South Carolina General Assembly
115th Session, 2003-2004

Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format

Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter

H. 3496

STATUS INFORMATION

Joint Resolution
Sponsors: Reps. Harrell, Wilkins, W.D. Smith, Bingham, Chellis, Clyburn, Cotty, Kirsh, McCraw, Merrill, Rice, Sheheen, Walker, Young, Harvin and Bailey
Document Path: l:\council\bills\ggs\22803htc03.doc

Introduced in the House on February 4, 2003
Introduced in the Senate on February 13, 2003
Last Amended on February 12, 2003
Currently residing in the Senate Committee on Finance

Summary: Constitutional amendment, balanced budget for State and political subdivisions

HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS

     Date      Body   Action Description with journal page number
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    2/4/2003  House   Introduced and read first time HJ-7
    2/4/2003  House   Referred to Committee on Ways and Means HJ-8
    2/4/2003          Scrivener's error corrected
    2/6/2003  House   Committee report: Favorable with amendment Ways and 
                        Means HJ-3
    2/6/2003  House   Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Harvin
   2/11/2003  House   Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Bailey
   2/11/2003  House   Member(s) request name removed as sponsor: Lucas
   2/12/2003  House   Amended HJ-21
   2/12/2003  House   Read second time HJ-24
   2/12/2003  House   Roll call Yeas-103  Nays-0 HJ-24
   2/13/2003  House   Read third time and sent to Senate HJ-12
   2/13/2003  Senate  Introduced and read first time SJ-8
   2/13/2003  Senate  Referred to Committee on Finance SJ-8

View the latest legislative information at the LPITS web site

VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

2/4/2003
2/4/2003-A
2/6/2003
2/12/2003

(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)

Indicates Matter Stricken

Indicates New Matter

AMENDED

February 12, 2003

H. 3496

Introduced by Reps. Harrell, Wilkins, W.D. Smith, Bingham, Chellis, Clyburn, Cotty, Kirsh, Lucas, McCraw, Merrill, Rice, Sheheen, Walker, Young and Harvin

S. Printed 2/12/03--H.

Read the first time February 4, 2003.

            

STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT

REVENUE IMPACT1/

This bill is not expected to have any impact on the Board of Economic Advisor's Revenue Estimate.

Explanation

This Joint Resolution will change the spending limit to the lesser of six percent or a percentage determined by population increase and increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The resolution would not change the revenue estimates of the BEA but would impact spending if the revenue estimate exceeds the limit.

Approved By:

William C. Gillespie

Board of Economic Advisors

1/ This statement meets the requirement of Section 2-7-71 for a state revenue impact, Section 2-7-76 for a local revenue impact, and Section 6-1-85(B) for an estimate of the shift in local property tax incidence.

A JOINT RESOLUTION

PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 7, ARTICLE X OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1895, RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE STATE AND ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS TO HAVE BUDGET PROCESSES DESIGNED TO KEEP REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES IN BALANCE, THE LIMITATION ON STATE APPROPRIATIONS, AND THE LIMITATIONS ON STATE EMPLOYEES, SO AS TO DELETE THE EXISTING STATE SPENDING LIMITATION AND REQUIRE THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO REPLACE IT BY A LAW PROVIDING A LIMIT ON STATE SPENDING FOR A FISCAL YEAR THAT IS THE LESSER OF THE TOTAL OF THE STATE APPROPRIATIONS IN THE PRIOR YEAR PLUS SIX PERCENT OR THE TOTAL OF STATE APPROPRIATIONS IN THE PRIOR YEAR ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION AND POPULATION GROWTH AND PROVIDE THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN ENACTING THE LIMIT SHALL DEFINE THE APPROPRIATIONS TO WHICH THE LIMIT APPLIES, AND EXCEPTIONS TO THE LIMIT, AND THE METHOD OF CALCULATING THE LIMIT AND PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 36, ARTICLE III, RELATING TO THE GENERAL RESERVE FUND AND THE CAPITAL RESERVE FUND, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY BY LAW SHALL ESTABLISH A NEW "SPENDING LIMIT RESERVE FUND" TO WHICH MUST BE CREDITED ALL GENERAL FUND REVENUES IN A FISCAL YEAR IN EXCESS OF THE APPLICABLE CONSTITUTIONAL SPENDING LIMIT, TO PROVIDE THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN THE IMPLEMENTING LAW SHALL DEFINE SURPLUS REVENUES, PROVIDE THE PURPOSES FOR WHICH THE REVENUES CREDITED TO THIS FUND MUST BE USED, AND THE TIMING AND METHOD OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY'S APPROPRIATION OF THESE REVENUES AND TO PROVIDE THAT THE IMPLEMENTING LAW MAY NOT BE AMENDED OR REPEALED EXCEPT BY A SPECIAL VOTE DEFINED AS A RECORDED ROLL-CALL VOTE OF AT LEAST TWO-THIRDS OF THE MEMBERS IN EACH BRANCH PRESENT AND VOTING, BUT NOT LESS THAN THREE-FIFTHS OF THE TOTAL MEMBERSHIP OF EACH BRANCH.

