The House assembled at 9:30 a.m.
Deliberations were opened with prayer by Rev. Charles E. Seastrunk, Jr., as follows:
Our thought for today is from Isaiah 40:29: "He gives power to the faint, and strengthens the powerless."
Let us pray. Almighty Father, give these Representatives and staff the strength when they feel tired and lift them up to do the work of the people. Bless these Representatives and staff as they work on the budget this week. Give them courage of their conviction to do what is good and right for the people they serve. Protect and bless our Nation, President, State, Governor, Speaker, staff, and all who give of their time and energy for this State. Bless and protect our defenders of freedom and first responders as they protect us. Heal the wounds, those seen and those hidden, of our brave warriors who suffer and sacrifice for our freedom. Lord, in Your mercy, hear our prayers. Amen.
Pursuant to Rule 6.3, the House of Representatives was led in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America by the SPEAKER.
After corrections to the Journal of the proceedings of yesterday, the SPEAKER ordered it confirmed.
Rep. ROBINSON-SIMPSON moved that when the House adjourns, it adjourn in memory of Cornelia Cato, which was agreed to.
The roll call of the House of Representatives was taken resulting as follows:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown
Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hart Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Weeks West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
The SPEAKER granted Rep. SANDIFER a temporary leave of absence.
Announcement was made that Dr. Larry R. Winn of Easley was the Doctor of the Day for the General Assembly.
In accordance with House Rule 5.2 below:
"5.2 Every bill before presentation shall have its title endorsed; every report, its title at length; every petition, memorial, or other paper, its prayer or substance; and, in every instance, the name of the member presenting any paper shall be endorsed and the papers shall be presented by the member to the Speaker at the desk. A member may add his name to a bill or resolution or a co-sponsor of a bill or resolution may remove his name at any time prior to the bill or resolution receiving passage on second reading. The member or co-sponsor shall notify the Clerk of the House in writing of his desire to have his name added or removed from the bill or resolution. The Clerk of the House shall print the member's or co-sponsor's written notification in the House Journal. The removal or addition of a name does not apply to a bill or resolution sponsored by a committee."
Bill Number: H. 3345 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/13/18 THAYER
Bill Number: H. 3847 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/13/18 THAYER
Bill Number: H. 4094 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/13/18 THAYER
Bill Number: H. 4115 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/13/18 PUTNAM
Bill Number: H. 4385 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/13/18 THAYER
Bill Number: H. 4418 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/13/18 GAGNON and HERBKERSMAN
Bill Number: H. 4912 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/13/18 THAYER
Bill Number: H. 4945 (Word version)
Date: ADD:
03/13/18 PUTNAM
Debate was resumed on the following Bill, the pending question being the consideration of Part IA, Section 1:
H. 4950 -- Ways and Means Committee: A BILL TO MAKE APPROPRIATIONS AND TO PROVIDE REVENUES TO MEET THE ORDINARY EXPENSES OF STATE GOVERNMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 2018, TO REGULATE THE EXPENDITURE OF SUCH FUNDS, AND TO FURTHER PROVIDE FOR THE OPERATION OF STATE GOVERNMENT DURING THIS FISCAL YEAR AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
Rep. MAGNUSON proposed the following Amendment No. 42
(Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\school resource officers.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 10, immediately after line 25, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4
Statewide School Resource Officers
$5,000,000 $5,000,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MAGNUSON explained the amendment.
Rep. MAGNUSON spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. GOVAN spoke against the amendment.
Rep. WHITMIRE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. MAGNUSON demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anthony Arrington Atkinson Atwater Bales Bamberg Bannister Blackwell Bradley Bryant Clemmons Clyburn Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Herbkersman Hewitt Hosey Jefferson Jordan Kirby Knight Lowe Lucas Mack Martin McCoy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Ott Pendarvis Pitts Pope Ridgeway M. Rivers Rutherford Simrill G. M. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Thigpen
West White Whitmire Williams Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Allison Anderson Ballentine Bennett Brawley Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Crosby Daning Davis Elliott Forrester Fry Funderburk Hamilton Henegan Hill Hiott Huggins Johnson King Long Mace Magnuson McCravy Norrell Putnam S. Rivers G. R. Smith Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham Willis Young
So, the amendment was tabled.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Arrington Atkinson Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bennett Blackwell Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott
Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 1 was adopted.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 55 to H. 4950 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\john de la howe reduction.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 7, JOHN DE LA
HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 2, opposite /Superintendent/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$55,764 $55,764
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 4, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$126,548 $126,548
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 6, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$1,269 $1,269
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 7, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$9,490 $9,490
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 12, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$30,880 $30,880
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 14, opposite /Unclassified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$272,301 $272,301
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 16, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$34,450 $34,450
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 17, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$6,549 $6,549
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 23, opposite /Classified Positions/ by
decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$612,746 $612,746
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 25, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$692 $692
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 26, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$68,961 $68,961
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 32, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$179,191 $179,191
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 21, line 34, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$29,017 $29,017
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 22, line 5, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$117,931 $117,931
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 22, line 7, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$3,250 $3,250
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 22, line 12, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$248,414 $248,414
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 22, line 14, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$90,155 $90,155
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 22, line 22, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$268,102 $268,102
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 22, line 24, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$87,012 $87,012
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 22, line 29, opposite /Employer Contributions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$874,466 $874,466
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. WHITMIRE spoke against the amendment.
Rep. WILLIAMS spoke against the amendment.
Rep. PARKS spoke against the amendment.
Rep. PARKS moved to table the amendment.
Rep. HILL demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Atkinson Bamberg Bannister Bernstein Blackwell Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Crawford Crosby Davis Delleney Dillard
Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrester Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hixon Hosey Howard Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Lowe Lucas Mack Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Ridgeway M. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Simrill G. M. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thigpen West White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Arrington Atwater Ballentine Bennett Caskey Chumley Collins Daning Elliott Forrest Fry Funderburk Hamilton Hewitt Hill Hiott Huggins Long Mace Magnuson McGinnis Murphy Putnam S. Rivers G. R. Smith Stringer Thayer Toole Trantham Wheeler
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. WHITE explained the section.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West
White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Chumley Hill Long Magnuson
Section 7 was adopted.
I was temporarily out of the Chamber on constituent business during the vote on H. 4950, Part IA, Section 7. If I had been present, I would have voted in favor of the Section.
Rep. Laurie Funderburk
Rep. BRADLEY proposed the following Amendment No. 73 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\003\bradley usc.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 20a, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, page 46, immediately after line 13, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4
Competency Based Teacher Training Program
500,000 500,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BRADLEY explained the amendment.
Rep. COLE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 1 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\006\childrenadvocmed.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 20A,
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, page 47, lines 16-17, opposite /Child Abuse & Neglect Medical Response Program/ by decreasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
1,125,000 1,125,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. G. M. SMITH spoke against the amendment.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN spoke against the amendment.
Rep. PITTS spoke against the amendment.
Rep. CASKEY spoke against the amendment.
Rep. G. M. SMITH moved to table the amendment.
Rep. SIMRILL demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Atwater Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan
King Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill
So, the amendment was tabled.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell
Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Weeks Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill Magnuson
Section 20A was adopted.
I was temporarily out of the Chamber on constituent business during the vote on H. 4950, Part IA, Section 20A, University of South Caroilna. If I had been present, I would have voted in favor of the Section.
Rep. Wm. Weston Newton
The SPEAKER granted Rep. KIRBY a temporary leave of absence.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 2 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\006\muschealthinnov.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 23, MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, page 65, line 34, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
7,500,000 7,500,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. G. M. SMITH spoke against the amendment.
Rep. FINLAY spoke against the amendment.
Rep. OTT spoke against the amendment.
Rep. FINLAY moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 89 to 3.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Atwater Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins
Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson King Knight Loftis Lowe Lucas Mace Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Weeks West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Caskey Hill Long Magnuson
Section 23 was adopted.
Rep. GOVAN proposed the following Amendment No. 30 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\003\govan denmark 500k.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 25, STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL & COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION, page 71, immediately after line 19, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4
Denmark Tech Program Expansion
500,000 500,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. GOVAN explained the amendment.
Rep. COLE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. GOVAN proposed the following Amendment No. 32 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\003\GOVAN 1A $300K.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 25, STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL & COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION, page 71, immediately after line 19, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4
Denmark Tech Program Expansion
300,000 300,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. GOVAN explained the amendment.
Rep. HOSEY spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. COLE spoke against the amendment.
Rep. COLE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. GOVAN demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Arrington Atkinson Atwater Bales Bannister Bernstein Blackwell Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Davis Delleney Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Fry Funderburk Gagnon Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton W. Newton Pitts Pope Putnam S. Rivers Simrill G. R. Smith Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Bamberg Bennett Bowers Brawley Brown Clyburn Dillard Gilliard Govan Henderson-Myers Hosey Jefferson King Kirby McEachern McKnight Norrell Parks Pendarvis Ridgeway M. Rivers Robinson-Simpson
Rutherford Thigpen Weeks Williams
So, the amendment was tabled.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Atwater Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Davis Delleney Douglas Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers
S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Weeks West Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 25 was adopted.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 3 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\006\artscommreduc.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 28, ARTS COMMISSION, page 78, line 11, opposite /Distribution to Subdivisions/ by decreasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
350,000 350,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. LOWE spoke against the amendment.
Rep. SIMRILL spoke against the amendment.
Rep. STAVRINAKIS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 71 to 4.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Arrington Atwater Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brown Bryant Caskey Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cogswell Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Fry Funderburk Gagnon Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Lowe Lucas Mack McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Weeks Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill Mace Magnuson
Section 28 was adopted.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 4 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\006\4SUBHHSREDUC.DO CX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 33, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, page 83, line 30, opposite /Rural Health Initiative/ by decreasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
4,000,000 4,000,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 33, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, page 84, line 1, opposite /Nursing Home Services/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
10,000,000 10,000,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 33, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, page 84, line 14, opposite /Coordinated Care/ by decreasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
16,416,551 16,416,551
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 33, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, page 84, line 23, opposite /Behavioral Health Services/ by decreasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
4,350,000 4,350,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. HILL moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atwater Ballentine Bamberg Bennett Blackwell Bowers Bradley Bryant Clary Clyburn Cogswell Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrest Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Mace Magnuson Martin McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill
Section 33 was adopted.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 5 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\006\sgcreduc.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 48, SEA GRANT CONSORTIUM, page 140, line 4, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
37,500 37,500
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 48, SEA GRANT CONSORTIUM, page 140, line 16, opposite /Employer Contributions/ by decreasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
12,500 12,500
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. SIMRILL spoke against the amendment and moved to table the amendment which was agreed to by a division vote of 65 to 2.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Atwater Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Clary
Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Lowe Lucas Mace Martin McCravy McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Weeks West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill Magnuson
Section 48 was adopted.
