South Carolina General Assembly
116th Session, 2005-2006

Download This Version in Microsoft Word format

Bill 370

Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter


(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)

Indicates Matter Stricken

Indicates New Matter

COMMITTEE REPORT

April 13, 2005

S. 370

Introduced by Senator Hawkins

S. Printed 4/13/05--S.

Read the first time January 27, 2005.

            

THE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

To whom was referred a Bill (S. 370) to amend Title 7, Chapter 17 of the 1976 Code, relating to certificates and records of results of elections by adding Section 7-17-275, to provide for, etc., respectfully

REPORT:

That they have duly and carefully considered the same and recommend that the same do pass with amendment:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, by striking all after the enacting words and inserting:

/    SECTION    1.    Section 7-17-260 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

"Section 7-17-260.    The State Board shall decide all cases under protest or contest that may arise in the case of federal officers, state officers, members of the State Senate and the State House of Representatives, and offices involving more than one county. Any such protest or contest shall be filed in writing with the chairman of the board, together with a copy for each candidate in the race, not later than noon five days following the canvassing of the votes for such offices by the board; provided, however, that service upon the board may be perfected by depositing at the office of the Chief of the State Law Enforcement Division a copy of the protest, together with a copy for each candidate in the race. The chief shall take immediate steps to deliver such copies to the chairman. The protest shall contain each ground thereof concisely stated separately. The chairman of the board shall forthwith serve upon each candidate in the protested race a copy of the protest and serve a notice of the time and place of the meeting of the board for the purposes of hearing the protest. A protest or contested case heard by the State Board pursuant to Chapter 17 of Title 7 shall be considered an 'administrative action' pursuant to Section 15-36-10."

SECTION    2.    Chapter 25, Title 7 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 7-25-210.    A poll worker, whether or not compensated, while acting pursuant to or in furtherance of the holding or conduct of an election, shall be immune from personal civil liability for any act or omission when the act or omission is done or made in good faith and does not constitute gross negligence, recklessness, willfulness, or wantonness."

SECTION    3.    This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.    /

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

LARRY A. MARTIN for Committee.

            

STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT

ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT ON GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES:

Minimal (Some additional costs expected but can be absorbed)

ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT ON FEDERAL & OTHER FUND EXPENDITURES:

$0 (No additional expenditures or savings are expected)

EXPLANATION OF IMPACT:

The Judicial Department indicates there will be a minimal impact on the General Fund of the State, which can be absorbed by the agency at the current level of funding.

Approved By:

Don Addy

Office of State Budget

A BILL

TO AMEND TITLE 7, CHAPTER 17 OF THE 1976 CODE, RELATING TO CERTIFICATES AND RECORDS OF RESULTS OF ELECTIONS BY ADDING SECTION 7-17-275, TO PROVIDE FOR AN AWARD FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES ASSOCIATED WITH AN ELECTION PROTEST; AND TO AMEND TITLE 7, CHAPTER 25 RELATED TO OFFENSES AGAINST THE ELECTION LAWS BY ADDING SECTION 7-25-210 TO PROVIDE FOR QUALIFIED CIVIL IMMUNITY FOR POLL WORKERS.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION    1.    Title 7, Chapter 17 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 7-17-275.    (A)    A party opposing an election protest that prevails at the hearing before the board may petition the circuit court for reasonable costs and attorneys fees associated with the defense of the protest if the protestant does not appeal the board's decision to the Supreme Court. The board may also petition the circuit court for reasonable costs and expenses associated with hearing the protest. For appeals filed pursuant to Section 7-17-70, the petition must be filed and heard in the county where the protest was originally filed. For protests filed pursuant to Section 7-17-260 involving officers elected on a statewide basis, the petition must be filed and heard in Richland County. For all other protests filed pursuant to Section 7-17-260, the petition may be filed in any county where voting precincts comprising the election district for the office under protest are located. In order to award costs and attorney's fees pursuant to this section, the court must find that the protestant brought the protest for an improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay, or that the protest was not warranted by existing law, the facts of the case, or that it was frivolous in nature.

(B)    Upon appeal from a decision of the board, the Supreme Court may award costs and attorney fees associated with the appeal to the party prevailing on appeal when the Supreme Court finds that there were no reasonable grounds to appeal the decision of the board. In cases where the prevailing party is the party opposing the protest, the Supreme Court may award costs and attorney fees associated with the entire defense of the protest if it finds that the protestant brought the protest for an improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay, or that the protest was not warranted by existing law, the facts of the case, or that it was frivolous in nature."

SECTION    2.    Title 7, Chapter 25 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 7-25-210.    A poll worker, whether compensated or not, while acting pursuant to or in furtherance of the holding or conduct of an election shall be immune from personal civil liability for any act or omission when the act or omission is done or made in good faith and does not constitute gross negligence, recklessness, willfulness, or wantonness."

SECTION    3.    This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

----XX----

This web page was last updated on Tuesday, June 23, 2009 at 2:27 P.M.