Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format
Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter
S. 1109
STATUS INFORMATION
General Bill
Sponsors: Senator McConnell
Document Path: l:\s-jud\bills\mcconnell\jud0135.gfm.doc
Introduced in the Senate on March 31, 2004
Currently residing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary
Summary: Oyster Beds
HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
Date Body Action Description with journal page number ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3/31/2004 Senate Introduced and read first time SJ-7 3/31/2004 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary SJ-7
View the latest legislative information at the LPITS web site
VERSIONS OF THIS BILL
TO AMEND SECTION 3-5-140, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE REVIEW AND APPEAL OF DETERMINATIONS OF DAMAGE TO OYSTER BEDS OR OYSTERS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT AN APPEAL OF A DECISION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE MAY BE TAKEN TO THE CIRCUIT COURT; TO AMEND SECTION 44-1-50, RELATING TO POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, SO AS TO DELETE THE REFERENCE TO THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT APPELLATE PANEL; TO AMEND SECTION 48-39-150, RELATING TO APPEALS OF A DECISION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DENYING OR GRANTING A PERMIT FOR USE IN A CRITICAL AREA, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT AN APPEAL OF A DECISION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE MAY BE TAKEN TO THE CIRCUIT COURT; TO AMEND SECTION 48-39-180, RELATING TO JUDICIAL REVIEW OF PERMIT DETERMINATIONS, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT AN APPEAL OF A DECISION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE MAY BE TAKEN TO THE CIRCUIT COURT; TO AMEND SECTION 48-39-280, RELATING TO A 40-YEAR POLICY OF RETREAT FROM THE SHORELINE, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT AN APPEAL OF A DECISION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE MAY BE TAKEN CIRCUIT COURT AND THAT A REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF THE FINAL OR REVISED SETBACK LINE, BASELINE, OR EROSION RATE ESTABLISHED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL MUST BE FORWARDED TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION AND AN APPEAL OF A DECISION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE MAY BE TAKEN TO THE CIRCUIT COURT; TO AMEND SECTION 48-39-290, RELATING TO RESTRICTIONS ON CONSTRUCTION OR RECONSTRUCTION SEAWARD OF THE BASELINE OR BETWEEN THE BASELINE AND THE SETBACK, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A PARTY AGGRIEVED BY A DECISION OF MAY APPLY TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION TO REVIEW THE DETERMINATION AND MAY APPEAL THE DECISION OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT; AND TO REPEAL SECTION 48-39-40, RELATING TO THE CREATION OF THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT APPELLATE PANEL.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. Section 3-5-140 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:
"Section 3-5-140. If the person in whose favor or the person against whom such the determination is made shall be dissatisfied therewith, such the person may apply to an Administrative Law Judge administrative law judge to review the determination. An appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge administrative law judge may be taken to the Coastal Zone Management Appellate Panel. An appeal from the decision of the Panel may be taken to the court of common pleas for the county in which the oyster beds lie, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Administrative Procedures Act. The Court shall court must review the award in the same manner as reports of a master in equity are reviewed by the court and the determination of the amount of the award by the court of common pleas shall be final.
Before a review shall be granted to the person against whom the award is made, such the person shall must pay to the person in whose favor the award is made, one half of the amount of the said award, and shall must file with the said clerk of court a bond conditioned for the payment of the remaining half of the award or so much thereof as may be finally awarded, such bond to be approved as to form, surety, and amount by the clerk of court of the county in which the oyster beds lie as to form, surety and amount.
The final award shall must be entered on record in the office of the clerk of court of common pleas for the county in which the oyster beds lie and when so entered shall have the force and effect of a judgment. The amount of the award shall must be limited to the direct actual damage suffered by the person owning in fee or in leasehold the oyster beds and the oysters growing therein."
SECTION 2. Section 44-1-50 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:
"Section 44-1-50. The board may conduct such hearings as may be required by law, as considered necessary by the board, and as necessary to hear appeals from decisions of administrative law judges pursuant to Chapter 23 of Title 1, except as otherwise provided in Sections 3-5-140, 48-39-150, 48-39-180, 48-39-280, and 48-39-290. The board does not have the authority to hear appeals from decisions of the Coastal Zone Management Appellate Panel or the Mining Council. Such appeals shall must be conducted pursuant to the provisions in Chapters Chapter 20 and 30 of Title 48.