Rep. MAGNUSON proposed the following Amendment No. 41 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\prt reduction.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 49, DEPT. OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 142, line 8, opposite /Advertising/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
$5,000,000 $5,000,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MAGNUSON explained the amendment.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to, by a division vote of 54 to 12.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 36 to (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\002\prt redirect.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 49, DEPT. OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 141, line 26-27, opposite /Undiscovered South Carolina Grants/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
500,000 500,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 49, DEPT. OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 142, line 3-4, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
667,620 667,620
(11.00) (11.00)
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 49, DEPT. OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 142, line 6, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
88,800 88,800
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 49, DEPT. OF
PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 142, line 7, opposite /Regional Promotions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
2,475,000 2,475,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 49, DEPT. OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 142, line 8, opposite /Advertising/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
13,214,793 13,214,793
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 49, DEPT. OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 142, line 9-10, opposite /Destination Specific Advertising/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
14,000,000 14,000,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 49, DEPT. OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 142, line 11-12, opposite /Sports Marketing Grant Program/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
2,500,000 2,500,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. TAYLOR moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 66 to 4.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 9 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\002\hill welcome centers.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 49, DEPT. OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 142, lines 11-12, opposite /SPORTS MARKETING GRANT PROGRAM/ by decreasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
2,500,000 2,500,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 49, DEPT. OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 142, line 20, opposite
/OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES/ by increasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
2,500,000 2,500,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 61 to 7.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Atwater Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Johnson Jordan Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy
McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pope Putnam Ridgeway S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Trantham Weeks West Wheeler White Whitmire Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 49 was adopted.
I was temporarily out of the Chamber on constituent business during the vote on 4950, Part IA, Section 49. If I had been present, I would have voted in favor of the Section.
Rep. Sylleste Davis
Rep. MAGNUSON proposed the following Amendment No. 23 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\allcommerceredux.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 145, line 3, opposite /Director/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
175,980 175,980
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 145, line 5, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
260,000 260,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 145, line 7, opposite /Unclassified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
145,000 145,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 145, line 9, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
113,000 113,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 145, line 14, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
526,660 526,660
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 145, line 16, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
5,000 5,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 145, line 17, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
190,000 190,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 145, line 22, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
175,000 175,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 145, line 24, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
76,000 76,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 145, line 33, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
1,054,500 1,054,500
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, line 1, opposite /Unclassified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
127,000 127,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, line 3, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
100,000 100,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, line 4, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
1,867,000 1,867,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, line 5, opposite /Public-Private Partnerships/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
101,065 101,065
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, lines 6-7, opposite /Local Economic Development Alliances/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
5,000,000 5,000,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, line 8, opposite /Locate SC/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
8,000,000 8,000,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, line 13, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
566,000 566,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, line 15, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
70,000 70,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, line 16, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
235,000 235,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, line 17, opposite /Alloc Private Sector/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
125,000 125,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, line 18, opposite /Council on Competitiveness/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
250,000 250,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, lines 19-20, opposite /SC Small Business Development Centers/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
500,000 500,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 146, line 33, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
690,000 690,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 147, line 1, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
25,000 25,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 147, line 2, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
215,000 215,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 147, line 3, opposite /Bus. Devel. Mktg./ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
750,000 750,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 147, lines 4-5, opposite /SC Manufacturing Extension Partnership/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
1,582,049 1,582,049
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 147, line 20, opposite /Closing Fund/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
22,300,000 22,300,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 147, line 25, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
203,036 203,036
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 147, line 27, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
25,000 25,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 147, line 28, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4
by:
Column 3 Column 4
230,000 230,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 148, line 14, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
190,000 190,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 148, line 16, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
5,000 5,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 148, line 17, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
390,000 390,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 148, line 22, opposite /Classified Positions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
107,500 107,500
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 148, line 24, opposite /Other Personal Services/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
5,000 5,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 148, line 25, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
106,500 106,500
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 148, line 33, opposite /Employer Contributions/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
1,450,888 1,450,888
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MAGNUSON explained the amendment.
Rep. SIMRILL spoke against the amendment and moved to table the amendment.
Rep. SIMRILL demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anthony Arrington Atkinson Atwater Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Felder Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Martin McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway
Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill Magnuson
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 6 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\006\commercereduc.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 147, lines 4-5, opposite /SC Manufacturing Extension Partnership/ by decreasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
250,000 250,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 147, line 20, opposite /Closing Fund/ by decreasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
2,500,000 2,500,000
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, page 147, line 28, opposite /Other Operating Expenses/ by decreasing the amounts in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
150,000 150,000
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. SIMRILL moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 71 to 4.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Atwater Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Govan Hamilton Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Hewitt Hiott Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Long Lowe Lucas Mace Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham West White
Whitmire Williams Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill Magnuson
Section 50 was adopted.
I was temporarily out of the Chamber on constituent business during the vote on H. 4950, Part IA, Section 50. If I had been present, I would have voted in favor of the Section.
Rep. Wm. Weston Newton
The SPEAKER granted Rep. ATWATER a temporary leave of absence.
Reps. CLARY and HIOTT proposed the following Amendment No. 51 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\007\dps director deletion.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 63, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, page 168, lines 2-3, opposite /DIRECTOR/ by decreasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
162,313 129,851
(1.00) (0.80)
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. CLARY explained the amendment.
Rep. CLARY moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bennett Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn Cogswell Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Mace Magnuson Martin McCravy McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 63 was adopted.
After recusing myself from voting on Section 63, Part IA of H. 4950, the General Appropriation Bill, I inadvertently voted on this Section. I wish the record to reflect that I meant to abstain from voting.
Rep. Tommy Pope
The motion of Rep. HIOTT to reconsider the vote whereby Section 72 was rejected was taken up and agreed to.
Rep. SIMRILL explained the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bradley Brown Bryant Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrest Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCravy McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton Norrell Ott Parks
Pitts Ridgeway S. Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 72 was adopted.
Rep. MAGNUSON proposed the following Amendment No. 24 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\commtoctc.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 86, COUNTY TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, page 211, line 6, opposite /Alloc Counties - Restricted/ by increasing the amount(s) in Columns 3 and 4 by:
Column 3 Column 4
47,937,178 47,937,178
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
I. Administration and Support
A. Office of the Secretary
PART IA, SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 145, LINE 3, OPPOSITE /DIRECTOR/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
175,980 175,980
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 145, LINE 5, OPPOSITE /CLASSIFIED POSITIONS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
260,000 260,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 145, LINE 7, OPPOSITE /UNCLASSIFIED POSITIONS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
145,000 145,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 145, LINE 9, OPPOSITE /OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
113,000 113,000
B. Financial Services
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 145, LINE 14, OPPOSITE /CLASSIFIED POSITIONS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
526,660 526,660
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 145, LINE 16, OPPOSITE /OTHER PERSONAL SERVICES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
5,000 5,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 145, LINE 17, OPPOSITE /OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
190,000 190,000
C. Information Technology
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 145, LINE 22, OPPOSITE /CLASSIFIED POSITIONS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
175,000 175,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 145, LINE 24, OPPOSITE /OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
76,000 76,000
II. Programs and Services
A. Global Business Development
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 145, LINE 33, OPPOSITE /CLASSIFIED POSITIONS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
1,054,500 1,054,500
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINE 1, OPPOSITE /UNCLASSIFIED POSITIONS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
127,000 127,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINE 3, OPPOSITE /OTHER PERSONAL SERVICES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
100,000 100,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINE 4, OPPOSITE /OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
1,867,000 1,867,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINE 5, OPPOSITE /PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
101,065 101,065
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINES 6-7, OPPOSITE /LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
5,000,000 5,000,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINE 8, OPPOSITE /LOCATE SC/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
8,000,000 8,000,000
B. Small Business/Existing Industry
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINE 13, OPPOSITE /CLASSIFIED POSITIONS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
566,000 566,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINE 15, OPPOSITE /OTHER PERSONAL SERVICES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
70,000 70,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINE 16, OPPOSITE /OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
235,000 235,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINE 17, OPPOSITE /ALLOC PRIVATE SECTOR/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
125,000 125,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINE 18, OPPOSITE /COUNCIL ON COMPETITIVENESS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
250,000 250,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINES 19-20, OPPOSITE /SC SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTERS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
500,000 500,000
D. Marketing, Communications & Research
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 146, LINE 33, OPPOSITE /CLASSIFIED POSITIONS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
690,000 690,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 147, LINE 1, OPPOSITE /OTHER PERSONAL SERVICES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
25,000 25,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 147, LINE 2, OPPOSITE /OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
215,000 215,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 147, LINE 3, OPPOSITE /BUS. DEVEL. MKTG./ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
750,000 750,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 147, LINES 4-5, OPPOSITE /SC MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
1,582,049 1,582,049
E. Grant Programs
1. Coordinating Council for Economic Development
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 147, LINE 20, OPPOSITE /CLOSING FUND/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
22,300,000 22,300,000
2. Community Grants
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 147, LINE 25, OPPOSITE /CLASSIFIED POSITIONS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
203,036 203,036
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 147, LINE 27, OPPOSITE /OTHER PERSONAL SERVICES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
25,000 25,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 147, LINE 28, OPPOSITE /OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
230,000 230,000
F. Regional Education Centers
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 148, LINE 14, OPPOSITE /CLASSIFIED POSITIONS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
190,000 190,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 148, LINE 16, OPPOSITE /OTHER PERSONAL SERVICES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
5,000 5,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 148, LINE 17, OPPOSITE /OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
390,000 390,000
G. Innovation/Emerging Industries
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 148, LINE 22, OPPOSITE /CLASSIFIED POSITIONS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
107,500 107,500
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 148, LINE 24, OPPOSITE /OTHER PERSONAL SERVICES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
5,000 5,000
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 148, LINE 25, OPPOSITE /OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
106,500 106,500
III. Employee Benefits
SECTION 50, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PAGE 148, LINE 33, OPPOSITE /EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS/ BY DECREASING THE AMOUNT(S) IN COLUMNS 3 AND 4 BY:
COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4
1,450,888 1,450,888
Rep. MAGNUSON explained the amendment.
Rep. MAGNUSON moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey
Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pope Putnam Ridgeway S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 86 was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Bales Bennett Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Forrest Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Putnam Ridgeway S. Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stringer Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Willis Young
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 111 was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crosby Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pope Putnam Ridgeway S. Rivers Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Weeks West
Wheeler Whitmire Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 113 was adopted.
