South Carolina General Assembly
125th Session, 2023-2024
Bill 3014
Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter
(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)
Committee Report
March 29, 2023
H. 3014
Introduced by Reps. Gilliard, Henegan, Ott, Collins, Carter, Murphy, Robbins, Brewer, Gatch, Kirby, Anderson, Rivers, Howard, King, McDaniel, Hosey, Clyburn, Cobb-Hunter, Bamberg, Williams, Bernstein, W. Newton, Herbkersman, Hyde, Brittain, Guest, Erickson, Bradley, Hager, Connell, Hewitt, Rutherford, Thigpen, B. Newton, McGinnis, Hardee, Hixon, Taylor, Sandifer, M. M. Smith, Wetmore, Bustos, Landing, Elliott, Pope, Stavrinakis, Rose, Neese, Davis, Wooten, Bannister, Wheeler, Bailey, Schuessler, Blackwell, W. Jones, Dillard, Bauer, Sessions, T. Moore, J. L. Johnson, Jefferson, B. J. Cox, Garvin, B. L. Cox, Tedder and Alexander
S. Printed 03/29/23--S. [SEC 3/31/2023 2:45 PM]
Read the first time March 14, 2023
________
The committee on SENATE Judiciary
To who was referred a Bill (H. 3014) to amend the South Carolina Code of Laws by enacting the "Clementa C. Pinckney Hate Crimes Act"; by adding Article 22 to Chapter 3, Title 16 so as to entitle the, etc., respectfully
Report:
That they have duly and carefully considered the same, and recommend that the same do pass:
LUKE RANKIN for Committee.
statement of estimated fiscal impact
Explanation of Fiscal Impact
State Expenditure
This bill enacts the "Clementa C. Pinckney Hate Crimes Act," which provides for an enhanced penalty for certain violent crimes when the offender intentionally selects a victim due to the offender's belief or perception regarding the victim's race, color, religion, sex, gender, national origin, sexual orientation, or physical or mental disability. The enhanced penalty, consisting of an additional fine of not more than $10,000 and an additional term of imprisonment of up to five years, may only be applied to the penalty for the underlying offense under certain circumstances.
Judicial. Judicial reports that implementation of this bill is likely to extend the length of certain trials. However, Judicial expects to manage any expenditure impact using existing staff and General appropriations.
Commission on Prosecution Coordination. The commission reports that implementation of the bill may increase the workloads in the Offices of the Circuit Solicitor. However, the agency intends to use existing staff and General Fund appropriations to manage any increase in expenditures.
Commission on Indigent Defense. The commission reports that the expenditure impact will depend upon the number of offenses charged pursuant to the bill. However, the agency intends to use existing staff and General Fund appropriations to manage any increase in expenditures.
Department of Corrections. SCDC reports that implementation of the bill is expected to affect the inmate population by extending the terms of imprisonment for certain inmates. In FY 2021-22, the annual total cost per inmate was $32,247, of which $30,044 was state funded, and the marginal cost per inmate was $4,836, of which $4,829 was state funded. However, as there are no data to determine the number of inmates whose terms of imprisonment would be affected, the expenditure impact of the bill on SCDC in FY 2023-24 is undetermined.
State Revenue
This bill may result in an increase in the fines and fees collected in court. Court fines and fees are distributed to the General Fund, Other Funds, and local funds. Therefore, RFA anticipates this bill may result in an undetermined impact to General Fund revenue and Other Funds revenue due to the increase in fines and fees collections in court.
Frank A. Rainwater, Executive Director
Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office
________
A bill
TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA code of laws BY enacting the "clementa c. pinckney hate crimes act"; by ADDING ARTICLE 22 TO CHAPTER 3, TITLE 16 SO AS TO ENTITLE THE ARTICLE "PENALTY ENHANCEMENTS FOR CERTAIN CRIMES", TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PENALTIES FOR PERSONS WHO COMMIT CERTAIN DELINEATED CRIMES WHEN THE VICTIM WAS INTENTIONALLY SELECTED BASED ON CERTAIN FACTORS, AND TO PROVIDE VICTIMS OF A VIOLATION OF THE ARTICLE MAY BRING A CIVIL ACTION FOR DAMAGES SUSTAINED.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. This act may be cited as the "Clementa C. Pinckney Hate Crimes Act".
SECTION 2. Chapter 3, Title 16 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding:
Article 22
Penalty Enhancements for Certain Crimes
Section 16-3-2410. (A) When a person commits a violent crime as defined in Section 16-1-60 or commits assault by mob in the second degree as defined in Section 16-3-210(C) and the trier of fact determines beyond a reasonable doubt that the offense was committed against a victim who was intentionally selected, in whole or in part, because of the person's belief or perception regarding the victim's race, color, religion, sex, gender, national origin, sexual orientation, or physical or mental disability, whether or not the perception is correct, the person is subject to additional penalties as provided in subsection (B).
(B) A person who violates the provisions of subsection (A) and commits a violent crime as defined in Section 16-1-60 or commits assault by mob in the second degree as defined in Section 16-3-210(C), upon conviction, is subject to an additional fine of not more than ten thousand dollars and an additional term of imprisonment of up to five years;
(C) The provisions of this section provide for the enhancement of the penalties applicable to underlying offenses. The court shall permit the prosecuting agency and the defense to present evidence relevant to the determination of whether the defendant intentionally selected the person against whom the offense is committed, in whole or in part, because of the person's belief or perception regarding one or more of the factors provided in subsection (A), whether or not the perception is correct. The court with competent jurisdiction over the underlying offense shall instruct the trier of fact to find a special verdict as to a violation of the provisions of this section.
(D) The additional penalties described in subsection (B) may not be imposed unless the person was indicted, either separately or as a separate count in the indictment for the underlying offense, for the offense pursuant to this section committed against the victim who was intentionally selected, in whole or in part, because of the person's belief or perception regarding one or more of the factors provided in subsection (A), whether or not the perception is correct, and the person was found guilty of the underlying offense.
SECTION 3. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.
----XX----
This web page was last updated on March 31, 2023 at 02:46 PM