-- of
Click here to see a list of stop words.
116th Session, 2005-2006 Journal of the House of Representatives
(Statewide Session)
The House assembled at 10:30 a.m.
Our thought for today is from Psalm 31:3: "Since you are my rock and my fortress, for the sake of your name lead and guide me." Pursuant to Rule 6.3, the House of Representatives was led in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America by the SPEAKER. After corrections to the Journal of the proceedings of Friday, the SPEAKER ordered it confirmed.
Rep. PHILLIPS moved that when the House adjourns, it adjourn in memory of Ernest Dixon of Blacksburg, which was agreed to.
The House stood in silent prayer for the family of Mrs. Louise Kelly, grandmother of Representative Vick.
The following was received: COMMITTEE TO SCREEN CANDIDATES FOR BOARDS OF
Memorandum To: Clerk of the House Re: Committee Hearings, March 21, 2006
The Committee to Screen Candidates for Boards of Trustees of State Colleges and Universities finds the following candidates for Boards of Trustees qualified. Background reports from the State Law Enforcement Division show no felony charges against any of the candidates. Coastal Carolina University 6th District, seat 12 Mr. Joseph Wayne George
Mrs. Ann Kirven Sanders
Rep. Olin Phillips, Chm. Sen. Thomas Alexander
11:33 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. The candidate screening conducted on March 21st, 2006, Room 501, Blatt Building, Columbia, South Carolina before Sonya K. Grice, Court Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of South Carolina.
APPEARANCES:
CHAIRMAN PHILLIPS: We'll go ahead and start. I'll call the meeting of the Joint Committee to Screen Candidates for our Boards of Trustees of State Colleges and Universities. The committee members present today is Representative Lanny Littlejohn of Spartanburg, Cherokee Counties; and myself, Representative Olin Phillips from Gaffney, Cherokee County; and taking dictation for us today is Sonya Grice of the Creel agency and Sophia Floyd with the committee, acting as our secretary to the committee. As you both stand, I want to swear both of you at one time. Please raise your right hand. The information given here today be the truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?
The following Bills were introduced, read the first time, and referred to appropriate committees:
H. 4896 (Word version) -- Rep. Rutherford: A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 20-7-2723 SO AS TO REQUIRE ALL GROUP CHILDCARE HOMES AND FAMILY CHILDCARE HOMES THAT DO NOT CARRY LIABILITY INSURANCE TO OBTAIN STATEMENTS FROM EACH PARENT OR GUARDIAN OF A CHILD ENROLLED IN THE CHILDCARE FACILITY INDICATING THAT THE PARENT HAS RECEIVED NOTICE FROM THE FACILITY THAT THE FACILITY DOES NOT CARRY LIABILITY INSURANCE AND TO REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES TO INFORM EACH GROUP CHILDCARE HOME AND FAMILY CHILDCARE HOME OF THIS REQUIREMENT.
H. 4897 (Word version) -- Rep. Rice: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 39-65-10, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PAYMENT OF POST-TERMINATION CLAIMS TO SALES REPRESENTATIVES, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A SALES REPRESENTATIVE IS ONE WHO SELLS TO BOTH WHOLESALERS AND END USERS AND ONE WHO DOES NOT SELL PRIMARILY FOR HIS OWN ACCOUNT, TO INCLUDE ORDERS FOR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, TO DEFINE "COMMISSIONS" AS INCLUDING A PERCENTAGE OF PROFITS, AND TO MAKE A TECHNICAL CHANGE.
S. 1264 (Word version) -- Senator Leventis: A BILL TO AMEND ACT 470 OF 1971, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION SCHOOL FOR SUMTER COUNTY AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CAREER CENTER BOARD, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CAREER CENTER SHALL BECOME AN ADVISORY BOARD TO THE BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF SUMTER SCHOOL DISTRICTS 2 AND 17 AND THE DUTIES, POWERS, AND FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CAREER CENTER ARE DEVOLVED JOINTLY UPON THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SUMTER SCHOOL DISTRICTS 2 AND 17 ON JULY 1, 2006, AND TO PROVIDE THAT BEGINNING JULY 1, 2006, THE SUPERINTENDENTS OF SUMTER SCHOOL DISTRICTS 2 AND 17 SHALL TOGETHER EMPLOY A DIRECTOR OF THE CENTER WHO SHALL SERVE AS SUPERVISOR AND FISCAL AGENT OF THE SCHOOL UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SUPERINTENDENTS.
