Printed Page 3110, Mar. 8
| Printed Page 3130, Mar. 8
|
Printed Page 3110, Mar. 8
| Printed Page 3130, Mar. 8
| Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. GAMBLE explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. HARRELL proposed the following Amendment No. 133 (Doc Name L:\council\legis\amend\JIC\5719HTC.94), which was adopted.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 129, General and Temporary, page 607, right column, paragraph 38.A, line 27, by inserting before the period /but the total reimbursement for lodging and meals may not exceed the maximum daily allowance applicable for federal employees while on official business/.
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. HARRELL explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted by a division vote of 61 to 11.
Rep. HUTSON proposed the following Amendment No. 177 (Doc Name L:\h- wm\legis\amend\FR.009), which was rejected.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 129, General and Temporary, Page 613, Paragraph 62, Line 37, right column, by inserting /using the funds appropriated under office services other operating expenses, the Department of Revenue and Taxation shall identify and calculate any income tax overpayment as a result of the Davis v. Michigan case to any federal retiree or eligible beneficiary for tax years 1985, 1986, 1987, and 1988 who did not receive a refund under the terms of the settlement of the class action suit related to this matter for any or all of these tax years. Notwithstanding any other provision of law the department shall then refund any overpayment due to this proviso by June 30, 1995/
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. HUTSON explained the amendment.
Rep. McABEE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. KLAUBER demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as
follows:
Alexander, M.O. Askins Boan Carnell Elliott Gamble Harris, J. Harris, P. Hodges Huff Jaskwhich Kennedy Kirsh Martin Mattos McAbee McCraw McTeer Phillips Rogers Sheheen
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander, T.C. Allison Anderson Bailey, J. Baker Barber Baxley Beatty Breeland Brown, H. Brown, J. Byrd Cato Chamblee Clyborne Cooper Davenport Delleney Farr Fulmer Gonzales Graham Hallman Harrell Harrelson Harrison Harvin Haskins Hines Hutson Inabinett Jennings Keegan Kelley Keyserling Klauber Koon Lanford Law Littlejohn Marchbanks McKay McLeod McMahand Meacham Moody-Lawrence Neal Neilson Quinn Riser Robinson Rudnick Scott Sharpe Shissias Simrill Smith, D. Smith, R. Spearman Stille Stoddard Stone Stuart Sturkie Thomas Trotter Walker Whipper Wilder, D. Wilder, J. Williams Witherspoon Wofford Worley Wright Young, R.
Rep. SHEHEEN spoke against the amendment.
Rep. HUTSON spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. SHEHEEN spoke against the amendment.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.
Rep. SHEHEEN demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Bailey, J. Baker Barber Baxley Brown, H. Clyborne Corning Davenport Fair Fulmer Gonzales Hallman Harrell Harrelson Harrison Harvin Harwell Hines Hutson Kennedy Keyserling Klauber Koon Law McLeod Meacham Moody-Lawrence Quinn Richardson Riser Rudnick Sharpe Shissias Simrill Stone Sturkie Vaughn Wofford Wright Young, A. Young, R.
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander, M.O. Alexander, T.C. Askins Bailey, G. Boan Breeland Carnell Cato Chamblee Cobb-Hunter Cromer Delleney Elliott Farr Felder Gamble Govan Graham Harris, J. Harris, P. Haskins Hodges Holt Houck Huff Inabinett Jaskwhich
Jennings Keegan Kelley Kirsh Littlejohn Marchbanks Martin Mattos McAbee McCraw McElveen McKay McTeer Neal Neilson Phillips Rhoad Robinson Rogers Scott Sheheen Snow Spearman Stille Stoddard Stuart Thomas Trotter Tucker Waites Waldrop Wells White Wilder, D. Wilder, J. Wilkes Wilkins Williams Witherspoon Worley
So, the amendment was rejected.