Rep. COLLINS proposed the following Amendment No. 67 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\interscholastic athletic association dues.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 285, paragraph 1.60, after line 13, by inserting:
/(6) does not implement statewide independent contractor fees. If fee schedules are implemented by the association, body, or entity, then benefits, including but not limited to workers' compensation, health insurance, and pension are to be provided to the independent contractor./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. COLLINS explained the amendment.
Rep. HAYES raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 67 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
Rep. COLLINS spoke against the Point.
The SPEAKER overruled the Point of Order.
Rep. HAYES spoke against the amendment.
Rep. HAYES continued speaking.
Rep. HAYES moved to table the amendment.
Rep. COLLINS demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atkinson Bales Bannister Blackwell Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Caskey Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Finlay Forrest Gagnon Gilliard Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hixon Hosey Howard Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Lowe Lucas Mack Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers G. M. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Taylor Toole Weeks West Wheeler White Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Allison Arrington Ballentine Bennett Burns Chumley Clary Collins Crosby Daning Elliott Erickson
Felder Forrester Fry Funderburk Hamilton Hewitt Hill Hiott Huggins Loftis Long Mace Magnuson Murphy Pendarvis Putnam G. R. Smith Tallon Thayer Young
So, the amendment was tabled.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE granted Rep. D. C. MOSS a temporary leave of absence.
Reps. HENDERSON, ELLIOTT, ALLISON, LOFTIS, ANDERSON and HAYES proposed the following Amendment No. 84 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\poverty.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 268, paragraph 1.3, line 13, by striking:/ Students in poverty are students who qualify for Medicaid, SNAP, TANF, or are homeless, transient, or in foster care. /
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 268, paragraph 1.3, lines 28-30, by striking the lines in their entirety and inserting /For the current school year, the Department of Education will continue to use counts from the prior school year to determine poverty funding for the add-on weighting. The Department of Education will continue to work with school districts to determine students eligible for the poverty add-on using the following data elements: used to determine USDA community eligibility to be used in future years students in poverty are students who qualify for Medicaid, SNAP, TANF, or are homeless, transient, or in foster care./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HENDERSON explained the amendment.
Rep. HENDERSON spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. WHITMIRE spoke in favor of the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. FELDER proposed the following Amendment No. 28 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\school attendance .docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 295, after line 4, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (SDE: School District Residence Boundaries) For Fiscal Year 2018-19, and with funds appropriated to local school districts, upon the reestablishment of a portion or entirety of a county boundary that impacts the school district boundary, persons residing on the impacted property may continue to enroll their children who previously attended a school in the district until such time as the child graduates from high school, as long as the child continuously resides at the same property until graduation. For the purposes of this section, "children" includes those children who are residing with their legal guardians whose property is impacted by a county boundary reestablishment in conflict with the immediate prior school district boundary. This proviso only applies to those persons residing on the impacted property and their children who reside with them. Once those persons move from the property or no longer have children living in the residence who are attending or will attend schools in the South Carolina K-12 public education system, this proviso no longer applies to that property. A district may draw down State and Federal funding for students enrolled under this section. A local board of trustees of the district where a student is being allowed to attend pursuant to this proviso shall determine the charge a student must pay for any bonded indebtedness that student would normally pay if they resided in the district. This proviso does not require the former resident of a county to continue enrollment of their children in school in the county in which their property was located before the reestablishment. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. FELDER explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. MAGNUSON proposed the following Amendment No. 43 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\statewide school resource officers proviso.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 295, after line 4, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (SDE: Statewide School Resource Officers) Funds appropriated for the Statewide School Resource Officers shall be utilized by the Department of Education (department) for the purpose of hiring certified law enforcement officers to serve as a school resource officer for school districts that otherwise would lack the adequate resources to hire their own school resource officers. In making determinations of eligibility the department shall use the most recent index of taxpaying ability as the district's indicator of ability to pay, with districts of the lowest index of taxpaying ability receiving priority consideration. Districts must apply for funding through the department and no districts shall receive an award of more than eight certified law enforcement officer positions. In making awards the department shall provide funding directly to the local law enforcement agency to pay for the cost of the law enforcement officer that will serve as a full-time school resource officer. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MAGNUSON explained the amendment.
Rep. MAGNUSON moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Reps. KING and ATWATER proposed the following Amendment No. 46 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\school closings.docx), which was ruled out of order:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 295, after line 4, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(SDE: School Holidays) For Fiscal Year 2018-19 local school districts must observe Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and memorial Day as legal holidays and schools and offices of the school districts must be closed on those dates. Districts may not schedule make-up days on either day. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. KING explained the amendment.
Rep. FELDER raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 46 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE sustained the Point of Order.
Rep. GOVAN proposed the following Amendment No. 63 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\school safety.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 295, after line 4, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (SDE: School Safety) Districts shall utilize funds appropriated under Aid to Districts (or a General Fund Aid to Subdivisions) to increase school safety measures, which may include: employment of an School Resource Officer, installation of secured entrances and exists, training for staff and mental health services. Districts shall provide plans to the department for approval no later than October 1st. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. GOVAN explained the amendment.
Rep. WHITMIRE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE granted Rep. SANDIFER a temporary leave of absence.
Rep. ALLISON proposed the following Amendment No. 69
(Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\001\CHARTER SCHOOL SPONSORS2.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 295, after line 4, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(SDE: Charter School Sponsors) For Fiscal Year 2018-19, and with funds provided to charter school authorizers, institutions of higher education and the South Carolina Public Charter School District may not sponsor more than a combined total of sixty schools./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. ALLISON explained the amendment.
Rep. ALLISON spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. G. R. SMITH spoke upon the amendment.
Rep. G. R. SMITH spoke upon the amendment.
Rep. KING raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 69 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE overruled the Point of Order.
Rep. G. R. SMITH continued speaking.
Rep. WHITE spoke upon the amendment.
Rep. ERICKSON moved to table the amendment.
Rep. HILL demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Arrington Ballentine Bennett Bradley Burns Chumley Cogswell Crosby Davis Delleney Duckworth Elliott Erickson Fry Gagnon Hamilton Henderson Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Johnson Jordan Long Mace Magnuson McCoy Murphy Putnam S. Rivers G. R. Smith Toole Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Atkinson Bales Bamberg Bannister Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Brawley
Brown Bryant Caskey Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cole Collins Daning Dillard Douglas Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Funderburk Gilliard Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson-Myers Henegan Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Lucas Mack Martin McCravy McEachern McGinnis V. S. Moss W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pope Ridgeway M. Rivers Rutherford Simrill G. M. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Trantham Weeks West Wheeler White Williams Young
So, the House refused to table the amendment.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. GOVAN proposed the following Amendment No. 70 (Doc Name COUNCIL\SA\4950C005.AGM.SA18.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 295, after line 4, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (SDE: Highest Potential in Education) With the funds appropriated in Part 1A to the Department of Education, in the current fiscal year, the Department of Education shall provide each child in this state a high-quality education allowing each student to reach his highest potential./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. GOVAN explained the amendment.
Rep. WHITMIRE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. GOVAN demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anthony Arrington Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Blackwell Bradley Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Cogswell Cole Crawford Crosby Davis Delleney Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Gagnon Hamilton Hardee Henderson Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCravy McGinnis V. S. Moss Murphy Pope Putnam S. Rivers Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Taylor Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson Bamberg Bernstein Bowers Brown Clyburn Collins Dillard Funderburk Gilliard Govan Henderson-Myers
Henegan Hosey Jefferson King Kirby Knight Mack McEachern McKnight Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Ridgeway M. Rivers Rutherford Thigpen Weeks Wheeler Williams
So, the amendment was tabled.
Reps. WHEELER and BRAWLEY proposed the following Amendment No. 81 (Doc Name COUNCIL\DG\4950C023.BBM. DG18.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 295, after line 4, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (SDE: Sumter Schools) In the current fiscal year, the Sumter County School District must use funds appropriated or authorized in this act, to operate DeLaine Elementary, Mayewood Middle, and Rafting Creek Elementary, in a manner similar to that of the previous fiscal year. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. WHEELER explained the amendment.
Rep. G. M. SMITH raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 81 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE overruled the point of order.
Rep. WHEELER continued speaking.
Rep. BRAWLEY spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. G. M. SMITH spoke against the amendment.
Rep. G. M. SMITH moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 53 to 26.
Reps. WHEELER and BRAWLEY proposed the following Amendment No. 82 (Doc Name COUNCIL\DG\4950C024.BBM. DG18.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 295, after line 4, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (SDE: Sumter Schools) In the current fiscal year, the Board of Trustees of the Sumter County School District must not use any funds appropriated or authorized in this act, including personnel salary, to close DeLaine Elementary, Mayewood Middle, or Rafting Creek Elementary. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. WHEELER explained the amendment.
Rep. WHEELER moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Reps. ERICKSON, PITTS, GOVAN and MACE proposed the following Amendment No. 88 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\crisis intervention team-erickson, pitts, govan, mace.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 295, after line 4, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(SDE: Crisis Intervention Team) For the current fiscal year, the Department of Education and the State Law Enforcement Division must develop within existing staff a Crisis Intervention Team to coordinate, collect and compile Crisis Intervention & School Safety Plans from each school district with their input. The report shall include recommendations for the General Assembly to consider which may include, but are not limited to, physical building security, bullet proof and access controlled doors, RFID chip in student identification cards, mental health services, school resource officers, and other school safety measures. Total costs associated with each recommendation shall be included in the report. If additional funding is required to implement the recommendations, the Department of Education and the State Law Enforcement Division are directed to include the recommended funds in their fiscal year 2019-20 agency budget plan. The report shall be submitted to the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, the
Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee and the Governor by December 31, 2018./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. ERICKSON explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. KING and ATWATER proposed the following Amendment No. 91 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\001\ SCHOOL HOLIDAY SAVINGS2.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 1, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, page 295, after line 4, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(SDE: School Holidays) For Fiscal Year 2018-19 local school districts must observe Martin Luther King, Jr. Day and memorial Day as legal holidays and schools and offices of the school districts must be closed on those dates. Districts may not schedule make-up days on either day. Schools and school districts may utilize the funds realized from observing those holidays to provide educational training related to the Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Memorial Day observance. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. KING explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell
Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West Wheeler White Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 1, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 16 to (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\003\hill lottery 3.2.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 3, LOTTERY EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT, page 325, paragraph 3.2, line 34, by striking the proviso in its entirety.