On motion of Rep. MILLER, with unanimous consent, the following was taken up for immediate consideration: H. 4898 (Word version) -- Reps. Miller, Anderson, Agnew, Allen, Altman, Anthony, Bailey, Bales, Ballentine, Bannister, Barfield, Battle, Bingham, Bowers, Brady, Branham, Breeland, G. Brown, J. Brown, R. Brown, Cato, Ceips, Chalk, Chellis, Clark, Clemmons, Clyburn, Coates, Cobb-Hunter, Coleman, Cooper, Cotty, Dantzler, Davenport, Delleney, Duncan, Edge, Emory, Frye, Funderburk, Govan, Hagood, Haley, Hamilton, Hardwick, Harrell, Harrison, Harvin, Haskins, Hayes, Herbkersman, J. Hines, M. Hines, Hinson, Hiott, Hodges, Hosey, Howard, Huggins, Jefferson, Jennings, Kennedy, Kirsh, Leach, Limehouse, Littlejohn, Loftis, Lucas, Mack, Mahaffey, Martin, McCraw, McGee, McLeod, Merrill, Mitchell, Moody-Lawrence, J. H. Neal, J. M. Neal, Neilson, Norman, Ott, Owens, Parks, Perry, Phillips, Pinson, E. H. Pitts, M. A. Pitts, Rhoad, Rice, Rivers, Rutherford, Sandifer, Scarborough, Scott, Simrill, Sinclair, Skelton, D. C. Smith, F. N. Smith, G. M. Smith, G. R. Smith, J. E. Smith, J. R. Smith, W. D. Smith, Stewart, Talley, Taylor, Thompson, Toole, Townsend, Tripp, Umphlett, Vaughn, Vick, Viers, Walker, Weeks, Whipper, White, Whitmire, Witherspoon and Young: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION TO REQUEST THAT THE GEORGETOWN COUNTY COUNCIL AND THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NAME THE SAMPIT RIVER BOAT PARK LANDING PROJECT THE "CARROLL ASHMORE CAMPBELL MARINE COMPLEX" IN HONOR OF ONE OF THE PALMETTO STATE'S MOST BELOVED LEADERS. Whereas, the Honorable Carroll Ashmore Campbell, Jr. was born in Greenville, South Carolina on July 24, 1940, the son of Carroll Ashmore and Anne Williams Campbell; and
Whereas, he was happily married to the former Iris Faye Rhodes of Liberty, and together they raised two sons, Carroll A. Campbell III and Richard Michael Campbell II; and Whereas, he served in the South Carolina House of Representatives from 1971 to 1974, served in the South Carolina Senate from 1977 to 1978, and served in the United States House of Representatives from 1978 to 1986; and Whereas, in 1986 he was elected Governor of the State of South Carolina and was only the second individual to serve in this capacity for two terms; and Whereas, he dedicated his life to serving his beloved Palmetto State and his country; and Whereas, during his two terms as Governor, Carroll Campbell provided extraordinary leadership prior to, during, and in the aftermath of Hurricane Hugo, one of the most trying times for the people of South Carolina; and Whereas, Carroll Campbell's service as Governor also will be remembered as a period of unprecedented economic growth for our State; and Whereas, he had a great love for the lowcounty. The Governor's Cup Bill Fishing Series, started by Governor Campbell, began at the Land's End Marina where he kept his boat for many years. This fishing tournament exemplifies the ideals of Georgetown County's Sampit River Boat Landing Project as it brought recognition to this area and promoted economic development; and Whereas, the citizens of this State and nation lost one of its most beloved leaders in 2005 when Governor Campbell succumbed to the devastating effects of Alzheimer's Disease; and Whereas, in light of Governor Campbell's personal commitment to the economic development of Georgetown County, it would be a fitting tribute to this great South Carolinian to name the Sampit River Boat Landing Project in Georgetown County in his honor. Now, therefore, Be it resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring: That the members of the General Assembly, by this resolution, request that the Georgetown County Council and the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources name the Sampit River Boat Landing Project the "Carroll Ashmore Campbell Marine Complex" in honor of one of South Carolina's most beloved leaders. Be it further resolved that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Georgetown County Council and the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. The Concurrent Resolution was agreed to and ordered sent to the Senate.
The roll call of the House of Representatives was taken resulting as follows: Agnew Altman Anderson Anthony Bales Ballentine Bannister Barfield Battle Bingham Brady Branham Breeland R. Brown Cato Ceips Chalk Chellis Clark Clemmons Clyburn Coates Cobb-Hunter Coleman Cooper Cotty Dantzler Davenport Delleney Duncan Edge Emory Frye Funderburk Govan Haley Hamilton Hardwick Harrell Harrison Harvin Hayes Herbkersman M. Hines Hinson Hiott Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Kennedy Kirsh Leach Limehouse Littlejohn Loftis Mack Mahaffey McCraw McGee McLeod Merrill Miller J. H. Neal J. M. Neal Neilson Norman Ott Owens Perry Phillips Pinson E. H. Pitts M. A. Pitts Rice Sandifer Scarborough Scott Simrill Skelton G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith J. R. Smith W. D. Smith Stewart Talley Taylor Thompson Toole Townsend Umphlett Vaughn Viers Walker Weeks White Whitmire Witherspoon Young
I came in after the roll call and was present for the Session on Monday, March 27. Donald C. Smith James Lucas Thomas Rhoad Gloria Haskins George Bailey Todd Rutherford Karl Allen Anne Parks Harold Mitchell Ted Vick Thayer Rivers Jackson "Seth" Whipper Bessie Moody-Lawrence Becky Martin Daniel Tripp Leon Howard Douglas Jennings Grady Brown
The SPEAKER granted Rep. J. BROWN a leave of absence for the day to attend the funeral of his brother-in-law.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. HAGOOD a leave of absence for the week.
In accordance with House Rule 5.2 below:
Bill Number: H. 4534 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Bill Number: H. 4882 (Word version)
Rep. CATO moved to adjourn debate upon the following Bill until Tuesday, April 4, which was adopted: H. 4317 (Word version) -- Reps. Brady, Funderburk, Mitchell, Bowers, Ballentine, Ceips and Scarborough: A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 48-52-690 TO THE SOUTH CAROLINA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ACT SO AS TO REQUIRE THE APPLICATION OF "GREEN BUILDING" OR COMPARABLE STANDARDS TO STANDARDS OR MEASURES OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND ENERGY CONSERVATION, WITH LIMITATIONS TO BUILDINGS OF MORE THAN TEN MILLION DOLLARS AND EXEMPTIONS OF CERTAIN STATE-FUNDED STRUCTURES.
Rep. CATO moved to adjourn debate upon the following Bill until Tuesday, April 4, which was adopted: S. 46 (Word version) -- Senator Thomas: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 29-5-21, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO SURVEYOR'S SERVICES AS MATERIAL FURNISHED FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF REAL ESTATE, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, A REAL ESTATE LICENSEE WHO PERFORMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE OWNER OF REAL ESTATE INCIDENT TO A REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION PURSUANT TO A WRITTEN AGREEMENT HAS FURNISHED LABOR OR MATERIAL FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF REAL ESTATE.
The following Bill was taken up: H. 4559 (Word version) -- Reps. G. R. Smith, Allen, Ballentine, Bannister, Dantzler, Haley, Hamilton, Hardwick, Haskins, Hinson, Leach, Loftis, Merrill, F. N. Smith, J. R. Smith, Umphlett and Vaughn: A BILL TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING SECTION 7-13-200 SO AS TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM METHOD OF FILLING VACANCIES IN AN ELECTED OR APPOINTED OFFICE WHEN A PERSON MOVES HIS RESIDENCE OUTSIDE OF THE AREA FROM WHICH HE WAS ELECTED OR APPOINTED.
