Obviously, something went wrong in their utility regulatory program, the same
exact with New Jersey and Pennsylvania. So to really have good service, I think
it's tantamount, the first responsibility of the Public Service Commission.
Q. What topics do you consider to be the most important at the PSC right now?
Where do you think are some cutting edge problems that are going to confront
--
A. Well, first and foremost is we must be competitive in doing business in the
State of South Carolina. We must be competitive with other states and other
nations if businesses are to come here and those that are here are to stay here,
so that's the number one consideration.
If we become no longer competitive and the Public Service Commission does
have a great deal of response and responsibility in this area, then, you know,
businesses will not grow, will not stay here and in the long run every one,
utilities and the public, will be at a disadvantage.
Q. Santee Cooper offers a range of rates to various utility customers that use
it, whether it be the electric co-ops whether it be a company like Valu-max
(phonetic) or whether it be the residential consumer that may buy directly in
that area. Is it appropriate for a utility regulated by the
And there has been many spin-off jobs. It's sort of a gut-wrenching decision
making process to give industry a special rate. And I don't think it should be
given. It has to be given with the idea to some surgical precision, but if we
don't do that, then we don't have employment and then we're all going to be
worse off. So I feel that, yes, it should be based on job creation and specific
requirements, but I think it is something that needs to -- it should be
done.
Q. Do you recognize the term generational mix as it relates to fuel sources?
A. Yes, that'd be like nuclear power, coal, oil, fire boilers,
hydroelectric.
Q. What -- how would that impact environmentally? How would you -- and what
role would you see the PSC taking in those areas in terms of requiring or
encouraging certain generational mixes?
A. Nuclear power has a -- and the only problem with nuclear power, quite
frankly, is the fact what are you going to do with the disposal of the waste.
Of course, presently, it's coming to Barnwell County, South Carolina.
But beyond that situation and the thought maybe the threat of a nuclear
accident, it is an excellent source of power and when things -- when the power
demand goes down, for instance, SCE&G runs -- they shut everything else
down, they keep running the Duke Sumner nuclear plant.
Q. Mr. Schuster, speaking a little more generically rather than trying to
identify what's clean power and what's not, I guess my question I would like to
focus on is it appropriate where something may be more expensive, but a cleaner
burn to opt for the more expensive, cleaner approach to generation of power as
opposed to the most -- to the least expensive generation of power, to mandate
that as a Public Service commissioner?
A. Well, I think quite frankly in that situation, we at the PSC should touch
base with the health departments, the environmental quality control and work
together and really just make a decision.
If they feel that is an air pollution problem, then you -- the power that we have over the utilities, tell them, you know, yes, we're going to have
But I don't think the PSC should be legislating by itself air quality control
standards. I think they need to really talk especially to people who really
know what they're doing which would be the environmental section of DHEC.
Q. Are you aware that the Public Service Commission has environmental authority
when it comes to the siting decisions as it relates to new plants?
A. No, I did not know that.
Q. A couple of short questions, are you familiar with the concept of wheeling as
it relates to the wholesale distribution of power?
A. No, I don't.
Q. What other types of utilities does the PSC regulate other than electricity
generated power?
A. Well, you have private water systems, private waste water systems, we have,
of course, natural gas. You have transportation, highway and railroad. It also
regulates, of course, the safety aspects of truck driving in this state.
Q. Thank you. And I don't believe that I've mentioned yet for the committee's
benefit, Mr. Schuster, that your credit reports and SLED reports were positive
in that there were no negative entries. I wanted to be sure that was on the
record.
Then, finally, would you have any recommendations for this committee as it
would relate to the screening process itself to improve it?
A. Well, it seems like it was a little longer like, for instance, we first met
and then you had to decide whether or not on whether to have all of the
candidates or not, maybe get that resolved. But you need have a thorough
process, you know, in doing this for the candidates.