The board shall must provide for the administrative organization of the department and shall must consolidate and merge existing duties, functions, and officers of the former agencies as may be necessary for economic and efficient administration. Provided, however, that However, the board may appoint such advisory boards as it considers necessary to carry out the functions of Sections 44-1-10 to 44-1-70, and there compensation for their services shall must be provided a compensation for their services as is provided by the law for members of boards and commissions."
SECTION 3. Section 48-39-150 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:
"Section 48-39-150. (A) In determining whether a permit application is approved or denied, the department shall must base its determination on the individual merits of each application, and the policies specified in Sections 48-39-20 and 48-39-30, and must be guided by the following general considerations:
(1) The extent to which the activity requires a waterfront location or is economically enhanced by its proximity to the water.
(2) The extent to which the activity would harmfully obstruct the natural flow of navigable water. If the proposed project is in one or more of the State's harbors or in a waterway used for commercial navigation and shipping or in an area set aside for port development in an approved management plan, then a certificate from the South Carolina State Ports Authority declaring the proposed project or activity would not unreasonably interfere with commercial navigation and shipping must be obtained by the department prior to issuing a permit.
(3) The extent to which the applicant's completed project would affect the production of fish, shrimp, oysters, crabs, or clams or any marine life or wildlife or other natural resources in a particular area including, but not limited to, water and oxygen supply.
(4) The extent to which the activity could cause erosion, shoaling of channels, or creation of stagnant water.
(5) The extent to which the development could affect existing public access to tidal and submerged lands, navigable waters and beaches, or other recreational coastal resources.
(6) The extent to which the development could affect the habitats for rare and endangered species of wildlife or irreplaceable historic and archeological sites of South Carolina's coastal zone.
(7) The extent of the economic benefits as compared with the benefits from preservation of an area in its unaltered state.
(8) The extent of any adverse environmental impact which cannot be avoided by reasonable safeguards.
(9) The extent to which all feasible safeguards are taken to avoid adverse environmental impact resulting from a project.
(10) The extent to which the proposed use could affect the value and enjoyment of adjacent owners.
(B) After considering the views of interested agencies, local governments and persons, and after evaluation of biological and economic considerations, if the department finds that the application is not contrary to the policies specified in this chapter, it shall must issue to the applicant a permit. The permit may be conditioned upon the applicant's amending the proposal to take whatever measures the department feels are necessary to protect the public interest. At the request of twenty citizens or residents of the county or counties affected, the department shall must hold a public hearing on any application which has an effect on a critical area, prior to issuing a permit. Such public hearings shall must be open to all citizens of the State. When applicable, joint public hearings will be held in conjunction with any such hearings required by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. On any permit application pertaining to a specific development which has been approved by the department, the department may support the applicant with respect to any federal permit applications pertaining to the same specific development.
(C) The department shall must act upon an application for a permit within ninety days after the application is filed. Provided, however, that in the case of minor developments, as defined in Section 48-39-10, the department shall have the authority to approve such permits and shall must act within thirty days. In the event a permit is denied, the department shall must state the reasons for such the denial and such the reasons must be in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
(D) Any An applicant having a permit denied or any a person adversely affected by the granting of the permit has the right of direct appeal from the decision of the Administrative Law Judge administrative law judge to the Coastal Zone Management Appellate Panel court of common pleas for the county in which the proposed project would lie for a determination as to whether the decision so restricts or otherwise affects the use of the property as to deprive the owner of its existing practical use and is an unreasonable exercise of the State's police power because the action constitutes the equivalent of taking without compensation, in addition to any other grounds for appeal. An appeal must be made in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act. Any An applicant having a permit denied may challenge the validity of any or all reasons given for denial.
(E) Any permit may be revoked for noncompliance with or violation of its terms after written notice of intention to do so has been given the holder and the holder has been given an opportunity to present an explanation to the department.
(F) Work authorized by permits issued under this chapter must be completed within five years after the date of issuance. The time limit may be extended for good cause showing that due diligence toward completion of the work has been made as evidenced by significant work progress. An extension only may be granted only if the permitted project meets the policies and regulations in force when the extension is requested or the permittee agrees to accept additional conditions which would bring the project into compliance. The time periods required by this subsection must be tolled during the pendency of an administrative or a judicial appeal of the permit issuance."