The Judiciary Committee proposed the following Amendment No. 1 (Doc Name COUNCIL\DKA\3669DW06), which was adopted: "Section 7-13-200. (A) The purpose of this section is to provide a uniform method of filling a vacancy when a person moves his residence outside of the area from which he was elected or appointed. (B) If a person who has been elected or appointed to an office moves his residence outside of the area from which he was elected or appointed, the member shall notify the presiding officer within fifteen days of the date of his residence changes as described in this section. (C) If a member notifies the presiding officer that he has changed his residence to a place outside of the area from which he was elected or appointed, the presiding officer shall take action as specified in subsection (E)(1) or (2), as appropriate. (D)(1) If the governing body, commission, board, or other body to which the person has been elected or appointed receives information that a member has moved his residence outside of the area from which he was elected or appointed and the information is obtained from a source other than the member, it shall vote in open session to determine whether the information supports removing the member from office on the basis that the member has moved from the area from which he was elected or appointed. If the vote is affirmative, the member must be afforded a public hearing unless he waives the hearing in writing. (2) Notice of a public hearing scheduled pursuant to subsection (D)(1) must be served on the member by certified mail, return receipt requested. (3) At the conclusion of the public hearing scheduled pursuant to subsection (D)(1), the governing body, commission, board, or other body to which the person has been elected shall vote in open session whether the member should be removed from office on the basis that the member has moved from the area from which he was elected or appointed. (a) If the vote is affirmative, the office is declared vacant and the presiding officer shall take action as specified in subsection (E)(1) or (2), as appropriate. (b) If the vote is negative, the member continues in office. (E) If a position is determined to be vacant pursuant to subsections (B) through (D), the position must be filled as follows: (1) if the office originally was filled by appointment, the presiding officer shall notify the appointing officer or entity of the vacancy. Within ninety days after receiving notice, the officer or entity shall fill the vacancy by appointment for the remainder of the unexpired term; or (2) if the office originally was filled by election, the presiding officer shall notify the county election commission that the office is vacant. Upon receiving notice, the county election commission shall schedule a special election in accordance with the provisions of Section 7-13-190 to fill the office for the remainder of the unexpired term.
(F) Notwithstanding another provision of law, the provisions of this section apply to all elected and appointed offices."
Rep. G. R. SMITH explained the amendment. The Bill, as amended, was read the second time and ordered to third reading.
The following Bill was taken up: H. 4509 (Word version) -- Reps. Kennedy, Harrison, Hosey, Scott, Moody-Lawrence, Clyburn, Hodges, Jefferson, Miller and Rivers: A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 20-7-945, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE REVOCATION OF A LICENSE OF A PERSON WHO IS OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH AN ORDER FOR CHILD SUPPORT, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A PERSON WHOSE DRIVER'S LICENSE HAS BEEN REVOKED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION MAY OBTAIN A SPECIAL RESTRICTED DRIVER'S LICENSE UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.
The Judiciary Committee proposed the following Amendment No. 1 (Doc Name COUNCIL\SWB\6775CM06), which was adopted: ( i) to and from work or his place of education and in the course of his employment or education; ( ii) to and from a place of worship; (iii) to and from a court proceeding or his attorney's office; or (iv) to and from any place authorized as part of a court ordered visitation. (b) The Department of Motor Vehicles may issue the special restricted driver's license only upon a showing by the person that he is employed or enrolled in a college or university, and lives farther than one mile from his place of employment, place of education, place of worship, courthouse, attorney's office, or place authorized as part of court ordered visitation.
(2) If the department issues a special restricted driver's license, it shall designate reasonable restrictions on the times during which and routes on which the person may operate a motor vehicle. A change in the employment hours, place of employment, status as a student, residence, place of worship, choice of legal counsel, or place authorized as part of court ordered visitation must be reported immediately to the department by the licensee. / ( i) to and from work or his place of education and in the course of his employment or education; ( ii) to and from a place of worship; (iii) to and from a court proceeding or his attorney's office; or (iv) to and from any place authorized as part of a court ordered visitation. (b) The Department of Motor Vehicles may issue the special restricted driver's license only upon a showing by the person that he is employed or enrolled in a college or university, and lives farther than one mile from his place of employment, place of education, place of worship, courthouse, attorney's office, or place authorized as part of court ordered visitation. (2) If the department issues a special restricted driver's license, it shall designate reasonable restrictions on the times during which and routes on which the person may operate a motor vehicle. A change in the employment hours, place of employment, status as a student, residence, place of worship, choice of legal counsel, or place authorized as part of court ordered visitation must be reported immediately to the department by the licensee. (3) The fee for each special restricted driver's license is one hundred dollars. However, an additional fee is not required because of changes in the place and hours of employment, education, or residence. Of this fee twenty dollars must be distributed to the general fund and eighty dollars must be placed by the Comptroller General into a special restricted account to be used by the Department of Motor Vehicles to defray the expenses of the Department of Motor Vehicles. (4) The operation of a motor vehicle outside the time limits and route imposed by a special restricted license by the person issued that license is a violation of Section 56-1-460.
(5) The special restricted driver's license issued pursuant to this subsection is available only as long as the person timely makes all required monthly child support payments that become due after the special restricted driver's license is issued. If the person fails to timely make each monthly child support payment after the special restricted license is issued, the Department of Motor Vehicles must revoke the license upon written notification by the Department of Social Services that the person is not complying with this provision."
Rep. ALTMAN explained the amendment. The Bill, as amended, was read the second time and ordered to third reading.
The following Joint Resolution was taken up, read the second time, and ordered to a third reading: H. 4881 (Word version) -- Reps. Cobb-Hunter, Mitchell, Clyburn, Hosey, Hodges, Govan, Howard, J. H. Neal, J. Hines, Funderburk, Haley, Mack, Branham, Breeland, J. Brown, R. Brown, Hardwick, M. Hines, Hinson, Jefferson, McCraw, McGee, Ott, Rivers, Scott, F. N. Smith, Vaughn, Weeks, Whipper and Young: A JOINT RESOLUTION TO CREATE THE CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE TASK FORCE, TO PROVIDE FOR ITS MEMBERS, POWERS, AND DUTIES, INCLUDING DEVELOPING A PLAN TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC AND HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS ABOUT EARLY SCREENING, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT AND PROVIDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH A PLAN; AND TO REQUIRE THE TASK FORCE TO SUBMIT ITS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BEFORE THE 2007 LEGISLATIVE SESSION, AT WHICH TIME THE TASK FORCE IS ABOLISHED. Rep. COBB-HUNTER explained the Joint Resolution.
