Download This Bill in Microsoft Word format
Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter
H. 3647
STATUS INFORMATION
General Bill
Sponsors: Reps. E.H. Pitts, Hinson, Young, Rutherford and Kirsh
Document Path: l:\council\bills\bbm\10685mm05.doc
Companion/Similar bill(s): 3530
Introduced in the House on February 24, 2005
Introduced in the Senate on April 27, 2005
Last Amended on April 19, 2005
Currently residing in the Senate
Summary: Sunday blue laws
HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS
Date Body Action Description with journal page number ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2/24/2005 House Introduced and read first time HJ-14 2/24/2005 House Referred to Committee on Judiciary HJ-14 4/5/2005 House Member(s) request name added as sponsor: McLeod 4/12/2005 House Committee report: Favorable with amendment Judiciary HJ-5 4/13/2005 House Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Young, Rutherford 4/14/2005 House Amended HJ-21 4/14/2005 House Requests for debate-Rep(s). Pinson, Rice, Bingham, Hayes, Hosey, White Herbkersman, Whitmire, Walker, Witherspoon, Scott, JE Smith, Emory, Neilson, Ott, Parks, Coates, Duncan, Rhoad, Anthony, Davenport, McGee, and Barfield HJ-24 4/19/2005 House Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Kirsh 4/19/2005 House Member(s) request name removed as sponsor: McLeod 4/19/2005 House Amended HJ-113 4/19/2005 House Read second time HJ-115 4/19/2005 House Roll call Yeas-56 Nays-44 HJ-115 4/20/2005 House Motion noted- reconsider the vote whereby Bill received second reading HJ-33 4/26/2005 House Motion to reconsider second reading tabled HJ-70 4/26/2005 House Read third time and sent to Senate HJ-71 4/26/2005 House Roll call Yeas-63 Nays-47 HJ-71 4/27/2005 Senate Introduced and read first time SJ-12 4/27/2005 Senate Referred to Committee on Judiciary SJ-12 5/9/2005 Senate Referred to Subcommittee: Martin (ch), Malloy, Campsen, Williams 5/18/2005 Senate Committee report: Favorable with amendment Judiciary SJ-21
View the latest legislative information at the LPITS web site
VERSIONS OF THIS BILL
2/24/2005
4/12/2005
4/14/2005
4/19/2005
5/18/2005
Indicates Matter Stricken
Indicates New Matter
COMMITTEE REPORT
May 18, 2005
H. 3647
Introduced by Reps. E.H. Pitts, Hinson, Young, Rutherford and Kirsh
S. Printed 5/18/05--S.
Read the first time April 27, 2005.
To whom was referred a Bill (H. 3647) to amend Section 53-1-5, as amended, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, relating to the right of an employee of a business to refuse, etc., respectfully
That they have duly and carefully considered the same and recommend that the same do pass with amendment:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, by striking SECTION 1 in its entirety and inserting therein the following:
/ SECTION 1. Section 53-1-5 of the 1976 Code, as last amended by Act 134 of 1995, is further amended to read:
"Section 53-1-5. (A) The provisions of this chapter do not apply after the hour of 1:30 p.m. on Sunday. Any An employee of any a business which that operates on Sunday under the provisions of this section has the option of refusing to work in accordance with Section 53-1-100. Any until 1:30 p.m. on Sunday if he is conscientiously opposed to Sunday work. An employer who dismisses or demotes an employee because he the employee is a conscientious objector to Sunday work is subject to a civil penalty of treble the damages found by the court or the jury plus court costs and the employee's attorney's fees. The court may order the employer to rehire or reinstate the employee in the same position he was in prior to before dismissal or demotion without forfeiture of compensation, rank, or grade, or seniority.
(B) No A proprietor of a retail establishment who is opposed to working on Sunday may not be forced by his lessor or franchisor to open his establishment on Sunday nor may and there be discrimination against persons a person whose regular day of worship is Saturday is prohibited.
(C) This section does not apply to employees, including support, maintenance, repair, and other service personnel, of a manufacturing establishment or a research and development operation that by its nature or for economic reasons involves processes requiring continuous and uninterrupted operation. For purposes of this subsection, 'the manufacturing of bakery products' is a chemical manufacturing process requiring continuous, uninterrupted operation."