Like I said, I -- in the letter I sent you speaks for what I feel about what
the Public Service Commission stands for. I guess all the members got that, so
that's really -- you know, you have a really -- a very important responsibility
and I appreciate your consideration. And I think you have a lot of candidates
here. You have a tough job ahead of you.
Q. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
REPRESENTATIVE WILKES: Would any of the screening committee members like to ask
questions of the candidate?
SENATOR COURTNEY: Mr. Chairman?
REPRESENTATIVE WILKES: Senator Courtney.
So we -- you need to make sure that they are keeping the utility up to par.
You know, first rate, first rate people, first rate facilities and --
Q. Assuming that the investments that they make are good investments, money
making investments, that don't detract from their overall financial situation,
is it all right for them to use money generated from their utility service to
invest in other areas even though that may reflect on their need for an increase
in rates?
A. So in other words if because of their putting money into other investments
requires them to go up on the rates, is that your question?
Q. Yes, sir.
A. I'd look very unfavorably upon that, Senator.
Q. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
If I were to ask you are you emotionally driven or logically driven or
somewhere in between, how would you respond to that?
A. Logically driven.
Q. That's an unqualified answer. All right. How about --
A. I was told I have a -- I'm as serious as a heart attack.
Q. How about the development oriented versus environmentally oriented? We seem
to be living in a time of extremes in adversaries sometimes, so --
A. I would have to -- you can have good development and be environmentally
sound. It's possible with the proper planning, it can be done, so I would say
-- I could -- I'm not going to say -- it's not either or. I think with the
proper planning, we can do both.
Q. So you would strike a balance then?
A. Yes, sir.
Q. How about if I were to pose this scenario, urban oriented versus rural
oriented?
A. Again, one of the big fallacies we're having in this state and nation is the
fact that central urban areas are decaying and we're going out urbanizing the
rural areas. I think what we really need to do is do what Oregon has done by
the way is restricting growth around the cities, so you can develop within this
area and not develop outside of that and then really spend our time and effort
redeveloping our urban areas because
At the same time, we are becoming more -- it takes more energy just to do
merely the things that we want, so I feel that we should be -- urban areas
should remain urban and rural areas should remain rural and we should plan --
work to keep it that way or the best we can.
Q. If as a commissioner you may have to make a decision sometimes that might
adversely effect a rural area or vice versa, so do I understand you to say that
if -- that maybe we don't need to look at economic development particularly in
the rural areas as far as, let's say, extending infrastructure at the cost of
the rest of the state possibly to underdeveloped or undeveloped rural areas?
A. Well, we have a bunch of -- well, it depends on how you determine rural. A
lot of people -- I think the classification I always remembered was a town of
500 people is rural, but actually that's a small town.
What I'm saying is that if we want to -- if we let -- small towns and central cities of this state are decaying, so if we develop, why not develop the small towns or the central city areas and the rural areas, but not just, say, if someone wants to develop something four miles out in the woods somewhere, that's rural, but it's probably if we could do it around an urban, existing small town or urban area.
So what I'm trying to say is that we should try to direct our growth, so that
we don't have urban sprawl which costs a lot for utilities to service the areas
and also it costs a lot of good farmland and stuff.
Q. Thank you.
REPRESENTATIVE WILKES: Any other committee members have a question for Mr.
Schuster? If not, Mr. Schuster, thank you for your time and you may be
excused.
A. Thank you very much.
1. Mr. Charles E. Schuster
Home Address: Business Address:
27 North Basilica Avenue P.O. Box 11280
Hanahan, SC 29406 Columbia, SC 29211
2. He was born in Greenville, SC on April 9, 1951.
Social Security Number: ***-**-****.
S.C. Voter's Registration Number: 1180028.
4. He married Karen Reynolds on March 24, 1989. He was previously married to Sarah Ballard Duvall from 1985 to 1987. They divorced in Charleston County in 1987. He has one stepson:David Corey Scott, age 16, student.
6. He received a B.S. in Food Science from Clemson University 1972, and a M.B.A. from the University of South Carolina in 1978. He has completed 28 hours of short courses between 1973 and 1993.