On motion of Rep. G. M. SMITH, with unanimous consent, the following Bill was ordered recalled from the Sumter Delegation: S. 1264 (Word version) -- Senator Leventis: A BILL TO AMEND ACT 470 OF 1971, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION SCHOOL FOR SUMTER COUNTY AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CAREER CENTER BOARD, SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CAREER CENTER SHALL BECOME AN ADVISORY BOARD TO THE BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF SUMTER SCHOOL DISTRICTS 2 AND 17 AND THE DUTIES, POWERS, AND FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CAREER CENTER ARE DEVOLVED JOINTLY UPON THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SUMTER SCHOOL DISTRICTS 2 AND 17 ON JULY 1, 2006, AND TO PROVIDE THAT BEGINNING JULY 1, 2006, THE SUPERINTENDENTS OF SUMTER SCHOOL DISTRICTS 2 AND 17 SHALL TOGETHER EMPLOY A DIRECTOR OF THE CENTER WHO SHALL SERVE AS SUPERVISOR AND FISCAL AGENT OF THE SCHOOL UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE SUPERINTENDENTS.
The Senate amendments to the following Concurrent Resolution were taken up for consideration: H. 4764 (Word version) -- Reps. Phillips and Harrell: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION TO FIX TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 2006, AT 12:30 P.M., AS THE DATE FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE TO MEET IN JOINT SESSION IN THE HALL OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ELECTING MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITADEL, CLEMSON UNIVERSITY, COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON, COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY, FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY, LANDER UNIVERSITY, MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, SOUTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, WIL LOU GRAY OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL, AND WINTHROP UNIVERSITY TO SUCCEED THOSE MEMBERS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRE IN 2006, OR WHOSE POSITIONS OTHERWISE MUST BE FILLED; AND TO ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE REGARDING NOMINATIONS AND NOMINATING AND SECONDING SPEECHES FOR THE CANDIDATES FOR THESE OFFICES DURING THE JOINT SESSION. The Senate amendments were concurred in and a message was ordered sent to the Senate accordingly.
Rep. COOPER moved that when the House adjourns today it adjourn to meet at 9:30 a.m. tomorrow, which was agreed to.
The following Bill was taken up:
MOTION ADOPTED Rep. COOPER moved that H. 4810, the General Appropriation Bill, be considered section-by-section on second reading, beginning with Part 1A, which was agreed to.
Rep. COOPER moved that while debating H. 4810, the General Appropriation Bill, that he be allowed to note a motion daily to reconsider each section adopted, which was agreed to.
Rep. COOPER proposed the following Amendment No. 7 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\007\instructional materials to eia.doc), which was adopted: Column 3 Column 4
11,000,000 11,000,000 Column 3 Column 4
11,000,000 Column 3 Column 4
11,000,000
Rep. COOPER explained the amendment. Rep. COOPER moved to adjourn debate on the Section, which was agreed to.
Section 1AA was adopted.
Section 2 was adopted.
Section 4 was adopted.
Section 5B was adopted.
Section 5C was adopted.
Section 5D was adopted.
Section 5E was adopted.
Section 5F was adopted.
Section 5G was adopted.
Section 5H was adopted.
Section 5KB was adopted.
Section 5KD was adopted.
Section 5KE was adopted.
Section 5KG was adopted.
Section 5KH was adopted.
Section 5L was adopted.
Section 5MA was adopted.
Section 5MB was adopted.
Section 7 was adopted.
Section 12 was adopted.
Rep. EDGE proposed the following Amendment No. 45 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\dss fte.doc), which was adopted:
Column 3 Column 4
(5.00) (2.67)
Column 3 Column 4
(20.00) (11.94)
Column 3 Column 4
(100.00) (92.27)
Column 3 Column 4
(181.00) (63.54)
Column 3 Column 4
(44.00) (18.04)
Rep. EDGE explained the amendment. Section 13, as amended, was adopted.
Section 14 was adopted.
Section 18 was adopted.
Section 19 was adopted.
Section 21 was adopted.
Section 22 was adopted.
Section 23 was adopted.
Section 24 was adopted.
Section 28 was adopted.
Section 29 was adopted.
Section 30 was adopted.
Section 32 was adopted.
Section 33 was adopted.
Section 35 was adopted.
Section 36 was adopted.
Section 36A was adopted.
Section 37 was adopted.
Rep. YOUNG proposed the following Amendment No. 28 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\006\target case mgt.doc), which was adopted:
Column 3 Column 4 Rep. YOUNG explained the amendment. The amendment was then adopted by a division vote of 64 to 11. Rep. OTT moved to adjourn debate on the Section, which was agreed to. Rep. OTT moved that the House recede until 2:00 p.m., which was agreed to. Further proceedings were interrupted by the House receding, the pending question being consideration of Part IA, Section 40.
At 2:00 p.m. the House resumed, the SPEAKER in the Chair.
The question of a quorum was raised.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. DAVENPORT a leave of absence for the remainder of the day due to giving a speech for Citizens for Effective Government in Spartanburg.
Debate was resumed on the following Bill, the pending question being the consideration of Part IA, Section 40.
Section 40 was adopted.
Section 41 was adopted.
Section 42 was adopted.
Section 42A was adopted.
Section 43 was adopted.
Section 44 was adopted.
Section 45 was adopted.
Section 46 was adopted.
Section 47 was adopted.
Section 48 was adopted.
Section 49 was adopted.
Section 50 was adopted.
Section 51 was adopted.
Section 53A was adopted.
Section 53B was adopted.
Section 54A was adopted.
Section 54B was adopted.
Section 54C was adopted.
Section 54D was adopted.
Section 54E was adopted.
Section 54H was adopted.
Section 55 was adopted.
Section 56B was adopted.
Section 56D was adopted.
Section 57 was adopted.
Section 58 was adopted.
Section 59 was adopted.
Section 60 was adopted.
Section 60A was adopted.
Rep. WHITE proposed the following Amendment No. 8 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\61 civ air pat white.doc), which was adopted: Column 3 Column 4
30,000 30,000
Rep. WHITE explained the amendment. Section 61, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. HOSEY proposed the following Amendment No. 79 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\62 local elect offices.doc), which was tabled: Column 3 Column 4
1,200,000 1,200,000
Rep. HOSEY explained the amendment. Rep. MCGEE moved to table the amendment. Rep. HOSEY demanded the yeas and nays, which were not ordered. The amendment was then tabled by a division vote of 60 to 26. Section 62 was adopted.