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. COLE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 18 to (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\003\hill lottery readysc.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 3, LOTTERY EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT, page 331, paragraph 3.6, line 8, by striking:/ (9)State Board for Technical and Comprehensive Education--ReadySC Direct Training $9,432,046 /
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 3, LOTTERY EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT, page 331, paragraph 3.6, line 11, opposite (11) Lottery Reserve Trust Fund by striking /$41,272,877/ and inserting /$50,704,923/
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. COLE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 73 to 2.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE granted Rep. NORRELL a temporary leave of absence.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 76 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\003\COBB HUNTER LOTTERY SUB.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 3, LOTTERY EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT, page 331, paragraph 3.6, line 15, opposite (3) State Board for Technical and Comprehensive Education--Workforce Scholarship Grants by striking /$11,000,000/ and inserting /$9,500,000/
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 3, LOTTERY EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT, page 331, paragraph 3.6, line 3, opposite (5) Commission on Higher Education--Need Based Grants by striking /$17,537,078/ and inserting /$18,537,078/
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 3, LOTTERY EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT, page 331, paragraph 3.6, line 4, opposite (6) Higher Education Tuition Grants Commission--Tuition Grants by striking /$8,830,008/ and inserting /$9,330,008/
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. WHITE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Arrington Bales Ballentine Blackwell Bradley Bryant Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Cogswell Cole Crosby Davis Delleney Duckworth Elliott Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Gagnon Hamilton Hardee Henderson Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCoy
McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Pitts Pope Putnam S. Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Willis Young
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atkinson Bamberg Bernstein Bowers Brawley Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas Funderburk Gilliard Govan Hayes Henderson-Myers Henegan Hill Hosey Jefferson King Kirby Knight Mack McCravy McEachern Ott Parks Pendarvis Ridgeway M. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Thigpen Wheeler Williams Yow
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. GOVAN proposed the following Amendment No. 44 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\003\govan lottery $500k.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 3, LOTTERY EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT, page 332, paragraph 3.6, after line 15, by inserting:
/Of the funds appropriated to State Board for Technical and Comprehensive Education for High Demand Job Skill Training Equipment, $500,000 shall be Directed to Denmark Technical College.
The remainder of the funding shall be appropriated based on the formula funding. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. GOVAN explained the amendment.
Rep. COLE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. GOVAN demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Arrington Atkinson Ballentine Bannister Bennett Blackwell Bradley Bryant Burns Caskey Clary Clemmons Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Hamilton Hardee Henderson Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Ott Pope Putnam S. Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole West White
Whitmire Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Bales Bamberg Bowers Clyburn Dillard Douglas Gilliard Govan Hayes Henderson-Myers Henegan Hosey Jefferson King Kirby Mack McEachern McKnight Parks Pendarvis Ridgeway M. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Trantham Wheeler Williams
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. HILL raised the Point of Order that Proviso 3.2 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE overruled the Point of Order.
Rep. HILL raised the Point of Order that Proviso 3.5 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE overruled the Point of Order.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bennett Blackwell
Bowers Bradley Brawley Bryant Burns Caskey Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Ott Parks Pendarvis Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Trantham West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 3 was adopted.
Rep. ERICKSON proposed the following Amendment No. 20 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\john de la howe.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 7, JOHN DE LA HOWE SCHOOL, page 335, after line 15, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(JDLH: Wilderness Camps) Of the funds appropriated to John De La Howe, the school must follow the Department of Social Services regulations for Wilderness Therapeutic Camps for Children. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. ERICKSON explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill
Hiott Hixon Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Ott Parks Pendarvis Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Trantham West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 7, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. MACE proposed the following Amendment No. 11 to (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\001\che tuition rates restriction .docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 11, COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION, page 339, after line 4, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (CHE: Tuition Rates Restriction) For the current fiscal year, state institutions of higher learning that receive general fund appropriations shall be prohibited from raising tuition rates. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MACE explained the amendment.
Rep. MACE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile
Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 11 was adopted.
Rep. MAGNUSON proposed the following Amendment No. 65 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\010\dhhs work requirements. docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 33, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, page 352, after line 16, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(DHHS: Community Engagement Requirements) (A) The Department of Health and Human Services may not implement any waiver sought pursuant to this proviso unless it has first been determined to meet any relevant federal budget neutrality tests.
(B) With funds available to the department in the current fiscal year and to address social determinants of health by promoting employment, retraining, or other appropriate activities through community engagement requirements, the department shall, as permitted by law:
(1) apply community engagement requirements to currently enrolled Parents/Caretaker Relatives, and
(2) eliminate existing policies that discourage work, and extend coverage only to those Parents/Caretaker Relatives with incomes between 67 and 100 percent of the federal poverty line who have either:
(a) agreed to meet the new community engagement requirements during the term of their coverage, or
(b) been exempted from community engagement requirements by law or policy, such as populations including but not necessarily limited
to children, the elderly, or persons with disabilities.
(3) Submit to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services no later than August 31, 2018 one or more waiver applications or other instruments necessary to implement each of the above items as expeditiously as possible.
(C) The Department of Employment and Workforce and any other requested state agency or institution shall support the department's development and implementation of community engagement standards so as to promote employment, retraining, volunteering, and other activities that foster independence. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MAGNUSON explained the amendment.
Rep. MAGNUSON moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bannister Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrest Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Mace
Martin McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Whitmire Williams Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill
Section 33 was adopted.
Reps. G.M. SMITH, CLYBURN, BALES, BRAWLEY, KING and COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 52 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\010\DHEC AIDS TREATMENT FUNDING.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 34, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, page 363, after line 27, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(DHEC: HIV/AIDS Treatment and Prevention) From the funds appropriated to the Department of Health and Environmental Control in the current fiscal year for HIV and AIDS prevention and treatment, no less than $500,000 shall be authorized for the Joseph H. Neal Wellness Center and CAN Community Health Inc. to develop a partnership to provide comprehensive medical, psychological and educational services to all patients, regardless of their financial situation, insurance status, or ability to pay. The department shall ensure the funds are expended solely for testing and treatment services. Funds may be used to enhance the services provided through any
allocation of federal funds or the state's AIDS Drug Assistance Program rebate funds. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. G. M. SMITH explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. MURPHY proposed the following Amendment No. 89 (Doc Name COUNCIL\SA\4950C003.DKA.SA18.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 34, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL, page 363, after line 27, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ 34. (DHEC: Ocean and Coastal Resource Management) Notwithstanding the appropriations in Part 1A, Ocean and Coastal Resource Management may not expend any funds or assets, including employees, to regulate and shall cease regulating in Dorchester County except for inside the critical area boundary located in the seaward portion of Dorchester County bounded beginning at the intersection of the county line and S.C. 165, then northward along S.C. 165 until its intersection with S.C. 642, then southeastward along S.C. 642 until its intersection with the county line. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MURPHY explained the amendment.
Rep. HIOTT moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 29 to 27.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister
Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cogswell Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Magnuson Martin McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 34 was adopted.
Reps. G. R. SMITH and ERICKSON proposed the following Amendment No. 56 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\010\dss child placement.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 38,
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, page 374, after line 6, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(DSS: Faith-Based Private Child Placing Agencies) From the funds appropriated to the Department of Social Services, the department shall make and promulgate such rules and regulations relating to licensing standards and other matters as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of Title 63, Chapter 11, Article 1 of the 1976 Code as applied to faith-based private Child Placing Agencies. For purposes of these regulations, any person or entity who holds legal or physical custody of a child for the purpose of placement for foster care or adoption or a private placement and, which for the purposes of these regulations, retain their own system of foster homes, is a child placing agency as defined in S.C. Code of Regulations 114-550. Such regulation must not discriminate or suggest the taking of any adverse action against a faith-based child-placing agency or an agency seeking to become a child-placing agency on the basis, wholly or partly, that a faith - based child placing agency has declined or will decline to provide any service that conflicts with, or provide any service under circumstances that conflict with, a sincerely-held religious belief or moral conviction of the faith-based child placing agency. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. G. R. SMITH explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. SIMRILL and G. M. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 59 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\010\DSS FOSTER PLACEMENT.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 38, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, page 374, after line 6, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (DSS: Foster Care Child Placements) With funds appropriated and authorized to the Department of Social Services for fiscal year 2018-2019, the department shall ensure that the following provisions are implemented related to child placements. The department shall promulgate any necessary rules or regulations to implement these provisions:
(A) If a child in foster care has been placed within the same foster home for at least 9 consecutive months and if the foster parents are willing to provide permanency through adoption for the child, the
department must obtain an attachment assessment of the child and current foster parents before selecting a different adoptive placement or other alternative setting. The attachment assessment must be conducted by a qualified attachment expert. Qualified attachment experts may include individuals who can demonstrate training and or education in attachment theory, developmental psychology, and measures of attachment in additional to a minimum of ten completed attachment assessments.
(B) If a child's permanency plan includes reunification with a parent or caregiver, the department shall develop a transition plan for the child, with input from the Guardian ad Litem and a child-focused mental health professional. The department's proposed transition plan must include sufficient visitation with the permanent guardian to promote a successful and emotionally healthy transition for the child, facilitate a positive relationship between caregiver and child, and lessen trauma that may result from the move. If the department pursues placement with a natural parent, relative, or other adult with whom the child has never lived, as determined to be in the child's best interest, the department's proposed transition plan must be progressive and include increased overnight visitation with ongoing assessment of the plan and the child's adjustment by the Guardian ad Litem and child focused mental health professional. Modifications to the plan must be driven by the child's adjustment to the transition.
(C) In accordance with Section 63-7-1710, the department must file a Termination of Parental Rights petition if a child has been in foster care for 15 of the last 22 months unless there are extenuating circumstances as follows:
(1) When the child is over the age of 16 and the department has identified another planned permanent living arrangement.
(2) The department asserts to the court that the child may be safely returned to the parent because the parent has remedied the conditions that caused the removal, with or without supervision by the department for up to 12 months.
(3) The department's proposed treatment plan can be extended up to 18 months but only if: (a) the department presents compelling and persuasive evidence of how the parent has demonstrated due diligence in completing the plan; (b) the department can articulate for the court specific reasons to believe the parent will timely remedy the conditions which led to the removal; (c) the department affirms that the return of child to the parent would not cause unreasonable risk of harm; (d) the department has compelling reasons to assert that a Termination of
Parental Rights is not in the best interests of the child; (E) the department has compelling reasons to assert the best interests of the child will be served by the extension.
(4) If the department assesses the viability of adoption and determines that adoption is not a viable option and has compelling reasons to assert that Termination of Parental Rights is not in the best interests of the child, then the department may pursue a permanent plan of custody or legal guardianship to relative or other person.
(D) In accordance with Sections 63-7-1640(G) and 1700(E), the department must file the petition for a Termination of Parental Rights within sixty day of the family court order designating the child's permanent plan or concurrent plan as Termination of Parental Rights and adoption. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. SIMRILL explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cogswell Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson
Johnson Jordan Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Mace Magnuson Martin McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Putnam Ridgeway S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 38, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. BOWERS proposed the following Amendment No. 29 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\002\lake warren state park.docx), which was rejected:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 49, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM, page 381, after line 2, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (PRT: Land Acquisition) Of the funds appropriated to and/or authorized for the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism, the department is directed to expend up to $400,000 to purchase the one hundred and seven acres of land neighboring Lake Warren State Park./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BOWERS explained the amendment.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN moved to table the amendment.