8. He was defeated in a 1980 bid for State House District 99.
9. From 1974 to present, he has worked for the S.C. Department of Agriculture as a food and cosmetic inspector.
19. From 1974 to present, he has worked for the S.C. Department of Agriculture as a food and cosmetic inspector. His supervisor is Thomas W. Brooks.
22. He estimates having spent approximately $20 on telephone calls and $52 on typing.
26. Professional organizations: Alpha Zeta Honor Agricultural Fraternity; Gamma Sigma Delta Professional Agriculture Society.
27. Civic, charitable, etc. organizations:Berkeley County Historical Society; Berkeley County Republican Men's Club (officer); Berkeley County Republican Party (officer for 12 years); Clemson University Alumni Association (past area representative); Hanahan Arts Council; Hanahan High Parent Teacher Assoc.; Otranto Civic Club; St. Philip's Episcopal Church; Toastmasters International (officer for 10 years); University of South Carolina Alumni Assoc.
29. Five letters of reference:
(a) Sheriff Ray Isgett
Berkeley County Sheriff
300 California Avenue
Moncks Corner, SC 29461
(803) 761-8190
Berkeley County Coroner
300 California Avenue
Moncks Corner, SC 29461
(803) 761-8178
(c) Janet Brown Jurosko
Berkeley County Auditor
223 North Live Oak Drive
Moncks Corner, SC 29461
(803) 761-6900 ext. 4036
(d) James K. McMillan, Jr., Esquire
P.O. Box 488
Sumter, SC 29151-0488
(803) 775-2455
(e) Jill Galdier
South Carolina National Bank
8599 Rivers Avenue
North Charleston, SC 29406
(803) 724-5148
30. First District.
MR. COUICK: Mr. Tyler I believe is coming in the door. Mr. Tyler, please
come forward and take the seat on your extreme left. Mr. Tyler, while you're
putting your things down, if you would take out your driver's license or your
voter registration card, whichever is most convenient.
MR. TYLER: I have both of them.
MR. COUICK: Did you by chance receive the letter?
MR. TYLER: Yes.
MR. COUICK: Good. Mr. Tyler, if you would raise your right and be repeat the
oath or take the oath.
HUBERT TYLER, having been duly sworn, testified as follows:
MR. TYLER - EXAMINATION BY MR. COUICK:
Q. Mr. Tyler, your South Carolina driver's license indicates that you live
at Route 3, Box 472, Ridgeland, South Carolina, 29936. Your voter registration
card indicates the same address. I believe that Ridgeland is in Jasper County;
is that correct?
A. Yes, it is.
Q. And you have been a resident of Ridgeland for some period of time, I take
it?
A. Life.
I served honorably in the United States Army for three years and as a Board
member for 17 years and I feel that now it's time for me to move onto larger or
to more diversified group of individuals.
Q. Aside from your service on the Jasper County Board of Education, do you have
any other outside interest right now other than just being retired? Do you have
any other employment or any other business interests at this time?
A. Yes, I -- at the present, I have a part time position with the United States
Postal Service as a rural carrier in Hardeeville, South Carolina, which is in
Jasper County.
Q. And I believe that's as a substitute; is that correct?
A. Yes, it is.
Q. How much control do you have over the hours you spend in that position?
A. None whatsoever. It's set.
Q. I guess my next question is would you anticipate that if you were elected to
the PSC that you would have to relinquish those responsibilities as a substitute
carrier?
A. Yes, I would.
Q. Mr. Chairman, in our research with SLED and a credit bureau, we found that
both indicate very positive reports on Mr. Tyler. No negative entries reported
by credit or judgment search. What would you think would be one or two major
issues confronting the Public Service Commission at this time, Mr. Tyler?
A. Well, I think one of the major issues would be fuel consumption and the
natural fuel that we use to generate electrical entities or whatnot. We'll have
to look at some alternative sources simply because our natural resources is
going to soon run out if we continue to use it.