Section 63A was adopted.
Reps. OTT, J.E. SMITH and COOPER proposed the following Amendment No. 11 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\63b natl gd ret sys open.doc), which was adopted: Column 3 Column 4
926,000 926,000 Rep. OTT explained the amendment. Rep. TRIPP moved to table the amendment. Rep. ALTMAN demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: M. A. Pitts Stewart Tripp
Those who voted in the negative are: Agnew Allen Altman Anderson Anthony Bailey Bales Ballentine Bannister Barfield Battle Bingham Brady Branham Breeland G. Brown R. Brown Cato Ceips Chellis Clark Clemmons Clyburn Coates Cobb-Hunter Cooper Cotty Dantzler Delleney Duncan Edge Emory Frye Funderburk Govan Haley Hardwick Harrell Harrison Harvin Haskins Hayes M. Hines Hinson Hiott Hodges Hosey Huggins Jefferson Jennings Kennedy Kirsh Leach Limehouse Littlejohn Loftis Lucas Mack McCraw McGee McLeod Merrill Miller Mitchell Moody-Lawrence J. H. Neal J. M. Neal Neilson Norman Ott Owens Parks Perry E. H. Pitts Rhoad Rice Rivers Rutherford Scarborough Scott Simrill Skelton D. C. Smith G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith J. R. Smith W. D. Smith Talley Taylor Thompson Toole Townsend Umphlett Viers Walker White Whitmire Witherspoon Young
So, the House refused to table the amendment. The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment, which was agreed to. Section 63B, as amended, was adopted.
Section 63C was adopted.
Section 64 was adopted.
Section 65 was adopted.
Section 66 was adopted.
Section 68 was adopted.
Section 69A was adopted.
Rep. COOPER proposed the following Amendment No. 12 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\69b cogs cooper.doc), which was adopted: Column 3 Column 4
110,000 110,000
Rep. COOPER explained the amendment. Section 69B, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. J. R. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 30 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\007\gifted and talented fix.doc), which was adopted: Column 3 Column 4
5,000,000 Column 3 Column 4
5,000,000
Rep. J. R. SMITH explained the amendment. Section 1, as amended, was adopted.
Section 3 was adopted.
Rep. SANDIFER proposed the following Amendment No. 38 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\5a che fte back ecs.doc), which was adopted: Column 3 Column 4 69,628 69,628
(1.00) (1.00) Rep. SANDIFER explained the amendment.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. KENNEDY a leave of absence for the remainder of the day.
Rep. SANDIFER continued speaking.
Rep. HOSEY proposed the following Amendment No. 47 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\005\salkinstche.doc), which was tabled:
Column 3 Column 4
150,000 150,000 Rep. HOSEY explained the amendment. Rep. LIMEHOUSE moved to table the amendment. Rep. HOSEY demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Altman Bailey Bales Ballentine Bannister Barfield Battle Bingham Brady Cato Chellis Clark Clemmons Cooper Cotty Dantzler Delleney Duncan Edge Frye Haley Hardwick Harrell Harrison Harvin Hinson Hiott Huggins Kirsh Leach Limehouse Littlejohn Lucas Mahaffey Martin McCraw McGee Merrill Norman Owens Perry Pinson E. H. Pitts M. A. Pitts Rice Sandifer Scarborough Simrill Skelton D. C. Smith G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. R. Smith Stewart Talley Taylor Thompson Toole Townsend Umphlett Vaughn Viers Walker White Whitmire Witherspoon Young
Those who voted in the negative are: Agnew Allen Anderson Anthony Branham Breeland G. Brown R. Brown Clyburn Coates Cobb-Hunter Emory Funderburk Govan Haskins Hayes M. Hines Hodges Hosey Jefferson Jennings Mack Miller Mitchell Moody-Lawrence J. H. Neal J. M. Neal Neilson Ott Parks Rhoad Rivers Rutherford Scott J. E. Smith Weeks
So, the amendment was tabled. Section 5A, as amended, was adopted.
Section 5J was adopted.
Rep. SANDIFER proposed the following Amendment No. 41 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\5ka usc fte back ecs.doc), which was tabled: Column 3 Column 4 95,000 95,000
(1.00) (1.00)
Rep. SANDIFER explained the amendment. Rep. LIMEHOUSE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Reps. OTT and COOPER proposed the following Amendment No. 78 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\005\ smallbusiness.doc), which was rejected: Column 3 Column 4
150,000 150,000
Rep. OTT explained the amendment. Rep. NORMAN moved to table the amendment. Rep. HAYES demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Ballentine Bingham Brady Cato Chalk Chellis Clark Coates Dantzler Delleney Duncan Edge Frye Haley Hamilton Hardwick Harrison Hiott Huggins Kirsh Leach Littlejohn Merrill Norman Perry Pinson E. H. Pitts M. A. Pitts Rice Sandifer Scarborough Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith W. D. Smith Stewart Talley Thompson Toole Umphlett Witherspoon
Those who voted in the negative are: Agnew Altman Anderson Anthony Bailey Bannister Barfield Branham Breeland G. Brown R. Brown Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cooper Emory Funderburk Govan Harrell Harvin Hayes M. Hines Hinson Hodges Hosey Howard Jefferson Jennings Limehouse Loftis Lucas Mack Mahaffey Martin McGee McLeod Miller Mitchell Moody-Lawrence J. H. Neal J. M. Neal Neilson Ott Owens Parks Rhoad Rivers Rutherford Scott Skelton D. C. Smith J. E. Smith J. R. Smith Taylor Townsend Vaughn Weeks White Whitmire Young
So, the House refused to table the amendment.
Rep. LITTLEJOHN spoke against the amendment. The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment. Rep. MERRILL demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Agnew Anderson Anthony Bales Barfield Branham Breeland G. Brown R. Brown Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cooper Funderburk Govan Hayes Hodges Hosey Jefferson Jennings Lucas Mack Mahaffey Martin McCraw McLeod Moody-Lawrence J. H. Neal Neilson Ott Parks Perry Rhoad Rutherford Scott Skelton J. E. Smith Taylor Townsend Whipper White
Those who voted in the negative are: Altman Bailey Ballentine Bannister Bingham Brady Cato Chalk Chellis Clark Clemmons Coates Dantzler Delleney Duncan Edge Frye Haley Hamilton Hardwick Harrell Harrison M. Hines Hinson Hiott Huggins Kirsh Leach Limehouse Littlejohn Loftis McGee Merrill Mitchell Norman Owens Pinson E. H. Pitts M. A. Pitts Rice Rivers Sandifer Scarborough Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. R. Smith W. D. Smith Stewart Talley Thompson Toole Umphlett Vaughn Walker Weeks Whitmire Witherspoon Young
So, the amendment was rejected.