Reps. WOFFORD, A. YOUNG, VAUGHN, WILKINS, HOWELL, MEACHAM HALLMAN, and HODGES proposed the following Amendment No. 178 (Doc Name L:\h-wm\legis\amend\DH.025), which was adopted.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 129, General Proviso's, Page 608, Paragraph 38F, Line 32, by striking and inserting a new paragraph to read: /No subsistence reimbursement shall be allowed to a Justice of the Supreme Court or Judge of the Court of Appeals while traveling in the county of his official residence. When traveling on official business of said court within 50 miles outside the county of his official residence, a Supreme Court Justice and a Judge of the Court of Appeals shall be allowed subsistence expenses in the amount of $35 per day plus such mileage allowance for travel as is provided for other employees of the State. When traveling on official business of said Court 50 or more miles outside the county of his official residence, each Justice and Judge of the Court of Appeals shall be allowed subsistence expenses in the amount as provided in this Act for members of the General Assembly plus such mileage allowance for travel as is provided for other employees of the State. The Chief Justice, or such other person as he designates, while attending the Conference of Chief Justices and one member of the Supreme Court while attending the National Convention of Appellate Court Judges, and three Circuit Judges while attending the
Upon approval of the Chief Justice, Supreme Court Justices, Judges of the Court of Appeals, Circuit Judges, and Family Court Judges shall be reimbursed for actual expenses incurred for all other official business requiring out-of- state expenses at the rate provided in paragraph A of this section./
Amend further, Paragraph 38G, Page 608, Line 14, Right Column, by striking it in its entirety and inserting a new paragraph to read: /No subsistence reimbursements are allowed to a Circuit Judge or a Family Court Judge while holding court within the county in which he resides. While holding court or on other official business outside the County, but within the circuit in which he resides and within fifty miles of his residence, a Circuit Court Judge or Family Court Judge is entitled to a subsistence allowance in the amount of $35 per day. While holding court or on other official business at a location fifty miles or more from his residence, a Circuit Court or Family Court Judge is entitled to a subsistence allowance in the amount as provided in this Act for members of the General Assembly./
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. WOFFORD explained the amendment.
Rep. WOFFORD continued speaking.
The amendment was then adopted.
Section 129 as amended was adopted.
Rep. BOAN moved that when the House adjourns it adjourn to meet at 9:30 A.M. tomorrow, which was agreed to.
Debate was resumed on Section 3A.
Section 3A was adopted.
Debate was resumed on Section 4A.
Reps. HODGES and WILKINS proposed the following Amendment No. 44 (Doc Name L:\h- wm\legis\amend\VC.008), which was adopted.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section Section 4A, Judicial Department, Page 25, Line 11, Opposite /Total Personal Service/ by decreasing the amount in columns (5) and (6) by /189,000/
Amend Further
Page 25, Line 12, Opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount in columns (5) and (6) by /184,500/
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. WILKINS explained the amendment.
Rep. ROGERS spoke against the amendment.
Rep. HODGES spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. ROGERS spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. McELVEEN spoke in favor of the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. WILKINS, HODGES, FELDER, ROGERS and BOAN proposed the following Amendment No. 81 (Doc Name L:\h-wm\legis\amend\DH.JBA), which was adopted.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 4A, Judicial, Page 26, Line 25, Opposite /Other Operating Expenses, by increasing the amounts in columns (5) and (6) by /$277,935/
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. WILKINS explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Section 4A as amended was adopted.
Debate was resumed on Section 6A.
Section 6A was adopted.
Debate was resumed on Section 6B.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 6B, SLED, Page 33, Line 35, Opposite /Other Operating Expense/ by increasing the amounts in Columns (5) and (6) by /100,000/
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. M.O. ALEXANDER explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. FARR, GAMBLE, HODGES and PHILLIPS proposed the following Amendment No. 39 (Doc Name L:\h-wm\legis\amend\DH.VFL), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 6B, SLED, Page 34, Line 30, Opposite /Other Operating Expenses by increasing the amounts of Columns (5) and (6) by /629,000/
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. HODGES explained the amendment.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. FAIR a leave of absence to go to a funeral visitation.