Rep. BOWERS demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Ballentine Bannister Bryant Clary Clemmons Cogswell Cole Collins Crosby Davis Delleney Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Gagnon Hamilton Henderson Herbkersman Hill Hiott Huggins Johnson Jordan Lowe Lucas Martin McCravy Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Pitts Pope Putnam S. Rivers Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Thayer Trantham West White Whitmire Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Bamberg Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Caskey Chumley Cobb-Hunter Daning Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Funderburk Gilliard Govan Hayes Henderson-Myers Henegan Hewitt Hosey Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Mace Mack Magnuson McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Norrell Ott Parks
Pendarvis Ridgeway Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Taylor Thigpen Toole Wheeler Williams Young
So, the House refused to table the amendment.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN spoke against the amendment.
Rep. BOWERS spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN spoke against the amendment.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment.
Rep. OTT demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Bales Bamberg Bernstein Bowers Brown Cobb-Hunter Daning Douglas Govan Hart Hayes Henegan Hosey King Kirby Knight Mack McKnight Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Ridgeway Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Thigpen
Those who voted in the negative are:
Allison Arrington Ballentine Bannister Bennett Blackwell Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Davis
Delleney Duckworth Elliott Erickson Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Gagnon Gilliard Hamilton Henderson Henderson-Myers Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Pitts Pope Putnam S. Rivers Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Willis Young Yow
So, the amendment was rejected.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anthony Arrington Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard
Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hart Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 49 was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hart Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thigpen Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Williams Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 54 was adopted.
Rep. PITTS proposed the following Amendment No. 62 to (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\007\electronic discovery pilot program deletion.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 60, PROSECUTION COORDINATION COMMISSION, page 391, paragraph 60.13, lines 18 - 23, by striking the proviso in its entirety.
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. PITTS explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay
Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 60, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. PITTS proposed the following Amendment No. 77 to H. 4950 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\007\scdc cbd study.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 65, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, page 404, paragraph 65.29, lines 17-21, by striking the proviso in its entirety and inserting / (CORR: CBD
Pilot Program) Of the funds appropriated or authorized to the Department of Corrections, the department shall initiate a
study committee with MUSC, DHHS, and DMH to explore the use of cannabidiol oil, also known as CBD oil, in a therapeutic manner for eligible incarcerated individuals. The committee shall review applicable laws to include 45 CFR 46, related to research authorized for use on prisoners and the federal protections created for prisoners as subjects of biomedical and behavioral research and develop criteria, eligibly, guidelines, policy recommendations, and an overview of the necessary federal approvals and boards required for the administration of a pilot program. Upon completion of the study, a report must be submitted to the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee and the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee that details the process and procedures involved, potential outcomes and cost savings, and feasibility of establishing a pilot program to allow use of CBD oil in a therapeutic manner for eligible incarcerated individuals. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. PITTS explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. MURPHY proposed the following Amendment No. 98 (Doc Name COUNCIL\DG\4950C021.BBM.DG18.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 65, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, page 404, after line 21, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (CORR: Video Bond Conferencing) In the current fiscal year, and from the funds appropriated to the Department of Corrections, the video conferencing bond system shall be used for all bond hearings for inmates incarcerated at Lieber Correctional Institution and charged with criminal offenses in Dorchester County. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MURPHY explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McEachern McGinnis V. S. Moss B. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Allison Bryant D. C. Moss Robinson-Simpson Tallon
Section 65, as amended, was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bennett Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Felder Forrest Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West
White Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 82 was adopted.
Rep. DANING proposed the following Amendment No. 60 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\006\chselectric.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 83, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKFORCE, page 415, after line 24, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(DEW: Electrical Contractor Grants) Of the funds authorized or appropriated to the Department of Employment and Workforce, the department shall provide $100,000 to the Charleston Electrical Contractors Association to be used for direct grants for training in the electrical industry through the Department of Labor registered Apprenticeship program.
The funds shall be used to further the education of apprentices, provide hands-on activities and demonstrations in a controlled environment, and purchase books and materials for students. Additionally, the funds shall be used for career awareness within the community and to provide teacher development and training. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. DANING explained the amendment.
Rep. LOFTIS spoke against the amendment and moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bennett Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrest Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Mace Mack Martin McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill Magnuson
Section 83 was adopted.
Rep. MACE proposed the following Amendment No. 13 to (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\001\dot restriping.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 84, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, page 417, after line 5, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (DOT: Road Restriping) From the funds authorized for the Department of Transportation the department is directed to restripe the two lane sections of I-526 east or west bound between Long Point Road and the Don Holt Bridge to three lanes./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MACE explained the amendment.
Rep. LOFTIS spoke against the amendment.
Rep. LOFTIS moved to table the amendment.
Rep. MACE demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Bales Ballentine Blackwell Bowers Bradley Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Crawford Douglas Duckworth Erickson Felder Forrest Forrester Fry Gagnon Hamilton Hardee Henderson Herbkersman Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Loftis Long Lowe Magnuson Martin McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton
Pitts Putnam Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Spires Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole West White Whitmire Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson Anthony Arrington Bernstein Brawley Brown Cogswell Crosby Daning Davis Finlay Funderburk Gilliard Henegan Hewitt Jefferson King Knight Mace Mack McCoy McKnight Murphy Norrell Ott Pendarvis M. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sottile Stavrinakis Trantham Williams
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. BRAWLEY proposed the following Amendment No. 61 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\006\zeiglerroaddot.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 84, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, page 417, after line 5, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(DOT: Zeigler Road Repair) Of the funds authorized to the Department of Transportation, the department shall utilize up to $1,000,000 for the repair and/or reconstruction of Zeigler Road in Richland County./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BRAWLEY explained the amendment.
Rep. LOFTIS spoke against the amendment.
Rep. BRAWLEY spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. LOFTIS moved to table the amendment.
Rep. BRAWLEY demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Arrington Ballentine Bannister Bennett Blackwell Bowers Bradley Bryant Caskey Chumley Clary Cogswell Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Duckworth Elliott Felder Forrest Forrester Fry Gagnon Hamilton Hardee Henderson Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton Pitts Putnam S. Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole West White Whitmire Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson Anthony Atkinson Bales Bernstein Brawley Brown Clyburn Dillard Douglas Finlay Funderburk
Gilliard Hayes Henegan Hosey Jefferson King Knight Mack McEachern McKnight Norrell Ott Pendarvis M. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Thigpen Trantham Williams
So, the amendment was tabled.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Ballentine Bennett Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Chumley Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson King Knight Loftis Long Lowe Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McEachern McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss B. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Putnam M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sandifer
Simrill Sottile Spires Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham Weeks West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 84 was adopted.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Jordan King Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin
McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham Weeks West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 91 was adopted.
Reps. OTT and COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 58 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\002\HEAD START FUNDS SUB.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 93, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, page 430, after line 7, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(DOA: OCAB Head Start Program) Of the funds appropriated to the Department of Administration, III. Executive Policy & Programs, the department is directed to transfer $30,000 to OCAB Community Action Agency, Inc., Head Start Program in order to match a grant award for the purchase of a 36-passenger bus to transport Head Start students./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. OTT explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham
Weeks West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 93, as amended, was adopted.
I was temporarily out of the Chamber on constituent business during the vote on 4950, Part IB, Section 93. If I had been present, I would have voted in favor of the Section.
Rep. Roger Kirby
Rep. OTT proposed the following Amendment No. 80 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\001\EXCESS DEBT SVC LGF 10.8M.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 112, DEBT SERVICE, page 455, paragraph 112.1, line 20-23, by striking the proviso in its entirety and inserting:
/ 112.1. (DS: Excess Debt Service) Excess Of the excess debt service funds from available in Fiscal Year 2016-17 2018-19 remaining after funding the State Ports Authority loan related to the Charleston Harbor Deepening Project, $10,800,000 must be carried forward and expended in Fiscal Year 2017-18 transferred to the Local Government Fund. Any remaining excess debt service funds may be expended to pay down general obligation bond debt for which the State (1) is paying the highest rate of interest, (2) will achieve relief in constrained debt capacity, or (3) reduce the amount of debt issued. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. OTT explained the amendment.
Rep. OTT spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN spoke against the amendment.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN moved to table the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Arrington Atkinson Ballentine Bannister Bennett Blackwell Bradley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Loftis Lowe Lucas Mack Martin McCoy McCravy McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton Pitts Pope Putnam S. Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Willis Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anthony Bamberg Bernstein Bowers Brawley Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas Funderburk Henderson-Myers Hill Hosey Jefferson King Kirby Knight Long Mace Magnuson McEachern Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Ridgeway M. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Weeks Williams Young
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 99 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\007\EXCESS DEBT SRV EPI.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 112, DEBT SERVICE, page 455, paragraph 112.1, line 20-23, by striking the proviso in its entirety and inserting:
/ 112.1. (DS: Excess Debt Service) Excess Of the excess debt service funds from available in Fiscal Year 2016-17 2018-19 remaining after funding the State Ports Authority loan related to the Charleston Harbor Deepening Project, $38,400,000 must be carried forward and expended in Fiscal Year 2017-18 transferred to the F300 Employee Benefits to provide a two percent base pay increase for state employees in accordance with proviso 117.114. Any remaining excess debt service funds may be expended to pay down general obligation bond debt for which the State (1) is paying the highest rate of interest, (2) will achieve relief in constrained debt capacity, or (3) reduce the amount of debt issued. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN spoke against the amendment.
Rep. MACK spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. FINLAY spoke against the amendment.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN moved to table the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Arrington Bannister Bennett Blackwell Bradley Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clemmons Cogswell Cole Collins Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Duckworth Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Gagnon Hamilton Hardee Henderson Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Johnson Jordan Loftis Lowe Lucas Mace McCoy McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Pitts Pope Putnam S. Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Thayer Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Willis Young
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bernstein Bowers
Brawley Brown Clary Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas Elliott Funderburk Gilliard Govan Hayes Henderson-Myers Henegan Hill Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Long Mack Magnuson Martin McCravy McEachern Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Ridgeway M. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Taylor Thigpen Weeks Wheeler Williams Yow
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER proposed the following Amendment No. 100 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\007\EMPLO YEE BONUS.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 112, DEBT SERVICE, page 455, paragraph 112.1, line 20-23, by striking the proviso in its entirety and inserting:
/ 112.1. (DS: Excess Debt Service) Excess Of the excess debt service funds from available in Fiscal Year 2016-17 2018-19 remaining after funding the State Ports Authority loan related to the Charleston Harbor Deepening Project, $38,400,000 must be carried forward and expended in Fiscal Year 2017-18 transferred to the F300 Employee Benefits and the Executive Budget Office is directed to utilize these funds to provide an $1,800 one-time bonus to state employees making $50,000 or less. Any remaining excess debt service funds may be expended to pay down general obligation bond debt for which the State (1) is paying the highest rate of interest, (2) will achieve relief in constrained debt capacity, or (3) reduce the amount of debt issued. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN moved to table the amendment.