I voted not to table this Amendment, in order to hear more debate, but in the final vote, I opposed the request for the following reasons: However, I do support funding for similar assistance for small business when coupled with market research and a commitment from the applying business entity. This would greatly increase the likelihood for the success of the business as well as the economic benefit to the community. Rep. Dwight Loftis Section 5KA was adopted.
Section 5KC was adopted.
Section 5KF was adopted.
Section 5N was adopted.
Section 6 was adopted.
Rep. SANDIFER proposed the following Amendment No. 39 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\004\8 dhhs fte back in ecs.doc), which was adopted: Column 3 Column 4 110,720 110,720
(2.00) (2.00)
Rep. SANDIFER explained the amendment. Section 8, as amended, was adopted.
Rep. E. H. PITTS proposed the following Amendment No. 92 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\009\birth defects $608,161.doc), which was tabled: Column 3 Column 4 241,596 241,596
(6.00) (6.00) Column 3 Column 4 53,897 53,897
(1.00) (1.00) Column 3 Column 4 48,998 48,998
(1.00) (1.00) Column 3 Column 4 25,394 25,394
(1.00) (1.00) Column 3 Column 4
134,708 134,708 Column 3 Column 4
103,568 103,568
Rep. E. H. PITTS explained the amendment. Rep. EDGE moved to table the amendment. Rep. E. H. PITTS demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Agnew Altman Anderson Anthony Bailey Bales Ballentine Bannister Barfield Brady Branham Breeland Cato Chalk Chellis Clark Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cooper Dantzler Edge Emory Funderburk Govan Haley Hardwick Harrell Harrison Harvin Hayes Herbkersman M. Hines Hinson Hiott Hodges Hosey Howard Jefferson Jennings Leach Limehouse Lucas Mahaffey Martin McCraw McGee McLeod Merrill Miller Mitchell Moody-Lawrence J. H. Neal J. M. Neal Neilson Ott Parks Perry Pinson M. A. Pitts Rhoad Rice Rivers Rutherford Sandifer Scarborough Scott Skelton D. C. Smith J. E. Smith J. R. Smith Taylor Thompson Townsend Umphlett Vaughn Weeks Whipper White Whitmire Witherspoon Young
Those who voted in the negative are: Bingham Delleney Duncan Frye Hamilton Huggins Kirsh Littlejohn Norman Owens E. H. Pitts Simrill G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Stewart Talley Toole
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. RICE proposed the following Amendment No. 64 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\008\dhecsmokingcessation.doc), which was tabled:
Column 3 Column 4
2,000,000 2,000,000
Rep. RICE explained the amendment. Rep. EDGE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to by a division vote of 45 to 17. Section 9 was adopted.
Rep. J. E. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 14 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\009\mircy funding.doc), which was tabled: Column 3 Column 4
$100,000 $100,000 Rep. J. E. SMITH explained the amendment. Rep. EDGE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to. Section 10 was adopted.
Section 11 was adopted.
Rep. GOVAN proposed the following Amendment No. 104 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\005\govanhist.doc), which was tabled:
Column 3 Column 4
25,000 25,000 Rep. GOVAN explained the amendment.
Rep. LIMEHOUSE moved to table the amendment. The amendment was then tabled by a division vote of 45 to 16. Section 15 was adopted.
Rep. E. H. PITTS proposed the following Amendment No. 91 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\009\rural lib $100k.doc), which was tabled: Column 3 Column 4
100,000 100,000 Rep. E. H. PITTS explained the amendment. Rep. LIMEHOUSE moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to. Section 17 was adopted.
Section 20 was adopted.
Section 23A was adopted.
Section 25 was adopted.
Rep. G. M. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 117 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\council\ms\7267mm06.doc), which was tabled: /Column 3 Column 4
5,000 5,000 /
Rep. G. M. SMITH explained the amendment. Rep. HINSON moved to table the amendment. Rep. SIMRILL demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Anthony Bailey Bales Bannister Barfield Breeland Chellis Clark Clemmons Cobb-Hunter Cooper Dantzler Govan Hamilton Harrell Hayes M. Hines Hinson Hodges Hosey Howard Jefferson Jennings Leach Limehouse Littlejohn Loftis Mack Mahaffey Martin McCraw McGee McLeod Miller Mitchell J. H. Neal Ott Parks Perry Pinson Rhoad Rivers Rutherford J. E. Smith J. R. Smith Toole Townsend Umphlett Vaughn Whipper White Whitmire Witherspoon Young
Those who voted in the negative are: Agnew Anderson Ballentine Bingham Brady Branham G. Brown R. Brown Cato Coates Cotty Delleney Duncan Edge Frye Funderburk Haley Hardwick Harvin Hiott Huggins Kirsh Lucas Neilson Norman Owens E. H. Pitts M. A. Pitts Rice Scarborough Scott Simrill Skelton D. C. Smith G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Talley Taylor Thompson Walker Weeks
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. G. M. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 107 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\council\ms\7266mm06.doc), which was tabled: / Column 3 Column 4
4,133 4,133 / Rep. G. M. SMITH explained the amendment. Rep. COOPER moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to.