Rep. HODGES continued speaking.
Rep. KIRSH spoke against the amendment.
Rep. FARR spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. KIRSH moved to table the amendment.
Rep. FARR demanded the yeas and nays, which were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander, M.O. Allison Anderson Bailey, J. Baker Barber Beatty Boan Breeland Brown, H. Brown, J. Byrd Canty Carnell Chamblee Cobb-Hunter Corning Davenport Fulmer Govan Hallman
Harrell Harris, P. Haskins Holt Jaskwhich Kennedy Kirsh Law Marchbanks McElveen McMahand Meacham Moody-Lawrence Neal Rhoad Robinson Rogers Rudnick Scott Sharpe Sheheen Simrill Smith, R. Stille Stone Trotter Vaughn Wells Whipper White Wilkes Wilkins Williams
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander, T.C. Askins Bailey, G. Baxley Cromer Delleney Farr Felder Gamble Graham Harrelson Harris, J. Harrison Harvin Harwell Hodges Houck Jennings Keegan Kelley Keyserling Kinon Koon Lanford Martin Mattos McAbee McCraw McKay McLeod McTeer Neilson Phillips Richardson Riser Shissias Snow Spearman Stoddard Stuart Sturkie Thomas Tucker Waites Waldrop Walker Wilder, D. Wilder, J. Witherspoon Wofford Wright Young, A. Young, R.
So, the amendment was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 6B, SLED, Page 33, Line 32, opposite /Other Operating/ by increasing the amount in columns (5) and (6) by / 1,550,000 /
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. SPEARMAN explained the amendment.
Rep. BOAN spoke against the amendment.
Rep. SPEARMAN spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. BOAN moved to table the amendment.
Rep. SIMRILL demanded the yeas and nays, which were not ordered.
The amendment was then tabled by a division vote of 63 to 24.
Section 6B as amended was adopted.
Debate was resumed on Section 12.
Reps. FELDER, CLYBORNE, HARWELL, TUCKER, JENNINGS, HARRISON, WILKINS and HODGES proposed the following Amendment No. 194 (Doc Name L:\h-wm\legis\amend\DH.016), which was adopted.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 12, Prosecution Commission, Page 50, Line 15, opposite /Judicial Circuit State Support/ by increasing the amounts in Columns (5) and (6) by /291,320/
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. FELDER explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Section 12 as amended was adopted.
Debate was resumed on Section 19.
Rep. STUART proposed the following Amendment No. 200 (Doc Name L:\h- wm\legis\amend\FR.020).
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 19, Education, Page 246, by inserting a new line after line 37 /Aid to Districts - School Board Orientation/ and inserting in Columns (5) and (6) by /$10,000/
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. STUART explained the amendment.
Rep. STUART moved to adjourn debate upon the amendment, which was adopted.
Rep. CORNING proposed the following Amendment No. 214 (Doc Name L:\h- wm\legis\amend\DC.044).
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 19, Dept. of Education, Page 0250, Line 12, Opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by increasing the amounts in Columns (5) and (6) by /4,315,000/
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. CORNING explained the amendment and moved to adjourn debate upon the amendment, which was rejected.
Rep. BOAN moved to adjourn debate upon the section, which was adopted.
Debate was resumed on Section 29.
Reps. McELVEEN and SHISSIAS proposed the following Amendment No. 211 (Doc Name L:\h-wm\legis\amend\VC.030), which was tabled.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 29, Page 290, Line 39, Opposite /Hospital Services/ by decreasing the amount in column (5) by /2,396,439/ and in column (6) by /700,000/.
Renumber sections & amend totals/title to conform.
Rep. McELVEEN explained the amendment.
Rep. MOODY-LAWRENCE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 54 to 35.
Printed Page 3110, Mar. 8
| Printed Page 3130, Mar. 8
|