SECTION 4. Section 48-39-180 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:
"Section 48-39-180. Any An applicant whose permit application has been finally denied, revoked, suspended, or approved subject to conditions of the department by the Coastal Zone Management Appellate Panel by an administrative law judge, or any person adversely affected by the permit, may, within twenty days after receiving notice thereof, file petition in the circuit court having jurisdiction over the affected land for a review of the department's action "de novo" or to determine whether the department's action so restricts or otherwise affects the use of the property as to deprive the owner of its existing practical use and is an unreasonable exercise of the State's police power because the action constitutes the equivalent of taking without compensation has the right of direct appeal from the decision of the administrative law judge to the court of common pleas for the county in which the proposed project would lie. An appeal must be made in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act. If the court finds the action to be an unreasonable exercise of the police power, it shall enter a finding that the action shall not apply to the land of the plaintiff, or in the alternative, that the department shall must pay reasonable compensation for the loss of use of the land. The use allowed by any permit issued under pursuant to this chapter may, in the discretion of the court, be stayed pending decision on all appeals that may be taken. The circuit court may in its discretion require that a reasonable bond be posted by any person. It is specifically intended that any person whose permit application has been denied may have such permit issued by the circuit court having jurisdiction if such person can prove the reasons given for denial to be invalid."
SECTION 5. Section 48-39-280(A)(4) of the 1976 Code is amended to read:
"(4) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, where a department-approved beach nourishment project has been completed, the local government or the landowners, with notice to the local government, may petition an Administrative Law Judge administrative law judge to move the baseline as far seaward as the landward edge of the erosion control structure or device or, if there is no existing erosion control structure or device, then as far seaward as the post project baseline as determined by the department in accordance with Section 48-39-280(A)(1) by showing that the beach has been stabilized by department-approved beach nourishment. If the petitioner is asking that the baseline be moved seaward pursuant to this section, he must show an ongoing commitment to renourishment which will stabilize and maintain the dry sand beach at all stages of the tide for the foreseeable future. If the Administrative Law Judge administrative law judge grants the petition to move the baseline seaward pursuant to this section, no new construction may occur in the area between the former baseline and the new baseline for three years after the initial beach nourishment project has been completed as determined by the department. If the beach nourishment fails to stabilize the beach after a reasonable period of time, the department must move the baseline landward to the primary oceanfront sand dune as determined pursuant to items (1), (2), and (3) for that section of the beach. Any An appeal of an Administrative Law Judge's administrative law judge's decision under this section may be made to the Coastal Zone Management Appellate Panel taken to the court of common pleas for the county in which the property lies. An appeal must be made in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act."
SECTION 6. Section 48-39-280(E) of the 1976 Code is amended to read:
"(E) A landowner claiming ownership of property affected who feels that the final or revised setback line, baseline, or erosion rate as adopted is in error, upon submittal of substantiating evidence, must be granted a review of the setback line, baseline, or erosion rate, or a review of all three. The requests must be forwarded to the Coastal Zone Management Appellate Panel and handled in accordance with the department's regulations on appeals Administrative Law Judge Division. An appeal from the decision of the administrative law judge may be taken to the court of common pleas for the county in which the property lies. An appeal must be made in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act."
SECTION 7. Section 48-39-290(D) of the 1976 Code is amended to read:
"(D) Special permits:
(1) If an applicant requests a permit to build or rebuild a structure other than an erosion control structure or device seaward of the baseline that is not allowed otherwise pursuant to Sections 48-39-250 through 48-39-360, the department may issue a special permit to the applicant authorizing the construction or reconstruction if the structure is not constructed or reconstructed on a primary oceanfront sand dune or on the active beach and, if the beach erodes to the extent the permitted structure becomes situated on the active beach, the permittee agrees to remove the structure from the active beach if the department orders the removal. However, the use of the property authorized under this provision, in the determination of the department, must not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare.
(2) The department's Permitting Committee is the committee to consider applications for special permits.
(3) In granting a special permit, the committee may impose reasonable additional conditions and safeguards as, in its judgment, will fulfill the purposes of Sections 48-39-250 through 48-39-360.
(4) A party aggrieved by the committee's decision to grant or deny a special permit application may appeal to the full Coastal Zone Management Appellate Panel pursuant to Section 48-39-150(D) request a hearing before the Administrative Law Judge Division. An appeal of an administrative law judge's decision under this section may be may be taken to the court of common pleas for the county in which the proposed structure would lie. An appeal must be made in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act."
SECTION 8. Section 48-39-40 of the 1976 Code is repealed.
SECTION 9. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.
This web page was last updated on Monday, December 7, 2009 at 10:21 A.M.