Rep. G. M. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 108 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\council\dka\3679mm06.doc), which was tabled: Column 3 Column 4
40,507 40,507 Rep. G. M. SMITH explained the amendment. Rep. HINSON moved to table the amendment. Rep. SIMRILL demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Anthony Bales Bannister Barfield Breeland Chellis Clark Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cooper Dantzler Edge Emory Funderburk Govan Harrell Hayes M. Hines Hinson Hodges Jennings Leach Limehouse Littlejohn Loftis Mack Mahaffey Martin McCraw McGee McLeod Miller Mitchell J. H. Neal J. M. Neal Neilson Ott Parks Perry Rivers Rutherford Scott J. E. Smith J. R. Smith Toole Townsend Umphlett Vaughn Whipper White Whitmire Witherspoon Young
Those who voted in the negative are: Agnew Ballentine Bingham Brady Branham G. Brown Cato Chalk Coates Cotty Delleney Duncan Frye Haley Hamilton Hardwick Harrison Harvin Hiott Huggins Kirsh Lucas Merrill Norman Owens Pinson E. H. Pitts M. A. Pitts Rice Scarborough Simrill Skelton D. C. Smith G. M. Smith G. R. Smith Talley Taylor Thompson Walker Weeks
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. G. M. SMITH proposed the following Amendment No. 115 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\council\ms\7265mm06.doc), which was tabled: / Column 3 Column 4
1,375,000 1,375,000 / Rep. G. M. SMITH explained the amendment. Rep. G. M. SMITH moved to table the amendment, which was agreed to. Section 26 was adopted.
Section 27 was adopted.
Section 29A was adopted.
Section 38 was adopted.
Section 39 was adopted.
Rep. R. BROWN proposed the following Amendment No. 37 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\council\ms\7269mm06.doc), which was tabled:
Column 3 Column 4
Rep. R. BROWN explained the amendment. Rep. VAUGHN moved to table the amendment. Rep. R. BROWN demanded the yeas and nays, which were not ordered. The amendment was then tabled by a division vote of 37 to 25.
Reps. BALES and HARRISON proposed the following Amendment No. 44 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\011\dot 1m shop road2.doc), which was adopted:
Column 3 Column 4
1,000,000 1,000,000
Rep. HARRISON explained the amendment. Rep. E. H. PITTS moved to table the amendment. Rep. BALES demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Agnew Bailey Ballentine Breeland R. Brown Chalk Chellis Clark Coates Dantzler Delleney Duncan Frye Haley Hamilton Harvin Hiott Huggins Kirsh Limehouse Littlejohn Lucas Mahaffey Martin Merrill Mitchell Norman Owens Pinson E. H. Pitts M. A. Pitts Rice Simrill Skelton G. M. Smith W. D. Smith Talley Taylor Thompson Toole Umphlett Walker Weeks Whipper Whitmire Young
Those who voted in the negative are: Anderson Anthony Bales Bannister Barfield Brady Branham G. Brown Cato Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cooper Cotty Emory Funderburk Govan Hardwick Harrell Harrison Hayes Hinson Hodges Howard Jefferson Jennings Leach Loftis Mack McCraw McLeod Miller J. H. Neal J. M. Neal Ott Parks Perry Rhoad Rivers Rutherford Scott D. C. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith J. R. Smith Townsend Vaughn White Witherspoon
So, the House refused to table the amendment.
Rep. COATES spoke against the amendment.
The SPEAKER granted Rep. TOWNSEND a leave of absence for the remainder of the day. The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment. Rep. UMPHLETT demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Anderson Anthony Bailey Bales Bannister Barfield Brady Branham Breeland G. Brown Cato Chellis Clemmons Clyburn Cobb-Hunter Cooper Cotty Delleney Edge Emory Funderburk Govan Hamilton Hardwick Harrison Hayes Hinson Hodges Jefferson Jennings Leach Limehouse Loftis Lucas Mack Martin McCraw McGee McLeod Miller Mitchell J. H. Neal Ott Parks Perry M. A. Pitts Rhoad Rutherford Sandifer D. C. Smith G. R. Smith J. E. Smith J. R. Smith W. D. Smith Vaughn Weeks Whipper White Witherspoon
Those who voted in the negative are: Agnew Ballentine R. Brown Chalk Clark Coates Dantzler Duncan Frye Haley Harvin Hiott Huggins Kirsh Littlejohn Mahaffey Merrill Norman Owens Pinson E. H. Pitts Rice Simrill Skelton G. M. Smith Talley Thompson Toole Umphlett Walker Whitmire
So, the amendment was adopted.
Reps. HINSON and VAUGHN proposed the following Amendment No. 65 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\011\dot icar and port access rd.doc improvements.doc):
Column 3 Column 4
1,500,000 1,500,000
3,000,000 3,000,000
Rep. VAUGHN explained the amendment. Rep. DUNCAN moved to divide the question, which was agreed to by a division vote of 48 to 36.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 53, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, page 257, immediately after line 3, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4 1,500,000 1,500,000
Rep. VAUGHN explained the question. The question recurred to the adoption of the question. Rep. MACK demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Agnew Anthony Bailey Bales Bannister Barfield Brady Branham Breeland G. Brown Cato Chellis Clemmons Clyburn Cooper Cotty Delleney Edge Emory Funderburk Govan Haley Hamilton Harrell Harrison Hayes Hinson Hodges Howard Jefferson Jennings Leach Limehouse Loftis Lucas Mack Mahaffey Martin McCraw McGee McLeod Merrill Miller Mitchell J. H. Neal J. M. Neal Ott Parks Perry M. A. Pitts Rhoad Sandifer Skelton D. C. Smith G. R. Smith J. R. Smith Talley Taylor Thompson Umphlett Vaughn Whipper White Whitmire Young
Those who voted in the negative are: Ballentine R. Brown Chalk Clark Coates Dantzler Duncan Frye Hardwick Hiott Huggins Kirsh Littlejohn Owens Pinson E. H. Pitts Rice Simrill G. M. Smith Stewart Toole Walker Weeks
So, the question was adopted.
Amend the bill, as and if amended, Part IA, Section 53, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, page 257, immediately after line 3, by inserting a new line to read:
Column 3 Column 4 3,000,000 3,000,000 Rep. SKELTON spoke upon the question. The question was adopted.