Rep. COBB-HUNTER demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Arrington Bannister Blackwell Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Gagnon Hamilton Hardee Henderson Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Johnson Jordan Loftis Lowe Lucas Mace McCoy McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Pitts Pope Putnam S. Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stringer Tallon Thayer Toole White Whitmire Willis Young
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Anthony Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bernstein Bowers Brawley Brown Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas Funderburk Gilliard Govan
Hayes Henderson-Myers Henegan Hill Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson King Kirby Knight Long Mack Magnuson Martin McEachern McKnight Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Ridgeway M. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Stavrinakis Taylor Thigpen Trantham Weeks Wheeler Williams Yow
So, the amendment was tabled.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard
Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Weeks West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 112 was adopted.
Rep. DANING proposed the following Amendment No. 57 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\002\117.21 orgs state funds.docx), which was ruled out of order:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 467, paragraph 117.21, line 36, after /spent,/ by inserting :
/goals to be accomplished, proposed measures to evaluate success in implementing and meeting the goals, /
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 468, paragraph 117.21, line 5, by inserting at the
end:
/For accountability purposes, by June thirtieth organizations receiving contributions in this act shall submit a report to the state agency making the contribution that includes an accounting of how the funds were spent and the outcome measures used to determine the success of the stated goals. State agencies receiving such data from organizations shall forward the information to the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. DANING explained the amendment.
Rep. CLEMMONS raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 57 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order.
Rep. G. M. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 48 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\010\opioid abuse prevention 2.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 502, paragraph 117.142, line 21, by inserting after "Medical Association,":
/ the South Carolina Primary Health Care Association, /
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 502, paragraph 117.142, line 28, by inserting after "diagnosis.":
/ Until a waiver is approved to expand access to substance use treatment in Institutions of Mental Disease (IMD), the department shall ensure that IMDs are considered an "in lieu of" service in its managed care contracts, when medically appropriate. /
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 502, paragraph 117.142, line 36, by inserting after "need.":
/ All medications proven to be effective in treating opioid addiction shall be considered as viable options on a case by case basis to ensure greatest level of success for individuals in the program. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. G. M. SMITH explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Reps. CLEMMONS, BERNSTEIN and RUTHERFORD proposed the following Amendment No. 19 (Doc Name COUNCIL\DG\ 4950C014.BBM.DG18.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 506, after line 2, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ 117.___. (GP: Prohibition of Discriminatory Practices) (A) In the current fiscal year and from the funds appropriated to public colleges and universities, when reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of a college or university policy prohibiting discriminatory practices on the basis of religion, South Carolina public colleges and universities shall take into consideration the definition of anti-Semitism for purposes of determining whether the alleged practice was motivated by anti-Semitic intent.
(B) Nothing in this proviso may be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States or Section 2, Article I of the South Carolina Constitution, 1895.
(C) For purposes of this proviso, the term 'definition of anti-Semitism' includes:
(1) the definition of anti-Semitism set forth by the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism of the Department of State in the fact sheet issued on June 8, 2010; and
(2) the examples set forth under the headings 'Contemporary Examples of Anti-Semitism' and 'What is Anti-Semitism Relative to Israel?' in the fact sheet. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. CLEMMONS explained the amendment.
Rep. MCKNIGHT raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 19 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
The SPEAKER overruled the Point of Order.
Rep. CLEMMONS continued speaking.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. ATWATER proposed the following Amendment No. 22 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\007\LITTERPRE VENTION 2.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 506, after line 2, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(GP: Litter Prevention) For the current fiscal year, evidence may be submitted to any local or state law enforcement agency showing footage of a vehicle littering where the vehicle make, model and license plate is clearly visible. A reward must be awarded to the individual providing footage equal to half the total fine amount should a fine be assessed to the registered owner of the vehicle./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. CLARY explained the amendment.
Rep. PITTS spoke against the amendment.
Rep. PITTS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. KING proposed the following Amendment No. 71 to H. 4950 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\007\king cremation permits.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 506, after line 2, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (GP: Cremation/Burial-Removal-Transit Permits) For the current fiscal year, applications for cremation permits and/or Burial-Removal-Transit Permits must not be assessed a fee by the coroner or medical examiner./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. KING explained the amendment.
Rep. HILL raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 71 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
Rep. KING spoke against the Point.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE overruled the Point of Order.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. DANING proposed the following Amendment No. 104 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\001\117.21REPORT ING.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 467, paragraph 117.21, line 36, after /spent,/ by inserting :
/goals to be accomplished, proposed measures to evaluate success in implementing and meeting the goals, /
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 468, paragraph 117.21, line 5, by inserting at the end:
/From the funds an organization receives from a state agency, for accountability purposes, by June thirtieth organizations receiving contributions in this act shall submit a report to the state agency making the contribution that includes an accounting of how the funds were spent and the outcome measures used to determine the success of the stated goals. State agencies receiving such data from organizations shall forward the information to the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. DANING explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. NORRELL proposed the following Amendment No. 95 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\007\untested sexual assault kits.docx), which was ruled out of order:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 506, after line 2, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(GP: Study Committee on Untested Sexual Assault Kits in South Carolina)
They shall establish a study committee to identify the number and/or type of untested sexual assault kits in the state. The committee shall review current written policies and procedures that regulate the submission and testing at the state, county and municipal levels; and identify strategies to increase the number of submissions of sexual assault kits for forensic testing.
The study committee shall be comprised of the following:
Two members of the Senate appointed by the President Pro Tempore of the Senate
Two members of the House of Representatives appointed by the Speaker of the House
Chief of the S.C. Law Enforcement Division
A representative of the S.C. Sheriff's Association
A representative of the S.C. Police Chief's Association
A representative of the S.C. Law Enforcement Division Forensic Laboratory
A representative from the South Carolina Commission on Prosecution Coordination
A representative from the South Carolina Attorney General's Division of Crime Victim Services
A representative of county or municipal forensic laboratories
A representative of the South Carolina Solicitors' Association
A representative of victim advocacy group
Staff support shall be provided by the agencies and associations represented. The Committee shall submit a written report of its finding and recommendations to the House of Representatives, the Senate and the Governor's Office no later than June 30, 2019. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. NORRELL explained the amendment.
Rep. HILL raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 95 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
Rep. NORRELL spoke against the Point.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE sustained the Point of Order.
Reps. FORREST and OTT proposed the following Amendment No. 97 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\010\shp firefighters.docx), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 506, after line 2, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (GP: SHP for Volunteer Firefighters) For the current Fiscal Year, active volunteer firefighters who are eligible for the income tax deduction pursuant to Section 12-6-1140 of the 1976 Code, and their eligible dependents, are eligible to participate in the State Health and Dental Insurance Plan, upon paying the full premium costs as determined by the Public Employee Benefit Authority. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. FORREST explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
Rep. G. M. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 101 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\010\GP LEGAL FUNDS.DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 506, after line 2, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(GP: Legal Funding Transactions) With the funds appropriated and authorized to the Department of Consumer Affairs for the current fiscal year, the department shall suspend and cease any investigations, enforcement procedures, or actions as a result of the Administrative Interpretation 3.104,106-1403 issued by the department and dated November 14, 2014. The department shall not make any such administrative determinations for legal funding transactions without the clear expression of intent from the General Assembly regarding the applicability of this administrative interpretation. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. G. M. SMITH explained the amendment.
Rep. G. M. SMITH spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. FORRESTER raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 101 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
Rep. G. M. SMITH spoke against the Point.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE overruled the Point of Order.
Rep. FORRESTER moved to table the amendment.
Rep. FORRESTER demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Bowers Cobb-Hunter Daning Forrester Fry Gilliard Govan Henderson Henegan Hosey Jefferson Johnson King Mack McCravy McEachern Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis M. Rivers Rutherford Sandifer Tallon Thigpen Toole Weeks Wheeler Williams
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson Anthony Arrington Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bradley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Davis Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Forrest Funderburk Gagnon Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson-Myers Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott
Hixon Huggins Jordan Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCoy McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway S. Rivers Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Taylor Thayer Trantham West White Whitmire Willis Young Yow
So, the House refused to table the amendment.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. BAMBERG proposed the following Amendment No. 102 (Doc Name COUNCIL\SA\4950C007.AGM.SA18.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 506, after line 2, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (GP: Gaming Study Committee) (A) Of the funds appropriated to the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the Department of Revenue, there is created a study committee to examine the feasibility of expanding gaming, the possible revenue generated by expanding gaming, specifically casinos, and to determine possible appropriations of revenue generated by gaming.
(B) The study committee is composed of the:
(1) Speaker of the House of Representatives, or his designee;
(2) Majority leader of the House of Representatives, or his designee;
(3) Minority leader of the House of Representatives, or his designee;
(4) Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, or his designee;
(5) President Pro Tempore of the Senate, or his designee;
(6) Majority leader of the Senate, or his designee;
(7) Minority leader of the Senate, or his designee;
(8) Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, or his designee; and
(9) Director of the Department of Revenue, or his designee.
(C) Members of the study committee shall serve without compensation, but are allowed the mileage, subsistence, and per diem allowed by law for members of state boards, committees, and commissions, to be paid equally from approved accounts of the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the Department of Revenue.
(D) The study committee shall choose its officers and must be provided with clerical, administrative, and research services by the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the Department of Revenue.
(E) The study committee shall make a report of its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly by June 30, 2019, at which time the study committee terminates./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BAMBERG explained the amendment.
Rep. LOFTIS raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 102 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
Rep. BAMBERG spoke against the Point.
The SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE overruled the Point of Order.
Rep. TALLON moved to table the amendment.
Rep. HIOTT demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anthony Arrington Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Blackwell Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley
Clary Clemmons Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Hamilton Hayes Henderson Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Pope Putnam S. Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson Atkinson Bamberg Bernstein Bowers Bradley Brown Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas Gilliard Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hosey Howard King Kirby Knight Mack McEachern McGinnis McKnight Norrell Parks Pendarvis Pitts Ridgeway M. Rivers Rutherford Stavrinakis Weeks Wheeler Williams
So, the amendment was tabled.