Amend the bill further, as and if amended, by striking SECTIONS 4 and 5 in their entirety and inserting therein the following:
/ SECTION 4. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor. /
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend title to conform.
LARRY A. MARTIN for Committee.
TO AMEND SECTION 53-1-5, AS AMENDED, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE RIGHT OF AN EMPLOYEE OF A BUSINESS TO REFUSE TO WORK ON SUNDAY, SO AS TO FURTHER PROVIDE FOR PROTECTION OF THIS RIGHT TO REFUSE TO WORK ON SUNDAY BY REASON OF CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION TO SUNDAY WORK AND TO EXCLUDE A MANUFACTURING OR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OPERATION REQUIRING CONTINUOUS UNINTERRUPTED OPERATION; TO REPEAL THE REMAINING SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE 53, SECTIONS 53-1-6 THROUGH 53-1-160, POPULARLY KNOWN AS THE "SUNDAY BLUE LAWS", RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION AGAINST THE SALE OF CERTAIN ITEMS ON SUNDAY EXCEPT DURING SPECIFIED HOURS AND THE PROHIBITION AGAINST THE CONDUCT OF CERTAIN WORK OR EVENTS OR THE OPERATION OF SPECIFIC BUSINESSES OR MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENTS ON SUNDAY; AND TO PROVIDE THAT THIS ACT DOES NOT AFFECT PROVISIONS OF LAW PROHIBITING OR OTHERWISE REGULATING THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC LIQUORS, BEER, OR WINE ON SUNDAY.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. Section 53-1-5 of the 1976 Code, as amended by Act 134 of 1995, is further amended to read:
"Section 53-1-5. (A) The provisions of this chapter do not apply after the hour of 1:30 p.m. on Sunday. Any An employee of any a business which that operates on Sunday under the provisions of this section has the option of refusing to work in accordance with Section 53-1-100. Any until 1:30 p.m. on Sunday if he is conscientiously opposed to Sunday work employer who dismisses or demotes an employee because he is a conscientious objector to Sunday work is subject to a civil penalty of treble the damages found by the court or the jury plus court costs and the employee's attorney's fees. The court may order the employer to rehire or reinstate the employee in the same position he was in prior to dismissal or demotion without forfeiture of compensation, rank, or grade.
(B) No A proprietor of a retail establishment who is opposed to working on Sunday may not be forced by his lessor or franchisor to open his establishment on Sunday nor may and there be discrimination against persons a person whose regular day of worship is Saturday is prohibited.
(C) This section does not apply to employees, including support, maintenance, repair, and other service personnel, of a manufacturing establishment or a research and development operation that by its nature or for economic reasons involves processes requiring continuous and uninterrupted operation. For purposes of this subsection, 'the manufacturing of bakery products' is a chemical manufacturing process requiring continuous, uninterrupted operation."
SECTION 2. Sections 53-1-6 through Section 53-1-160 of the 1976 Code are repealed.
SECTION 3. The repeal of Sections 53-1-6 through 53-1-160 of Chapter 1, Title 53 of the 1976 Code, as contained in Section 2 of this act, does not affect provisions of law, including those in Title 61 of the 1976 Code, prohibiting or otherwise regulating the sale of alcoholic liquors, beer, or wine on Sunday.
SECTION 4. Section 41-1-70 of the 1976 Code, as added by Act 320 of 1986, is amended to read:
"Section 41-1-70. Any employer who dismisses or demotes an employee because the employee complies with a valid subpoena to testify in a court proceeding or administrative proceeding or to serve on a jury of any court, or violates the provisions of Chapter 1, Title 53, is subject to a civil action in the circuit court for damages caused by the dismissal or demotion.
Damages for dismissal are limited to no more than one year's salary or fifty-two weeks of wages based on a forty-hour week in the amount the employee was receiving at the time of receipt of the subpoena.
Damages for demotion are limited to the difference for one year between the salary or wages based on a forty-hour week which the employee received before the demotion and the amount he receives after the demotion."
SECTION 5. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.
This web page was last updated on Friday, December 4, 2009 at 3:43 P.M.