Reps. MILLER and ANDERSON proposed the following Amendment No. 134 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\001\dot 250k port road impr.doc), which was rejected:
Column 3 Column 4
250,000 250,000
Rep. MILLER explained the amendment. Rep. VAUGHN moved to table the amendment, which was not agreed to. Rep. COOPER spoke against the amendment. The question then recurred to the adoption of the amendment. Rep. E. H. PITTS demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Anderson Anthony Bales Branham Breeland G. Brown R. Brown Clemmons Clyburn Funderburk Govan Hardwick Hodges Jefferson Jennings Limehouse Loftis Mack Martin McGee McLeod Miller Ott Rhoad Rivers Rutherford Simrill J. E. Smith Whipper Witherspoon
Those who voted in the negative are: Bailey Ballentine Bannister Barfield Brady Cato Chellis Clark Coates Cooper Cotty Dantzler Delleney Duncan Edge Emory Frye Haley Hamilton Harrell Hayes Hinson Hiott Huggins Kirsh Leach Lucas Mahaffey Merrill J. M. Neal Parks Perry Pinson E. H. Pitts M. A. Pitts Rice Sandifer Skelton D. C. Smith G. R. Smith J. R. Smith Stewart Talley Taylor Thompson Toole Umphlett Weeks White Whitmire Young
So, the amendment was then rejected.
Reps. GOVAN and OTT proposed the following Amendment No. 135 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\011\inland port infrastructure.doc), which was tabled:
Column 3 Column 4
100,000 100,000 Rep. OTT explained the amendment. Rep. VAUGHN moved to table the amendment. Rep. OTT demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Agnew Bailey Ballentine Bannister Barfield Brady Chellis Clark Clemmons Coates Cooper Cotty Dantzler Delleney Duncan Edge Frye Haley Hamilton Harrell Harrison Hinson Hiott Huggins Kirsh Leach Limehouse Littlejohn Loftis Lucas Mahaffey McGee Merrill Owens Perry Pinson E. H. Pitts Rice Sandifer Simrill Skelton D. C. Smith G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. R. Smith Stewart Talley Taylor Thompson Toole Umphlett Vaughn Walker White Whitmire Young
Those who voted in the negative are: Anderson Anthony Bales Breeland G. Brown R. Brown Clyburn Funderburk Govan Hardwick Hayes Hodges Howard Jefferson Jennings Mack McCraw McLeod Miller Mitchell J. H. Neal Ott Parks M. A. Pitts Rhoad Rivers Rutherford Scarborough J. E. Smith Weeks Whipper Witherspoon
So, the amendment was tabled.
Rep. ANDERSON proposed the following Amendment No. 137 (Doc Name h:\legwork\house\amend\h-wm\001\dot 500k hemingw.doc), which was tabled:
Column 3 Column 4
500,000 500,000 Rep. ANDERSON explained the amendment. Rep. VAUGHN moved to table the amendment. Rep. ANDERSON demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Agnew Bannister Barfield Brady Cato Chellis Clark Clemmons Cooper Cotty Dantzler Delleney Duncan Edge Emory Hamilton Hinson Hiott Huggins Kirsh Leach Limehouse Littlejohn Lucas Mahaffey McCraw Merrill J. M. Neal Owens Perry Pinson E. H. Pitts Rice Rutherford Sandifer Scarborough Simrill Skelton D. C. Smith G. M. Smith G. R. Smith J. R. Smith Stewart Talley Taylor Thompson Toole Umphlett Vaughn Walker White Whitmire Young
Those who voted in the negative are: Anderson Anthony Bales Branham Breeland G. Brown R. Brown Clyburn Coates Frye Funderburk Govan Howard Jefferson Jennings Loftis Mack McGee McLeod Miller Mitchell J. H. Neal Ott Parks Rhoad J. E. Smith Weeks Whipper Witherspoon
So, the amendment was tabled.
Column 3 Column 4
500,000 500,000 Rep. ANDERSON explained the amendment. Rep. VAUGHN moved to table the amendment. Rep. ANDERSON demanded the yeas and nays which were taken, resulting as follows:
Those who voted in the affirmative are: Bailey Bannister Barfield Brady Cato Chellis Clark Clemmons Coates Cooper Cotty Dantzler Delleney Duncan Edge Emory Frye Hamilton Harrell Hinson Hiott Huggins Kirsh Leach Limehouse Littlejohn Lucas Mahaffey McCraw Merrill J. M. Neal Owens Perry Pinson E. H. Pitts Rice Sandifer Simrill Skelton D. C. Smith G. R. Smith J. R. Smith Stewart Talley Taylor Thompson Toole Umphlett Vaughn White Whitmire Young
Those who voted in the negative are: Agnew Anderson Anthony Bales Branham Breeland G. Brown R. Brown Clyburn Funderburk Govan Howard Jefferson Jennings Loftis Mack McGee McLeod Miller J. H. Neal Ott Parks Rhoad Rutherford J. E. Smith Weeks Whipper Witherspoon
So, the amendment was tabled. Section 53, as amended, was adopted. Rep. RHOAD moved that the House do now adjourn, which was agreed to.
Rep. COOPER moved to reconsider the vote whereby Sections 1, 1AA, 2, 3, 4, 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5E, 5F, 5G, 5H, 5J, 5KA, 5KB, 5KC, 5KD, 5KE, 5KF, 5KG, 5KH, 5L, 5MA, 5MB, 5N, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 23A, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 29A, 30, 32, 33, 35, 36, 36A, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 42A, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 53 53A, 53B, 54A, 54B, 54C, 54D, 54E, 54H, 55, 56B, 56D, 57, 58, 59, 60, 60A, 61, 62, 63A, 63B, 63C, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69A, 69B, were adopted and the motion was noted. Further proceedings were interrupted by adjournment, the pending question being consideration of Part IA, Section 56A.
The Senate returned to the House with concurrence the following: H. 4871 (Word version) -- Reps. Harrell and Phillips: A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION TO FIX WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 2006, AT 12:00 NOON, IMMEDIATELY BEFORE THE FOLK HERITAGE AND ELIZABETH O'NEILL VERNER AWARDS AS THE DATE FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE TO MEET IN JOINT SESSION IN THE HALL OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ELECTING MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY, AND MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COUNCIL, AND OLD EXCHANGE BUILDING COMMISSION TO SUCCEED THOSE MEMBERS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRE IN 2006, OR WHOSE POSITIONS OTHERWISE MUST BE FILLED; AND TO ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE REGARDING NOMINATIONS AND NOMINATING AND SECONDING SPEECHES FOR THE CANDIDATES FOR THESE OFFICES DURING THE JOINT SESSION.
At 6:38 p.m. the House, in accordance with the motion of Rep. PHILLIPS, adjourned in memory of Ernest Dixon of Blacksburg, to meet at 9:30 a.m. tomorrow.
This web page was last updated on Wednesday, June 24, 2009 at 9:41 A.M. |