Reps. COBB-HUNTER and HERBKERSMAN proposed the following Amendment No. 103 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\001\STATECONTRACTS3 .DOCX), which was adopted:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 117, GENERAL PROVISIONS, page 506, after line 2, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/(GP: State Contracts) Of the funds appropriated or authorized to the State Fiscal Accountability Authority, the authority shall develop guidelines regarding covered contracts exceeding $50,000 that state agencies enter into which incentivizes contractors to pay their employees promptly. For purposes of this proviso, a "covered contract" is any contract that involves the physical performance of manual labor within South Carolina, if the contracting agency reasonably anticipates that the total cost of the manual labor will exceed seventy percent of the total cost of all labor. These guidelines shall provide that an agency may consider a prospective contractor's record of promptly paying its employees both (a) when making a determination of the contractor's responsibility to perform, or (b) when deciding whether to exercise a contractual right to extend, renew, or otherwise lengthen an existing contract. The guidelines may, but are not required to, include model terms and conditions that allow the State to deem a contractor's persistent failure to timely pay its employees as a material breach of contract./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HERBKERSMAN explained the amendment.
The amendment was then adopted.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bamberg Bannister
Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brown Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Weeks West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Section 117, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. MACE proposed the following Amendment No. 68 to H. 4950 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\001\santee cooper lobbyist.docx), which was ruled out of order:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 507, paragraph 118.6, after line 27, by inserting:
/ Santee Cooper is prohibited from entering into contracts to provide lobbying services for the organization./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MACE explained the amendment.
Rep. CROSBY raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 68 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
The SPEAKER sustained the Point of Order.
Rep. HILL proposed the following Amendment No. 26 to H. 4950 (Doc Name COUNCIL\SA\4950C004.DKA.SA18.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 507, by striking paragraph 118.6, and inserting:
/ 118.6. (SR: Prohibits Public Funded Lobbyists) All state agencies and institutions are prohibited from using general state fund appropriations to compensate employees who engage in lobbying on behalf of the state agency or institution. The State Ethics Commission shall require state agencies and institutions that report lobbying activities to the commission to certify that the lobbying activities were not funded by general state fund appropriations.
All state agencies and institutions are prohibited from entering into contracts using general state fund appropriations to provide lobbying services to the agency or institution. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. HILL explained the amendment.
Rep. CLARY moved to table the amendment.
Rep. HILL demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Anderson Anthony Atkinson Bales Bannister Blackwell Brawley Brown Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Forrest Fry Gilliard Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hiott Hixon Hosey Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Lowe Lucas Mack Martin McEachern McGinnis McKnight V. S. Moss B. Newton W. Newton Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Ridgeway Rutherford Sandifer G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Trantham Weeks Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Allison Arrington Ballentine Bennett Bernstein Bradley
Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Daning Felder Finlay Forrester Funderburk Gagnon Govan Hamilton Hewitt Hill Huggins Loftis Long Mace Magnuson McCoy McCravy D. C. Moss Murphy Norrell Pope Putnam S. Rivers Simrill G. M. Smith Thayer Thigpen Toole Willis
So, the amendment was tabled.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. NORRELL a temporary leave of absence.
Reps. KING and BRAWLEY proposed the following Amendment No. 37 (Doc Name COUNCIL\DG\4950C016.BBM.DG18.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 513, after line 33, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (SR: School Safety Fund) In the current fiscal year, in addition to any other tax or fee applied to the sale of a firearm, there is imposed a fee equal to ten percent of the gross proceeds from the sale of a firearm. The fee must be credited to a fund established within the State Department of Education entitled the 'School Safety Fund'. The fund must only be expended to employ or otherwise provide school resource officers. Each school district may apply to the Department of Education for a disbursement from the fund. In determining which district shall receive a disbursement, and the amount thereof, The Department of Education must give priority to school districts that, in the previous fiscal year, did not have a full-time school resource officer at each school within the district. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. BRAWLEY explained the amendment.
Rep. PITTS spoke against the amendment.
Rep. BAMBERG spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. THIGPEN spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. BRAWLEY spoke in favor of the amendment.
Rep. PITTS moved to table the amendment.
Rep. BRAWLEY demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anthony Arrington Ballentine Bannister Bennett Blackwell Bradley Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Govan Hamilton Hardee Henderson Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Pitts Pope Putnam S. Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham West
White Whitmire Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Anderson Atkinson Bales Bernstein Bowers Brawley Brown Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas Gilliard Hayes Henderson-Myers Henegan Hosey Howard Jefferson King Kirby Knight Mack McEachern McKnight Parks Pendarvis Ridgeway M. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Stavrinakis Thigpen Weeks Wheeler Williams
So, the amendment was tabled.
I inadvertently voted in favor of tabling Amendment 37 of Part IB, Section 118 of H. 4950. I intended to vote against tabling the Amendment.
Rep. Jerry Govan
Rep. MACE proposed the following Amendment No. 83 to (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\001\sled pilot system.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 513, after line 31, by adding appropriately numbered items to read:
/ ( ) D100 - State Law Enforcement Division
Data Integration and Analytics System $1
( .1) From the funds appropriated to the State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) for a Data Integration and Analytics System, SLED shall develop a pilot data integration and analytics system to improve
access to timely, complete, and accurate information integrating data from, at a minimum, but not limited to, the following data sources by December 31, 2018: (1) SLED; (2) the Judicial Department; (3) the Department of Corrections; (4) the Department of Motor Vehicles; (5) the Sex Offender Registry; (6) the Department of Public Safety; (7) the Department of Natural Resources; and (8) state and local law enforcement departments and agencies.
SLED shall contract with an analytics vendor, using a competitive bid process, to establish the centralized integrated data repository with necessary data analytic resources. The repository shall integrate and provide up to date information in a cloud based environment accessed via a secure connection for use by state and local government.
Data that is not classified as a public record under Chapter 1, Title 30 shall not be considered a public record when incorporated into the pilot data integration and analytics system.
To maintain the confidentiality requirements attached to the information provided to pilot data integration and analytics system by the various state and local agencies, each source agency providing data shall be the sole custodian of the data for the purpose of any request for inspection or copies under Chapter 1, Title 30 of the 1976 Code.
The pilot data integration and analytics system shall only allow access to data from the source agencies in accordance with rules adopted by the respective source agencies.
SLED shall achieve and demonstrate full operational capability of the pilot program before the system is expanded to other areas of the state.
SLED shall ensure that the pilot data integration and analytics system receives access to federal criminal information deemed to be essential in managing the system to support criminal justice professionals.
The pilot data integration and analytics system shall be completed and providing useable data to various state and local law enforcement agencies by December 31, 2018. SLED shall issue a report to the General Assembly by June 30, 2019, on the success of the pilot system with recommendations as to possible statewide expansion and possible other local, state and federal data systems that can be incorporated. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MACE explained the amendment.
Rep. PITTS moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Reps. PENDARVIS, KING and PUTNAM proposed the following Amendment No. 86 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\001\suspend parts of act 388 .docx), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 513, after line 33, by adding an appropriately numbered paragraph to read:
/ (SR: Suspend Portions of Act 388) For Fiscal Year 2018-19, Sections 12-36-1110, 11-11-156, 12-37-220(B)(47), and 6-1-320 of the 1976 Code shall be suspended./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. PENDARVIS explained the amendment.
Rep. WHITE moved to table the amendment.
Rep. KING demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Blackwell Bradley Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Herbkersman Hewitt Hill Hiott Hixon Huggins Johnson Jordan Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Magnuson Martin McCoy
McCravy McGinnis D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Pope Putnam S. Rivers Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Toole Trantham West White Whitmire Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Alexander Anderson Bernstein Brawley Brown Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Dillard Douglas Gilliard Govan Henderson-Myers Henegan Hosey Howard Jefferson King Kirby Mack McEachern McKnight Ott Parks Pendarvis Ridgeway M. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Thigpen Weeks Wheeler Williams
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. MACE proposed the following Amendment No. 105 (Doc Name H:\LEGWORK\HOUSE\AMEND\H-WM\004\SANTEE COOPER 2.DOCX), which was tabled:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IB, Section 118, STATEWIDE REVENUE, page 507, paragraph 118.6, after line 27, by inserting:
/In the current fiscal year, Santee Cooper is prohibited from expending funds to enter into contracts to provide lobbying services for the organization./
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MACE explained the amendment.
Rep. CROSBY raised the Point of Order that Amendment No. 105 to H. 4950, under Rule 5.3B, was not germane to the Bill.
Rep. CROSBY stated that Santee Cooper did not receive state funds and the Amendment was not germane to the Bill.
The SPEAKER overruled the Point of Order.
The SPEAKER cited the differences between the germaneness standards of Part IB Amendments and Part II Amendments to the Appropriations Bill.
The SPEAKER went further and cited the precedent of former Speaker Wilkins from March 11, 2004, and stated that Part IB Amendments and Part IB provisos may concern other types of funds, not just state funds, and be germane. He stated that nothing in House Rule 5.3B required an amendment or proviso to relate to, effect, or concern state funds, and he overruled the Point of Order.
Rep. MACE continued speaking.
Rep. LOWE spoke against the amendment.
Rep. CLARY moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
The question then recurred to the adoption of the section.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson
Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Trantham Weeks West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill
Section 118 was adopted.
After recusing myself from voting on Section 118, Part IB of H. 4950, the General Appropriation Bill, I inadvertently voted on this Section. I wish the record to reflect that I meant to abstain from voting.
Rep. William Cogswell
Rep. WHITE gave notice of offering amendments on third reading if necessary, pursuant to Rule 9.2.
Rep. WHITE moved to table all pending motions to reconsider, which was agreed to.
The question then recurred to the passage of the Bill, as amended, on second reading.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clary Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crawford Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Duckworth Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Martin McCoy McCravy McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss
Murphy B. Newton W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Weeks West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill Magnuson
So, the Bill, as amended, was read the second time and ordered to third reading.
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 59 and 60
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Todd Atwater
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with
or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Justin Bamberg
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Bruce Bannister
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Beth Bernstein
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 20D
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Bill Bowers
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 117
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Wendy Brawley
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or
business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Micah Caskey
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 45
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Bill Chumley
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 57 and 66
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or
business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Gary Clary
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Alan Clemmons
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 34, 35, 37, 38, 44, 45, 63, and 67
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 14 and 118
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. William Cogswell
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. J. Derham Cole, Jr.
