South Carolina General Assembly
118th Session, 2009-2010

Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format

Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter

H. 3249

STATUS INFORMATION

General Bill
Sponsors: Reps. G.M. Smith and Viers
Document Path: l:\council\bills\ms\7128ahb09.docx

Introduced in the House on January 13, 2009
Introduced in the Senate on April 21, 2010
Last Amended on April 20, 2010
Currently residing in the Senate

Summary: Torts Claims Act

HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS

     Date      Body   Action Description with journal page number
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1/13/2009  House   Introduced and read first time HJ-102
   1/13/2009  House   Referred to Committee on Judiciary HJ-102
   3/24/2010  House   Committee report: Favorable with amendment Judiciary 
                        HJ-32
   3/25/2010  House   Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Viers
   4/20/2010  House   Amended HJ-22
   4/20/2010  House   Read second time HJ-23
   4/21/2010  House   Read third time and sent to Senate HJ-7
   4/21/2010  Senate  Introduced and read first time SJ-5
   4/21/2010  Senate  Referred to Committee on Judiciary SJ-5
   4/28/2010  Senate  Referred to Subcommittee: L.Martin (ch), Rankin, Hutto, 
                        Bright, Davis
   5/19/2010  Senate  Committee report: Majority favorable with amend., 
                        minority unfavorable Judiciary SJ-25

View the latest legislative information at the LPITS web site

VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

1/13/2009
3/24/2010
4/20/2010
5/19/2010

(Text matches printed bills. Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)

Indicates Matter Stricken

Indicates New Matter

COMMITTEE REPORT

May 19, 2010

H. 3249

Introduced by Reps. G.M. Smith and Viers

S. Printed 5/19/10--S.

Read the first time April 21, 2010.

            

THE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

To whom was referred a Bill (H. 3249) to amend Sections 15-78-30 and 15-78-50, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, relating to liability pursuant to the Tort Claims Act, etc., respectfully

REPORT:

That they have duly and carefully considered the same and recommend that the same do pass with amendment:

Amend the bill, as and if amended, page 1, in Section 8-1-195 (A), as contained in SECTION 1, by striking line 32 and inserting the following:

/        action or decision regarding an employee, the court, prior to         /

Amend the bill further, as and if amended, page 2, as contained in SECTION 2, by striking line 4 and inserting the following:

/        SECTION    2.    This act takes effect upon approval of the Governor and applies to any claim that arises or accrues after that date.                /

Renumber sections to conform.

Amend title to conform.

Majority favorable.    Minority unfavorable.

LARRY A. MARTIN    JOHN L. SCOTT, JR.

For Majority.    For Minority.

            

STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT

ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT ON GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES:

$0 (No additional expenditures or savings are expected)

ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT ON FEDERAL & OTHER FUND EXPENDITURES:

$0 (No additional expenditures or savings are expected)

EXPLANATION OF IMPACT:

The State Budget and Control Board indicates there is no fiscal impact with the adoption of this bill.

Approved By:

Harry Bell

Office of State Budget

A BILL

TO AMEND SECTIONS 15-78-30 AND 15-78-50, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO LIABILITY PURSUANT TO THE TORT CLAIMS ACT, SO AS TO FURTHER DEFINE THE DEFINITIONS OF THE TERMS "SCOPE OF OFFICIAL DUTY" AND "SCOPE OF STATE EMPLOYMENT" AND TO EXPRESSLY PROVIDE FOR IMMUNITY OF CERTAIN GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES WHEN INVESTIGATING POTENTIAL WRONGDOING OR DISCIPLINING ANOTHER EMPLOYEE UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION    1.    Chapter 1, Title 8 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

"Section 8-1-195.    (A)    If the State, an agency, a political subdivision, or an employee of these governmental entities is sued for civil conspiracy based in part upon a personnel or employment action or decision regarding a state employee, the court, prior to trial, must make a determination whether the action or decision giving rise to the suit was made by the employee within the scope of official duty. If the court finds that the employee was acting within the scope of the employee's official duties, the State, an agency, a political subdivision, or an employee of these governmental entities is immune from suit, liability, and damages from the civil conspiracy claim. The immunity granted by this section does not limit any claim available at law, other than civil conspiracy, which challenges personnel or employment action of a governmental entity.

(B)    When applicable, the terms used in this section have the same meaning as the terms defined in Section 15-78-30."

SECTION    2.    This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

----XX----

This web page was last updated on Monday, October 10, 2011 at 12:20 P.M.