Amend Title To Conform

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION    1.    It is proposed that the first two paragraphs of Section 7(c), Article X of the Constitution of this State be amended to read:

"(c)    The General Assembly shall prescribe by law a spending limitation on appropriations for the operation of state government which shall provide that annual increases in such appropriations may not exceed the average growth rate of the economy of the State as measured by a process provided for by the law which prescribes the limitations on appropriations; provided, however, the limitation may be suspended for any one fiscal year by a special vote as provided in this subsection.

During the regular session of the General Assembly in 1990 and during every fifth annual regular session thereafter, the General Assembly shall conduct and complete a review of the law implementing this subsection. During such session, only a vote of two-thirds of the members of each branch present and voting shall be required to change the existing limitation on appropriation. Unless that is done, the existing limitations shall remain unchanged.

The General Assembly by law shall prescribe a spending limitation on appropriations and an enforcement mechanism therefor which provides that state appropriations for a fiscal year must not exceed the lesser of the total of the prior year's state appropriations plus six percent or the total of the prior year's state appropriations adjusted for inflation and population growth. The law implementing the limit must specify the appropriations to which the limit applies and the method of calculating the adjustments for inflation and population."

SECTION    2.    The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the ballot:

"Must Section 7, Article X of the Constitution of this State be amended relating to the requirement for the State and its political subdivisions to have budget processes designed to keep revenues and expenditures in balance and the limitation on state appropriations, so as to delete the existing state spending limitation and require the General Assembly to replace it by a law providing a limit on state spending for a fiscal year and an enforcement mechanism therefor that is the lesser of the total of state appropriations in the prior year plus six percent or the total of state appropriations in the prior year adjusted for inflation and population growth and provide that the General Assembly in enacting the limit shall define the appropriations to which the limit applies, and exceptions to the limit, and the method of calculating the limit?

Yes    []

No    []

Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word 'Yes', and those voting against the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word 'No'."

SECTION    3.    It is proposed that Section 36, Article X of the Constitution of this State be amended by adding at the end:

"(C)(1)    The General Assembly by law shall establish a 'Spending Limit Reserve Fund' (fund) to which must be credited all general fund revenues in a fiscal year in excess of the spending limit applicable to these revenues provided by this constitution. In the implementing law, the General Assembly shall define surplus revenues and provide the purposes for which the revenues credited to this fund must be used and the timing and method of the General Assembly's appropriations of these revenues.

(2)    Upon implementation of the provisions of this subsection by law, this law may not be amended or repealed except by the special vote provided in item (3) of this subsection.

(3)    The special vote referred to in item (2) of this subsection means an affirmative recorded roll-call vote in each branch of the General Assembly by two-thirds of the members present and voting but not less than three-fifths of the total membership of each branch."

SECTION    4.    The proposed amendment must be submitted to the qualified electors at the next general election for representatives. Ballots must be provided at the various voting precincts with the following words printed or written on the ballot:

"Must Section 36, Article III of the Constitution of this State relating to the General Reserve Fund and Capital Reserve Fund be amended so as to provide that the General Assembly by law shall establish a new 'Spending Limit Reserve Fund' to which must be credited all general fund revenues in a fiscal year in excess of the applicable constitutional spending limit, to provide that the General Assembly in the implementing law shall define surplus revenues, provide the purposes for which the revenues credited to this fund must be used, and the timing and method of the General Assembly's appropriation of these revenues and to provide that the implementing law may not be amended or repealed except by a special vote defined as a recorded roll-call vote of at least two-thirds of the members in each branch present and voting, but not less than three-fifths of the total membership of each branch?

Yes    []

No    []

Those voting in favor of the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word 'Yes', and those voting against the question shall deposit a ballot with a check or cross mark in the square after the word 'No'."

----XX----

This web page was last updated on Monday, December 7, 2009 at 10:26 A.M.