South Carolina General Assembly
116th Session, 2005-2006

Download This Version in Microsoft Word format

Bill 112


Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter


(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)

A BILL

TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 39-5-45 SO AS TO MAKE IT AN UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICE FOR THE PROVIDER OF CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCESS, SERVICE, OR EQUIPMENT TO CHARGE A REACTIVATION FEE WHEN A CELLULAR PHONE IS LOST, DAMAGED, OR DESTROYED, OR TO OTHERWISE BE UNJUSTLY ENRICHED IN CONNECTION WITH A TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCESS, SERVICE, OR EQUIPMENT CONTRACT, AND TO DEFINE "UNJUST ENRICHMENT" FOR THIS PURPOSE.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION    1.    The 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 39-5-45.    (A)    It is an unfair trade practice, pursuant to Section 39-5-20, for the provider of cellular telecommunications access or service or cellular telephone equipment, or all of them, to require payment of a reactivation charge when a cellular telephone that is operating in good standing under an existing cellular telecommunications agreement is replaced because it is lost, damaged, or destroyed.

(B)    It is an unfair trade practice, pursuant to Section 39-5-20, for the provider of cellular telecommunications access or service or cellular telephone equipment, or all of them, to be unjustly enriched in any manner in connection with a cellular telecommunications agreement. For purposes of this subsection, 'unjust enrichment' is the collection of damages in excess of compensation for the actual pecuniary loss suffered by the provider upon breach of the agreement by the customer."

SECTION    2.    This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

----XX----

This web page was last updated on Tuesday, June 23, 2009 at 2:08 P.M.