   2,197
VTD 6   6,216
VTD 61   293
VTD 63   1,846
VTD 7   428
VTD 8   1,389

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,351

PERCENT VARIATION   0.152

Area   Population
Darlington County
VTD 13   1,026
VTD 14   1,165
VTD 15   1,468
VTD 16   1,502
VTD 17   1,315
VTD 18   2,269
VTD 19   1,986
VTD 20   3,268
VTD 21   1,240
VTD 22   2,608
VTD 23   2,593
VTD 24   2,757
VTD 25   3,966
VTD 26   497
VTD 27   2,200
VTD 31   1,093

Florence County
VTD 3   1,392
VTD 38   2,232
VTD 46   2,833
VTD 67   1,584

Lee County
VTD 10   702
VTD 11   522
VTD 12   7
VTD 13   2,475
VTD 14   854
VTD 15   423
VTD 16   320
VTD 17   1,115
VTD 25   1,143
VTD 26   145
VTD 27   273
VTD 28   781
VTD 29   1,360

Sumter County
VTD 12   1,136
VTD 13   135
VTD 14   826
VTD 15   1,843
VTD 16   1,250
VTD 31   1,304
VTD 36   2,544
VTD 37   1,702
VTD 38   2,297
VTD 39   2,430
VTD 40   2,002
VTD 43   1,075
VTD 44   1,634
VTD 45   1,192
VTD 46   1,557
VTD 47   1,469
VTD 48   1,006
VTD 49   3,050
VTD 50   687
VTD 51   1,064
VTD 52   107
VTD 58   712
VTD 59   506
VTD 60   1,235

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,020

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.227

Area   Population
Berkeley County
VTD 12   1,159
VTD 15   2,678
VTD 16   2,543
VTD 17   3,040
VTD 18   1,599
VTD 19   313
VTD 23   1,480
VTD 29   3,410
VTD 37   5,021
VTD 38   5,220
VTD 4   3,404
VTD 40   3,083
VTD 42   8,253
VTD 43   8,882
VTD 46   4,791
VTD 7   2,661

Charleston County
VTD 10   1,915
VTD 11   543
VTD 12   2,675
VTD 31   1,909
VTD 32   1,380
VTD 33   1,474
VTD 34   626
VTD 35   1,540
VTD 4   3,486
VTD 6   1,016
VTD 7   2,536
VTD 71   2,767
VTD 8   2,911
VTD 9   4,467

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,782

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.500

Area   Population
Charleston County
VTD 170   935
VTD 171   2,328
VTD 180   1,673
VTD 182   745
VTD 89   2,852
VTD 90   1,201

Colleton County
VTD 13   507
VTD 14   792
VTD 17   4,616
VTD 19   960
VTD 20   1,282
VTD 22   939
VTD 26   3,474
VTD 9   896

Dorchester County
VTD 19   1,168
VTD 20   966
VTD 21   4,566
VTD 22   4,541
VTD 23   3,143
VTD 24   4,025
VTD 25   1,812
VTD 26   2,621
VTD 27   1,904
VTD 28   2,773
VTD 29   2,843
VTD 30   3,603
VTD 31   1,834
VTD 32   1,447
VTD 33   2,325
VTD 34   239
VTD 35   2,000
VTD 36   1,960
VTD 37   3,099

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,216

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.002

DISTRICT 39

Area   Population
Berkeley County
VTD 1   3,534
VTD 13   777
VTD 14   3,218
VTD 2   1,082
VTD 3   1,829
VTD 5   4,914
VTD 6   1,301
VTD 9   3,182

Clarendon County
VTD 1   1,560
VTD 10   430
VTD 13   1,042
VTD 19   850
VTD 2   942
VTD 25   1,291
VTD 26   1,198
VTD 27   323
VTD 28   1,447
VTD 29   762
VTD 3   765
VTD 30   1,180
VTD 31   293
VTD 4   1,793
VTD 5   486

Orangeburg County
VTD 10   1,291
VTD 11   1,252
VTD 12   2,187
VTD 17   1,003
VTD 18   2,359
VTD 19   1,181
VTD 2   1,098
VTD 25   2,409
VTD 26   1,878
VTD 27   2,653
VTD 28   844
VTD 29   2,832
VTD 3   1,662
VTD 30   2,881
VTD 31   2,766
VTD 38   1,744
VTD 4   3,109
VTD 40   3,224
VTD 43   2,218
VTD 47   2,464
VTD 48   1,645
VTD 49   2,458
VTD 5   923
VTD 50   2,263

Williamsburg County
VTD 18   2,031
VTD 30   239
VTD 31   116
VTD 32   152
VTD 33   730

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,059

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.182

Area   Population
Aiken County
VTD 12   1,264
VTD 15   839
VTD 16   432
VTD 17   535
VTD 18   1,024
VTD 21   2,773
VTD 25   2,286
VTD 26   2,930
VTD 27   2,019
VTD 28   2,185
VTD 29   1,553
VTD 37   1,842
VTD 38   1,262
VTD 40   2,095
VTD 43   1,106
VTD 65   1,909
VTD 74   7
VTD 75   0

Barnwell County
VTD 1   1,362
VTD 11   1,501
VTD 12   1,795
VTD 13   2,122
VTD 14   869
VTD 15   1,449
VTD 2   2,380
VTD 3   2,246
VTD 4   2,254
VTD 8   984
VTD 9   1,033

Calhoun County
VTD 1   1,395
VTD 10   558
VTD 12   2,118
VTD 2   1,060

Orangeburg County
VTD 1   1,143
VTD 15   1,668
VTD 16   2,081
VTD 22   1,008
VTD 32   4,534
VTD 33   1,986
VTD 34   1,838
VTD 35   1,967
VTD 36   1,885
VTD 37   3,785
VTD 41   1,031
VTD 42   939
VTD 45   1,156
VTD 46   974
VTD 6   1,355
VTD 7   850
VTD 8   802
VTD 9   787

DISTRICT TOTAL   86,922

PERCENT VARIATION   -0.339

DISTRICT 41

Area   Population
Charleston County
VTD 103   2,008
VTD 105   2,736
VTD 106   1,519
VTD 107   1,138
VTD 110   3,137

Dorchester County
VTD 45   6,333

DISTRICT TOTAL   87,402

PERCENT VARIATION   0.211

DISTRICT 42

Area   Population
Charleston County
VTD 100   802
VTD 102   596
VTD 104   1,422
VTD 108   4,455
VTD 109   2,879
VTD 120   3,818
VTD 121   355
VTD 127   2,169
VTD 128   851
VTD 129   2,394
VTD 130   1,764
VTD 131   1,502
VTD 132   926
VTD 133   1,429
VTD 134   1,927
VTD 135   974
VTD 44   1,666
VTD 45   1,379
VTD 46   2,473
VTD 47   1,615
VTD 48   3,675
VTD 49   1,452
VTD 50   1,991
VTD 51   1,173
VTD 52   1,824
VTD 53   1,878
VTD 54   1,330
VTD 55   1,775
VTD 56   1,057
VTD 57   1,735