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Neil Collins
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 16, 113, 114, and 115
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Heather Crawford
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 25
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Joe Daning
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or
business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Greg Delleney
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 16, 25, 84 and 87
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Greg Duckworth
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 38, 58, 61, 63, 66, 67, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 81, 82, 83, 84, and 109
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. Jason Elliott
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 38
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Shannon Erickson
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 78
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Raye Felder
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 25
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Mike Forrester
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 16, 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Russell Fry
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 58
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Laurie Funderburk
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 109, and 110
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Chris Hart
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 35, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Rosalyn Henderson-Myers
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Jeff Johnson
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 23, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Jay Jordan
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 78 and 93
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. John R. King
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 84 and 86
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Roger Kirby
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from
voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 32, 33, 36, 74, and 75
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Phillip Lowe
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by
myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Jay Lucas
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 13
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Nancy Mace
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Sections Number 23, 33, and 34
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. David J. Mack III
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 57, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Peter McCoy
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 18, 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
Rep. John McCravy
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Cezar McKnight
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 57, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Chris Murphy
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 20E
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Brandon Newton
*********************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or
business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Wm. Weston Newton
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 38, 61, 74, and 75
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Mandy Norrell
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 25 and 93
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Anne Parks
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Marvin Pendarvis
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 53
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Mike Pitts
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Tommy Pope
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 84
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Robert Ridgeway
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Todd Rutherford
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 17, 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. G. Murrell Smith
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 20A, 23, 28, 33, 34, 35, 38, 49, 50, 51, 52, 58, 59, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. James E. Smith
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 1, 1A, 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Leon Stavrinakis
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 25
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Ivory Thigpen
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. David Weeks
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section, and/or Amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Number 109
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Jay West
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 33, 34, 38, 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 101, 102, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, and 111
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-740(C) because of representation of a client before a particular agency or
commission by me or an individual or business with whom I am associated within the past year.
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Will Wheeler
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4950, the annual General Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, for the below referenced Part, Section and/or amendment because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
Part IA and Part IB, Section Numbers 25, 33, 35, 36, 37, and 38
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Brian White
*******************************************************
The following Joint Resolution was taken up:
H. 4951 (Word version) -- Ways and Means Committee: A JOINT RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE MONIES FROM THE CAPITAL RESERVE FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018, AND TO ALLOW UNEXPENDED FUNDS APPROPRIATED TO BE CARRIED
FORWARD TO SUCCEEDING FISCAL YEARS AND EXPENDED FOR THE SAME PURPOSES.
Rep. MAGNUSON proposed the following Amendment No. 3 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\001\crf-teacher bonus.docx), which was tabled:
Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, Section 1, page 2, lines 15-43, and page 3, lines 1-39, by striking the lines in their entirety.
Amend the Joint Resolution further, as and if amended, Section 1, page 4, after line 42, by adding an appropriately numbered item to read:
/( ) H630 - Department of Education
Certified Teacher Bonus $49,736,282/
Amend the Joint Resolution further, as and if amended, page 5, line 1, by adding an appropriately numbered Section to read:
/SECTION . The Department of Education is directed to utilize the $49,736,282 appropriated above for Certified Teacher Bonus to provide all certified teachers with a one-time bonus based on a pro rata share of the funds./
Renumber items and sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. MAGNUSON explained the amendment.
Rep. MAGNUSON moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. GOVAN proposed the following Amendment No. 4 to (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\003\crf-crf govan usc to Denmark .docx), which was tabled:
Amend the joint resolution, as and if amended, Section 1, page 2, lines 42-43, and Page 3, Line 1, Item (18) H270 - University of South Carolina, opposite /Relocation/ by striking: /$5,000,000/ and by inserting: /$4,000,000/
Amend the Joint Resolution further, as and if amended, Section 1, page 4, after line 41 by adding an appropriately numbered item to read:
/( ) H590 - State Board for Technical & Comprehensive Education - Denmark Technical College Capital Improvements
$1,000,000/
Renumber items and sections to conform.
Amend totals and titles to conform.
Rep. GOVAN explained the amendment.
Rep. WHITE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
The question then recurred to the passage of the Joint Resolution.
The yeas and nays were taken resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are:
Alexander Allison Anderson Anthony Arrington Atkinson Bales Ballentine Bannister Bennett Bernstein Blackwell Bowers Bradley Brawley Brown Bryant Burns Caskey Chumley Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cogswell Cole Collins Crosby Daning Davis Delleney Dillard Douglas Elliott Erickson Felder Finlay Forrest Forrester Fry Funderburk Gagnon Gilliard Govan Hamilton Hardee Hayes Henderson Henderson-Myers Henegan Herbkersman Hewitt Hiott Hixon Hosey Howard Huggins Jefferson Johnson Jordan King Kirby Knight Loftis Long Lowe Lucas Mace Mack Magnuson Martin McEachern McGinnis McKnight D. C. Moss V. S. Moss W. Newton Norrell Ott Parks Pendarvis Pitts Pope Putnam Ridgeway M. Rivers S. Rivers Robinson-Simpson Rutherford Sandifer Simrill G. R. Smith J. E. Smith Sottile
Spires Stavrinakis Tallon Taylor Thayer Thigpen Toole Trantham Weeks West Wheeler White Whitmire Williams Willis Young Yow
Those who voted in the negative are:
Hill
So, the Joint Resolution was read the second time and ordered to third reading.
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4951, the Capital Reserve Fund, because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Gary Clary
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4951, the Capital Reserve Fund, because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or
business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Heather Crawford
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4951, the Capital Reserve Fund, because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
A potential conflict may exist under S.C. Code Section 8-13-745(B) and (C) because a contract for goods or services may be entered into within the next year with an agency, commission, board, department, or other entity funded through the general appropriation bill by myself, an individual with whom I am associated in partnership with or a business or partnership in which I have a greater than 5% interest.
Rep. Greg Duckworth
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4951, the Capital Reserve Fund, because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Nancy Mace
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4951, the Capital Reserve Fund, because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or
business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. John R. McCravy
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4951, the Capital Reserve Fund, because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Peter McCoy
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4951, the Capital Reserve Fund, because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Chris Murphy
*******************************************************
In accordance with Section 8-13-700(B) of the S.C. Code, I abstained from voting on H. 4951, the Capital Reserve Fund, because of a potential conflict of interest and wish to have my recusal noted for the record in the House Journal of this date:
The reason for abstaining on the above referenced legislation is:
A potential conflict of interest may exist in that an economic interest of myself, an immediate family member, or an individual or
business with which I am associated may be affected in violation of S.C. Code Section 8-13-700(B).
Rep. Brandon Newton
*******************************************************
Rep. HIXON moved that the House do now adjourn until 12:01 a.m., Wednesday, March 14, which was agreed to.
The Senate returned to the House with concurrence the following:
H. 5093 (Word version) -- Reps. J. E. Smith, Bernstein, Finlay, Alexander, Allison, Anderson, Anthony, Arrington, Atkinson, Atwater, Bales, Ballentine, Bamberg, Bannister, Bennett, Blackwell, Bowers, Bradley, Brawley, Brown, Bryant, Burns, Caskey, Chumley, Clary, Clemmons, Clyburn, Cobb-Hunter, Cogswell, Cole, Collins, Crawford, Crosby, Daning, Davis, Delleney, Dillard, Douglas, Duckworth, Elliott, Erickson, Felder, Forrest, Forrester, Fry, Funderburk, Gagnon, Gilliard, Govan, Hamilton, Hardee, Hart, Hayes, Henderson, Henderson-Myers, Henegan, Herbkersman, Hewitt, Hill, Hiott, Hixon, Hosey, Howard, Huggins, Jefferson, Johnson, Jordan, King, Kirby, Knight, Loftis, Long, Lowe, Lucas, Mace, Mack, Magnuson, Martin, McCoy, McCravy, McEachern, McGinnis, McKnight, D. C. Moss, V. S. Moss, Murphy, B. Newton, W. Newton, Norrell, Ott, Parks, Pendarvis, Pitts, Pope, Putnam, Ridgeway, M. Rivers, S. Rivers, Robinson-Simpson, Rutherford, Sandifer, Simrill, G. M. Smith, G. R. Smith, Sottile, Spires, Stavrinakis, Stringer, Tallon, Taylor, Thayer, Thigpen, Toole, Trantham, Weeks, West, Wheeler, White, Whitmire, Williams, Willis, Young and Yow: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE AND HONOR THE A. C. FLORA HIGH SCHOOL JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS AND INSTRUCTORS OF RICHLAND COUNTY FOR THEIR EXCEPTIONAL PERFORMANCE AND TO CONGRATULATE THEM FOR CAPTURING THE 2016-2017 DISTRICT ONE SUPERINTENDENT'S TROPHY AWARD.
H. 5104 (Word version) -- Reps. Bradley, Alexander, Allison, Anderson, Anthony, Arrington, Atkinson, Atwater, Bales, Ballentine, Bamberg, Bannister, Bennett, Bernstein, Blackwell, Bowers, Brawley, Brown, Bryant, Burns,
Caskey, Chumley, Clary, Clemmons, Clyburn, Cobb-Hunter, Cogswell, Cole, Collins, Crawford, Crosby, Daning, Davis, Delleney, Dillard, Douglas, Duckworth, Elliott, Erickson, Felder, Finlay, Forrest, Forrester, Fry, Funderburk, Gagnon, Gilliard, Govan, Hamilton, Hardee, Hart, Hayes, Henderson, Henderson-Myers, Henegan, Herbkersman, Hewitt, Hill, Hiott, Hixon, Hosey, Howard, Huggins, Jefferson, Johnson, Jordan, King, Kirby, Knight, Loftis, Long, Lowe, Lucas, Mace, Mack, Magnuson, Martin, McCoy, McCravy, McEachern, McGinnis, McKnight, D. C. Moss, V. S. Moss, Murphy, B. Newton, W. Newton, Norrell, Ott, Parks, Pendarvis, Pitts, Pope, Putnam, Ridgeway, M. Rivers, S. Rivers, Robinson-Simpson, Rutherford, Sandifer, Simrill, G. M. Smith, G. R. Smith, J. E. Smith, Sottile, Spires, Stavrinakis, Stringer, Tallon, Taylor, Thayer, Thigpen, Toole, Trantham, Weeks, West, Wheeler, White, Whitmire, Williams, Willis, Young and Yow: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION TO CONGRATULATE THE RBC HERITAGE PRESENTED BY BOEING GOLF TOURNAMENT HELD EACH YEAR ON HILTON HEAD ISLAND ON THE OCCASION OF ITS FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY THIS COMING APRIL AND TO RECOGNIZE AND THANK THE HERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION, THE TOURNAMENT SPONSORS, AND COUNTLESS FRIENDS AND VOLUNTEERS WHO HAVE MADE THIS SPECIAL EVENT SO SUCCESSFUL AND UNIQUE AMONG PGA TOUR EVENTS.
At 11:10 p.m. the House, in accordance with the motion of Rep. ROBINSON-SIMPSON, adjourned in memory of Cornelius Cato, to meet at 12:01 a.m. tomorrow.
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 9:52 A.M.